Category: Spiritual

  • Jungian archetypes of Nefertiti and the Heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten

    Jungian archetypes of Nefertiti and the Heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten

    Akhenaten (Echnaton) is the most mysterious and interesting of all the ancient Egyptian pharaohs. In the following essay I will try to interpret what little is known about the androgynous pharaoh, who brought down the Egypt empire with his daring cultural and religious revolution, the enigmatic chief queen Nefertiti (Neferneferuaten), and his overpowering mother Tiye.

    By trying to piece together a somewhat coherent picture, I noticed that archeological sources, scholarly books, old texts and results of biological science with recent genetic research are not enough. C.G. Jung’s  concepts of Archetypes and complexes and his “Anima and Animus” theory in his analytical psychology writings are key to understand it. Why bother – to read on? I have become interested in the psychological aspects of those events and its potential implication to Jewish and Christian faith. Was he or she behind Atenism  (aka Amarna heresy)? Was it the first attempt of henotheism (pre-monotheistic) belief? Were the motives political, or brought the Asian princesses the seed from northern Syria? Did Christian dogma learn from the failure of Atenism – a cold sterile monotheistic abstraction – and reacted with so much focus on Trinity and the essence of Jesus – a god becoming human? Was the Heretic Pharaoh the first Oedipus and pervert or an “Uebermensch”? Was he the first individualist and humanist or a kind of pacifist Mao? Was he the archetype of the addicted lover or a weak king in a world of warriors with plenty of mature feminine archetypes around him? Yes, we think we know, but picture the story of Napoleon 2500 years ago, and all we would have, were a few royal names,  letters and DNA samples…. You judge.

    As often in Egypt history, research of powerful queens yield best results, so this essay was written through the eyes of Tye and Neferneferuaten, both likely royal blood from Mitanni (kingdom in north Syria), although the stories of their origin differ. The Eighteenth Dynasty was characterized by powerful women. Some scholars even suggest not only his mother Tiye, but later also his chief wife Neferneferuaten ruled as co-regent and both were he real power behind his reign. With Jung’s archetypes of the collective unconscious, it is possible to attach all historical figures the common cultural pattern, the  Archetypes of the mature masculine and feminine. Its all there, weak Kings, powerful Queens, Wise Women and Mother, sadist Warriors, manipulative wizards and priests of both sexes and Akhenaten the hermaphrodite, the Addicted Lover, in incestuous relationship with his mother Tiye and daughters but leading a loving family life with Neferneferuaten, maybe widow of Akhenaten’s despised father.

    Facts and Theories

    Early Historian view

    Depending which theory you follow, Akhenaten was the most outstanding individual in Egyptian history or a record-breaking pervert with Mother and Oedipus complex, both physically and mentally deformed by genetic disease. Historian James Henry Breasted considered Akhenaten to be “the first individual in history,” as well as the first monotheist, romantic, and scientist. Flinders Petrie stated, that “Akhenaten’s new worship of the old Aton of Heliopolis, brought views and symbolism to a position which we cannot logically improve upon at the present day”. Psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud assumed Akhenaten to be the pioneer of monotheistic religion and Moses as Akhenaten’s follower (some came to the conclusion that Moses was Akhenaten himself).

    Recent Historian view

    Recent historians give a less flattering view. In Akhenaten: Egypt’s False Prophet, Nicholas Reeves construes the pharaoh’s religious reformations as attempts to weaken the Amun priests, centralize his power and strengthen of his role as sole “divine monarch.” Based on the reconstructed talatat scenes Temple of Amenhotep IV at Karnak and the Akhenaten (Amarna) Temple Project, Dr. Redford reveals that opposed to being a monotheist, Akhenaten was more of an atheist as there was no real religion behind the concept of the Aten. Through the eyes of Dr. Redford, the Heretic becomes a man worth loathing, one who enforced too harshly or didn’t rule at all and for the most part did just leave the empire to rot. Based on a cache of diplomatic correspondence written on clay tablets with imperial outposts and foreign allies, detailed below, we clearly understand that Akhenaten ruled his empire from “cloud number nine” almost, but not quite, like a combination of Mao’s cultural revolution and the fairy king Ludwig II. The psychoanalyst Immanuel Velikovsky pointed to Akhenaten’s psychological troubled relationship with his father his strong mother complex.  Sigmund Freud, Thomas Mann and many others wrote about.

    Historical evidence : The Amarna letters

    A large cache of clay tablets, now known as the Amarna letters, was found in the city. Those letters provide us with a view of Akhenaten’s administration efforts and the political status in rest of the ancient world. They depict a very confused situation. These tablets span the later part of Amenhotep III’s reign, Akhenaten’s reign, and a portion of the rule of Akhenaten’s eventual successor, Tutankhaten (later Tutankhamun).

    In these letters, we see the disintegration of the massive Egyptian empire taking place. The vassals and kings of the various domains of the empire begged for gold and complained of being snubbed and cheated by Amenhotep III. Vassals asked Akhenaten for help against as a band of rebels referred to as the Apiru wreaked havoc in the empire. Early on in his reign, Akhenaten had a falling out with the king of Mitanni, and, against said king’s advice, signed a treaty with the Hittites, which unleashed on Mitanni ( the loyal vassal and buffer state) to forge out their own empire. A group of Egypt’s other allies attempted to rebel against the factions that were taking over, were captured, and begged Akhenaten for troops. Apparently, Akhenaten did not respond to their desperate pleas.

    Psychoanalytic view: Oedipus and Akhenaten

    Heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten
    Aton

    C.G. Jung and Freud were both interested in ancient Egypt. In regards of the “father-son rift” Jung and Freud discussed once publicly the extinction of the name of Pharaoh Amenhotep III. by his son Akhenaten. Freud’s protégé Karl Abraham had recently published a detailed psychoanalytical dissect about Akhenaten’s Oedipus complex. Arthur Weigall’s Life and Times of Akhnaton was then accessible in German. So Freud and Jung discussed Abraham’s thesis that Akhenaten was mother-fixed neurotic, who wanted to replace his hated father with an ideal fantasy father Aton. This idea was rejected by C. G. Jung, who saw in Akhenaten primarily a religious and innovative man. In his book “Symbole und Wandlung (pg. 163)” he described the syncretic  attempt to unite all the different gods to one abstract sun as a psychological valuable clarification of many symbols and unification of the many different archetypes to one. Although syncretism did not play a role in Christianity, Jung seems to imply that a polytheistic tendency always fight monotheism and that they can be even traced in the Christian trinity and Catholic saints.

    The connection between Akhenaten and Oedipus was not seriously pursued again until Immanuel Velikovsky published his Oedipus and Akhenaten in 1960. This work is still extremely valuable, not from archaeological evidence but correlations not found elsewhere in the published literature. In this book, “Oedipus and Akhnaton”, the  psychoanalyst Immanuel Velikovsky hypothesized an incestuous relationship of Akhnaton with his mother Tiye.  He claims this historic myth is the background of the Theban plays by Sophocles (Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, and Antigone).  Akhenaten had enlarged legs (Oedipus being Greek for “swollen feet”) and the setting may have been moved from the Greek Thebes to the Egyptian Thebes. Velikovsky uses the fact that Akhenaten viciously carried out a campaign to erase the name of his father, which he argues symbolizes Oedipus killing his father.

    There is also some circumstantial evidence, like that with Beketaten, considered to be the youngest daughter of Pharaoh Amenhotep III and his Great Royal Wife Tiye, thus the sister of Pharaoh Akhenaten. According to one theory Beketaten was in fact a daughter of Akhenaten and his secondary wife Kiya.  According to the more daring theory, however, Beketaten was in fact a daughter of Akhenaten and his mother Tiye. Both theories  partially based on the fact that Beketaten was never named king’s sister in the scenes from Amarna, but only king’s bodily daughter. She never appears alongside the daughters of Nefertiti.

    Flinders Petrie, the great Egyptologist wrote: The princess Beketaten has been usually placed as a seventh and youngest daughter of Akhnaton. She occurs,however, in a tomb of his twelfth year, or only six years after the second daughter was born; and she appears among the daughters where four or six are shown, hence the difficulty of her position…” Petrie solved the problem by demonstrating that Beketaten was not the youngest daughter of Nefertiti but a daughter of Tiye. She is always associated with Tiye, she sits by the side of Tiye, while the daughters of Akhnaton sit by their mother; she alone follows Tiye in a procession where no other children appear. Moreover, she is never called other than a King’s daughter whereas all the other princesses in every inscription are entitled Daughters of Nefertete. Beketaten’s body is depicted smaller than the body of Ankhesepaten , the third daughter of Akhnaten and Nefertete.

    Immanuel Velikovsky refers to a “relief in Huya’s tomb in which Beketaten is depicted as a small child  in the twelfth year of Akhenaten’s reign”. Indeed, if you discard co-regency with Amenhotep III, his father was already dead for twelve years. So the child depicted in the relief next to Tiye and Akhenaten might his as opposed to that of Amenhotep III. It would seem that Akhenaten is the king shown under the disk of the Aten with swollen thighs. G. Davies thought that this relief was a depiction of Amenhotep III though he also was aware of the possible time problem and the symbolism that suggested Akhenaten being the king referred to as Beketaten’s father in the words “the kings daughter of his body”.

    Oedipus married his mother and had children with her. Akhenaten was controlled by his mother, possibly in an incestuous relationship and handed over to an equally intelligent women. That women was according to some other theories the former wife of his father. So he took not only revenge by erasing his fathers inscriptions, but claiming his mother and his wife. Both lived in Thebes, Oedipus in the Greek city named after the original city in Egypt, where Akhenaten once lived. Both kings are referred to as sons of the sun god.  Both men grew up far from their homes and parents, each returning to take the throne only after the death of his father. Oedipus was described as having swollen feet, while Akhenaten was depicted as having swollen legs.

    Some other parallels are fascinating, but pure speculation. He interprets the evidence from tombs in the Valley of the Kings indicates the two sons of Akhenaten having killed each other in a battle for the throne in much the same way as the two sons of Oedipus met their untimely end. In addition, he points to a strange tomb that might be the original for the story of Antigone, the daughter of Oedipus who was sealed up in a cave for the “crime” of having buried her brother.  Ay, the father-in-law of Akhenaten, takes on much the same role as Creon, the father-in-law of Oedipus, even down to taking the throne after the death of the sons and rightful heirs of the king.

    Sigmund Freud later explored association between Akhenaten and Moses in a  study published in 1939 under the title Moses and Monotheism. However, Freud rejected the notion of his protégé Karl Abraham that Akhenaten was also Oedipus of the Greek traditions memorialized by Sophocles, Euripides and Aeschylus. The tale of the Egyptian heretic Akhenaten is enclosed in bookends about Freud’s theory of the Oedipal Complex.

    Religious view

    moses
    moses

    Akhenaten carried out a religious revolution which, for a period of about twenty years,  replaced the age-old beliefs and practices of the Egyptian religion of about 2000 god and goddesses in human, composite or animal form for one single abstract concept  – the sun.  He did away with an elaborate and powerful system of priests, temples, and iconic images in particular with Amun the god of all gods. Its priests were at that time almost as powerful (and rich) as the Pharaoh.  Akhenaten alone was the mediator to god and asked to be worshiped, actually with his wife as holy family. He was the sun of Aton. Akhetaten, the new capital with temples was built from scratch, like Brasilia, but Akhetaten  lasted only 20 years.

    “O Sole God beside whom there is none”.

    Freud, in his last book , Moses and Monotheism Religion, from 1938, goes to the origin of Judaism and associated (Jewish) monotheism. But also about to the origin of Jew-hatred .  He sees in the Jewish monotheism  “progress in spirituality “over the image centered religions  (Freud , Vol IX , p 557 ). No wonder C.G. Jung got annoyed. The prohibition of images ( cf. Ex 20:4 Thou shalt not make thee any graven image) holds the key rationalist impulse. The worship of idols (symbols of transcendence) eases and ends with with pure monotheism. Strict monotheism prohibits images , rejects any magical acting ceremony and puts the emphasis on the writing and worldly ethical requirement as gods law without constraints of idolatry. In Freud’s thesis, antisemitism means reaction against humanism and pure anti-intellectualism. But Freud developed another historical truth of religion, the killing the Great Father. To him, the Jews have missed a certain progress in religion, introduced by Jesus and Paul, the transformation of the father religion into  a son religion, in which the  original sin is forgiven. The murder of God , also known as parricide , is the main subject in Freud’s Moses and Monotheism religion – the historical truth of religion. Thus in old age Freud sees a certain justification of religion, which is a present compulsive repetition of this Egyptian event. Moses is , according to Freud , ” the creator of the Jewish people ” (IX , p 553 ), and he explains this as follows: Moses himself was an Egyptian living in Egypt who imposed to a Jewish ethnic group the already banned again monotheism of Akhenaten as their own religion. Then, he led this people  (shortly after Akhenaten’s death ) out of Egypt.

    Akhenaten’s Dream In Plato’s Mind and German literature

    It’s been a long way since Earth was created from cosmic dust after the Big Bang still undisclosed and only intuitive  or religious grasped. The Artist’s Signature of Akhenaten’s was picked up by Thomas Mann, Rainer Maria Rilke and others.

    1922 wrote the German Poet Rainer Maria Rilke in a letter: “What event of calmness. Which God held his breath, that mankind came to its senses during the time of the fourth Amenhotep“. Where did they come from? And how, did it disappear after he time window closed which had give the “being” room of carved out singularity. (Note: Free translation).

    Brief family history

    Scientific evidence: Genetic research

    If you go by the recent surprising discovery in the mummified remains of the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten, it appears that he had a feminine body compared to the classic body frame we expect of the Pharaohs, though maybe by choice of emphasize the feminine by mimicking physical appearance of a woman in men (or vice versa).

    Recently scientists analyzed the early death of Akhenaten and the premature deaths of other Eighteenth dynasty Pharaohs (including Thutmose IV). They claim their early deaths were likely a result of a Familial Temporal Epilepsy. This would account for the untimely death of Akhenaten, his abnormal endocrine body shape on sculptures.

    Many other medical abnormalities have been brought up to explain Akhenaten’s appearance. Among them, an endocrine disorder found mostly in men called Froehlich’s Syndrome, which causes sterility and feminine fat distribution; Klinefelter Syndrome, a male chromosomal abnormality, which can cause gynecomastia (male breast enlargement) and infertility; or Marfan syndrome, a genetic disorder whose characteristics include a long face and long fingers.

    Some theorized that Akhenaten had two medical problems that together contributed to his appearance. They attributed the king’s female form to familial gynecomastia, brought on by an inherited syndrome called aromatase excess syndrome.  Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) is an enzyme complex that plays a critical role in converting androgens, hormones associated with male characteristics, into estrogens, hormones associated with female characteristics. It had recently been possible to rule out the presence of the genetic aromatase syndrome because the mummies of Akhenaten relatives Tutankhamun, Tuthmosis  I and Queen Hatshepsut do exist.

    Current Wisdom

    There is, however, a 2010 report of the Head of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, based on German and Italian research from 2007 to 2009 with eleven mummies of Tutankhamun’s bloodline and five more to earlier royal families. The first DNA study ever allowed by the Egyptian government to be conducted with ancient Egyptian royal mummies apparently solves several mysteries. Using DNA samples taken from the mummies’ bones, the scientists were able to create a five-generation family tree by shared genetic sequences in the Y chromosome passed only from father to son. The researchers then determined parentage for the mummies by looking for signs that a mummy’s genes are a blend of a specific couple’s DNA. In this way, the team concluded that a mummy known until now as KV55 is the “heretic king” Akhenaten. The eaely assumption that male mummy was pharaoh Amenhotep III and a mummy previously known as the Elder Lady is Queen Tiye, wife of Amenhotep II has been revised. DNA tests revealed, however,  that Akhenaten was Tutankhamun’s  father and his mother a sister of Akhenaten. Incest is never advantage for biological or genetic fitness. Tutankhamun’s  mother is as mentioned what mummy researchers had been calling the Younger Lady. DNA studies show that she was the full sister of her husband, Akhenaten. Another speculation apparently laid to rest by the new study is that Akhenaten had a genetic disorder that caused him to develop the feminine features seen in his statutes, including wide hips, a potbelly, and the female-like breasts associated with the condition gynecomastia. The researchers found that several members of the royal family were suffering from deformities. Tutankhamunhad  the so-called Köhler’s disease diagnosed, in which patients have exercise-induced pain in the bones.

    As for the shape of Akhenaten’s head, physicians attribute this more  to a condition called craniosynostosis, in which sutures, the fibrous joints of the head, fuse at an early age, and interfere with the process of skull formation. The specific condition, called a sagittal suture, is dominantly inherited. Phillip Vandenberg observed this abnormality in the king’s daughters as well as in Queen Hatshepsut, daughter of Tuthmosis I, founder of Akhenaten’s paternal line, and in Tutankhamun, who ended this line. Sutures normally expand as the brain expands and typically do not fuse until the age of 25 to 30.

    The Father: Amenhotep III

    Several early warrior pharaohs of the 18th dynasty, expended considerable effort in forging out a huge, far-reaching empire. Thutmose IV left to his young son Amenhotep III an empire that was secure and stable. Amenhotep III was a prolific builder, also more concerned with women and sport than state affairs. With him the gradual decline of Egypt’s foreign relations and power started. Into this peculiar situation, prince Amenhotep IV was born.

    The Mother: Tiye

    Tye
    Tye

    Tiye was apparently the daughter of the non-royal Yuya and Tjuyu. She became the Great Royal Wife of the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep III. It is today genetic established, that she is the mother of Akhenaten and grandmother of Tutankhamun. Her mummy was identified as The Elder Lady found in the (Tomb KV35). Tiye held the power during the last years of Amenhotep’s III. After his death, she continued so; quietly and in-officially she co-ruled with Akhenaten the first eight years. No official seal of him was found until Nefertiti took over a similar, but even less quiet role as his chief queen. Tiye, who some say came also  from Mitanni,  had considerable political clout, and stayed behind in Thebes to protecting her erratic son after he left with Nefertiti. Gilukhipa (sister of Tushratta II) had married Pharaoh Amenhotep III in his 10th year.  Tadukhipa (niece if Gilukhipa) was to marry Amenhotep III more than two decades later. Both were often identified with Kiya and/or or Nefertiti. Tushratta married his daughter Tadukhipa  to his ally Amenhotep III to strengthen their alliances and for gold, as referenced in Tushratta’s thirteen Amarna letters. Amenhotep III died shortly after Tadukhipa arrived in Egypt and she eventually married his son and heir Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten), which is remarkable in respect of his father-rift. From the DNA analysis 2010, the Elder Lady was formally identify to be Queen Tiye, which means Akhenaten had not buried her with her king and she was later moved.

    The Queen: Neferneferuaten Nefertiti

    Nofretete
    Nofretete

    Nefertiti is the most enigmatic figure in this. Tey, wife of Ay, are credited as Nefertiti’s parents. Many historians have wondered whether she might have been a foreign princess. As said before Nefertiti is most likely identical with Tadukhipa, Amenhotep III last wife and the daughter of Shuttarna II, ruler of Mitanni. Amenhotep IV had several temples erected at Karnak. In scenes found on the talatats, Nefertiti appears almost twice as often as her husband. She is shown appearing behind her husband the Pharaoh in offering scenes in the role of the queen supporting her husband, but she is also depicted in scenes that would have normally been the prerogative of the king (also she was presented in a way only pharaohs were presented – one leg forward). When she married Amenhotep, he was a weak 12 year old child and she a very assertive, intelligent 17 year old women. His mother Tyle,  handed over beautiful Nefertiti the motherly wife role, almost as an attempt of separation and was silent co-regent of the young Amenhotep IV until the couple left Thebes.

    Nefertiti is often referred to in history as “The Most Beautiful Woman in the World.” The Berlin bust (above), seen from two different angles, is indeed, the most famous depiction of Queen Nefertiti. Found in the workshop of the famous and outstanding sculptor Thutmose by a German archeologist , the bust is believed to be only a sculptor’s model. After the counter-revolution almost all traces of her had been destroyed. Thutmose’s technique used a carved piece of limestone, plastered the stone core to be first and then painted. Flesh tones on the face and full lips are enhanced by a bold red give the bust life. Thutmose, may or may not have been her lover, he certainly had access and close contact to her – no man could blame him falling in love. Her graceful elongated neck balances the tall, flat-top crown which adorns her sleek head. The vibrant colors of the her necklace and crown contrast the yellow-brown of her smooth skin. While everything is sculpted to perfection, the one flaw of the piece is a broken left ear. Only a few reigns before her’s had been the reign of Hatshepsut, the most famous (but not the only) female pharaoh, which certainly might have been her role model. How this remarkable sculpture came to Berlin, is quite a(nother) story

    Dr. Redford points out that Nefertiti is an Egyptian name, but there are reasons to think that she might have been like Tyle a from Mitanni, Northern Syria.  One other suggestion is that Nefertiti was Akhenaten’s cousin. The wife of the vizier Ay would have been only her wet nurse.  Redford  notes, that Ay never specifically refers to himself as the father of Nefertiti and Nefertiti’s sister, Mutnojme, not Nefertiti, is featured prominently in the decorations of the tomb of Ay.

    After a few loving years, the couple split and went on different ways (only three of her six children were from the pharaoh) but later Nefertiti became invisible to the public. Close to the end she reacted again, as it is believed that not Ankhesenamun but her mother Nefertiti sent a frantic letter to the Hittite King Suppiluliumas after Tutankhamun died, begging the longtime enemy of Akhenaten and Egypt, for a marriage with one of his sons. One of Suppiluliumas sons. Zannanza, was sent and subsequently killed on the way into Egypt most likely from Ay, thus ensuring his claim to the throne (Brier, 1998). Nefertiti then faded into history. Until recently she has not been identified, but now it is assumed that “The young Lady” (CG 61072 in KV 35) with deadly injuries breast and head is her.  CG 61074 in KV 35 (grave ofAmenhotep II)  has been assumed to be Ay, according ot DNA  the father of “The young Lady who was the Mo. “Theold Lady” (CG 61070 in KV 35) is assumed Tiye-Tii and according to DNA mother of  The young Lady” (CG 61072 in KV 35),

    The King: Amenhotep IV (later Akhenaten)

    echnaton
    echnaton

    Amenhotep IV was the second son of Amenhotep III and Tiye. The reconquering of Egypt and the forging of a new empire, started off by the pharaoh Ahmose a the beginning of the 18th dynasty, had raised the god Amun (and its priests) to a position of unprecedented power. Amenhotep IV worldly rule would become stagnant and troubled but he would be the catalyst of an unprecedented religious, cultural, political and sociological and cultural revolution.

    Egyptian religion under the early 18th dynasty knew more than 2000 gods and goodness’s  with their chief god Amun. The kings of that period devoted the booty from foreign campaigns to Amun, since they ascribed the success of their military ventures to him alone.  To further establish Amun worldly influence, from Ahmose on, a new tradition was established — that of always taking on the High Priestess of Amun (who bore the title of “God’s Wife”) as the chief queen.

    Early Life:

    His father’s reign is largely void of references to the prince. That Amenhotep IV actually appears as a co-ruler was until recently matter of great dispute. However this theory has been largely discarded. Seldom are both of them mentioned in the same text or depicted together in artwork.

    It is likely that, after his older brother Thutmose V died early under unknown circumstances, Amenhotep IV would have taken over the posts held by Thutmose, i.e., High Priest of Ptah and Governor of Memphis.

    Official art developed into the full-fledged “early Amarna” style, and recently discovered  unusual features of the king has led some scholars to believe that Akhenaten may have suffered from some sort of disorder. Akhenaten’s monotheism (actually henotheism) survived until approximately the third year of Tutankhamun’s reign, and Akhenaten/Amarna remained the center of Egypt’s administration until that time.

    Early Reign — The Karnak Years:

    Amenhotep IV kicked off his reign with a large building project. The stela documenting this event, found at Gebel Silsila, depicts the god Amun speaking to the young pharaoh: “… I have given you life, stability and dominion”. However, another god is also mentioned. The pharaoh had by now apparently taken on another title, “First Prophet of Hor-Aten”.

    We see the beginnings of the drastic changes that the pharaoh would soon impose starting to emerge. The king was claiming that the gods in the traditional Egyptian pantheon were nothing but material representations which could be destroyed, no how precious the material of their construction. Only the god that he promoted (indubitably the Aten, or sun-disc) was unique, untouchable, undeniable and indestructible.

    In the third or fourth year of Amenhotep’s reign, close to the time of his decision to change his name to Akhenaten, the king decided to have a royal jubilee, known as a Sed-festival.  The festival marked a major turning point in Akhenaten’s reign. The king had, by this time, changed his name to Akhenaten, translated most commonly as “One Who is Useful to Aten.” (Murnane)

    Fragments of a speech from Amenhotep IV’s first building at Karnak provide a fascinating insight into what was going on in the mind of the king. We know a lot from the talatat, disjointed and scattered when Akhenaten’s successors brought down his buildings, which bear many fruitful scenes and the inscription. The Akhenaten Temple Project, directed by Dr. Donald Redford, undertook a major project to piece them back together using IBM computer technology. On the talatat, aside of military personnel, and of the pharaoh worshipping the sun in various incarnations, we get many glimpses of the royal family: Akhenaten  with his mother, his chief wife Nefertiti, their six daughters, his mother, Tiye, his concubine, Kiya, and two of his mysterious successors of Smenkhkare and Tutankhaten.  The couple’s eldest daughter was Meritaten and  second daughter, Meketaten, appears somewhat later. (Redford, 1984)

    The Amarna (Akhetaten) Years:

    In the fifth year of his reign, Akhenaten abandoned the old capital city of Thebes and set out to create a new one in central Egypt in a previously uninhabited spot. He called his new city Akhetaten, or “The Horizon of the Sun-disc.”

    The site of Akhenaten, now called Amarna, is a barren place surrounded by cliffs. According to Cyril Aldred, from the Nile the eastern cliffs look like the giant hieroglyph for “akhet” or “horizon” (1988). Akhenaten made it quite clear that he wanted that place, was specifically advised from the go Aten, his father, so that it could be made for him as Akhet-Aten. In order for the construction of the city to go quickly, Akhenaten employed rather shoddy building stone  and according to archaeologists , many of the Theban officials did not come to Akhetaten and were replaced by new followers outside of the old elite (1984). Several more daughters of Akhenaten and Nefertiti: Neferneferuaten-Tasharit (tasharit means “junior”), Neferneferure and Sotepenre joined Meritaten, Meketaten and Ankhesenpaaten.

    A plague broke loose and spread across the ancient Near East (Moran, 1992; Redford, 1984). Ignoring those disasters, Akhenaten continued to build his city, and further suppressed the traditional array of Egyptian gods after a coup and began a campaign to erase the name of Amun. He even changed the spelling of the word “mut” (mother) so that it no longer made reference to the goddess of the same name and put into effect the more popular version of the written language as the official text rather than the archaic middle kingdom text known mostly by scribes and priests (Redford, 1999).

    In year twelve of his reign, Akhenaten had a large durbar, a festival in which foreign dignitaries from all across the Egyptian empire visited him in Akhetaten and presented large quantities of tribute. This durbar marked the beginning of the end of the reign of the “heretic king.” In the years following the event, the situation at Akhetaten rapidly disintegrated.

    This spiral into tragedy started when Akhenaten’s mother, Tiye, paid a visit to Akhetaten around Akhenaten’s 12th reignal year, but disappeared at the same time when Akhenaten’s second daughter, Meketaten had died in childbirth at the age of twelve or thirteen. That baby was possibly by Akhenaten (Aldred, 1988). Nefertiti faded quietly into the background (what exactly happened is unknown).

    What happened to Akhenaten at the end of his reign is unknown too. He presumably died in Akhenaten of natural causes. Upon its rediscovery and exploration in the 19th century, Akhenaten’s tomb lay empty save for some debris and the smashed remnants of the king’s red granite sarcophagus, and the city of Akhetaten was abandoned and in ruins.

    The Lover: Smenkhkare (Ankhkheperure-Neferneferuaten)

    Smenkhkare apparently reigned for about three years, and spent some uncertain length of time as Akhenaten’s coregent. Most historians assume that Smenkhkare was the lover of Akhenaten.  Newberry in his article (1928) also drew attention to a small private stele (upright stone slab) in the Berlin Museum, originally made for a military officer, which showed two kings (identified by their crowns, one the double crown of Upper and Lower Egypt and the other a war crown), nude and sitting side by side. Although the piece is unfinished, with its cartouches blank (ovals which usually contained names), the figures seemed easily identified as Akhenaten and Smenkhkare, the former caressing the youth’s chin while Smenkhkare rests his arm around the older king’s shoulder. Still he warned, the evidence is “slender” and not conclusive.

    In any case, Princess Meritaten was married to the mysterious figure to strength Ankhkheperure-Neferneferuaten’s royal claim. Some say he was Akhenaten’s son. Since neither Smenkhkare nor Tutankhamun was featured in artwork and texts from Akhenaten’s reign the way Akhenaten’s and Nefertiti’s  daughters were, some have theorized that they were Akhenaten’s children by a minor wife, such as Kiya. Little is known about the actual reign of King Ankhkheperure.

    Some people have even questioned whether he existed at all — at least, as a single individual. It was during the late part of Akhenaten’s reign that references to a second king began to appear. On a box, alongside with this name are written the names and titles of Akhenaten, and the text “King’s Chief Wife Meritaten, may she live forever.” (Murnane). It is apparent from this inscription that Akhenaten and Ankhkheperure were ruling together, and that Ankhkheperure was married to Akhenaten’s eldest daughter, Meritaten. But the most curious thing about this inscription is that one of Ankhkheperure’s names is Neferneferuaten, also one of the names of Akhenaten’s Chief Wife, Nefertiti. Because of this, some people have come to the conclusion that Akhenaten’s co-regent was none other than Nefertiti herself, in the guise of a man and taking on her own daughter(s) as a spouse. A fragmentary stela from Amarna, now known as the “Coregency Stela” had originally depicted Akhenaten, Nefertiti, and princess Meritaten. Later the name of Nefertiti had been replaced with the name of King Ankhkheperure Neferneferuaten, and the name of Meritaten had been replaced with Nefertiti’s third daughter, Ankhesenpaaten after Meritaten died.

    The Son: Tutankhaten (later Tutankhamun)

    Tutankhaten succeeded his father Akhenaten and Smenkhkare and was married to Akhenaten’s daughter Ankhesenpaaten. He came to the throne when he was about eight years old and reigned 10 years. Most likely he was advised by Ay and done away after getting too old to be manipulated. The couple soon changed their names to Tutankhamen and Ankhesenamun, moved away from Akhetaten, and reestablished the old religion. Tutankhamun, was chosen as a tool to reverse the changes and return Egypt to the traditional religion of worshipping a variety of gods. His his tomb was discovered by Howard Carter in the 1920s. The world’s most famous mummy – ancient Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun – was buried with his penis stood up at a 90 degree angle in order to help quash a religious revolution and make him appear as Osiris, the god of the afterlife,  to counter attempts of Akhenaten to establish a monotheistic religion. A recent examination of his body also revealed previously unknown deformations in the king’s left foot, caused by the necrosis.  The scientists found also DNA from more than one strain of mosquito-borne parasite that causes malaria (including the most deadly), the oldest known genetic proof of the disease. These factors, combined with the fracture in his left thighbone, which scientists had discovered in 2005, may have ultimately been what killed the young king. Until now the best guesses as to how he died have included a blow to the head based on his fractured skull.

    The Daughter: Meketaten

    Meketaten was the second daughter of Akhenaten and Nefertiti. She was probably born by at least the second year of her father’s reign. Her death is documented on the walls of the royal tomb at Akhenaten in the form of a poignant funeral scene. Some believe she did giving birth to a baby from Tutankhaten, later to become the famous and ill-fated pharaoh Tutankhamun. One theory is that Meketaten died in a plague raging across the Middle East at the time after that durbar, a large festival in which representatives from all across the empire paid tribute to Egypt, brought the plague to Egypt.

    An incest theory resulted from the fact that Akhenaten’s three eldest princesses all evidently had daughters when they were very young, and when they were not married. Inscriptions refer to the these infants as “child of the king.”The theory goes that, in a mad attempt to have a male heir of fully royal blood, Akhenaten fathered children on his own children. A distasteful thought, but his own father married his daughter, Akhenaten’s sister Sit-Amun, so again there is some basis for the idea

    The Magician: Ay

    Ay succeed Tutankhamen. He has been a prominent background figure even before Akhenaten. As writer he climbed the social ladder and became involved in political intrigue taking the title of Master of the Horse under Akhenaten, and, eventually, taking the throne under mysterious and rather shady circumstances. While the names of Ay’s parents are never explicitly stated, many scholars agree that Ay was probably a brother of Queen Tiye. Cyril Aldred and Donald Redford point out that it is likely that the job of Master of the Horse, formerly held by Yuya, father of Tiye, would have been passed on to Yuya’s son (Aldred, 1987; Redford, 1984). Also, the fact that “God’s Father” is among Ay’s titles–suggesting to some he was the father of Akhenaten’s chief wife  Nefertiti — if she was not North Syrian of royal blood.

    Ay held the distinctive position of “the favored one of the Good God, fan-bearer on the king’s right hand, true king’s scribe and god’s father, trusted throughout the entire land, commander of chariotry” (Redford, 1984). His wife,Tiye, had earlier been Nefertiti’s wet-nurse. Ay was, by all appearances, devoted to Akhenaten and the new religion as after the counter revolution  a follower of Amun. After the death of Akhenaten, Ay continued to serve under Akhenaten’s son-in-law, Tutankhamun. He was no doubt quite influential during the young king’s reign, and adopted the title of “eldest king’s-son” (Redford, 1984). It seems likely that Ay had much to do with the eventual return to the former religion and capital during Tutankhamun’s reign. A good deal of evidence points to Ay playing a role in the untimely death of Tutankhamun. . It seems that Ay had set himself up to become pharaoh after the death of Tutankhamun, who died shortly after reaching an age when he might have begun to take more of his pharaonic power into his own hands. Once Ay had secured the kingship, the unfortunate Ankhesenamun quickly vanished. Ay reigned for only a little over four years, and apparently had no children to succeed him. Ay devoted much of his reign to the persecution of Akhenaten. Thus, Ay brought a close to the tumultuous and fascinating Eighteenth Dynasty.

    The warrior: General Horemheb

    Ay left the throne to one General Horemheb, who had served under Akhenaten and Tutankhamun.  Other than the fact that Horemheb came from Herakleopolis near the entrance to the Fayoum, little else is known about the background of this pharaoh that we place as the last king of Egypt’s important 18th Dynasty (New Kingdom). His parentage is completely unknown. Horemheb served under Akhenaten’s father and Akhenaten. During the reign of Tutankhamun, he became King’s Deputy (and very likely regent), and may, together with Ay, been responsible for governing Egypt in the background during Tutankhamun’s reign.  It is also very possible that Ay or Horemheb had Tutankhamun murdered when that king grew near adulthood and hence, independent rule. In any case, at the time of Tutankhamun’s death, on top of all that turmoil. Egypt was engaged in a fairly major confrontation with the Hittites that ended in a defeat. Upon the death of Ay, he declared himself king of Egypt in about 1321 BC. and though he made no claim to be of royal blood, he became divinely elected to the throne by means of an oracle (most likely fabricated by the conservative Amun clerics). He formed a link back to the female royal blood line.   From the bones recovered from Horemheb’s Saqqara tomb, it is believed that Mutnodjmet, who was in poor health at the time, may have died at the age of 45 while attempting to give birth to a child during the king’s 13th year as ruler. No other children seem to have outlived the pharaoh. and though the transition had begun as early as the reign of Tutankhamun, he also sought to complete the return to Egypt’s traditional religion

    He probably felt, and rightly so, that Egypt was in need of strong leadership after the military decay Amarna Period. Besides being a very harsh ruler, it appears that it was during the reign of Horemheb that elaborate attempts were made to write the Amarna Period out of Egyptian History, and he is often credited with reopening and repairing the temples of Amun, as well as restoring the powerful priesthood who had caused for previous kings, but outflanked them by military men who’s loyalties he could trust appointed as priests. The new city Amarna and the Aten temples at Karnak were dismantled  so that the stone could be used elsewhere. That was it.

    Conclusion

    Akhenaten is all things to all people–to some he was a fanatical lunatic, to some he comes across as a strange, eccentric young man whose behavior was strongly influenced by his mother, to others he was a Christ-like visionary and a mentor of Moses, and to still others he was simply someone who happened to be there but had really had little to do with the dramatic reformations that went on during his reign. Much of the research I did is dated  since it was written more than 50 years ago and questionable.The thesis of Oedipus and Akhnaton: Myth and History is no less shocking to scholars,  does have some plausibility even if Velikovsky’s other work rightly deserves less credential. And if, as the author asserts, Oedipus of Greek myth is not the same person as the historical Pharaoh Akhenaten the psychoanalytical interpretation of the rejected child with powerful mothers and a intelligent assertive wife is evident as his clueless reign from the Araman letters. My view of the of religion is heavily influenced by C.G. Jung – human cannot be Homo Faber alone, but must be Homo religious. Nevertheless I subscribe also to Phillip Jenkins in regards of rise and fall of religions: they are born, prosper, fight with each other and die sometime.  To me Atenism died as an infant, too early to kill Amun and 2000 gods, too early for cold rationalism too early for radical exclusive monotheism.

    Bibliography:

    Redford, Donald B. (1984). Akhenaten: The Heretic King. New Jersey: Princeton University Press

    The Life and Times of Akhnaton, by Arthur Weigall

    Aldred, Cyril (1988). Akhenaten: King of Egypt. New York: Thames and Hudson Inc.

    Murnane, William J. (1995). Texts from the Amarna Period in Egypt. Georgia: Society of Biblical Literature

    Moran, William L. (1992). The Amarna Letters. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press

    The Religion of Ancient Egypt Sir W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders) Petrie

    Nofretete, Echnaton und ihre Zeit: Scherz, Bern, München 1975 by Phillip Vandenberg,

    Geschichte des Morgenlandes im Altertum: Hertzberg, G.F.: Verlag: Berlin, Historischer Verlag Baumgärtel (ca. 1904), 1904

    Prophyläen der Weltgeschichte, Golo Mann, Ullstein 1961

    A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. I and II by Charles Chipiez, Georges P

    The Religions of Ancient Egypt and Babylonia, by A. H. (Archibald Henry) Sayce

    Ancient Egypt, by George Rawlinson (Kindle)

    Echnaton, Herrman A. Schloegl

    Nofretete, Die Wahrheit über die schöne Königin, Herrman A. Schloegl,

    Davis, T. M. et al. The Tomb of Queen Tiyi. London 1910.

    Child of the Morning: A Novel about Hatsshepsut  by Pauline Gedge 1977

    Nefertiti by Evelyn Wells 1964

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com
    Google

  • Isis, Mithras and Jesus: Clash of male and female Archetypes in classical Rome

    Isis, Mithras and Jesus: Clash of male and female Archetypes in classical Rome

    Cults mithraeum_tauroctony
    Cults mithraeum_tauroctony

    A scholarly fashion claims that only by coincidence Christ and not the Egyptian Isis or the Persian Mithras gained the upper hand as a world religion. There is some truth in it, but also an utter disregard of the attractiveness of Christianity at that time. This article will explore this question from a historical thesis, that the globalized  Roman Imperia created a market of religions. Furthermore the exclusive – or shall I say smart – Christian religious offerings took in account the Romans’religious preferences and the  weaknesses of the many competing religions and cults. Its explosive growth was supported by a successful sociological approach and a savvy management style – strategic global, acting locally but centralizing its control over teachings.

    Christianity entered a Rome in which its citizens suffered from the first major globalization. Success bread failure, the expansion of the empire brought wealth, cheap resources and slaves, which led to unemployment of the lower classes and then to their subsidizing: the famous “bread and circus”. The Roman society was sharply divided between rich and the (heavily) sedated poor and an anxious middle class. Rome became confused, spiritually bankrupt and fractured, chasing a million different dreams–tolerant but in moral chaos–polytheistic, not exclusive–embracing a “cafeteria”approach to religion. At this point the growth of the polytheism ceased as the history and state religion slowly shifted to monotheism. (e.g. Mithraism , Sol Invictus). This brings us to Christianity, which was first seen as just another “Oriental cult” in Rome rather for somewhat crazy sectarians. A lot of ink has been spilled, how Christianity developed from a Jewish sect to the world religion, which even today is nothing else than the Western cultural identity, but the question was never answered conclusively. I suggest there is more than a miracle to worry about. By studying the nature of these cults, it’s possible to gain insight into the reasons Christianity succeeded where all the others failed in the long run. So why did Christianity win? Will it win again today?

    Before we start, let’s have a look on the attributes or criteria from we want to evaluate …

    • religious offering:  resurrection or infinite afterlife;  personal relationship with  God;
    • practical offering: community, strengthen the individual in daily life;
    • demand:   exclusive or non-exclusive commitment from followers ?
    • god:  monotheistic or polytheistic, pantheistic
    • sociological approach: what was role of women, to which class did it appeal (e.g. elite, urban)?
    • political demand: could it be seen as a political threat, was it private, against or with the authorities?
    • organization: central with approved and authorized teachings or fractured cults and spinoffs;
    • ethic: like charity, love, sexual conduct, hedonistic
    • structure:  cult, integration with astrology

    of early Christianity and some major religious competitors:

    • Isis and Sarapis
    • Mithras Cult
    • Cybele and Attis
    • Roman polytheistic state cults
    • Imperial Cult ( emperor worshipping)

    Philosophical Religions

    In this article I will not look at gnosticism or philosophical religions. From a Christian perspective the uprooting of Gnosis was almost an inner fight of live or death, of which I have written here. Philosophical Religions (Neo-Platonism, Neo-Pythagoreanism, Gnosticism) have Roots in Platonism and in Pythagoreanism, but no clear descent and are characterized by a disdain for the material world appeal more to intellectuals than to ordinary people. It is clear that Christianity owes Neo-Platonism and also includes some streaks of Gnostics as C.G. Jung pointed out.

    Roman state religions

    For  early Empire, there was a strong need to reunite the Romans culturally. A possible political solution was emperor-worship•but emperors are transient and many blamed the Empire and the generals for the decline in their living standards. Its important to note that nearly every emperor following Alexander was deified by the Senate as standard practice; until the reign of Constantine in the 4th Century AD. Worse, the emperor-worship was a form of taxation –and who wants to worship tax-collectors?  State religions comprised a Rome that was spiritually bankrupt and fractured, chasing a million different dreams–indifferent in disguise of tolerance but in moral chaos–polytheistic, not exclusive–embracing a “cafeteria”approach to religion. As a rule, the Roman authorities showed indifference to every cult  interpreted today as tolerance, but actually can be compared to today’s Western spiritual void.  The Roman Senate did exercise some limits of practicability, for instance it restricted in the 2. Century B.C. the Bacchus cult which always offered an occasion to celebrate orgies in public. Rome came down hard  on cults which were understood as a political threat. However, as long as the citizen adhered to the state gods Jupiter, Juno, Minerva and paid the  emperor credulity taxes, the Romans could shop freely in the religious supermarket. Here they showed a strong preference for the oriental and exotic, better said: they credited their favorite cult’s eastern origins and ministered their idols with unique attributes of non-roman origin, i.e. long trousers, Phrygian caps, or in the case of Isis, with a “typical Egyptian” guise.

    Male Archetype: Mithras the Roman Warrior

    MITHRA
    MITHRA

    The central motive of every Mithraism is a representation of Mithras dragging a bull and slitting its throat. Mithras defeated the bull, killing the animal creating a cycle of life. He holds the bull kneeling down, with the head of the left-hand it tears him in the neck, and the right carotid artery leads to the dagger. Snake and dog have been waiting for the blood. The Scorpion – symbol of the evil – has retreated within the testicles. The death of the bull, whose tails are not in a tuft atop, but end in an ear, frees its life-giving liquids. The divinity is originally from Persia, but that was of little importance. Mithras is also surrounded by other animals representing the zodiac, and celestial elements like the sun, moon and stars are constantly present. Scholars disagree as to the exact nature of the meaning of this, but two explanations are likely. The first is that the slaying of the bull represents a cosmic regeneration, essentially a cosmic  Genesis. In many Oriental cultures, the bull is a symbol of fertility. In times of drought, bulls were sacrificed and their blood spilled to the ground to renew the fertility of the earth and forestall famine. From this perspective, Mithras is a cosmic regenerative force. By shedding the blood of the cosmic bull, he nourishes the universe against the forces of darkness of the serpent, ant and scorpion that undermine life.

    The roman Mithras cult was most likely brought by Oriental troops serving in the legions and its public offshoot of Sol Invictus, the Invincible Sun, was only related to the private Mithraic cult. Sol Invictus became the official religion of the empire until conversion to Christianity much later. The Mithraic cult as practiced by Romans  lived and died with vita the Roman society. When the West Roman disintegrated seriously in the fourth century, the cult declined with it.

    The Romans were the first society encountering a globalization shock. From Ernest Renan comes the dictum that the Western world would have become believers of Mithras, if any accident had inhibited the spread of Christianity. Mithraism followers met in caverns or in artificial enclosures made to resemble caverns like the early Christians, often operated secretly. Of the members of the cult, the mainstay were soldiers but it seems the cult appealed to officers. There were also imperial civil servants, as well as traders, craftsmen, and many others connected to the imperial economy or government. Mithraism appealed to those connected with the Imperial establishment building tightly knit groups that met to progress through spiritual, esoteric knowledge and celebrate the. The cult was organized along a hierarchy of seven grades, and advancement through the cult was contingent on mastering various physical and spiritual trials.

    Age of Taurus
    Age of Taurus

    It has to be noted, that the bull represents of course the constellation of Taurus. In pre-christian time the sun rose in the zodiacal sign of Taurus during the vernal equinox. By christian times the sun, due to the natural progression of astrological bodies, had moved out of Taurus into another constellation – Pisces. According to this view, Mithras by slaying the bull is in effect ending the Age of Taurus and inaugurating a new zodiacal age of Christianity which secret symbol was the fish. Mithras is thus a god of the cosmos who regulates the great astrological cycles. Mithraism was strongly connected with astrology (and superstition) and maybe this was the answer to the “mystery”of Mithras. In first-century Rome, the sun was moving from the house of Aries to Pisces but earlier (ca. 2200 BCE) the sun moved from Taurus to Aries.  So according to Ulansey Mithraism was tied to those astrophysical changes.

    Mithra was the god of war, battle, justice, faith, and contracts and Mithraism believed in duty, honor and sacrifice. Mithras symbolized  certain sacred values that were seen as traditional to the Roman soldier. Not unlike the German philosopher Nietzsche, who knew Persian philosophy well, Mithraism emphasized the strong, superior man against the weak masses. Nietzsche considered burgeoning Christianity’s relationship to that secretive “mystery cults” that flourished alongside the official state religions of ancient Rome. He shared criticism of Christianity  that the Christian religion was not based upon divine revelation but that it borrowed from pagan sources, Mithra being one of them. They assert that the figure of Mithra has many commonalities with Jesus, too common to be coincidence. However, Mithraism shared only themes with Christianity (and Judaism) which were recorded in both the Old and New Testaments too. What is more probable is derived from the timing that with the explosive growth of the Christian church in the 1st and 2nd century, other cult groups – syncretic by definition – started to adapt themselves and took advantage of some of the teachings found in Christianity:

    “Allegations of an early Christian dependence on Mithraism have been rejected on many grounds. Mithraism had no concept of the death and resurrection of its god and no place for any concept of rebirth — at least during its early stages…During the early stages of the cult, the notion of rebirth would have been foreign to its basic outlook…Moreover, Mithraism was basically a military cult. Therefore, one must be skeptical about suggestions that it appealed to nonmilitary people like the early Christians.” (R. Nash, Christianity and the Hellenistic World).

    If the Roman Mithras is a descendant of the older, persian Mithras, it must be understood that his cult evolved over the generations in many different lands, absorbing influences from each of them. The Mithras cult was a secret religion full of mystery which apparently didn’t harm its popularity. That was exactly what was offered. The Santa Maria Capua Vetere murals in southern Italy show also initiation ceremonies including mock executions by swords piercing the body. Those were ritual sword with the blade omitted by a headband. It is so similar to the sawed virgins in the circus, that after 2000 years you still feel the wink and the religious serenity of the Romans. It was a cheer from the fullness. There was not only Mithras, although, as one would say he was a real manly God, but also the strangely solemn Jupiter Dolichenus from Syria, always on a bull, his wife Juno on a doe. This is a very deep down in the origins of civilization, as with the cult of bulls the domestication of the animal of arable land and the state began. But at the time, the universe turned from age of bull to the age of pieces – just as our similar stormy time 2012 entered now the Age of Aquarius.  So  “the dawning of the Age of Aquarius” is calling today for the end of Christianity? Mithraism reached the peak of its power in the middle of the third century, but the invasions of the barbarians ended it. Temples were sacked in the uniform downfall of the Empire. The army was the only institution standing – so the Caesars founded to supported religion of their soldiers the public version of Mithraism – in honor of the Sol Invictus, leading to great persecutions of the Christians (maybe encourages by the Mithraic clergy). But the conversion of Constantin in Byzantine Empire turned the tables and target of persecutions. East Rome,  became the political  center of the world until 1453. Theodosius formally outlawed all pagan sects, and Mithraism was officially abolished. It did continue in secret for a number of years, but the cult was never the same with the decline of Roman power in the West. Rome remained still the center of paganism, other adversaries coming up, but that is another story.

    The original Mithras, however, is a very ancient deity. In the Vedic religions that preceded Hinduism, Mitra is a solar deity and in Persian religion, he is also a solar deity because they both share an older Indo-European heritage. Apparently Mitra was a comparatively minor deity until the reformer Zoroaster revised Persian religion. In his view the cosmos was divided between a clash of light and darkness, good and evil. As the Persian Empire spread, the cult of Mitra spread with it.

    mithraic-communion
    mithraic-communion

    Critics of Christianity claim the early Christ cults must have stolen from the Mithraic cults other refute that view claiming that Christianity was established in Rome before Mithraism , but most likely the similarity between the two cults is rooted in common Archetypes of the  Greco-Oriental culture. Never forget the Ronan version Mithras cult was syncretic by nature and very different from the early Mithras cultAccording to Cumont the parallels between Mithraism and Christianity were many,—belief in the immortality of the soul, a future resurrection, judgment, heaven, hell,…a communion rite consisting in Mithraism of bread and water, to which he would add wine; a purificatory rite of similar to baptism, a feature common to practically all religions, having an outward resemblance to baptism…a remote resemblance to the Christian rite of confirmation…the seven grades of the initiation as the seven sacraments, a clergy system based on it. However, according to Dumont,  Mithraism was inferior to Christianity, as it offered only a mythical redeemer ( 195 ff Mysteries-of-Mithra-the.-Franz-Cumont-1903). Some non-original doctrines that mainstream “Christianity” “share” with Mithraism were Christmas on the 25th and Sunday. According to Robert Turcan Christians blamed the Mithras followers even for performing rites which supposedly were an imitation of the eucharistic liturgy. So to sum it up:

    • Pros: “Be different but not too different!” link the old and the new plus astrology while making your cult novel and familiar, both revolutionary and marketable.
    • Cons: It was a cult that played to the moment well but was bound not to age well. It omitted women and was essentially an elite cult of warriors and establishment. Today one would say, it was “a white man’s religion”.

    Female Archetype:  Cybele the Great Mother

    cybele
    cybele

    It is one of the oldest cults imported into Rome, ca. 205-204 BCE, and –Cybele was credited with the Romans’victory in the Second Punic War and the goddess Cybele is the protectress of the besieged.One of Cybele’s major attributes was that she protected people at war and, as such, was often shown wearing a crown of city walls symbolizing the defense she offered adherents. Also, as an earth-mother deity in origin, she bestowed fertility and governed creatures of the wild—ancient portraits show her riding in a chariot pulled by lions—and in both aspects she appealed to the Roman public whose lifestyle was still, for the most part, agrarian. Besides that, her powers included the ability to cure disease and predict the future, making Cybele an all-purpose deity if ever there was.

    The rites of Cybele revolved around not only the goddess herself but also a young male consort of hers named Attis who was said to die and be reborn annually. That is, myth held he perished each fall and returned each spring, an obvious reflection of plants and vegetation. Isis is related to the Cybele with her chubby lover Attis, who emasculated himself. Many terracotta figures witnesses that both were widespread in popular piety. These characters do show how deep the roots of Christian iconography are based in the religious imagery of the pagan “Oriental” cults of the Roman antiquity.

    The way Cybele’s adherents celebrated his renewal and restoration involved much lamentation and also wild behavior, ecstasy to put it technically—ecstasis in Greek means literally “standing outside (oneself),” in other words, the transportation of a person out of his or her body which allows spirits to possess it, much the same way mediums at séances act today—and worse yet, during her rites, worshipers produced this feeling of ecstasy by dancing and carousing, whipping themselves into a frenzy where they felt elated, in Latin “carried away.” At times this involved scanty clothing and mixed company.

    A traditionally conservative people, most Romans took a dim view of such behavior. The Roman Senate was repulsed enough at this purported worship to issue edicts condemning and criminalizing its bacchanal. So, in spite of their gratitude to Cybele for her help in defeating the Carthaginians, this was just not a way the majority of Romans were willing to comport themselves. Still worse, the priests who oversaw Cybele’s worship were eunuchs, men who’d been castrated when they joined the cult. That was definitely not something Roman mothers dreamed of for their boys.

    But the advent of Cybele had opened a door that wouldn’t stay shut, and no senatorial edict or general disapprobation could stop the cult from growing. Besides its impressive debut, its attractions were great and manifold. First of all, it preached a doctrine of life-after-death, a promise to all its faithful of immortality through union with Cybele in the beyond. To many that was very enticing, especially those with little hope for success in this life: slaves and women and the working classes of Rome. Also, its vegetation-oriented imagery resonated well amongst a populace that was still deeply connected to the land.

    • Cons: most Romans naturally disliked the sort of excessive behavior seen in this cult specially as it became ever more licentious over time in order to attract followers.
    • Pros: Cybele thrived for other reasons he promise of life after death with Cybele appealed especially to those with little hope of finding satisfaction in this life (e.g. slaves).

    Female Archetype: Isis – Holy Mary’s great predecessor

    The cult of Isis–practiced as a mystery or mystery cult appealing to those who longed for a club with secret truths but the Mithras-Cult somewhat was too elitist and too male. The cult is mysterious to us today involving chorus singing and in general pageantry.  As private worship, the cult of Isis probably came to Rome itself in the 30s or 40s BCE. About 50 years later, large temples, still private, were built for Isis. The maternal archetype of Isis is often shown, as a seated female figure, breast-feeding her son.

    Isis-and-Holy-Mary
    Isis-and-Holy-Mary

    The symbol of Isis in the heavens was the star Sept (Sirius), which was greatly beloved because its appearance marked not only the beginning of a new year, but also announced the advance of the Inundation of the Nile, which betokened renewed wealth and prosperity of the country. As such Isis was regarded as the companion of Osiris, whose soul dwelt in the star Sah, i.e., Orion. From what has been said above it is manifestly impossible to limit the attributes of Isis, for we have seen that she possesses the powers of a water goddess, an earth goddess, a corn goddess, a star goddess, a queen of the Underworld, and a woman, and that she united in herself one or more of the attributes of all the goddesses known to us.

    Scholars think that the Roman branch of Isis worship may have come to Rome as Delian and Capitoline cults, from slave trader cities set up  to a free port for commercial purposes by the romans.  Interestingly, temples Isis later became associated with freedom for slaves.  Apparently, the worship of Isis was spreading wildly throughout the Roman world and it made the rulers nervous. Rome and the follower of the Egyptian gods were long hostile to one another. On several occasions, Isis altars on the Capitol were destroyed at the initiative of the Senate. Many of their contemporaries thought it as an affront that Caesar erected  in the temple of Venus a golden sculpture of his beloved Cleopatra 44 BC. As Cleopatra as the incarnation of the Isis mind, which in turn was also the Roman Venus, came to the Egyptian goddess sacred honor.

    Somewhere between Tiberius’ reign and 65 CE, the worship of Isis received imperial sanction. Under Caligula and Vespasian, it apparently flourished.  By the second century CE, the worship of Isis had spread throughout the Roman Empire and Isis was being worshipped by people in every level of society, from emperors to slaves. Isis became the Universal Goddess; She was The One. A Roman graffito records what I suspect was a mantra of sorts for ancient Isiacs: Una quai es omnia, Dea Isis—Being one, Thou art all, Goddess Isis.

    The cult of Isis was centered around the Egyptian deities Isis and Osiris. Its Roman origins are placed in the early empire, which would make it very likely that the Egyptian campaigns of the Second Triumvirate (most likely under Marcus Antonius) brought the cult to Rome. It had a popular following up until the fourth century CE, but as Christianity took a firmer hold was completely eliminated by the sixth century. Isis was, in Egyptian mythology, goddess of fertility and motherhood. She was the daughter of the god Keb (Earth) and his wife/sister the goddess Nut (Sky).

    The central image of the cult concerned the myth of the death and rebirth of Osiris. In this myth, Osiris’ brother Seth (god of death) was envious of Osiris’ rulership of Egypt and murdered him, cutting him into many pieces. Osiris’ wife Isis then gathered the pieces together and took them into herself and gave birth to Osiris, resurrecting him.  While the rituals of the cult remain a mystery even today, we do know that in the initiation ritual the initiate experienced symbolic “death” and “rebirth,” purified by the Goddess Isis gaining access to revelations and divine secrets and finally being reborn in death as a clean and new person.

    The Cult of Isis was, thanks to Ptolemy, Hellenized to a degree that the Roman mind could understand it, and yet still foreign enough to be exotic and alien. However,  the Iseum was walled off from the surrounding world, suggesting a space of inner sanctity. Prospective initiates were called to the goddess by dreams and visions. The subject of the ethics of the cult is a complicated one. We know that Egyptian culture as a whole was free with sexuality compared to Roman culture. Isis was in fact rather popular with courtesans and other such professions, and there are speculations that Isis cults may have promoted a kind of “positive sexuality” which Augustus and Tiberius took this as proof of a “pornographic” cult. Yet the Isis cult also demanded regular periods of sexual abstinence and gave early Christians little to complain about the degeneracy of Isis as they could about some other cults in the Empire. Twice a year large Isis festivities were celebrated in Rome. On the full moon day of the “Month of Heaven”, in which the sun is in the sign of Aries, based on Apuleius’s the “exit of the Isis” – the date of the feast celebrated varied as the Christian Easter and was also calculated.

    sacred sex
    sacred sex

    The roman Isis cult mainly concerned itself like Christianity with material sacrifice (such as fasting and donations of wealth. Unlike other mystery religions, there were both yearly rituals and daily services. Not only this, but there was a very public display of devotion to Isis, with temples, devoted priests, and the worshipers in her honor. Most evidence suggests that the cult of Isis was the largest competitor for Christianity in the Empire, especially concerning the inclusion of women as priests and worshipers equally. That it had an influence on the budding religion of Christianity can be in little doubt, for the iconography of the Virgin Mary often bears similarity to Isis, and Isis’ titles such as the “Queen of Heaven” are still used to refer to the Virgin even today. Finally, Osiris’s promise of eternal life (through his sacrifice) for his followers to me parallels early Christian understandings of Christ. Her symbols are the Ankh (like a modified cross) which represented life. A completely different sign is a Graffito from Palatine Hill in Rome of the 2. Century BC which must be addressed as the first representation of a cross. A stick figure is praising the crucified and the Greek inscription reads: Alexamenos worships God which is a bashful derision. To die on the Cross, was reserved for high treason, scam and slaves. That is why the early Roman Christians first avoided presenting the image of the crucified Son of God. The sarcophagi from the Vatican Museums depict scenes from the life of Jesus, the Crucifixion in vain.

    The Isis cult had a particularly large number of followers, divided into three levels. The lowest level were the normal believers. The second level were zealous supporters, the Isis cult very intensively practiced under the guidance of a priest. The top level were those whose function was so high that they often equated with priests. Only very rarely was a woman in the highest level. Isis was a relatively chaste goddess. As the Holy Father the Paleochristian Clemens (50-97 A.D. ), the Bishop of Rome, and the Christian writer Tertullian (150-230 A.D. ), praising their chaste trailer and priestesses. The cult was brisk in an ascetic direction, without sexual symbols and signs. The hairs were shaved and lowered the clothing were discreet. The ritual processions and prayers, and their facilities for water, incense and musical instruments were very frugal. The followers  lived celibate, men as well as women. A rarity in the classical world. But this abstinence was only in the short term. Ten days was the usual length.  The Isis of the Hellenistic time protected the chastity of lovers. Women who fled because of sexual coercion, found a safe home in its temple. They gave their very pious women married sex life and were, as Tertullian called it, to self-proclaimed widows. They rejected any further physical contact with their husbands. Sometimes they offered their husbands even new women you should replace itself. Some women avoid the contact with the men even to the extent that they refuse to kiss, their sons. Unlike Mithraism which was confined to a small percentage of “middle class” Roman males, the Isis cult was truly universal and could be practiced by women. Like Christianity it was women who perhaps took it up most enthusiastically. The cult of Isis had the numbers and the appeal to mount a serious threat to Christianity.

    Some scholars assert that the triangle of Isis, Serapis and Horus were not really defeated – they were merely absorbed into the new Holy Trinity of Christianity. The reverence for Mary among high Christian churches is similar to faith in Isis. We should consider at the very least that many chapels to the Virgin were built purposely on the remains of temples to Isis, and that furthermore the iconography of the Madonna and Christ is quite similar to Isis and Horus.

    Triads, trinity and quaternity
    Triads, trinity and quaternity

    It is true, that many triads of gods were taught in non-Christian religions since ancient times. In Mesopotamia one such ‘trinity’ was Anu (the god of the sky), Enlil (the god of the earth) and Ea (the god of the waters). Another trinity, in ancient Babylon, was made up of the three gods Nimrod, Semiramas and Tammuz. Grouping of gods in triads was also common in Egypt, Greece and Rome in the centuries before and after Christ. Some of these ancient trinities are still worshipped today. In India, the three gods, Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu, are worshipped as a trinity in the Hindu faith. Likewise in Egypt, a trinity (made up of the three gods called Osiris, Isis and Horus) is worshipped. But triads are no trinities. There is a no doubt, also that quaternity as a symbol has a very long history.   Quaternity could be found literally all over the world – from China to Peru ,  from earliest paleolithic paintings in Rhodesia to the bronze time in all cultures until today. The number four indicates the border of accuracy in information technology,  was dominating also Greek philosophy and science and represents the number of dimensions in the space-time continuum.  There is also no doubt, that C. G. Jung regarded quaternity as most important symbol, even more important than trinity:  “The quaternity, is an archetype of almost universal occurrence [. . .] For instance, if you want to describe the horizon as a whole, you name the four quarters of heaven…There are always four elements, four prime qualities, four colours, four castes, four ways of spiritual development, etc. So, too, there are four aspects of psychological orientation [. . .] The ideal of completeness is the circle sphere, but its natural minimal division is a quaternity”. (Psychology and Religion: West and East).In more than one occurrence, Jung mentioned that the most significant “advantage” in Catholicism ist the coronation of Mary in Heaven making the four complete. This coronation of Mary in Heaven, finally endorsed by the Pius XII in 1954, made to him Quaternity out of Trinity. He regarded this of a very meaningful psychological move.  It fulfilled the prophecy from Revelation which Catholics have repeatedly pleaded for. The assumption was hardly the bold stroke of a rogue pope, because the pope not only endorsed this devout custom but “on many occasions, either personally or through bishop-delegates, carried out the coronation of Marian images.” [See Pius XII, Encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam, Oct 11, 1954].

    Christological_heresies_in_Jesus_Human_Divine

    Many historians and religious scholars, however,  do attest to the influence of Greek or Platonic philosophy in the development and refinement of the Trinity doctrine in the fourth century.  Neoplatonic’s refined Plato’s concepts into what they referred to as three “substances”—the supreme God or “the One,” from which came “mind” or “thought” and a “spirit” or “soul.” These were different divine aspects of that same supreme good—distinct and yet unified as one. Many distinct threads of Christianity split and developed separately and debate swelled over the nature of Jesus after the Councils of Nicaea and Constantinople in the fourth century. The term Trinity is, in fact, taken directly from Platonic and Greek philosophy. The Platonic term trias, from the word for three, was Latinized as trinitas— the latter giving us the English word trinity.  However as well that may be, Chalcedonian Creed at the Fourth Ecumenical Council, held at Chalcedon,, in 451, as a response to certain heretical views concerning the nature of Christ established the view that Christ has two natures (human and divine) that are unified in one person:

    We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ; as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us.

    Spead of isis-cult in the Roman Empire
    Spead of isis-cult in the Roman Empire

    In any case, the Egyptian goddess gradually conquered the Roman Empire, in the north, the cult has proven to be up to the region of Cologne his followers.  Isis was also made available the new Christian faith. “As in the day of trouble helping Mother Goddess”, was Isis soon in the hearts of the people so deeply rooted that you in the time of the emerging Christianity collided with Mary to a new mother.” This will also liturgically in the pictorial representation: Isis and her son Horus here sitting on the throne, there Mary with the Infant Jesus on the arm. Theologically founded the Council of Ephesus in 431 the role of Mary as “Theotokos”.

    However, Isis was never popular with the more sincere Roman rulers. Octavian took up the mantle of protecting the moral fiber of Rome from Isis worship  and later while Augustus was away in 21 BC, his second-in-command, Agrippa, pushed the Isiacs out of the city entirely and forbid worship within a mile of Rome. The official Roman antipathy for Isis lasted after Augustus’ death. Caligula, not entirely a wise ruler restored Isis worship in Rome, where it would eventually flourish until the money run out. The same time, West Rome broke down, the Isis cult was pushed back in the whole empire. Its decline began at the end of the 4. Century with the destruction of the famous temple (Serapeion) in Alexandria. Patriarch Theophilus had called up to 391, encouraged by the Christian Emperor Theodosius.  Only in the south of Egypt, could the Isis cult survive more than 100 years, until (East Roman) Emperor Justinian closed  also this temple and threw the priests  in prison.

    So while it’s true that Rome generally accorded respect to foreign gods, this is not true for religions that fell afoul of the powers-that-be. Rome virtually exterminated the Druids.  And we learn from Tertullian, Cassius Dio, Valerius Maximus, Josephus and others, they cracked down on Isis worship too. The female-centric Alexandrine cult was thought to be a threat to the moral fiber of Rome. Writers like Juvenal and Cattullus propagated the idea that the religion was obscene and orgiastic. Today, Isis is undergoing something of a revival among among New Age crowds and a popular symbol among those seeking an alternative to “patriarchal” religions. In fact, Isis worship is part of the “goddess spirituality” movement promoted by feminist and other postmodern identity groups with little respects for history or archaeology.

    • Pros: all in all, Isis worship was just as popular as Cybele worship but conducted in a more decorous way the Isis cult appealed to those Romans who wanted a more dignified and traditional way to worship a foreign deity and, provided the celebrant with the promise of eternal salvation and a personal union with the divine in the afterlife and the importance of the individual.
    • Cons: essentially it was like the Mithras cult an élite but very female-centric instead of male-centric movement. It also raised suspicion under the Roman middle an upper class and positioned itself as a political threat.

    Some thoughts based on C.G. Jung’s Archetypes, F. A. Hayek’s “spontaneous order” and Hannah Arendt’s concept of free will

    C.G. Jung saw  in the Egyptian Isis the direct predecessor of Maria’s principles. She carries great wisdom and also the basic vision of life-giving.  She is not just an abstract principle, but a path (encoded in her fundamental processes) and the antipode of -one-  male archetype the warrior. Today too, as in Roman times, we face a major challenge: our relationship to a global world.  Tangible and non-tangible conflicts are occurring at a much faster rate than predicted. There will be many ways in which sustainability of cultures will be considered.  A Jungian perspective, however, will look for the underlying issues; and such a view would be long-term and more subtle in approach. Jungian’s would consider the archetypes, the worldviews, and the processes in the natural psyche of the Romans  that apply to our attitudes about the cults and our growing problems. A Jungian approach would be to search for a principle of psychological and spiritual transcendence, aware that we now need a higher level charity, aware that it is now time to become “citizens of the world”. Archetypes, as written of in this blog, are those primordial, universal energy patters that form our behaviors, attitudes, and values, both individual and collective.  They carry the full range of possibilities, positive and negative, for that theme.  They are found in our myths, symbols, dreams, visions, and cultural stories  – and in religions and cults. In considering this  the archetype of those sects rise to prominence. Jung has written about male and female archetype of greatest universality.  Archetypes are found throughout all cultures and all times in all religions and cults, enduring even religions and cults which are born, live, fight and die.

    I want to invoke an angle borrowed from an important social philosopher and economist. The nobel price winner and freedom advocate Friedrich A. Hayek, is  much appreciated again in some economic circles today, who try to understand what goes wrong with our finance system (and hated by the mainstream). Friedrich A. Hayek, seems rather appropriate  for quite a number those cultural and social-philosophical aspects of the rise of Christianity. For Hayek, modern society constitutes a “spontaneous order” which no central (human) will and knowledge could ever reproduce or surpass. Certain rules are retained because they are “more efficient” and provide an advantage to those who adopt them (“rules of correct behavior”), while others are abandoned.  Hayek writes:  In fact, “if freedom has become a political morality, it follows from a natural selection, which means that society has gradually selected the value system responding best to the constraints of survival.”

    Before urbanization, the “tribal order,” reflects “primitive” conditions of life. It denotes a closed system whose members know one another and organize their conduct in terms of concrete objectives determined in a relatively homogeneous manner. In this society of face to face interactions arranged in terms of collective goals, human relations are largely determined by “instinct” and are essentially based on solidarity, reciprocity, and group altruism.

    This “tribal order” gradually unravelled as personal ties dissolved into more impersonal social structures. It gave way the classical society of Rome, which Hayek would have called an “extensive order” – something corresponding more or less to Popper’s “open society.” This type of society knows no limits. Thus social relations can no longer be regulated according to the face to face model. Within such a society, “instinctual” behavior becomes useless and is replaced by abstract contractual arrangements (except, perhaps, within very small groups such as families or early Christian communities). Order came not (only) as a result of goals or intentions, but spontaneously and in the abstract, under the impact of multiple interrelations among the various agents during this volatile time. The “early Christianity “may have been a social system which spontaneously manages itself.  Hayek, an utopian, might have likened it to his term “grand society” whereas Augustine  might have called it the” city of god”.

    Hannah Arendt traces the origins of the concept of freedom to the practice of politics in ancient Greece. According to her study, the concept of freedom was historically inseparable from political action. According to Arendt, the concept of freedom became associated with the Christian notion of freedom of the will, or inner freedom, around the 5th century C.E. and since then, freedom as a form of political action has been neglected, even though, as she says, freedom is “the raison d’être of politics.”

    In his last decade, the professing agnostic Hayek turned to the subject of religion and started to explore it from his evolutionary perspective. Personally, I would count his German lecture of 1982 about the topic at Klessheim castle and his final chapter “Religion and the Guardians of Tradition” in his final book “The Fatal Conceit” (1991) among the most important works in this field and time. For example, he rightfully observed the reproductive potential of religious groups, based on the Amish people.

    Whatever happened in Rome – winning archetypes, free will as USP or superior efficiency: It might very well be, that the early Christians fixed the Roman problem of globalization –  because as of today the concept of solidarity works only in small groups, not in macro societies. After all, before anything, culture is “memory of beneficial behavioral rules selected by the group.” or as C.G. Jung would say “collective memory of archetypes” the collective unconsciousness.

    Conclusion – Why did Christianity win?

    Christianity entered the drama of ancient life—and, in particular, Roman urban culture—rather late in the play. Onto a set already stacked to the ceiling with ecstasy, astrology, mysteries and emperor-gods, the first Christians need to carve out a room to maneuver, that marked them as different from their many religious rivals. Christianity somehow secured a niche, a very small one initially, and in what must be seen as most remarkable about their rise, especially given how little they had to work with at first, they survived their religion’s birth and infancy and ultimately found a way to take center stage.

    Christ and Tinity
    Christ and Trinity

    That makes it very important to understand that some things working in Christianity’s favor  were decisions made by Christian leaders in the religion’s formative period. Clearly, its savvy architects not only assessed the evolving climate of Roman culture with great insight—not to mention foresight—but also understood well how to avoid the fallacies that eventually stifled and strangled their competition in the market.  A critical success factor was for instance the abundance of women under Christians which led to a higher breeding rate and was one factor of the spectacular growth rate of Christianity. Understanding strategies and packaging of the offering  is central in grasping the achievement of early Christians. Let’s review, then, a few of the most important aspects of that decision-making process, in particular, where Christianity learned from bad choices which ultimately doomed others to extinction:

    Unlike Greek philosophical systems with which a number of early Christians were clearly conversant Christianity appealed primarily to the heart of the many, in addition to the intellect of the élite. If one recalls the many councils about the nature of Jesus, it becomes evident how subtile Christianity is in comparison to other religions.  Christianity’s complexity lay, however,  not in an echelon of gods like the Gnostics , but in a very unique offering.  When God becomes human and dies for us, that in essence means there is God (or a window to God – the Self as a Jungian would say) in every human. This allows a personal one-to-one relationship to a single God for every follower – essentially the advent of the enlightened individual. Another example, the Catholic concept of the Holy Trinity was a very smart transition from polytheism to  monotheism. Trinity and Jesus’ nature has been later seen as heresy by the Islam, which is radical monotheistic, essentially based on Arianism.

    Christianity hid its complexity well and provided coherent messages. That allowed its proponents to deflect assaults based on reasoning and resort to its mystic dimension if challenged. That is, by avoiding “logical traps,” the young religion could stop debates which threatened to undermine its basic propositions, like the exact relationship between God the father and Jesus the son. As I have written before,  communities which had allowed these sorts of discussions to proceed ultimately buckled under the weight of “logic” and were dissolved into heretical infighting like the Monophysites after Caledonian Creed.  The non-diluted and simple message was as critical as the integrated spiritual dimension, both fostering also organizational unity.

    1. Although full of mysteries, Christianity never promoted itself as a mystery cult like Mithraism or Isis worship, where the primary appeal to the initiate, the knowledge of a “secret” shared by few, kept later advocates from being able to spread the cult’s “gospel” freely in public. Early Christian leaders surely saw that, even if their movement was slow on the uptake, in the long run it was better not to create a members-only club.
    2. Christ, however, was not a typical deity either – his final triumphs come mainly after death – and unlike other gods, the Christian god did not return to crush his detractors in real, tangible terms as the King.
    3. The Christian God was a loving god not asking for a slave relationship (like later the Islam), nor a “little better than human” deity, who fooled around like the Roman state gods.  This God offered a personal relationship.
    4. The free will , real or not, and the personal connection to God was in and of itself very enticing and made people feel important as individuals, critical  for the middle class. A savvy choice because it gave people trapped in the “machinery”of imperial rule a sense that they could do something to make themselves different.
    5. Along with all these wise decisions, early Christian leaders also brought something new to the altar: exclusivity – an idea coming from Judaism but very different from the polytheistic myriads of gods dominating the Roman Empire. The approach “A belief is not a fruit basket”, also said recently by Pope Francis, may be one of the unique selling proposition. Exclusivity and some other strong demands of Christianity from their followers raised the “entry price” overcoming the free-rider problem and setting it apart from the inflationary gods. In general, the demand of exclusive committment is a typical property of monotheistic religions.
    6. A scholarly view that Christianity was the religion of the poor appealing especially to the lower classes, is somewhat outdated.  It is true, however, that Christianity was an urban religion. It provided a practical solution for the anonymous misery of urban life in crowded cities – health care and access community.
    7. Many early converts were women and slaves, but that too, spread the word even faster. Christian women married often non-Christian men.  There was a high abundance of Christian women in the early communities leading to marriages with pagans and more children raised in Christian belief. Roman slaves often were well-educated and had access to the nobles and the administration.
    8. Christianity played well to the general interests of those ancient Romans who were searching for meaning in their lives in particular, it avoided pitfalls which held back and undermined other cults:
      • vs. Greek philosophy: Christianity appealed primarily to the heart, not the head this saved it from having to be “logical”
      • vs. Mithras and other mysteries: Christianity allowed a wide-open path for spreading the gospel while it lost some initial impetus, it was a better plan in the long run. Mithraism was one of Christianity’s principle competitor. The cult of Mithras was confined to a small section of the population – perhaps one or two percent. It also, unlike Christianity, excluded women and it was imperial establishment sect. Christianity’s earliest successes were most likely opposed to the imperial establishment. In terms of numbers, Mithraism could never have competed with Christianity, and most likely did not try. The cults were directed at different segments of the population – Mithras being in a shrinking niche market
      • vs. emperor worship: Christianity based itself on “weakness” “The meek shall inherit the earth” vs. the very real and tangible but transitory power of rulers. Divine Roman emperors were just the opposite and indeed, who wants to worship the taxation authority. It also gave the message to the political power, that here was god who stood strong in heaven, if not on earth, and in any case  Christianity was not a political threat since its trump card was “strength in weakness.”
      • vs. Isis: Christian leaders kept up their contacts with each other and didn’t allow their religion to fracture as badly, for instance, as Isis worship had.

    Christian leaders worked hard – Catholic leaders up today – to enforce uniformity of worship across the empire to keep down forces promoting diversity and schism. The Evangelists’s letters must have served as an important model for those ambitious to keep Christianity globally integrated. This tradition paid off well later, when the religion had become widely practiced and popular and, as such, naturally inspired all sorts of debate, the first slippery step toward schism. Though Christianity ultimately did fragment, and seriously—several times, in fact—there was never any sense among its early advocates, that it should be tolerated. Philip Jenkins  describes in his book ”Jesus Wars” the historical intricacies that surrounded the theological debates of the fifth through eighth centuries of nature and person of Christ weakening Christianity until today.

    A Hellenized (Greek influenced) version of Isis, the Queen of Heaven, was in fact one of Christianity’s strongest competitors in late Roman times until her role and title were taken over by the Christian Mary, who is still called Queen of Heaven today. Mary is a shining example of the love of a mother radiating from heaven to ease the burden of we creatures below, and though her divinity is no longer officially recognized as such, she bears the titles and receives the prayers once addressed to the Goddess, whose body is not just the earth but the universe, and whose children we are.

    Division, we must remember, is the very essence of polytheism, as is the recognition that other religions bear their own validity. From its Judaic roots, Christianity inherited a very different view from this à la carte mode of worship, the notion of exclusivity. It was surely a novelty to most Romans, the idea that converts must abandon all other forms of worship when they embrace Christ. That insistence on imposing a definitive choice with grave and irreversible finality seemed to many, no doubt, an unreasonable burden to place on prospective adherents, an especially perilous tenet for a young and vulnerable cult to adopt, but exactly the opposite proved true. Demanding exclusivity turned out to be a brilliant way of playing the historical moment.

    Stuffed

    Many Romans, stuffed with all manner of worship and stripped of free speech –  awash in all sorts of economic and “immigration” problems – by an increasingly necessary but ever more despotic succession of emperors, sought ways to assert themselves as individuals, some choice they could honestly call their own. And of all it offered, that freedom to choose is what Christianity delivered best, a vindication of one’s personhood, a way to spit in the face of society’s disdain. And there’s no better evidence of that than the sorts of people to whom the religion at first appealed: urbanites and women primarily, as well as others from Rome’s vast census of minorities but also people in high places.

    Reeling in the top, for the power-brokers, the men in charge, it would take longer. Silently Christianity built the first Global NGO, did minor modification of its policy and took over when the Roman Empire fell. And that was the major reason for end of all this cults:  after the empire broke down their funding broke down. The immensely fractured rest was mopped up, after Christianity became -the single- state religion.

    As I said, why the cross at the end of the day won against the multicultural credo is pretty evident. Some Christians today see in the religious pluralism of the late Roman Empire  somewhat a model for the present. Not so.  The late antiquity, I would argue with the Austrian economist F. A. Hayek, was a market  to be seen as an ideal communication system „experiments” on new paths and new orders. The better won, enlightened by the Holy Ghost. Religious indifference of late antiquity must not be rediscovered, otherwise  we are right back in confused Roman times. And Christianity today? Well, if you look at some dry Protestant events in Europe, you could get the idea that a religious contrast by a little bit of Mithras-Cult would be not bad. The protestants in Europe are some weak crossover of social workers and Isis cult; The Catholic clergy administers a lifeless state religion collecting tax money with no spirituality whatsoever (in Germany there is a concordat). The real church is carried on the shoulder of first line priests and the pope.  Look to the Pentecostal Movement and the new Pope from South America – and – our major competition.  Otherwise a  rotten shopping basket of pluralism is a recipe  for a disaster, which is precisely where history may take us next.

    Sources:

    The Cults of the Roman Empire by Robert Turcan

    Mysteries-of-Mithra-the.-Franz-Cumont-1903

    The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries by Rodney Stark

    The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia–and How It Died by Philip Jenkins

    Historia Mundi Volume IV, Lehnen Verlag,

    Die Kirche zur Zeit der Apostel und Märtyrer

    Von Hayek and the Amish Fertility. How religious communities manage to be fruitful and multiply. A Case study“, in: Frey, Ulrich (Hrsg.), The Nature of God – Evolution and Religion“, Tectum Verlag Marburg 2010

    Phillip Jenkins, “Jesus Wars” Harper, 2010

    http://www.theknowledgeden.com/area/ancient-history-archaeology-mythology/

    The Reproductive Advantage of Religiosity – Bristol 2010“, Lecture at the “Explaining Religion” Conference, Bristol University 2010 (PowerPoint-Sheets)

    .

  • Symbols live on when language is lost – Archetypes of the Picts in Scotland

    Symbols live on when language is lost – Archetypes of the Picts in Scotland

    I learned recently during a trip through Scotland more about the Picts, who were a group of Late Iron Age and Early Medieval Celtic tribal people living in ancient eastern and northern part. Their language has been lost, except for fragments, although they left behind a wealth of “picture stones,” large monoliths carved with mysterious symbols whose meanings are mostly unknown. I encountered what their culture was like from the Pictish stones in Inverness. One of them showed  a wolf, an important animal to them, as they were hunters which facinated me. I wanted to know more, thus I complied this article. The Ardross Wolf has been called the finest surviving animal symbol. The significance of the Pictish Wolf, or it’s meaning to the Picts is unknown. The assimilation of Pictish Culture into Gaelic Scot culture caused oral knowledge and the Pictish language to be lost, but the Wolf’s Gaelic names was Luh, Madadh Alluidh, and sometimes Mac Tire, meaning ‘earth’s son; The wolf lives still on in a number of Scottish place names though, such as Mullinavaddie (‘Mill of the wolf’) in Perthshire, as well as Lochmaddy, Ardmaddy and Craigmaddy. About 350 objects classified as Pictish stones have survived, with mysterious Pictish symbols, which have intrigued me, because those symbols live on when language of the was lost – the Archetypes of the Picts in Scotland endure.

    Picts history

    Picts are assumed to have been the descendants of the Caledonii and other tribes that were referred by Roman historians as Pictland, also called Pictavia. Whatever the case, by the end of the first century AD, there was an identifiable Pictish people occupying eastern Scotland above the Firth of Forth.  In 84 AD, Agricola, the Roman Governor of Britain defeated a the Caledonians as, the Romans called the whole area Caledonia.  The victory was transient at best: the following year, Agricola and his legions were recalled to Rome.  The Romans abandoned their attempt to occupy the region and built Hadrian’s wall from Solway Firth to the mouth of the Tyne, and the Antonine wall further north, in an attempt to defend their southern territory.  Near the end of the third century, Emperor Constantius invaded again  still unsuccessful. From this time forward, Roman historians started referring to the northern people as Picts. Over the next hundred years, there were periodic raids across the wall driving the Romans back until they finally abandoned all of their outposts in Britain in 409. The Picts are mentioned unitil the 10th century, when they are thought to have merged with the Gaels. and by the 11th century the Pictish identity had been subsumed into the “Scots” amalgamation.

    Pictish stones

    The distinctive art work on stones and metalwork and later in manuscripts depict known things, while others are more mysterious geometric shapes, with distinctive curves. These stones are now thought to be associated with the territory of a family or clan. There are about fifty major Pictish picture-symbols. Some are easily identified as animals or mythical creatures; others are completely mysterious, such as the “crescent and V-rod” and the “double disk” emblems. They may have originated as tattoos or amulets. After the fifth century, most Picts converted to Christianity, and most of their carvings reflect this change; many of the so-called “Celtic crosses” dotting England and Scotland are in fact Pictish stones. Below, you can view some of the more common Pictish signs.

    Animals

    Pictish animal signs may have been related to Gods and Goddesses, and included typical Celtic themes of boars, salmon, wolves, and birds:

    pict
    pict

    Mythical creatures

    Some of the most famous Pictish carvings are of monsters, mermaids, and other sea creatures:

    Pictstone2

    Enigmatic Symbols

    Pict3

    Most unusual, and most identifiably Pictish are the enigmatic symbols known as the “V-rod,” “Z-rod,” and “double disks,” all named for their unusual shapes. The V-rod appears to be a bent arrow superimposed on a crescent; it is assumed to be a symbol of death:

     The so-called z-rod is found in combination with a serpent, a tomb/doorway, or a double-sun (double disk), all possibly symbols of the solar cycle and the afterlife:

    Another object commonly inscribed on Pictish stones is the mirror, often paired with a comb. The comb and mirror are symbols of female wealth and prestige, and usually denote a woman’s memorial, although they are also heavily associated with mermaids.

    The Pictish Wolf

    A powerful image, the Pictish Wolf was one of many animals the Picts carved on their stoneworks. The lines, deeply incised on the wolf, express the force instinctive to the nature of the most feared of dogs.Inverness wolf A fragmentary image of a wolf can be seen on the Ardross Stone, which is shown here upon, from the Inverness Museum and Art Gallery. which I visited. This is one of the most interesting and beautiful objects in the collections at Inverness Museum and Art Gallery. Made in the 6th or 7th century, the craftmanship is superb, a narrow line, expertly carved with a cleanly cut v-shaped profile. It shows a magnificent wolf which looks like it’s about to leap off the stone at any moment. The Pictish wolf stone was found in 1890 in a field dyke near to Ardross in Ross-shire.

    http://symboldictionary.net

    http://symboldictionary.net/?p=295

    A Catalogue of the Pictish Symbol Stones at Inverness Museum & Art Gallery.

    Very good pictures of Ed Ziomek

  • Number, Pattern and Kabbalah Symbols – from a Jungian view

    Number, Pattern and Kabbalah Symbols – from a Jungian view

    The interpretations which Jung places on Gnosticism and the texts which Jung refers to on alchemy, were often Number, Pattern and Kabbalah Symbols , so much so that one would be more justified in calling the Jung of the Mysterium Coniunctionis  or Kabbalistic in contemporary disguise. 

    Red Book Tree of Life
    Red Book Tree of Life

    Jung has been often (rightfully) seen of being a contemporary Gnostic.One of the most serious and arguably criticisms against Kabbalah and the early Gnosticism of C.G. Jung is, that they may lead away from monotheism, and instead promote dualism, the belief that there is a counterpart to God: The good power versus an evil power.  Gnostic-dualistic cosmology having roots in Zoroastrianism, believes since creation good and evil forces are divided; Neo-Platonism (which found its way in Christianity), argues that the universe knew a primordial harmony,  disrupted by an evil force. This second model influenced the cosmology of the Kabbalah.

    According to Kabbalah cosmology, an infinite number of ten Sefirots are emanated from the representing ten different ways the one God reveals his will and also represent the different aspects of Morality. To Jung, profoundly influenced by Catholicism  God is in us, to Taoism God is in the nature. The goal of this essay is therefore to find the Tree of life in C.G. Jung’s view of our psyche, Astrology and contemporary Physics. The article appreciates the affinities between Jungian psychology and Jewish mystical thought in particular Jung’s use of Kabbalistic symbols and ideas as well as his usage of numbers and Alchemist thoughts.  It is just draft, and sketchbook and interested primarily on three (trinity), four (quaternary) and  ten (as well as their multiples).

    Number, Pattern and Jewish characters

    Practical Kabbalah

    The Hebrew Alef-Beit (alphabet, can be mapped to a number and symbol representing the deepest secrets of Creation. In one monastery I say recently an exhibition which visualizes those numbers and characters as symbols. The Kabbalistic classic Sefer Yetzirah (Book of Formation) teaches that creative consciousness exists in three states (space, time, and soul), which are reflected in the form, name and numerical equivalent of each letter.

    In practical Kabbalah the Rabbis counted every word and letter, and as their numbers were represented by their letters, they counted the numeration of all God names and titles, and all proper names, and the numeration of he phrases recording Divine commands. The Hebrew letters and numbers were :

    • Aleph A 1
    • Beth B, V 2
    • Gimel G, Gh 3
    • Daleth D, Dh 4
    • Heh H 5
    • Vau O, U, V 6
    • Zayin Z 7
    • Cheth Ch 8
    • Teth T 9
    • Yod I, Y 10
    • Kaph K, Kh 20
    • Lamed L 30
    • Mem M 40
    • Nun N 50
    • Samekh S 60
    • Ayin Aa, Ngh 70
    • Pe P 80
    • Tzaddi Tz 90
    • Qoph Q 100
    • Resh R 200
    • Shin Sh 300
    • Tau T, Th 400

    Dogmatic Kabbalah

    In Dogmatic Kabbalah the conscious God is the awakened decade of Sephira. The primary human conception of God is the Boundless, whereas the Conscious God has awaked.

    Tree of Life
    Tree of Life

    Kether, the Crown, the First Sephira, First Emanation of Incomprehensible Deity will be followed by the Second Sephira, Chokmah, Wisdom, The King, and the Third Sephira Binah, Understanding, The Queen. Then follows the forth Sephira Gedulah, also called  Chesed, Mercy, and its contrast  Geburah, Severity, also called Pachad, Fear. That triangle is completed by the Sixth Sephira, the Sun named Tiphareth, or Beauty. The third triangle is formed of the seventh, eighth, and ninth Sephiroth; Netzach, Firmness or Victory, Hod or Hud, Splendour and Yesod, Foundation. Finally, all these ideals are resumed in a single form, the Tenth Sephira, MLKUT, Malkuth, the Shekinah, the Kingdom, also sometimes called Tzedek, Righteousness. The whole Decad form “Adam Kadmon,” “The Archetypal Man,” and the  “Tree of Life.”

    The word “Sephir,” from which “Sephira” is derived, is usually translated as “Book” “Letter” or “Number” but the underlying idea is “Information” or “Pattern”.  Those pattern represent culture interconnections or in a Jungian sense symbols, i.e. manifestations of archetypes.

    The sephiroth operate on a numeric progression. The ideas corresponding to the number one naturally lead on to the ideas corresponding to the number two, and so on. The Sephiroth, when referred to by number, are always shown in their descending order, referring to their order of emanation. However, the task of the mystic is to move his consciousness in their reverse order, this process being called “The Way of Return”

    • The left column is called the Pillar of Severity. This represents the female side of man and contains three sephira: Binah (Understanding), Geburah (Severity) and Hod (Splendor).
    • The right column is called the Pillar of Mercy. This represents the male side of man and also contains three sephira: Chokmah (Wisdom), Chesed (Mercy) and Netzach (Victory).
    • The middle pillar is called the Pillar of Equilibrium. It represents the balance between the male and female pillars. It contains four sephira: Kether (Crown), Tiphareth (Beauty), Yesod (Foundation) and Malkuth (Kingdom).

    The fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth Sephira are called, respectively, Hesed (Strength, Red), Gevurah (Beauty,Yellow), Netsah (Firmness,Green), and Hod (Splendor, Blue) and represent four of the component colors of Light: Red, Yellow, Green and Blue.

    Tifereth, Hesed and Gevurah form the second Triad, and Yesod, Netsah and Hod the third; these two Triads combined constitute the Hexad, which is the Soul of the World, and of it are derived the souls of all individualized existences.

    (1) Finding its Soul

    rb-1

    The Primary Archetype the Self which is neither known nor can be known to consciousness – Kether

    The First Cause, timeless and eternal, the first emanation of diety as our universe is Kether. Like the Chinese Tao, talking about it too much, evaporates your understanding of it.

    • English meaning: Crown
    • Sphere: Primum Mobile/Uranus
    • Gem: Diamond
    • Plants: Almond
    • Magical Tool: Crown
    • Divine Name: Eheieh
    • Archangel: Metatron
    • Angelic Choir: Chayoth ha-Qadesh

    (2) Soul and God

    rb-2

     To Jung is the union of every thing and its opposite, of male and female, good and evil,  Animus  – Chokmah and Anima

    While Kether is timeless, the action of Chokmah is completely dynamic. It is the Lingam of creation, the “bang” part of the big bang, the massive Yang exploding outwards in all directions with the energy of Kether. This explosive nature is admirably suited to the astrological character of Pluto, to which it has now been assigned

    • English meaning: Wisdom
    • Sphere: Zodiac/Pluto
    • Gem: Star Ruby/Turquoise
    • Plants: Amaranth
    • Magical Tool: The Inner Robe of Glory
    • Divine Name: Yah
    • Archangel: Raziel
    • Angelic Choir: Auphanim

    .

    (3) On the Service of the Soul

    rb-3-1

     The primal unconscious is concealed from awareness through a primal opposite, the Animus – Binah

    The Yin to the Yang of Chokmah, Binah receives the projective force of Chokmah and limits it to give it form. It is the last of the supernal powers, which are beyond manifestation. Saturn was placed upon this sephira, but with the discovery of the three outer planets, it is more effectively associated with Neptune. Binah is also the Great Mother, the ocean that gives birth to the life of the universe.

    • English meaning: Understanding
    • Sphere: Saturn/Neptune
    • Gem: Star Sapphire, Pearl
    • Plants: Cypress, Poppy
    • Magical Tool: The Outer Robe of Concealment
    • Divine Name: YHVH Elohim
    • Archangel: Tzaphquiel
    • Angelic Choir: Aralim

    (4) The Dessert

    rb-4

     The boundless, chaotic, Personal Unconscious  which lies at the heart of the human psyche  – Chesed / Gedulah

    The first sephiroth below the supernals is Chesed, which means “Mercy.” This is a sephira of merciful power, benevolence and generosity.  The influence of this sephira is kingly and mystical.

    • English meaning: Mercy
    • Sphere: Jupiter
    • Gem: Amethyst/Sapphire
    • Plants: Olive, Shamrock
    • Magical Tool: Staff, Sceptre, or Crook
    • Divine Name: El
    • Archangel: Tzadiquiel
    • Angelic Choir: Chashmalim

    (5) Descent into Hell in the Future

    rb-5-1

    Here there is the smallest element of awareness of the conscious and the Ego – Geburah

    The primary influence of this sephira is strength. Specifically, the strength of the righteous against the forces of evil like warrior gods.

    • English meaning: Severity
    • Sphere: Mars
    • Gem: Ruby
    • Plants: Oak, Nux Vomica, Nettle
    • Magical Tool: Sword,Spear, Scourge, or Chain
    • Divine Name: Elohim Gibor
    • Archangel: Kamael
    • Angelic Choir: Seraphim

    (6) Splitting of the Spirit

    rb-6

    A primal Self emerges  – Tiphareth / Tiferet

    At the center of the Tree of Life lies Tiferet, the sephira of the sun. It is the main connection between the Divine and the mundane, and is the only sephira below the supernals which has a direct path with Kether. The gods attributed to this sphere are the child, and the sacrificed god, as well as the more obvious solar dieties

    • English meaning: Beauty/Harmony
    • Sphere: Sol
    • Gem: Topaz/Yellow Diamon
    • Plants: Acacia, Bay, Laurel, Vine
    • Magical Tool: The Lamen or Rosy Cross
    • Divine Name: YHVH Eloah Ve-Daath
    • Archangel: Raphael
    • Angelic Choir: Melekim

    .

    (7) Murder of the Hero

    rb-7

    From the interaction between the Ego and the world the original, unmodified structures of the Persona emerge – Netzach

    The sephira of nature is Netzach. Its nature is ecstatic, the joyous play of the divine energy. It is also the first sephira of emanation that operates without “ethics,” It contains within its meaning the process of negative feedback. To this sphere are attributed the gentle gods of life and beauty, of which some are Venus, Aphrodite, and Bast. Their terrible aspect comes from their inhuman natures with respect to justice or morality. To note that the most successful are often those unworthy of it is to operate within the laws of this sphere

    • English meaning: Victory
    • Sphere: Venus
    • Gem: Emerald
    • Plants: Rose
    • Magical Tool: The Lamp and Girdle
    • Divine Name: YHVH Tzabaoth
    • Archangel: Haniel
    • Angelic Choir: Elohim

    (8) The Conception of the God

    rb-8

    (8) These structures are the archetypal values and tendencies of humanity which are embodied within the conscious realm – Hod

    Hod is the sephiroth of the scientific intellect, which operates here in a passive sense to the emotional Netzach. Instead of unintelligible ecstasy, we have wonderful ideas, words of knowledge and poetry, and inspirations. All gods of the intellect are represented here

    • English meaning: Glory/Splendour
    • Sphere: Mercury
    • Gem: Opal/Fire Opal
    • Plants: Moly, Anhalonium Lewinii
    • Magical Tool: The Names, Versicles, and Apron
    • Divine Name: Elohim Tzabaoth
    • Archangel: Michael
    • Angelic Choir: Beni Elohim

    .

    (9) Mysterium encounter

    rb-9

    Will or Desire, the fundamental motivating force  of the Shadow – Yesod

    The sephiroth of Yesod is the process of crystalization, where energy becomes definable as forces. The action of Hod and Netzach comes together before its final projection into Malkuth.

    • English meaning: Foundation
    • Sphere: Luna
    • Gem: Quartz
    • Plants: Mandrake, Damiana
    • Magical Tool: Perfumes and Sandals
    • Divine Name: Shaddai El Chai
    • Archangel: Gabriel
    • Angelic Choir: Kerubim

     

    (10) Instruction

    rb-10

    A new Self must emerge by restoring and restructuring the elements of the old ego that has been shattered by crisis. This is the process of individuation – Malkuth

    The last emanation of creation is Malkuth, which represents the final solidification of the energy of Kether. It is result of all the work done through the preceding sephiroth. This sephira is totally passive; all energy directed to it works it’s change and is grounded. The titles of Malkuth are “Malkah,” the princess and “Kalah,” the bride, when considered as the Spouse of Zauir Anpin, the Microprosopus

    • English meaning: Kingdom
    • Sphere: Elements/Saturn/Earth
    • Gem: Rock Crystal/Salt
    • Plants: Willow, Lily, Ivy
    • Magical Tool: The Magical Circle and Triangle
    • Divine Name: Adonai ha-Aretz
    • Archangel: Sandalphon
    • Angelic Choir: Ashim

    (0) The Incantations

    DA’ATH – Knowledge – is not a Sephira. It is not on the Tree of Life: that is, there is in reality no such thing. Da’ath is the crown of the Ruach, the Spirit and its place is in the Abyss. “Da’ath like the evil number zero, has a dual aspects, on one hand it is our knowledge of the world of appearance, the body of facts which constitute our beliefs, identity and ego. On the other hand it is revelation, objective knowledge, what is often referred to as gnosis. The transition between the knowledge of the world of appearance and revelation entails the experience of the abyss, the abolition of the sense of ego, the negation of identity. From within the abyss any identity is possible. It is chaos, unformed. It contains, as it were, the seeds of identity.

    “sacred whore;”
    “sacred whore;”

    The sphere of knowledge Daath is invisible and the Random chaos of thought and conceptionbecause it contains both accessible and hidden knowledge. This sphere has no archangel but is used as an entrance and exit point to the Yetzirah (the third world of formation), the realm of the angels. Daath is often called the Abyss, the gulf between the phenomenal world of manifestation and its source. Only by passing through the Abyss can we realize out innermost spiritual nature. Daath is the primary junction where various forces on the Tree of Life – femal and male – come together, yet it is also a barrier that you must pass beyond if you wish to scale the Tree of Life.

    In Christianity the male and female archetype is the celibate Jesus and the Virgin Mary. In Babylon however, the High Priestess, however, a priestess is essentially a “nun”, whereas the role of the priestess in the mystery cults of the ancient world was essentially that of what has been derogatorily (but correctly) described as a “sacred whore” of Babylon.

    Kabbalah and C.G. Jung

    In Messianic Kabbalah relevations it represents the mystical relevation of God’s secret and mysteries in effect knowledge of god and the infinite. C.G. Jung loved  quaternities (multiples of them are of course 8 and 16) and says this about numbers and their relation to the unconscious in his book “Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle”:

    Number helps more than anything else to bring order into the chaos of appearances. Remarkably enough, the psychic images of wholeness which are spontaneously produced by the unconscious, the symbols of the self in mandala form, also have a mathematical structure. They are as a rule quaternities (or their multiples). These structures not only express order, they also create it. 

    The Red Book
    The Red Book

    The Kabbalah,  regarded by many as a Jewish form of Gnosticism , the Kabbalah achieved its own unique expression in the anonymous Sefer HaBahir, generally regarded as the earliest extant text in this mystical genre. It is in this work that the theory of the ten Sefirot, the value archetypes (Will, Wisdom, Understanding, Kindness, Judgment, Beauty, Glory, Splendor,Foundation and Kingship) which the Kabbalists all held to be the essence of creation, takes distinctive form. The Zohar, which is written as a loose and far-reaching commentary on the Torah (the Five Books of Moses), is the source of much of the “wedding symbolism” (unifications of the various Sefirot) which preoccupied the alchemists studied by Jung. Its homilies on the nature of the unknowable infinite, the integration of masculine and the feminine, and the relationship between good and evil can provide much of interest to analytic and archetypal psychologists. Jung himself quoted a number of Zoharic passages. Mysterium Coniunctionis includes citations of the Kabbalistic symbols and ideas found in non-Hebrew reference on the Kabbalah and had correspondence with a number of sholars who had first-hand knowledge of Kabbalistic texts and certain Kabbalistic symbols, such as the Sefirot. The major Kabbalistic ideas which concerned Jung were those that had clear parallel formations in Gnosticism and alchemy: the notion of a spark of divine light contained within humanity, the concept of Primordial Adam who contains within himself in coincidentia oppositorum the various conflicting tendencies within the human spirit, the theory of divine unifications, particularly the unifications of good and evil and masculine and feminine.

    Quaternio series: Moses - Shadow - Paradise - Lapis Quaternio
    Quaternio series: Moses – Shadow – Paradise – Lapis Quaternio

    Jung’s interpretation of Gnosticism, indeed his interpretation of religious phenomena in general, rests upon his theory of the history of the human psyche in which humankind has historically moved from a condition in which it projects the contents of its unconscious onto the world and heavens but fails completely to recognize the archetypes of the unconscious mind “loosing its religion.  Jung writes:
    Psychology, specifically Jungian psychology, is in a position to provide individuals with a direct awareness of the archetypes within their own psyches. This, Jung believes, can be accomplished through an interpretation of the spontaneous symbolic projections of the unconscious in fantasy, art, and dreams, guided by a new psychological understanding of the basic archetypal images which have presented themselves in the history of myth and religion. Jung’s interpretation of Gnosticism is critical to his understanding of the Kabbalah.  Traditionally Gnosticism was viewed as a Christian heresy which developed along-side the early Catholic Church in the second and third centuries. The discovery in 1945 of a library of Gnostic texts at Nag Hammadi along the Nile River in Egypt, and their eventual publication, has led to a view of Gnosticism as a multifaceted religious phenomenon with roots (and foes) not only in Christianity. Scholars have also differed in opinions regarding the identity and defining characteristics of Gnosticism, some pointing, for example, to its dualism of good and evil, others to its theories regarding the aeons, and the demiurge. Jung’s comments on Gnosticism are scattered throughout his writings (See Segal, 1992), but his major statement on the subject is contained in his essay “Gnostic symbols of the self” (Jung, 1969). However, long before he had
    systematically considered Gnosticism from the point of view of his own analytical psychology, Jung had been familiar with Gnostic theology and even constructed, in 1916, his own “Gnostic Myth” entitled “Septem Sermones ad Mortuos” (Seven Sermons to the Dead). A variety of other typically Gnostic themes make their appearance in “The Seven Sermons”. Amongst these are the doctrine that humans, as finite creatures, are characterized by “distinctiveness,” and the natural striving of humankind is towards distinctiveness and individuation. Years later, when Jung comes to take a second look at Gnosticism through the eyes of a more fully developed archetypal psychology, he reverses himself and interprets it in a manner which is far more friendly to the world and the individual, and, as I will argue, far more Kabbalistic than Gnostic.  Jung sees in the Gnostic (and Kabbalistic) symbol of Primordial Man a symbol of the goal of his own analytical psychology.

    Kabbalah and Alchemy

    Jung provides a  daring and far reaching interpretation of alchemy and was aware of the strong relationship between the Kabbalah and late alchemy. He wrote of specific Kabbalistic influences on the alchemists of the 16th century and later. “Directly or indirectly”, Jung writes in the Mysterium, “the Kabbalah was assimilated into alchemy. Relationships must have existed between them at a very early date, though it is difficult to trace them in the sources”.Jung points out that by the end of the 16th century the alchemists began making direct quotations from the Zohar. He also notes that Paracelsus had introduced the sapphire as an “arcanum” into alchemy from the Kabbalah. While Jung clearly recognizes the relationship between Kabbalah and alchemy, the spiritual aspects of alchemy, which interested Jung, were to a very large extent Jewish in origin. He regarded the various metals in the alchemical work to be analogous to aspects of humanity, hence one famous maxim “Join the male and the female and you will find what is sought” could well serve as a motto for much of Jung’s  individuadion. The interested reader is referred to works by Suler (1972), and Patai (1994).

    Kabbalah and Science

    Although its origins are rooted in deep antiquity, from the time of ancient Babylon, the science of Kabbalah has remained virtually hidden from humanity since it appeared more than four thousand years ago. Newton, Leibniz, and Pico della Mirandola, have investigated and tried to understand the science of Kabbalah. It is impossible to comprehend the invisible, the imperceptible, and that which has not been experienced. For thousands of years, humanity was offered a wide variety of things under the name “Kabbalah”: spells, curses, and even miracles, cluttered with misconceptions and misinterpretations. Therefore, first and foremost, the numers of Kabbalah needs to be made clear. There exists the upper force or the Creator, and governing forces descend from this upper force into our world.  We are familiar with various forces in our world, such as gravity, electromagnetism and the power of thought. This upper force gave birth to the upper worlds. There are five worlds in total. The so called Machsom—a barrier that separates the upper worlds and our world—follows them. From the upper force—the Creator, also known as “the world of Infinity”—mathematically the turned eight. There was a wonderful article about Hod, Hebrew for 8. Indeed the 8 is well used in the archetypical knowledge in all cultures. In Hebrew every letter has a numerical value, or gematria.  The gematria of Chet ח is 8 and is referred to as ‘the letter of life’. i.e. the Life Dynamic – Run and Return.

    Quantum physics

    Lets not forget the three and the hexagon. Six (and twelve) are important to science and its early sisters – astrology and alchemy. Also the Kabbalah system of ten sephiroth, is comprised in three pillars of three with twenty-two paths interconnecting them: – “The Tree of Life”.  The three is prominent in physics, especially in quantum physics.A unique scientific conference was held in San Francisco, California  2005, introducing Kabbalist Rav Michael Laitman, PhD and quantum physicists William Tiller, PhD, Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, and Fred Alan Wolf, PhD. The theme of the conference was “Quantum Physics Meets Kabbalah”.

    bigbang

    Isaac Newton proved through a series of experiments that  white light refracted with a prism, resolved it into its component colors: red, orange, yellow, green, blue and violet (being red, green and blue primary). Two times three. Then there are six quarks who form matter. This Standard Model of six flavors of describe all the currently known elementary particles, as well as the Higgs boson: (q), named up (u), down (d), strange (s), charm (c), bottom (b), and top (t). Again two times three.

    Now, a term “color” was introduced to label a property of the quarks which allowed apparently identical quarks to reside in the same particle, for example, two “up” quarks in the proton. To allow three particles to coexist and satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle, a property with three values was needed. The idea of three primary colors like red, green, and blue making white light define symbolic three distinct quantum states.

    Unfortunately that das not match with the four colours of those for Kabbalah Sephiras have also pretty consistent cross cultural meanings.

    • Green nature/wisdom: Egyptians believed that a god named Thoth led the souls of the dead to “a green hill of everlasting life and eternal wisdom.” Romans based their god Mercury on Thoth, and the planet Mercury was in turn based on the god. For this reason, in astrology,”green is sometimes said to be the color of the planet Mercury, which is the planet governing the mind and conferring knowledge knowledge. Christians often tied the archangel Michael to Roman mythology’s Mercury. The color green is often said to forebode death. This idea may be a survival of the ancient worship of Mercury, and even of St. Michael in Christian times, both of whom were messengers of death.”
    • Blue truth/sadness The primary association of the color blue for most of recorded history was with truth a meaning that leaves a remnant in our language in the phrase “true blue.” This was because blue is the color of a calm and clear sky, and it is calm reflection that leads to truth.
    • Red passion: Red has a range of symbolic meanings, including life, health, vigor, war, courage, anger, love and religious fervor. The common thread is that all these require passion, and the “life force” that drives passion blood is red.
    • Yellow happiness/cowardliness It isn’t surprising that yellow symbolizes happiness, warmth and sunshine in most cultures; these are characteristics of the yellow sun and its effects.In ancient cultures where a god or gods were associated with the sun, such as Egypt and China, yellow was the highest and noblest of colors and thus, the color of religious figures and royals (who were thought to be descendants of the gods or semi-gods).

    The quest for the unified theory

    Science, in its quest to reveal the underlying unity within nature, constantly finds itself returning to the origins of the universe — to the primordial “day one” (yom echad) of Creation or Big Bang. The universe, in its present state, is too cool and solid for one to find within it an intimation of such unity. Only amid the energy and heat that reigned at the very inception of time and space, could all the forces and elements of nature meld into one. Such are the premises that underlie the unified field and “big bang” theories. Should one seek the even deeper unity that binds “existence” to “non-existence,” then it becomes necessary to propose even more obscure theories — such as string theory — which an meta-physical character and somewhat discared today.

    The cosmological process that produced this space-time continuum is presently understood by many to have taken place in four stages — derived from the “string” theorists and the “big bang theory”. First, the mathematical properties and relations governing space-time had to be defined or “created”. Next, in a single quantum leap, “something-ness” emerged spontaneously out of that “abstraction”. At that point, a great “inflation” of the universe occurred. Finally, the “big bang” unleashed the full thrust of its force from within a single point inside that inflated universe.

    In Kabbalistic terms, these four stages could be viewed as corresponding to the four-letter sequence of G-d’s ineffable Name — Yud Hei Vav Hei, the model upon which all meditation directed at G-d and Creation is based. Thus, any return to the primordial unity of creation would seem to imply a corresponding return to maximal symmetry.

    Uncertainty principle

    PauliJungKeplerSychrity

    The uncertainty principle of quantum physics,  discussed by Paul and Jung establishes the impossibility of simultaneously determining certain pairs of subatomic phenomena (such as position and momentum), implies that the very act of human observation — or “consciousness” — irrevocably affects one of the properties which one is observing. Physicists disagree as to what degree of consciousness is necessary to the measurement of physical reality. Nevertheless, the implication remains — as supported by the corresponding meta-physics of Kabbalah — that consciousness can determine of its own the nature of the world we seek to know.

    The litany of modern physics is replete with constants: the speed of light remains constant regardless of the circumstances surrounding its measurement; energy-changes in the universe occur at fixed “quantum” intervals (Planck’s constant) rather than in contiguous increments. These two “constants” in nature — “c” (the speed of light) and “h” (the quantum-energy unit) — change forever the way we conceive classical concepts such as “infinity” and “zero”.

     Position of Rest

    Another foundation of modern physics is cited as the postulate stating that all physical structures tend toward their lowest possible energy level. This fundamental principle is reflected in the Kabbalistic doctrine of “descending worlds” whereby Creation is viewed as descending from the infinite energy of Divine Being into the stasis of material reality.

    In Kabbalah, the property of “descent” associated with the material realm achieves its ultimate expression in water — which by nature flows downward, seeking out the lowest ground. The opposing property of spiritual ascent is modeled in the flame of fire, consuming matter in its attempt to ascend upward. Ultimately, the force of gravity associated with water supersedes the force of lightness connected with fire — just as the world’s grounding in materiality over-rides its inner desire to be consumed within Divinity. According to most physicists, the universe has already achieved its lowest level of energy distribution. This would mean, according to Kabbalistic faith, that the world is about to enter into a new state of symmetry.

    In conclusion, we now see how fundamental tenets of modern science — the underlying unity of nature, the uncertainty built into subatomic reality, and the universe’s tendency toward increasing dissipation — found in Kabbalistic belief at three junctures: the primordial past (belief in the initial Divine unity out of which Creation was conceived), the continuous present moment (belief in the ongoing construction of reality through refined consciousness), and the developing future (belief in the higher unity that will assert itself once every last element within Creation is illuminated by the soul).

    Kabbalah and Sufism

    Sufi is a form of Islam which typically places less emphasis on literal interpretations of Qur’an and hadith but instead focuses on mysticism and spirituality. Typical practices include dhikr (reciting the names of God) and some forms of mystical dance.  It can rightfully been argues as to whether Sufis are even Muslim, a separate Islamic denomination to Sunni/Shia or whether Sufi practice is included in normal Muslim beliefs. Despite the repeated protestations to the contrary, Sufism was infused from Kabbalah and may be more Gnostic than Islam in the inside. Sufism was endemic around the Mediterranean basin, surrounding Kabbalistic philosophers. Islamic mystics were not only ubiquitous in the areas where the Kabbalah emerged, but they had used as Gnostics the trail of mystical which the Kabbalah showed. While Jewish mysticism of the visceral, prophetic sort had been a decentralized, flaccid affair over the several hundred years prior to even Christianity,  Sufis had been assiduously following a path of personal union with God.

    Sufis became inspired by Jews such as Moses, Abraham and Obadyah Maimonides, Solomon Ibn Gabirol, Judah Halevi and many other philosophical ideas of Jewish mystical conceptions, thereby taking their first steps in this journey towards a mystical symbiosis.

    Kabbalah and Alchemy

    Since ancient times the close correlation between the kabbalistic Tree of Life and astrological charts, which could interpret personal paths of absolutely different individuals, was carefully studied by a great number of kabbalistic and astrological interested. Together they combined their wisdom and learned to see the signs sent by cosmos and understand them from the deeply kabbalistic point of view. These signs affect every living and not-living matter, every creature and object on the planet. Here the mapping is:

    kabbalahl_spheres
    kabbalahl_spheres
    1. Kether – Primum Mobile
    2. Chokmah – Zodiac (Fixed Stars)
    3. Binah – Saturn
    4. Chesed – Jupiter
    5. Geburah – Mars
    6. Tiphireth – Sol
    7. Netzach – Venus
    8. Hod – Mercury
    9. Yesod – Luna
    10. Malkuth – Earth

    There were seven classical planets including the sun and the moon, seven days in a week.  Below we see a hexagram with the planets displayed on it.kabbalahexagram

    In the Old World it was taught that the soul ‘descends from and returns to the stars’ via the planetary spheres. The order of descent was as you see above, from Saturn, to Jupiter, Mars, the Sun, Venus, Mercury, and the Moon. The Moon, at the bottom is the last sphere before reaching the earth plane, and since the moon rules Cancer, this was called the Gate of Birth. Saturn, at the top, rules Capricorn and is the last sphere before the stars, and is the Gate of Death.

    Conclusion

    NWO
    NWO

    Today, many people believe that humanity’s progress is approaching a dead end. Our past hopes for a better, happier life through scientific and economic progress have been overshadowed by a growing pessimism over what seems to be an impasse.

    We see that more and more people in the world are unable to find fulfillment. Once, we thought of ourselves as making great leaps forward, believing we were making substantial progress, but now we appear to be facing some kind of a wall.

    Humanity seems to be plunging into depression, greed and violence abound, and people are trying to disengage themselves from the world, and suppress their feelings. Terrorism and a rapid upsurge in natural disasters are symptoms of a global crisis, and all these states are leading humanity to one fundamental question: “What is the meaning of life?”

    It may be found in the Book of Zohar, that at the end of the twentieth century humanity will start asking about the meaning of life, and that the answer to this question, hidden in the ancient science of Kabbalah, can only be revealed in our time, precisely because of these challenging circumstances of the new world order.

    Sources:

    Stephan A. Hoeller “Der gnostische Jung und die sieben Reden an die Toten

    Jung, C. G. (Hg.) (1968). Der Mensch und seine Symbole. Olten: Walter

    Jung, C. G., Clarke, J. J. (1997): C. G. Jung und der östliche Weg. Hrsg. und mit einer Einl. von J. J. Clarke. Düsseldorf: Walter

    Jung, C. G., Jacobi, J. (1971 ): Mensch und Seele. Zitate von C. G. Jung aus dem Gesamtwerk 1905 bis 1961. Olten: Walter

    Jung, C. G., Wilhelm, R. (1938): Das Geheimnis der goldenen Blüte: Ein chinesisches Lebensbuch. Übersetzt und erläutert von Richard Wilhelm mit einem europäischen Kommentar von C. G. Jung. (1929) 2., revidierte und erweiterte Aufl. Zürich: Rasche

    C. G. Jung Das Rote Buch, Patmos-Verlag Olten, 2010

    C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters (Bollingen Series) [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

    C.G. Jung Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle

    C.G. Jung Four Archetypes (Routledge Classics)

    C. G. Jung Archetypen (dtv, Bd. 11)

    Mandala: Bilder aus dem Unbewussten (German Edition) [Hardcover] 2.Auflage Olten 1977

    Jung, C. G. (1973): Briefe I, 1906-1945; Briefe II 1946-1955;

    Briefe III 1956-1961. Olten: Walter

    Jung, C. G. (1976) The Visions Seminars. Zürich: Spring

    Jung, C. G. (1986): C. G. Jung im Gespräch. Interviews, Reden, Begegnungen. Zürich: Daimon. Herausgegeben von Hinshaw, R. Fischli, L.

    Jung, C. G. (1997): Die Zofingia-Vorträge. Mit einer Einführung von Marie-Louise von Franz. Hrsg. von Helga Egner. Düsseldorf : Walter

    Jung, C. G. (1998): Die Psychologie des Kundalini-Yoga.

    Herausgegeben von S. Shamdasani. Düsseldorf: Walter

    Jung, C. G., Jaffé, A. (1962): Erinnerungen, Träume, Gedanken von C. G. Jung. Aufgezeichnet und herausgegeben von Aniela Jaffé. Olten: Walter

    Jung, C. G., Kerényi, K. (1951): Einführung in das Wesen der Mythologie. Zürich: Rhein

    Jung, C. G., Pauli, W. (1952): Naturerklärung und Psyche. Zürich: Rascher (Download)

    Jung, C. G., Pauli, W. (1992): Ein Briefwechsel 1932 – 1958. Wolfgang Pauli und C. G. Jung. Hrsg. von Meier, C. A. Unter Mitarb. von Enz, C. P. und Fierz, M. Berlin: Springer

    C. G. Jung Grundausgabe

    C. G. Jung. (1963) Mysterium Coniunctionis. C.G. Jung Collected Works, Vol. 14, Translated by R.F.C. Hull. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Jung, C.G. Psychology and Religion. In Psychology and Religion: West and East. Collected Works, Vol. 10.

    Jung, C. G. (1968). Psychology And Alchemy. In C.G. Jung Collected Works, Vol. 12. (

    Pictures: Taken from a pdf published and freely available on the internet under public domain.

  • The wolf in us from an Jungian view: “lupus est homo homini”

    The wolf in us from an Jungian view: “lupus est homo homini”

    Recently I attended a catholic retreat in a Benedictine mountain monastery.  The theme was: The wolf in us.  We discussed the archetypes and myths of the wolf, a topic I had explored in great length before, their archetypes here and here. The point was raised, that the wolf represents greed, one of the seven deadly sins.  What was interesting, however, was  at some point the monk, an American Swiss, who can flawlessly yodel, let us howl like wolves. A quite devoted group of catholics from all walk of life became a wolf pack. My experience during this long Whitsun weekend with an intimate and less organisational approach to spirituality is what I want to write about. Because, as I see it, the wolf in us, seen from a Jungian view, is our untamed shadow, but also a great source of energy. This article is so the third in cycle of the archetype of the wolf, a personal defense of the wolf from German romanticism (or if you want from Rousseau’s nobel savage) and includes some of my unsystematic associations.  Nature never deceives us; it is always we who deceive ourselves – the philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

    St. Francis and the wolf of Gubbio

    animalschagall
    animalschagall

    The monk told us on the first day the most famous story of St. Francis is when he tamed the wolf that was terrorizing the people of Gubbio. While Francis was staying in that town he learned of a wolf so ravenous that it was not only killing and eating animals, but people, too. The people took up arms and went after it, but those who encountered the wolf were killed. The villagers became afraid to leave the city walls.

    Francis took pity on the people and the wolf as well and decided to go out and meet the wolf. He was desperately warned by the people, but he insisted that God would take care of him. A brave friar and several peasants accompanied Francis outside the city gate. But soon the peasants became terrified and said they would go no farther.

    Francis and his companion began to walk on. Suddenly the wolf, jaws wide open, charged out of the woods at the couple. Francis made the Sign of the Cross toward the wolf who immediately slowed down and closed its mouth. Then Francis called out to the wolf: “Come to me, Brother Wolf. I wish you no harm.” At that moment the wolf lowered its head and lay down at St. Francis’ feet, meek as a lamb.

    St. Francis explained to the wolf that he had been terrorizing the people, killing not only other animals, but humans as well. “Brother Wolf,” said Francis, “I want to make peace between you and the people of Gubbio. They will harm you no more and you must no longer harm them. All past wrongs are to be forgiven.”

    The wolf showed its assent by moving its body and nodding its head. Then to the absolute surprise of the gathering crowd, Francis asked the wolf to make a pledge. As St. Francis extended his hand to receive the pledge, so the wolf extended its front paw and placed it into the saint’s hand. Then Francis invited the wolf to follow him into town to make a peace pact with the townspeople. The wolf meekly followed St. Francis.

    By the time they got to the town square, everyone was there to witness the miracle. Then he offered the townspeople peace, on behalf of the wolf. The townspeople promised in a loud voice to feed the wolf.

    Apollo_Action
    Apollo_Action

    Then Francis asked the wolf if he would live in peace under those terms. He bowed his head and twisted his body in a way that convinced everyone he accepted the pact. Then once again the wolf placed its paw in Francis’ hand as a sign of the pact.From that day on the people kept the pact they had made. The wolf lived for two years among the townspeople, going from door to door for food. It hurt no one and no one hurt it.  When the wolf finally died of old age, the people of Gubbio were sad.

    Owning a Labrador,  actually I thought during the session the wolf in me says; Come to me, Brother. My Labrador retrievers never fails to amaze me when he puts his paw in my hand. Which he does at least every morning, when I come down to the basement giving him his two pieces of a treat. Labs are known for their voracious appetites and mine seems always hungry. Apollo, thats his name, will never turn down food except when not feeling well (or one rare exception italian Rucola salad). His the most negative behaviors that need to be curtailed is begging while I cook, making  long faces and pleading eyes. But is he or the wolf a symbol of greed?  I think not.  More a symbol of bonding. Both have developed the emotional need to constantly interact with the other members of the “pack”.

    The (human) wolf pack

    Wolfsklamm, gorge in Tyrol Alps in Karwendel
    Wolfsklamm, gorge in Tyrol Alps in Karwendel

    georgenberg

    Most of us in the group of 15 knew the open-minded monk (who is priest and psychoanalyst) and each other, from past exercitation – but wolf howling created an extra physical and psychological experience of belonging and trust. As did two days of long mountain hikes, where we held a proper holy masses, one time on a wide mountain meadow and on the next day in three parts  in two different churches and one capella. Again the experience was quite unique. Like wolves we roamed “our territory” with a resident monk, who explained us that most of this Tirol territory with its 20 high mountains still has been owned by the monastery in which we stayed. That opened many doors in this countryside area.

    waterfallpfinsten
    waterfallpfinsten

    We hiked up a waterfall  which carved out a deep canyon in limestone (called wolf gorge / Wolfsklamm). The Wolfsklamm in Karwendel impressed the nature lover with thundering waterfalls, emerald green pools and a  rising spray creating rainbows. The strong spring floods, the roar of the stream lead up to the monastery of St. George mountain pilgrimage. We walked further in the nature reserve Karwendel. Just before reaching the Stall Alm, we reached a wide alpine meadow for the open air mass. The monastery of St. George – St. Georgenberg – was a mountain hermitage, which was first mentioned in 950 for the first time in writing. St. George Berg, is the oldest place of pilgrimage throughout the Tyrol. The monastery still exists, it is a place of power and offers  personal retreats. We stayed this year down in the large monastery in Fiecht.

    While I walked up against the current of the water, I could not help but seeing in the water flow a symbol of going back in (my life) time. I saw blocks and trees in the rapid water, going up river water the water was calm. You never now what the future holds for oneself down the river.  I imagined a wolf pacing up the stones. Time is rapid water.
    There is eternal timeless truth within our universe which expands since 13.8 Billion years. To the Hindus this is just on of many Shiva’s dreams, a representation of the creation of the universe at the beginning of each cosmic cycle – a reminder that the universe now newly created… will billion of years from now will be utterly destroyed or vanish. Creation. Destruction. But the the deep canyon also reflects the eternal truth and overall time. At least within the realm of one of Shiva’s dreams.

    chapellpfingsten
    chapellpfingsten

    Now back to the real wolves an wolfs howl. The groups conclusion was, that wolves and people did not get along well because their social behaviors is so similar. To find the wolf in us we imitated how it would be like wolves. That means, observing like they walk and how they use several forms of verbal communication, including high-pitched-barks, yips, whines, whimpers, and howls. Like my Labrador dog also wolves whine and whimper as indication of either physical or emotional discomfort or if they are hungry. A yip might be heard when a Wolf is suddenly frightened or hurt during play or ritual combat. Barks or woofs are generally short and warn against the approach of intruders or to attract the attention of another Wolf within visual range. Of all the sounds, none are as famous, haunting, or beautiful (and frightening) as a Wolf’s howl. Wolves howl also alone or together for a variety of reasons. To notify other Wolves of their whereabouts; such as when they wish to attract a mate, rally the pack together for the hunt, when distressed, during or after playing and other social interactions, and often just for the fun of it.

    I have to admit it was fun to howl in a group, and actually the famous Bavarian or Tirol yodel may be a reminiscences of the lone howling (don’t try that in an urban environment):

    • Find a wide open space – opportune locations include fields, meadows, rolling hills, and/or the privacy of your own (large) backyard.
    • As the power rises within you, gather strength from your diaphragm and inhale deeply.
    • Exhale with force and feeling as you make an oval shape with your mouth.
    • During exhalation, let out a piercing and mournful cry,(also known as a “howl”) keeping your mouth in an oval shape
    • Let the howl resonate for seconds, gradually reducing inflection and fading out.
    • You can tell what a howl means by its pitch and strength. The longer the lasting, the more strength of the emotion. The higher the pitch, the happier the feeling. Quieter sounds mean more bland of an emotion.
    • Repeat if desired, until all frustration is let loose. Once howling has ceased, reflect on your wolf experience,It is better to do this with friends if your personality is like a “pack wolf” but if you’re a lone wolf..try doing it yourself. One howl a day keeps the doctor away.

    Howling sessions among multiple Wolves generally begin as a series of short yaps, then howls that last from less than a second to longer than ten seconds. During the howl the voice may maintain a single tonal quality or cascade from high down to low and then back up to high. Group howls can take on a truly frenzied quality, and two or three howling Wolves can sound like a dozen or more. Larger Wolves tend to have a lower sounding howl. A Wolf’s howl can be heard for up to ten miles under optimal conditions. Wolves can howl while standing, sitting, or laying down. Wolves do not howl at the moon as so many people like to romanticize, studies have shown no correlation to (Wer-)Wolves howling and lunar phase; Wolves just love to howl, period.

    Charismatic wolves

    pentecostal
    pentecostal

    Rousseau, said also once, the world of reality has its limits; the world of imagination is boundless, which I would translate in C.G.Jung’s claim, the religion is out of scope of the temporal world but the desire for it is in every men. By chance I talked one time with the monks about the new pope Francis I and the pentecostal movement. The question was what can we use as catholics  from “charismatic techniques” learning from the competition. I got mixed responses. A pragmatic response was, they spread the gospel, that is good. But not following liturgy literally raises also eyebrows. Once during dinner the head of the monastery greeted us and when we discussed our “three church mass” asked us quite ironically, he sure hopes we had celebrated catholic. It occurred to me then that our weekend experience was quite closer to the bible than to conservative church rituals and in a way proper catholic with some little charismatic sprinkles very appropriate to the special liturgy of Whitsun. We sung to the guitar every night after dinner and during the retreat sessions. The world of spirituality is boundless indeed.

    I’m not very familiar with the pentecostal churches (outpacing in Africa and South America any other religion) but I have written a bit about them consider them historically interesting.  Some have very charismatic leaders where everyone is memorised by their voice.  The music, speaking in tongues etc puts people into a trance-like state where they are open to suggestion.  Any person should know, who plays music to evoke the mood, to evoke emotion, to enable free thinking.  Are they the wolves in sheep clothes, or allies? There seemed to be a psychological connection between our howling in the group and the pentecostal trance – at least this was a Whitsun weekend. I know it is a clumsy, if not even an offending comparison, but I am suspicious of group experiences. Furthermorehowling with wolves is a not well-meaning proverb.

    Paul warned us that grievous wolves in sheep’s clothing would come into the Church. We know that in the history of the Church many wolves dressed in sheep’s clothing have devoured the flock. Today in our time there are many breeds of wolves in sheep’s clothing work in temporal institutions and religious organizations churches and ideologies dressed up as  religions that are decimating the flock like never before.  But is it? The writer and respected professor of  history and religious studies Philip Jenkins who is also the author of The Lost History of Christianity argues that the rapid growth of  Christianity around the world (both within and alongside existing traditions) will literally reshape the world, with possible religious and geopolitic conflicts.  Jenkins observes that especially Pentecostalism, mainly a protestant renewal movement within Christianity (German: Pfingstler, Pfingstkirche, Pfingstbewegung), is steadily winning  millions of follower in Latin America, South America, Africa, India, Malaysia, China, and Eastern Europe, including Russia. There is even a Catholic Charismatic Renewal, which  pope emeritus Benedict XVI once praised highlighting its positive contribution.  According to the U.S. urban specialist Mike Davis “Pentecostalism is the largest self-organized movement of urban poor in the world”.  Are they a wolf’s pack in a good sense to defend persecution, or wolves in sheep clothes?  Can learn Christians from wolves – giving the bad rap they have within the bible? I think, yes we can.

    windowpfinsten106The perils for Christians today are real.  In the very monastery a young christian refuge from South Sudan had one time dinner with us on Sunday. He told us his story. His whole family and all relatives had been killed.  He was assaulted as kid from the militias with machetes and survived  just because he protected his head with his hand stopping the machete with his wrist. This cost him half of his hand and he was left for dead in a pool of blood. His journey went then on through Tchad, Libia often helped by Christians and lastly via a cargo ship to Europe. I saw this boys smile and his hand, who lives now with kids mainly from Afghanistan in a sort of foster home until he is 18. I believe his story. Persecution and poverty of which so much are made in the New Testament literature is very much the context of the majority of today’s southern Christians (not to mention those who await their moment a half-century hence).  However, for whatever reason, Western investment in missions has been cut back dramatically at just the point it is most desperately needed, at the peak of the current surge in Christian numbers from self-centered European clergy. According to Philip Jenkins:  “For the average Western audience, New Testament passages about standing firm in the face of pagan persecution have little immediate relevance…. “Millions of Christians around the world do in fact live in constant danger of persecution or forced conversion, from either governments or local vigilantes.”

    When he says, “Looking at Christianity as a planetary phenomenon, not merely a Western one, makes it impossible to read the New Testament in quite the same way ever again”, he has a particular strong point pointing out the Book of Revelation. and that nevertheless, “Christianity is flourishing wonderfully among the poor and persecuted, while it atrophies among the rich and secure.”  We could learn from the wolves breathtaking ability to bundle strength in a pack.

    Conclusion

    wolfhowling
    wolfhowling

    lupus est homo homini, non homo, quom qualis sit non novit.“ The phrase is sometimes translated as “man is man’s wolf” or “man is a wolf to his fellow man.”  It is widely referenced when discussing the horrors of which humans are capable. But that Man to me is an errant Wolf not the Wolf an errant Man and I dislike Hobbes’s observation, claiming that all human are always inherently selfish.

    Yes, there have never been so many human wolves in sheep’s clothing attacking from so many directions. With mass media the grievous wolves in sheep’s clothing have access to many sheep and they are fleecing the flock like never before in history. Some prosperity confession and temporal (taxing) powers teach sheep that coming to the Great Shepherd is to partake in the abundant life that will be provided for them while they are still on the hoof. To become a partner in this abundant lifestyle sheep just need to send them a hundred pounds of wool each month (or a one time annual gift of a thousand pounds). In return, these wolves will send the sheep a collector item bell to wear around their neck to remind them how much they enjoyed being fleeced. But are they wolves?

    I agree with the idea being that Greed is a powerful, vicious force and a deadly sin. It is shameless in what it wants and how it takes it. Greed,  bites down hard and shakes and tears into things, it is untamed and straightforward and devours all it can.  While a greedy person may come off as wolfish, the actual feeling that one gets while in the grip of being greedy is unlike a wolf on the hunt. Pigs are better used to describe the so-called and admired star investors who shape our world today. Wolves in traditional symbolic meanings may differ from how an actual wolf behaves. Even the wolf of Gubbio was just hungry. I came to the conclusion after this retreat we were howling after what we lost, the connection to an untamed dangerous nature and the dream of the nobel savage.

    Freedom

    Many miles mankind went
    To reach this point
    They went to seek what they lost
    What they lost before time
    Before the first rays of light
    When men settled down more domesticated than their dogs

    Despair

    Men, they the warriors they once were

    They dedicated their existence to explore
    To control
    And to follow

    Eternity and enlightenment

    Men, they the thinkers they were
    ended up trivialized

    In a never-ending maze of

    Confusion

    Wolves so many lifetimes before
    Had reached those points
    Made the right decisions

    And so many lifetimes to go

    Greed and  darkness

    But Men still see only pieces of the
    Complete puzzle

    Emptiness
    They – the wolves they were
    Are now a never-ending maze of emptiness and

    Greediness
    The wolf their symbol for this major sin.
    Really? The Dow Jones is up.
    But the lone wolf still howls.

    And avoids men.

    2001-manIsMnsWolf
    2001-who is evil wolf or men

     

    Back in Munich, during a visit of the newly opened Lenbach House, I came across a  of this exuberant painting by the German painter Franz Marc (1880-1916.)  Marc’s paintings of animals, mostly horses, had fluidity, grace and deep emotion. In 1911, Franz Marc, along with August Macke and Wassily Kandinsky, founded Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider). They were a diverse group stylistically, but they held common beliefs in the spiritual nature of art, the link between visual art and music and the symbolic use of color to depict emotion. Sadly, Marc was killed by a shell splinter to the head in the Battle of Verdun in his twenties where people killed each other in the millions.