C.G.Jung / Leisure / Literature & Art / Music / Recent Events

Die Walküre at Opera for All 2026: A Review of Tobias Kratzer’s Production

Tobias Kratzer’s Die Walküre at Opera for All 2026 combined magnificent musical performances with visually compelling theatre. Yet despite its powerful imagery, the production never developed a coherent interpretation of Wagner’s central tragedy. Rather than illuminating Wotan’s metaphysical dilemma, it dispersed attention across several competing symbolic systems.

Introduction

This is a very personal take on yesterday’s Die Walküre, Part II of Richard Wagner’s famous Ring cycle (Ring 2025/26, premiere June, 25 2026)

Saturday, 4 July 2026, 5:00 p.m. Happy Fourth of July and 250th anniversary of the American revolution.

Live audiovisual broadcast from the National Theatre to Max Joseph Square as part of Opera for All. Admission free; no tickets required.

Cast

  • Sieglinde – Irene Roberts
  • Brünnhilde – Miina-Liisa Värelä
  • Fricka – Ekaterina Gubanova
  • Siegmund – Joachim Bäckström
  • Wotan – Nicholas Brownlee
  • Hunding – Ain Anger

Conductor: Vladimir Jurowski
Production: Tobias Kratzer


The Festival

For more than 130 years, the Munich Opera Festival has attracted opera lovers from around the world. As one of the oldest international opera festivals, its reputation extends far beyond the city and Germany itself. For around twenty years, the festival has also presented the free open-air event Opera for All, once again held yesterday on the newly refurbished Max Joseph Square.

Opera-for-All-2026-Valkyrie

The Musical Performance

The Bavarian State Opera clearly possesses everything required for productions of this calibre and has long been among the opera houses seeking new ways of presenting opera. Munich has every reason to be grateful for that.

Nicholas Brownlee, singing Wotan, combines commanding stage presence with even greater musical authority. His German diction is exceptionally clear. His voice fills the space with ease, possessing a rich baritonal timbre and impressive depth. He is a convincing Wotan.

I am neither a Wagnerian nor what today is called an expert, but, subjectively, Miina-Liisa Värelä’s Brünnhilde does not quite match him, although her overall performance is strong. I remember Anne Evans in Harry Kupfer’s 1988 production: when she sang “Hojotoho! Hojotoho! Heiaha! Heiaha!”, even before she appeared on stage one could almost see Brünnhilde riding furiously through the air.

Joachim Bäckström possesses a warm and highly appealing tenor as Siegmund. His partner, Irene Roberts, gives an excellent performance as Sieglinde, moving effortlessly between lyrical tenderness and emotional intensity while never being overwhelmed by the orchestra.

Since the charismatic conductor Vladimir Jurowski came to Munich, these Opera for All performances have become even more of a cult event for both younger audiences and those less accustomed to the rustle of jewellery in plush opera-house seats. I have admired him in several Academy concerts. Here he unleashes Wagner’s Walküre with tremendous passion, shaping the score with unwavering commitment. It is a performance well worth both hearing and seeing.


Tobias Kratzer’s Interpretation

A persistent feature of Regietheater—director-driven theatre in its less convincing form—is its tendency toward didactic finger-wagging: the desire to explain, to uncover the “true” meaning of the work, to understand composer and librettist better than the educated member of the audience (who, after all, has paid for the ticket), and to demonstrate the work’s contemporary relevance. The latter is entirely legitimate.

Tobias Kratzer undoubtedly approaches Wagner with profound understanding. Yet, as the saying goes, there is light and shadow in his realisation.

I remain a great admirer of Harry Kupfer’s Ring at Bayreuth. Occasionally Regietheater, as in Kupfer’s case, succeeds in creating something genuinely new. The austere aesthetic of that production, conceived in the waning years of the Cold War in 1988, remains palpable. Its minimalist staging strips away the heavy layers of Teutonic theatrical decoration. If one reads the Reclam edition of the text, the abstraction makes perfect sense. Heaven and the underworld—equally troubled and troubling—leave room for the psychological tragedy to emerge.

It is difficult to surpass Kupfer’s production, but equally difficult to do worse than last year’s Opera for All staging, one which Kratzer himself, between the lines, seemed to consider a bit too far.

Kratzer makes extensive use of video, often presenting flashbacks to events occurring between Das Rheingold and Die Walküre. His interpretation begins with the burning of the woodland cabin where Wotan had lived with his mortal wife and where Siegmund and Sieglinde spent their childhood. In an additional visual layer, the fire is later attributed to Fricka and Loge, the god of fire. Kratzer’s Ride of the Valkyries sweeping through Munich is an attractive sequence, and although similar imagery had already appeared (Western Style) in the 1970s television series Münchner Geschichten, it is beautifully filmed.

Where Kratzer is less persuasive is in replacing one layer of theatrical convention with another. Rather than removing the cumbersome realism of traditional staging, he overlays it with an equally cumbersome critique of the petty bourgeoisie: a cheap prefabricated house, something resembling a Land Rover, and a ram hunted by Hunding, the oppressive husband of Sieglinde.


The Wälsung twins Siegmund’s and Sieglinde

In Kratzer’s backstory, Wotan lives with his mortal wife and the Wälsung twins in a woodland cabin a peaceful and rewarding family life. While hunting with his son, the cabin is consumed by fire killing his wife. Subsequently separated in childhood, Siegmund and Sieglinde suffer profound isolation. Siegmund becomes a hunted outcast, forever fleeing society’s laws. Sieglinde is trapped in an abusive and loveless marriage to Hunding, the embodiment of rigid bourgeois morality. When Siegmund seeks refuge in Hunding’s house, the twins recognise one another not merely as brother and sister, but as psychological mirrors.

Their bond later develops into an incestuous love. They do not experience it as a transgression, but rather as a return to an original, uncorrupted wholeness.

In Wagner’s drama, Siegmund draws the sword Notung from the ash tree into which Wotan had thrust it—a weapon destined only for the greatest hero. In Kratzer’s production, however, the sword comes from a tool shed instead. This outrages Fricka, the goddess of marriage, who is both magnificently sung and convincingly portrayed. She demands that Wotan swear to avenge this violation of marriage by abandoning his own children.

Wotan’s Central Tragedy

Kratzer intensifies the scene considerably. Fricka dismembers the ram, pulling out its entrails and heart while ordering Wotan to destroy the offspring of his adulterous relationship by supporting Hunding in combat. To reinforce her argument, she waves Siegmund’s underwear as incriminating evidence.

Yet this seems inconsistent with Kratzer’s own interpretation. He has argued that Fricka persuades Wotan not because the twins are products of his long-standing extramarital affair, but through the force of her rhetorical sophistication. However, both Wagner’s text and Kratzer’s imagery appear to contradict that reading.

The more compelling argument is, in my view, Wotan’s own explanation to Brünnhilde. There he reveals that he is ensnared by the very contracts and obligations through which he rules the world, and by the consequences of Alberich’s realm beneath the earth. This tragic self-awareness—not merely Fricka’s moral outrage—is what ultimately seals Siegmund’s fate.

Kratzer has remarked that immortality is itself a burden. That is an intriguing premise. One can easily imagine that an eternal marriage—whether Wotan’s with Fricka or Zeus’ with Hera—would carry its own peculiar misery. The gods may possess limitless time, but not necessarily freedom or happiness.

Yet this idea never fully develops into the production’s central dramatic argument.

Instead, Kratzer seems to ask a different question: what do gods do in a godless age? Hunding’s house is cluttered with religious icons and domestic altars. He compels Sieglinde to participate in empty rituals and appears as the stereotype of a religious hypocrite who uses faith to justify domestic tyranny. Even Wotan seems repelled by him.

Hunding sacrifices a ram to Fricka, who disembowels the animal with bloodied hands while demanding Siegmund’s death. The image is visually striking, but its symbolic meaning remains elusive. Is religion itself being indicted? Is Fricka exposed as merely another bloodthirsty deity? Or is the production suggesting that religious morality ultimately serves violence? None of these possibilities is developed sufficiently to become the production’s governing idea.

The extensive flashbacks projected onto the screen are often beautifully realised. The opening images of an idyllic family—Wotan with his mortal wife and the Wälsung twins in a woodland cabin—create genuine emotional investment. Their destruction by fire and Sieglinde’s abduction effectively establish the family’s trauma. Yet almost all of this background is already narrated in Wagner’s libretto. The projections illustrate rather than reinterpret.

More importantly, they shift attention away from what is, in Wagner’s drama, the central conflict: not the childhood of the twins, but Wotan’s impossible predicament.

Wotan’s tragedy is not that he has become unhappy in his marriage, nor even that he cannot save his children. His tragedy is metaphysical. He has created a legal and political order that now binds him. The ruler of the gods discovers that he is no longer sovereign. Every attempt to preserve his power only strengthens the system that deprives him of freedom. His great monologue to Brünnhilde is therefore not merely paternal grief but the confession of a ruler trapped by his own laws.

Kratzer stages Wotan’s despair through repeated attempts at suicide, slashing his wrists. Yet this never becomes convincing. An immortal being cannot escape his predicament by dying. His despair lies precisely in the impossibility of death. If immortality is the premise, suicide becomes a literal gesture for a fundamentally metaphysical condition.


“Heroes” in Kratzer’s reading

This leads to a further question concerning the representation of the male figures and so-called “heroes” in Kratzer’s reading.

Siegmund appears less to me as a mythic figure or tragic outsider than as a physically imposing but psychologically subdued man, almost passive in his own fate.

Wotan similarly no longer reads as the ruler of a collapsing metaphysical order, but rather as a figure who has already lost authority without fully articulating the nature of that loss. His struggle with the underworld, the gods, and Fricka’s moral claims remains visually present, yet its philosophical dimension is only partially developed.

Hunding, by contrast, is rendered with much clearer definition: he becomes a socially coded figure of bourgeois rigidity and domestic authoritarianism. While this is theatrically legible, it risks reducing him to a satirical type. In Wagner, Hunding is more than a social caricature; he functions as an expression of law, survival, and violence stripped of justification. When reduced to a contemporary stereotype, this complexity is diminished.

For me, this leaves the production without a fully coherent narrative or reading of the protagonists. Its individual images are often memorable, but they never quite crystallise into an interpretation that illuminates Wagner’s central tragedy.

My reservation is not directed against reinterpretation itself. Opera has always invited new readings. Rather, I wonder whether the additional narrative truly grows out of Wagner’s drama. The libretto already provides extraordinarily rich material—psychological, philosophical, and political. If a production adds another conceptual layer, it should sharpen those conflicts, not obscure them. Otherwise, the audience is left with impressive images whose relationship to the central tragedy remains uncertain.

Wagner’s Ring is already extraordinarily dense. Every motif, every dialogue, every dramatic turn serves multiple functions. When a director adds another symbolic system—religious oppression, the nuclear family, contemporary politics—it must earn its place. Otherwise, the original network of meanings becomes diluted rather than enriched.


Comparison with Harry Kupfer

A useful point of comparison is Harry Kupfer’s Ring, particularly its opening conception of Die Walküre. Kupfer’s Bayreuth Ring demonstrates that radical abstraction need not obscure Wagner’s dramaturgy. His minimalist stage language consistently serves a single conceptual idea. One may disagree with his interpretation, but it remains internally coherent. Kratzer’s production, by contrast, offers a succession of compelling theatrical images without arriving at an equally clear interpretative centre.

In Harry Kupfer’s legendary Bayreuth Ring production (1988–1992, designed by Hans Schavernoch), the traditional World Ash Tree (Weltesche) in Die Walküre was reimagined within a bleak, post-apocalyptic universe.

The Ash Tree concept is central to this vision:

  • The “Road of History”: an endless cracked asphalt highway stretching into a foggy void, symbolising the trajectory of human civilisation.
  • Dead metallic trunk: the ash tree reduced to a skeletal vertical structure.
  • Ecological collapse: a metaphor for a world ruined by Wotan’s system of power.
  • Siegmund’s entrance: his descent into Hunding’s shelter through this fractured landscape.

By contrast, Kratzer’s approach relies heavily on cinematic layering, flashbacks, and external visual commentary. While often visually compelling, these elements remain detached from Wagner’s text rather than emerging from its internal logic. The result is interpretative multiplication: instead of a single governing spatial idea that evolves, several parallel explanatory systems coexist. This may enrich perception in the short term, but it can also dilute the dramaturgical necessity central to Wagner’s construction. Kratzer introduces numerous interpretative motifs—religious ritual, domestic violence, cinematic flashbacks, ecological imagery and the modern nuclear family. Individually these changes are often theatrically effective. Collectively, however, they do not converge upon a single reading of the drama. Rather than clarifying Wotan’s predicament, they disperse the audience’s attention across several competing symbolic systems.

Why the Religious Symbolism Doesn’t Convince

Kratzer’s religious imagery appears to originate less in Wagner’s text than in a contemporary symbolic vocabulary linking patriarchy, religious ritual, and domestic oppression. While theatrically intelligible, this association seems not developed by Wagner himself. Hunding represents law, custom, and clan obligation rather than institutional religion, while Fricka’s victory over Wotan rests primarily on the force of her argument rather than ritual or sacrifice. Consequently, the production shifts the audience’s attention from Wagner’s philosophical debate toward a symbolic discourse of its own.The third act (Aufzug) I leave uncommented. I listened to the broadcast of the premiere. The music was beautiful.

Conclusion

That is ultimately why I remain unconvinced. I admired many individual scenes—the flashbacks, the cinematography, the Ride of the Valkyries through Munich—but left the theatre without a clear sense of the production’s governing idea. Wagner’s Ring is already one of the most intellectually and dramatically complex works in the operatic repertoire. A new interpretation need not simplify that complexity, but it should help us see it more clearly.

As a review of Tobias Kratzer’s Die Walküre at Opera for All 2026, my conclusion remains mixed. The musical performance was exceptional, but the staging never quite clarified the metaphysical tragedy at the heart of Wagner’s drama

Richard Wagner PRIMARY SOURCE APPARATUS

  • Robert Donington, Richards Wagner’s Ring des Nibelungen und seine Symbole (Wagner’s Ring and its Symbols) Reclam 1978
  • Das Rheingold, Richards Wagner, Reclam 5641
  • Die Walküre, Reclam 5642
  • Siegfried, Reclam 5643
  • Götterdämmerung, Reclam 5644

Richard Wagner Links

My Review Harry Kupfer Wagner Ring cycle

Opera for All

Richard Wagner from Scene to Scene utilizing C.G. Jung

Vladimir Jurowski

Bavarian State Opera

My review of Götterdämmerung

Leave a Reply