Category: Philosophy

  • The hero myth in a post-heroic society – seen from a Jungian view

    The hero myth in a post-heroic society – seen from a Jungian view

    Our identities as individual or as group are shaped by our heroes and the hero myths. Likewise our enemies (villains) define what we are not, or refuse to be ( Shadow in a Jungian sense). Postmodern philosopher pointed out, however, that the romantic attitude toward heroes made fascism possible and is also contra to Kant’s enlightenment and rationality. His dream of everlasting peace seemed to have succeeded in today’s post-heroic society, which has no desire for war nor heroes. Post-heroic societies are characterized in replacing passion, sacrifice and honor, by prosperity, temporal pleasures and personal happiness as guiding principles. This essay wants to explore the current interpretation of peace and hero myth, which symbolizes a personality formation which occurs only through struggle, suffering, and sacrifice. Does that mean the Jungian Hero myth died? How does a world without heroes look like? As it will shown, the discarded hero creeps back as two imperfect warrior archetypes (the weak and the cruel) as defined in my article: King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine.

    Jung developed an understanding of archetypes as being “ancient or archaic images that derive from the collective unconscious”. There are many different archetypes, and Jung has stated they are limitless, but basic  archetypes (here functional complexes) in every person  include the ‘persona’, the ‘shadow’, the ‘anima’, the ‘animus’,  and the Self.  Four more archetypes “per se”  are prominently mentioned by C.G. Jung; ‘great mother’, the ‘trickster’ , the archetype of rebirth (transformation) and  spirit, the wolf can represent them all and more. Wolves reaching maturity leave the family pack (disperse) routinely for a dangerous quest for a princess or prince and own territory. It is interesting that so the wolf in a strange way can represent the hero and heroine too.

    The hero myth – basic plot of the hero’s journey.

    Night Journey
    Night Journey

    Inwardly, the whole history of the human race, back to the most primitive times, lives on in us and myths reflect the archetypes  of the  collective unconscious, universal themes which run through all human life.  A strong element is the line between good and evil, right and wrong, is crystal clear; it is absolute, like in Chinese wuaxi stories one can see the Archetypes of the shadow, animus and anima of the personal unconsciousness. The Chinese wuxia stories can be contrasted with martial codes from other countries, such as the Japanese samurai’s bushido tradition, the chivalry of medieval European knights and America’s Western but moral and laws of physics may not apply in this grene. But all hero myths contains a dangerous hero’s journey. Joseph Campbell recognized a basic pattern in many of those narratives and has named those necessary stages of  such a journey:

    • Separation and departure from the safe haven of home or childhood,
    • Initiation,
    • The fight or the underworld,
    • Return and reintegration.

    To accomplish his quest, the hero will need to call on his own strengths. These qualities are represented as companions with different qualities. The hero archetype and the warrior archetype are not the same although warriors per definition strive to be heroic. Heroes, however, are almost always the most unlikely person possible. The hero myth is also a symbol for transformation and a hero’s journey represents the Jungian individuation in the search of oneself and transcendence.

    In response to the call the hero undertakes a journey, usually a dangerous journey to an unknown region full of both promise and danger. Often the journey is a descent. Sometimes, as with Horus, Christ, and Psyche, it is a descent into the depths — the sea, the Egyptian underworld, or Hades itself. Always there is a perilous crossing. Sometimes the faintheartedness of the hero is balanced by the appearance of guardians.

    The ultimate epic, Homer’s Iliad, along with its companion-piece, the Odyssey, was venerated by the ancient Greeks themselves as the cornerstone of their civilization.The ancient Greek concept of hero (the English word is descended from the Greek), going beyond the word’s ordinary levels of meaning. In ancient Greek myth, heroes were humans, male or female, of the remote past, endowed with superhuman abilities and descended from the immortal gods themselves. In some stories, only gods miraculously restored the hero’s to life after death – a life of immortality. The story of Herakles, is perhaps the most celebrated instance. But even in such a case, the hero has to die first.

    The post-heroic society

    The hero myth
    Wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing or the other way around

    The post-heroic society is the socio-political foundation on which Kant’s ideal of ​​lasting peace abuses is characterized by three factors:

    • Open aggression is no option more – nobody wants to slay wolves or dragons anymore.
    • Then there is the demographic decline in reproductive rate –  instead of princesses and heaven the only goal is a status quo with the end in sight.
    • The place of the hero has been taken over by the victim.
    • Wars are outsourced by ‘rentier economies’.

    Finally, and in this attribute is mostly explored in this essay, post-heroic societies are cultural and spiritual cooled societies, whereby the central mobilizer for the sacrifice and endurance of hardship is missing. The contemporary French philosopher Pascal Bruckner called this “The sickness of modernity: I suffer so I am”. For a while religions had been substituted by extreme nationalism and political ideologies. Ideologies became, as Jung observed, particularly with person cults quasi-religions and led to disastrous results. With the erosion of the hero myths and its substitutes there is no socially accepted creation of meaning for neither heroes not even for victims.

    The long war

    Post-heroic societies pretend to pacify on their margins and peripheries, some say even marginalize male virtues within its area of influence (education, media) and seem to avoid open confrontation for as long as possible. Their sword has been exchanged by a dagger and poison – drones and financial warfare. There are no accepted archetypes anymore, when their mercenaries or soldiers come home they will be neglected. We speak of them as victims when their right to compensation is contested. Internal repression and  external aggression become interchangeable. One speaks of humanitarian interventions, of a “responsibility to protect” and so on. Under these circumstances, the eternal peace remains a project in the nascent state, a dream always slipping out of reach, or one, of which one is always rudely awakened. Of course such peaceful societies still must alway have their villains and are constantly in war.

    The lost Self

    The long internal and external war
    The long internal and external war

    The post-heroic society never sets out for a quest and subsequently never returns home. Without separation and departure,  the post-heroes never go through  an initiation, instead stay as children, victims, consumer and entitlement receivers. The individual never encounters his(her Self. Furthermore, as we can clearly see, the World Society as a whole is not post-heroic. The problem with this development is, that the post-heroic societies are surrounded by pre-heroic archaic societies and heroic warrior societies. You have to resist the threats emanating from them and intervene again and again to keep the challenges of peripheral control. As a result, post-heroic societies develop theorems, where aggression (war) is transformed into a model of a repression (police action), and outsourced aggression. Highly interesting is that also the opposite transformation happens, as post-heroic societies become destabilized not only by demographic problems but intrinsic contradictions.

    The post-heroic society and transcendence

    trust_the_lies_not_the-truth.
    trust_the_lies_not_the-truth.

    Post-heroic societies pretend generally strive for heaven on earth. To many it seems, they create more hell on earth, but surely they have no concept of transcendence nor a desire for a hero’s quest.  The Jungian shadow of the Western suppressed aggression are the international brigades of jihadism, which as it is said again and again, deny our universal values, political structures and social orders. A culture of death challenges the West on the preservation of the status quo. The emergence  of armed agents of change point to the main problem of worldly eternal peace: that it is based on the preservation of the status quo and resists any dynamic change  to destroy that peace. The everlasting peace is ultra rigid and sterile, and its hollow void is its Achilles heel. Post-heroic are dead societies, spiritual deaf  and ironically those are not peaceful societies. The heroic, or presumptuous, stretch for transcendence of religions, is simply beyond the imaginative reach of this post-heroic personage. It is a Freudian world, success is measured in money and sex where fear of death cannot by mitigated by spirituality and individuation. Why is that? Because the West is doomed to rationality by giving up intuition and and emotions. This changing view of emotions in philosophy is consistent with an emerging interest in emotion among moral psychologists, who suggest that emotions are related to or mediate various forms of ethical or unethical behavior. All emotions are responses to perceived changes, threats, or opportunities in the world, but in most cases it is the self whose interests are directly affected by these events. In contrast, moral emotions are connected to social events that often do not directly affect self-interest.

    The post-heroic society and peace

    logo_49549_paro

    In the modern Western world media has tended to engage in forms of evangelism and apologetics that emphasize rational argumentation in order to defend the accepted worldview and as a means of communicating images and symbols.  Therefore there is a significance of myths in popular culture, particularly for various new  movements, how popular culture and these religious movements often draw upon mythic archetypes and symbols.  Myths have long provided people and their cultures with narratives to live by. In the modern scientific age we are used to thinking of myths as unhistorical and false, but there are a variety of ways in which to think of myths and scholars define them variously. Myth have been defined as as “a story with culturally formative power” . The western symbol of peace is of course the paradise. Contrary to the Biblical story of paradise as a place of eternal peace, which had been destroyed by people under the influence of evil, is the worldly peace, historically considered to be achieved through political and cultural power of the people. Recent work on the history of violence claim that archaic societies must have been much more violent than modern societies even considering the terrible wars in the first half of the 20th century. The argument goes, violence seems to have been a constant companion of life in archaic societies. However, the same is true today today:  peace is just a pause in the long violence caused by the competition for scarce goods.

    We have not become increasingly peaceful in the course of our recent history, neither not in a continuous, nor in a development with setbacks. Extrapolating this trend into the future, the expectation that of war as organized violence will finally  disappear, is completely absurd.

    The dream of everlasting peace is old. This expectation is not new, but we find it already with the prophet Isaiah, with some writers in the context of the Emperor Augustus, especially Virgil, later in the philosopher  Kant. The dream of everlasting peace has been spelled out in quite different ways to make the hoped or expected transition from the dream of the real state plausible. It is the counter blueprint of St. Augustine “City of God”. In Isaiah, it is an eschatological peace: God himself intervenes, destroying the bad and transforming nature in such a way that all living beings can live together peacefully. There is peace not only between people, but also among animals. This is on the other end of the contemporary hero myth, that of the lone hero who rescues and regenerates society through violence.

    The post-heroic society and war

    By the dawn of the Middle Ages, successful states gradually managed to gain monopoly over the means of (legitimate) violence. Today even military violence tends to be hidden or dressed as video game. The hero’s death is a particular kind of mortality. This category imposed itself in a specific historical and cultural  context. In the domain of military death, it is not uncommon to meet expressions such as:‘‘hero,’’ ‘‘sacrifice not done in vain,’’ ‘‘patriotism,’’ ‘‘price to pay in the defense of liberty,’’ and so on. However, death is not a virtue in the current Western armed forces. Two experiences led us to this post-heroic stage: the monstrous sacrifice of mass heroism in World War I, and the misuse of the terms “honor” and “sacrifice” driven by totalitarian regimes in World War II. There is also demographic development. One-child families have a very different relationship to the loss of sons in the service of a nation than families with six or more children and a high child mortality rate.

    dronesThe post-heroic weak warrior

    The new post-heroic warrior might be a drone operator as shown left, an oligarch, a bankster or a corporate mercenary. Post-heroism  rests on the assumption, that war today is no longer fueled by heroic motivations, and does not produce any popular public heroes, particularly in “modern” societies. Willingness to kill or die for the cause of one’s socio-political community appears to be either a phenomenon of an historical stage that such states have long left behind, or an indicator of nationalistic or religious fanaticism. This is what has been described as the ‘post-heroic condition’ of societies. According to this view, demographic and cultural changes in the west have severely decreased the tolerance for any hardship. Today’s everlasting peace rapes the earth. This peace is at war with the creation. The peace within ourselves is put down as dream, on which all later peace ideas are based but because it exceeds the possibilities of human action, it must remain a dream.
    This dream of a peaceful time, connected into the Golden Age, with the mythical motif of the birth of a child, a peaceful hero is dismissed, only seen as mythological and literary exaggeration of an imperium, in which the competition of powers has been replaced by an unitlateral power. The West claims that God is dead and religious promise and political reality have converged today. Their guiding ideology would be the reign of Emperor Augustus, and its justification for the dissolution of the Republic as political ideal, against which all todays regulatory structures must be measured, because Augustus peace is an indicative measure of good government. In short, this view of peace throws spirituality and freedom together in the trash bin. The Iliad by Homer depicts the events of the Trojan War, with Achilles being the central character. The Greeks gathered all of their forces to attack the city of Troy led by Agamemnon and his brother Menelaus. Achilles initially declined the summons to war. but then fought fearlessly at Troy and distinguished himself as the best of the Greek warriors. When Achilles did not fight for the Greeks, the Trojans prevailed in battle. Not fully immortal, Achilles had one weak spot, his heel. The Achilles heel reflects not only individual’s weakness but the weakness of all heroes.

    The post-heroic cruel warrior (villain)

    IMF

    History repeats itself. Eight hundred years ago, the  Assassins a fanatical sect of Shi’ite Muslims, who had broken away in the late eleventh century from the Fatimids, the main Shi’ite regime, set themselves up in the Elburz mountains in northern Persia and later in the mountains of the Lebanon; their leader became known to the Franks as ‘the Old Man of the Mountains’.  In 1173, the King of Jerusalem, Amalric I (1162–74), attempted to negotiate an alliance with the Assassins, as Amalric was given to believe that the Old Man of the Mountains was about to convert to Christianity, as the Old Man had, just a few years earlier, abrogated the law of the Prophet and proclaimed the Millennium, thus making himself and the rest of the sect heretical. Traditional Islam was declared heresy. The Qiyama heresy was promulgated in Syria by the charismatic Assassin leader Sinan. He was a contemporary and sometime ally of both Saladin and Richard Lion-heart. The Syrian Assassins were the channel by which the Ismaili Gnostic current entered the Knights Templar Order which had uneasy and shifting relations with the Assassins.The medieval assassin, who was once the typical representative of asymmetric weakness, is now the terrorist, in particular the suicide bomber.

    WARNING GRAPHIC, RAW PHOTOS -- ISIS on Christians: ' By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
    WARNING GRAPHIC, RAW PHOTOS — ISIS on Christians: ‘
    By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

    Today, the Internet is the most popular means for recruiting from post-heroic societies, leading, and training terrorists. Guerrilla war was defensive, the war of terror is offensive. It takes place on the enemy’s territory. Like its enemy, the state, the terrorist, does not need the support of the population. It uses the  vulnerable infrastructure of the enemy. The medieval assassins targeted individuals, politicians, business leaders, and law enforcement agencies; instead today the target is public opinion, the Jungian archetypes structure of society.

    Symbols like landmark buildings, mobility carrier, public space, consume: the randomness of the victim selection is intended to spread worldwide fear and terror (hence “terrorism”) with the help of the sensation-obsessed media, create uncertainty, destroy confidence in the future. The murdered people are not the target, rather the survivors are, every one of us.

    With pictures like convoy of stolen vehicles  – and also with the horrible video of murder  – the new dragons target the people through the possibilities of modern communication. The asymmetrically weak person, the terrorist, has a very different relationship with time and space than the opponent, who is looking for a defined territory to dominate (Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon), and is in a hurry. The costs of war are enormous for the opponent, the patience of his own population is limited; without rapid victory, the legitimacy of political and military leaders quickly fades. The asymmetrically fighting weak person knows no defined territory. He is omnipresent, virtual and global. They know, victory depends not on tactical and operational successes, but instead on taking over the space of symbols to instill archetypal fear.  The act of beheading is preferred because it is gruesome and intimate. It’s painful and excruciating to the victim and takes time as opposed to simply being shot. Crude methods of execution are intended to serve as torture and intimidation. Note the arrangement of the four Alawites victims heads. Even crucifixions are being performed.

    The sacred whore is back

    “sacred whore;”
    “sacred whore;”

    The Whore of Babylon is the epitome of self deception. To understand the mystery of the whore and her evil city, we must familiarize ourselves with the culture of the architects that laid Babylon’s foundation; Semiramis and her son Nimrod. As a child, she listened Semiramis her Grandfather recite the sad history which led up to the great flood. Noah and his three sons had personally witnessed an entire civilization degrade into moral chaos. Although a dark chapter of man’s history came to an abrupt end, God predicted that mankind’s rebellion would continue.

    Volumes of books have been written about Mystery Babylon. The word “Babylon” represents confusion.  This means the place and origin of language confusion or where having different speech that causes confusion began.  Confusion or Babylon additionally meant not able to decide, determine, or think and understand according to one language or interpretation.  There was then a division between the mystery of Babylon and the revelation that came down to Abraham.  With a new religious interpretation manufactured by Nimrod and his wife Simeramus, this new mystic gnostic system was behind the building of the tower of Babel.  Mystery Babylon then represents all the present gates to hell.  Her religious perversion bring chaos, division, and confusion upon the minds and lives of her devotees.  Jerusalem is called a city of *confusion* in Isaiah 24:10. Because of the mixture of gnosticism and mysticism many chose  to seek sin, pleasure, wealth, cult practices, and philosophy.

    Much later, Immanuel Kant  design  of a comprehensive legalization of international relations reasoned on a largely deterministic evolution of society in peace. In this  society in which no violence, but work distribution of goods and life. Instead divine action or the uncontrollable course of history the political reason or social development ruled. For a short while the criticism of the idea of ​​perpetual peace became more vocal: It was no longer enough to dismiss it as a dream or a utopia, but to maintain the functionality of the war for the ordering of society and the development of humanity. Human race developed from a heteronomous  creature to take fate in its own hand to the post-heroic society of today. The Whore of Babylon again  rides the Seven-Headed Dragon. Like in John’s day the Whore represented the  emperor, and the Dragon the Empire. She rides the Dragon side-saddle, like the Great Lady she is, or pretends to be, riding in a rich red and purple robe, a Venetian-style dress like those worn by the most expensive whores of that city. In her right hand she holds a “golden cup”.

    Conclusion

    a-philosophy-now-cover

    The archetype of  the King. Warrior, the Magician and the Hero are all in trouble today. What we are witnessing at the moment in which negative archetypes produce deceiving mirages – symbols so false that they are the lever for the self-destruction when ‘no peace’ is a disguise for war. 

    Update: This post from 2014 has aged well. Back then, I wrote: “Our peaceful, post-heroic societies are not peaceful at all, but rather extremely vulnerable and easy to manipulate.” 2026: The pursuit of “Everlasting European Peace” (Pax Europaea), a centuries-old political philosophy tracing from the early Enlightenment and the Westphalian Peace as a diplomatic paradigm, to the framed imago of the European Union as an elite peace project, has revealed the global twilight condition: not yet a direct global war, but one literally claimed by elites as a state of “not peace.” As I wrote then, the discarded hero has crept back. He returned in the form of two imperfect warrior archetypes: the weak warrior and the cruel warrior. Today, in 2026, I would add imperfect king archetypes rule the post-heroic twilight from their castle(s), governing in increasingly autocratic ways while outsourcing their wars to warriors roaming without moral guardrails. Meanwhile, the globalist agenda(s) have acquired an increasingly unmistakable transhumanist scent. The promise of perpetual peace in reality looks increasingly like perpetual war.

    A not so secretive power elite with a globalist agenda may eventually rule the world through an authoritarian transhuman maze from more than one castle. No heroes are needed, roaming of violence under sheep is not objected. Today’s numerous historical and current events can be seen as steps in an on-going plot to strive for financial powers and manipulated decision-making processes.  Pope Francis urged the world on September,13th 2014, to shed its apathy in the face of what he characterizes as a third world war, intoning “war is madness”, The pope said “even today, after the second failure of another world war, perhaps one can speak of a third war, one fought piecemeal, with crimes, massacres, destruction.” Pope Francis said also these wars are driven by “interests, geopolitical strategies, lust for money and power, and there is the manufacturing and selling of arms.”

    God is dead said Nietzsche.  Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was a 19th-century German philosopher wrote critical texts on religion, morality, contemporary culture, philosophy and science. Nietzsche’s influence remains substantial within and beyond philosophy, notably in existentialism and postmodernism, the gateway to today’s state of society. His key ideas include the death of God, perspectivism, the Übermensch, the eternal recurrence, and the will to power. The latter we see paired with boundless narcissism. In  short, without heroes and religion we are what we are.

    The Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact (2005), by Jean Baudrillard

    Mythology Comte, 1988

    Der Mensch und seine Symbole, C.G. Jung, Jaffe Olten 1968

    Richard Wagner, Ring des Nibelungen und seine Symbole, Donnington (Transl)

    Wes Nisker, 1990 Crazy Wisdom

    C.G. Jung Four Archetypes (Routledge Classics)

  • Rethinking the Banality of the Good

    Rethinking the Banality of the Good

    The Banality of the Good or for many the most evil man in the world right now, seems to be a  retired lieutenant colonel of the Russian KGB, who is determined to reestablish the Soviet empire, to invade world and was likened to Hitler by a leading politician of a superpower. To others, President Vladimir Putin is a judo-chopping, IMF-taming, U.S.-defying global hero. But according to  the controversial biography of  Stanislav Belkovsky, a star columnist at a Moscow tabloid,  former speechwriter and insider, Putin represents the “Banality of the Good” (quote).  The striking similarity with Hannah Arendt’s remark, one of the 20th century’s great political thinkers did catch my eye and let me finish his book, which has its weaknesses. Now if “being good” is all, after a string of rumours and dirty laundry, which may or may not be true, what Stanislav Belkovsky, sworn enemy of Putin, came up against him, there must be something unworthy with all of us, not belonging to the élite.  I long fancied to write a psychological study of Putin, motivated by the C.G. Jung interview of H.R. Knickerbocker 1938 in the Cosmopolitan , reprinted in C.G. Jung Speaks (page 115-135). To qualify the banality of the good (or the evil) I will follow C.G. Jung’s method, the money flow and the little I really know about the person Putin – that is some minor direct account, my own remote observation, his own account and what his enemies say.

    The Banality of the Good and Evil

    This is how one understands the banality of the good: In order to gain a sense of selfworthiness of a normal citizen, it is not needed to be an hero or to be sacrified on the cross. It is completely sufficient (and required) to take good care of and raising kids, pay taxes, go to work, obey rules and laws. And not because one would be punished hard for not obeying them, but because one sees them as mandatory and essential in a sense of the Kant’s imperative.

    The Banality of the Good is often likened to the secondary virtues or vices. Secondary virtue was an important term of the German positivism dispute in the 1970s / 1980s.  Secondary virtues or civic virtue characteristics were classified as those virtues, which contribute to the practical accomplishment of everyday tasks and a trouble-free” operation of a society without having intrinsic ethical significance, provided they are not used to implement the primary moral virtues but held up as means in itself: Diligence, loyalty, obedience, discipline, sense of duty, punctuality, reliability, tidiness, courtesy, cleanliness.  That one can with “secondary virtues” easily run a concentration camp, was thrown at a fomer German chancellor Helmut Schmidt once. And this very assessment, secondary virtues and having a tendency to choose “non-Machiavelli none-elite” friends,  was the most serious allegation Stanislav Belkovsky brought up, besides Putin’s alleged accumulated wealth. Interesting circle, bringing us back to Hannah Arendt’s banality of evil of which I have written here, isn’t it? 

    Putin through the eyes of C.G. Jung

    Putin’s Ego

    Starting point of the consideration is Putin’s reportedly rather unhappy childhood. It does not matter if the gossip version of the birth and childhood of Putin states is true, that the future Russian President was born two years before the date that is otherwise formally specified as a birthday of PutinLater, the mother gave her son to childless relatives who are officially recognized as the birth parents, in what was then Leningrad. This version is buzzing around again in MoscowStanislav Belkovsky  concludes from that Putin was looking for a father figure, which he had initially in Anatoly Sobchak, the former mayor of St. Petersburg, and later found in Boris Yeltsin. Second argument was Putin’s encounter with the – at that time – very effective hard working Germans gave him according to Stanislav Belkovsky a culture shock with lasing implications. 

    Putin’s Persona

    PutinPersona
    PutinPersona

    The Persona is  the “mask” helps us get by in the world, the ideal image we have of ourselves. We latch onto these social identities to define us, but as a part of the “collective psyche” they do not distinguish us in any significant way. For the persona of a public person you just look at the best spin and pictures in the media. The media nowadays are just hooker,s printing what they are told. It’s no secret that Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin carefully presents his reputation of masculinity with various publicity stunts and photo ops. First of all, let’s look at physique. Putin does have a certain eagerness to flaunt his bare chest, and there’s definitely a Rambo quality to the man when he starts going after wildlife.

    Vladimir Putin is a Culture Warrior. Every Jungian must admit his effort and success who he carefully constructs an archetypal warrior identity. Is seems,  most media and most of his fellow world leaders , that he receives more hate for presenting the archetype of a warrior than anything else. The imago’ range from tagging dangerous animals, to stopping wildfires, to playing with guns on vacation. Putin may not want  be the most popular guy in the world but he sure manages to be one of the most interesting. Even action-star Arnold Schwarzenegger can’t outdo this is original WWP . He does judo, which lacks the pure bestial blood lust of American football; but when not using others’ own strength against them, he likes to take to the outdoors. On a horse. With a gun. He hunts wild animals. Tigers. Bears. Moose. He prowls around the Siberian woods, with no shirt, as a variety of fearsome beasts. The Western media used to say – not anymore – iIt’s lucky he’s got affairs of state to distract him, or extinction rates of rate animals would double overnight. And when he’s not hunting, he’s hang-gliding: 2012 he led a flock of endangered cranes on their migration route.

    Putin’s Shadow

    04_Putin_shadow_g_w

    The Shadow lives within us another side of our personality that is filled with all those aspects of ourselves we hide away, both from ourselves or others, as unacceptable. The shadow has a “dark side,” what we find morally reprehensible – and often project into others, but it also has a “bright side” containing our potentialities .For the shadow of a public person again you just look at the worst public rumors and gossip printed by the mainstream media. Stanislav Belkovsky is good too, he must have compiled all dirt one can openly find and was given to him. Biographies are often books about the authors themselves and sometimes amalgam between most banal kitchen psychology, insider knowledge, personal experiences and spreading rumors.  If informal decision-making processes prevail, the hour of psychology is rife. Belkovsky  insinuates that Putin, who is divorced with two daughters, might be gay. Belkovsky offers little proof for any of this also for his allegation of wealth. He also acknowledges that people who crossed about Putin (except in one case) never meet unfortunate ends – he even gives plausible versions of the case of an  journalist and a KGB traitor, who both  died under mysterious circumstances. Stanislav Belkovsky shows Putin as weak, soft KGB bureaucrat responsible for interior work rather than the foreign Cold War agent. Stanislav Belkovsky says Putin is shy, and would much rather spend his time with four-legged friends. “Therein lies the real Putin. He flees from people and his obligations to nature. Here we have Vladimir’s best friends; the Labrador Conny and the Bulgarian shepherd dog Buffy, his only roommates in the presidential residence.” A Russian political scientist summed up Belkovsky this way: “he can be considered to be either a little crazy or a business-minded manipulator whose utterances are always well paid for by someone in advance.”

    Putin like the German Schroeder and Berlusconi all pariahs are all self made out of their own strength. That is true. Surely Putin is driven by business interests and under him the flourishing corruption is not as visible anymore but still seems to be there. Putin might be indeed, feel an end time ruler who either might slow the decay, or maybe stop it 

    From narcissism and paranoia 

    In another attack of kitchen psychology Stanislav Belkovsky differentiates two type of politicians the schizophrenic and the paranoid, the former creative enforces, do creating empires the latter manager and beholders soonly administering decay. I do agree with his thesis, only the mentally unstable go into politics (se my article Archetype of the vampire in todays culture of Narcissism). I think, however he meant narcissism and paranoia, and here, having had my own encounter with politics, he defintly  got some point. Putin  to him, is of course the weak paranoid.   Narcissism and paranoia sounds like a pathology and it often is. However, those are dynamic opposites of the psyche even in healthy subjects but can actually reach down to the severest forms of psychopathology. Healthy narcissism is the desire to be loved and to provide adequately for their own well-being, and a healthy paranoia setting corresponds to what is called healthy skepticism. In a balanced way both guarantors for mental health.  Stalin was a sever case of paranoia, and according to Jung not a creator just a devourer.  Narcissism and paranoia in a slightly or severe pathological form is found in almost any politician. Slight pathological paranoia includes distrust and to be a little suspicious with the tendency of principle: You never know Such a person is cautious, somewhat aloof but of course also vigilant. The basic feeling is that you should always be on guard.Well in regards to Putin, if so it served him well. There is a deliberate elusiveness of the Russian system, in which all sorts of conspiracy theories flourish. But according to a Russian saying, just because you’re paranoid,  it does not mean that you will not be prosecuted.

    Projection of the Westen Shadow

    Pojection ot the Western Shadow on Putin.
    Pojection ot the Western Shadow on Putin.

    Is Putin like Stalin? To quote C.G. Jung again: Stalin [..]  is, however, not a creator. Lenin, created; Stalin is devouring the brood. He is a conquistador; he simply took what Lenin made and put his teeth into it and devoured it. He is not even creatively destructive. Lenin was that. He tore down the whole structure of feudal and bourgeois society in Russia and replaced – it with is own creation. Stalin is destroying that. Mentally, Stalin is not so interesting as Mussolini, who resembles him in the fundamental pattern of his personality, and he is not anything like so interesting as the medicine man, the myth—Hitler. Anybody who takes command of one hundred and seventy million people as Stalin has done, is bound to be interesting, whether you like him or not. No, Stalin is just a brute—a shrewd peasant, an instinctive powerful, beast—no doubt in that way far the most powerful of all the dictators. He reminds one of a) Siberian saber-toothed tiger with that powerful neck, those sweeping mustaches, and that smile like a cat which has been eating cream. I should imagine that Genghis Khan might have been an early Stalin. I shouldn’t wonder if he makes himself Czar.

    Maybe not.

    The West has a bad habit of personalizing foreign affairs and demonizing uncooperative leaders. Remember when Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser was denounced as “Hitler on the Nile?”, “Khadaffi, Mad Dog of the Mideast?”, Assad  a butcher slaughter of the innocents, Hussein and many others. Vladimir Putin is the foreign bogeyman. He is being hysterically demonized by the  Western Media, an as we know we usually project out shadow in others.

     

    The Terror of the Good – Origins of Totalitarianism

    Journalists are awfully liberal, Arendt they
    Journalists are awfully liberal, Arendt they?

    I’ve read Hannah Arendt “Eichmann in Jerusalem” and “The Origins of Totalitarianism”, several times – it always amazes me. I find Arendt very hard to disagree with – she just seems so shrewd, so alert, annoyingly good at noticing everything that needs noticing; She must have it right. Writing 50 years ago, this great theorists of totalitarianism, noted that totality and irreversibility are related. It used to be thought that totalitarianism had repealed the law of history by which power sows the seeds of its own destruction. If sheer ruthless vigilance could destroy any center of opposition, even any island of independent thought, then — aside from external conquest, with humanitarian  pretext — totalitarian rule could never be reversed. Conversely, if total control fails due to today’s interconnected multipolar world, what happens to single-minded direction? If totalitarianism can decay, can it not be transformed? We don’t yet know. We know only that it can be modified. It can give way to a society with some space. How much? Well,  somewhat between 1984 with drones,  full coverage realtime surveillance and a brave new world of constructed realities – the terror of the Good.

    On 5 February 1794 Robespierre stated, “Terror is nothing else than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible.” The government in a war against terror is despotism of liberty against tyranny. Sounds like today’s war on terror. Stalin said “Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?” Well, we might have run out of ideas and ideals, but sure not of weapons. How much different is President Obama, when he declared gently that “we tortured some folks.  The West shrugged their shoulders, well than we tortured some folks.  Nobody is perfect, but we are exceptional.  This is the terror of the good, the soft terror for the good, but rather the banality of the evil than the banality of the good. My famous quote of Arendt is: The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.

    The ordinary average guy

    Certainly the terror of the Good is not the same as the Banality of the Good: do or not doing something without fear of being caught by temporal or heavenly police as Alan Watts once said. When I lived in California I could not avoid to stumble over this song.

    I’m just an ordinary average guy
    We all live ordinary average lives
    With average kids
    And average wives …
    And every Saturday we work in the yard
    Pick up the dog do
    Hope that it’s hard (whaf whaf)
    Take out the garbage and clean out the garage…
    Ordinary average average guys.

    We are getting in archetypes if not stereotypes, but the banality of the Good is not so banal after all, just like the banality of the Evil. In an essay for Foreign Affairs, Joshua Yaffa notes a fascinating way Putin has responded to what Stanislav Belkovsky, described as grumbling Haute-Volée in Moskow during his last election (he called them “Bildungsbürger” which I cannot really translate, something like educated class, bourgeoise, maybe the chattering classes is good here, a term often used in the media and by political commentators). Putin instead reached out to the average guy, channeling populist politicians in the rhetoric of class-warfare: This dynamic perhaps explains why by the end of the campaign season in February and March, Putin sought to stir up a kind of Russian class-based politics. As he saw it, he was the leader of rural and industrial Russia, defending the country from those unnamed forces that want, as he said in a campaign speech, “to interfere in our affairs, to force their will on us.” In this speech and others, Putin has tried to link in the public consciousness the country’s middle-class protestors to enemies abroad that would wish Russia ill. On the night of his victory, he told the employees of a tank factory, “You put in their places those people who went one step too far and insulted the working man.” The real “Russian people,” he went on to say, are the “worker and the engineer.”

    The banality of the good or the evil?
    The banality of the good or the evil?

    Putin through the eyes of the cultural war

    I said half-jokingly the other day that it’s sometimes hard to tell the reporting of Western mainstream media  between Soviet-era Russia and Putin-era Russia.  If you ignore the personal insults, it’s impossible to tell the difference between now and the Cold War after JFK. In many cases, Putin is closer to the US and Europa’s ideals and interests than its own élite and global financial oligarchy. Plain stereotypes of the cold war are applied from them every day, but this is not my topic here. Lets go back to C.G.  Jung.

    H.R. Knickerbocker asked the famous question: What would happen if you were to lock Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin in a room together and give them one loaf of bread and one pitcher of water to last them a week? Who would get all the food and water, or would they divide it? Jung’s answer included a cryptic remark:The true leader is always led. We can see it work in him. He himself has referred to his Voice.”  … “The demands of the unconscious act at first like a paralyzing poison on a man’s energy and resourcefulness, so that it may well be compared to the bite of a poisonous snake.

    Journalists are awfully liberal, Arendt they?
    Hillary Clinton, hardly a reasonable facsimile of gender icons going along.

    Let’s rephrase it, What would happen, if we were to lock Hillary, Merkel, Putin and Obama today  in a room together and give them one loaf of bread and one pitcher of water to last them a week? Putin seems to be a gentlemen but not a push over. The Russian president asked whether it would be worse to meet with Clinton than President Obama: “It’s better not to argue with women. But Ms Clinton has never been too graceful in her statements.”  From there, Putin added: “When people push boundaries too far, it’s not because they are strong but because they are weak. But maybe weakness is not the worst quality for a woman.”  So that is interesting, also with Mr. Merkel, there is divide of gender archetypes of a supposedly feminized west, calling this modern and a supposedly more traditional Russia with a positive image of the male archetype. I am not sure if this cultural war is the Russian response to a cultural revolution, or just one more warfare technique before an information, financial and hot/cold war.

    Putin and his friends and enemies

    Who is Putin? The question is as pressing today as it was 14 years ago when he became Russia’s president for the first timePutin’s supporters consider him the savior of Russia, opponents see him as a tyrannical ruler. Despite the rhetorical attacks on the chaotic conditions in Russia in the nineties Putin , Putin a heir of Yeltsin’ apparently made a deal with Yeltsin’s oligarchy (The Family”) between 2000 and 2004, but on his terms. From there on he seem to have accepted a mission which Mr. Putin’s role model, Czar Peter the Great, might have tolerated. The major oligarchs who survived under Putin are Roman Abramovich, Alexander Abramov, Oleg Deripaska, Mikhail Fridman, Mikhail Prokhorov, Alisher Usmanov, German Khan, Viktor Vekselberg, Leonid Michelson, Vagit Alekperov, Pyotr Aven, and still Vladimir Potanin and Vitaly Malkin.

    • Alisher Usmanov: The richest man in Russia and the 40th richest person in the world;
    • Oleg Deripaska: Aluminum magnate Deripaska embroiled in ‘yachtgate’;
    • Mikhail Prokorov: Ran as an independent candidate against Putin;
    • Roman Abramovich: The oil tycoon one of Putin’s closest allies.  He had a major dispute with Putin king-maker Boris Berezovsky, who committed suicide after loosing an $5 billion lawsuit against him.
    • Leonid Mikhelson: CEO of Novatek, one of Russia’slargest natural gas producers and art sponsor
    • Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Once the most wealthy Russian with Yukos oil, he’s now only worth $170 million anymore.

    A few more  business people have become oligarchs during his time, such as  Vladimir Litvinenko and  Arkady R. Rotenberg (Russian). Some had to go, who did not hold the bargain and subsequently coming under fire for various illegal activities, particularly tax evasion. Vladimir Gusinsky (MediaMost) and Boris Berezovsky both avoided legal proceedings by leaving Russia, and the mentioned, Mikhail Khodorkovsky , was arrested in October 2003 and only recently as released on December 2013. Like so many other oligarchs, he made his fortune when the Soviet Union privatized its resources in an ill-fated Western strategy, tying himself in to the country’s desasterous move to a typical IMF inflicted economy.  Khodorkovsky challenged Putin openly 2003 on behalf of the old Yeltsin oligarchy and Putin pardoned him only after a decade in prison, according to Stanislav Belkovsky the only really serious counter move, Putin has inflicted on  his enemies. Even after that Khodorkovsky was allowed recently  to address a crowd of protesters in Kiev, railing against the Russian government.

    Looking at the numbers, GDP (a hockey stick success curve, granted 50% from energy business)  and dept (none), I hate to say he  did “slightly” better than President Obama’s, TARP, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, including the banking bailouts and fiscal stimulus in years of quantitive easing (QE). We generally overlook that his value to the system, like that of the czars who preceded him, is based on maintaining the balance among competing vested interests. Just as it was centuries ago, the main battles inside the Kremlin among these groups are about power, money and access to special privileges, not ideology.

    Conclusion

    I found something C.G. Jung could, maybe even would have said about the Putin Complex:The world is as it ever has been, but our consciousness undergoes peculiar changes. First, in remote times (which can still be observed among primitives living today), the main body of psychic life was apparently in human and in nonhuman objects: it was projected, as we should say now. Consciousness can hardly exist in a state of complete projection. At most it would be a heap of emotions. Through the withdrawal of projections, conscious knowledge slowly developed. Science, curiously enough, began with the  discovery of astronomical laws, and hence with the withdrawal, so to speak, of the most distant projections. This was the first stage in the despiritualization of the world. One step followed another: already in antiquity the gods were withdrawn from mountains and rivers, from trees and animals. Modern science has subtilized its projections to an almost unrecognizable degree, but our ordinary life still swarms with them. You can find them spread out in the newspapers, in books, rumors, and ordinary social gossip. All gaps in our actual knowledge are still filled out with projections. We are still so sure we know what other people think or what their true character is C. G. Jung -“Psychology and Religion” (1938) In CW II: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P. 140
    To be continued /expanded – published as a case of oops…

    Appendix:

    Hypothesis

    • Putin is the not a real macho nor a tyrant
    • Putin is the typical “little guy” a self-made man with business sense
    • Putin is not an imperialist but an anti-Soviet
    • Putin is an outsider  of the cultural chattering class (globally and in Russia)
    • Putin is an idealist who does not care for power
    • Putin was never the tough KGB agent but a disliked outsider; as his career was nearly destroyed by the KGB he dislikes it
    • Putin did not create a central Putin system, but rather a system of many power clusters not unlike the Czar’s
    • Putin was pro-West, first puzzled, later annoyed and now confronting Western geopolitics and wars
    • Putin is the real successor of Yeltsin but with a better sense for Russian interest
    • Putin is pro-German or pro-Europe in the sense of Czar Peter the Great, Peter
    • There is a big shiism between the Moskowitsch ( god-derived) and Peterism (rule based) autocratic system

    Expanded Definition of the Banality of the Good:

    • In order to gain a sense of selfworthiness of a normal citizen, it is not needed to be an hero or to be sacrified on the cross. It is completely sufficient (and required) to take good care of raising kids, pay taxes, go to work, obey rules and laws. And not because one would be punished hard for not obeying them, but because one sees them as absolutely required in a sense of the Kant’s imperative.
    • A real direct democracy is possible.
    • Citizen an stated must mutually respect each other.

    Bibliography

    • Wladimir: Die ganze Wahrheit über Putin von Stanislaw Belkowski von Redline Verlag,München  (Dezember 2013, Translation)
    • Aus erster Hand von Wladimir Putin Heyne (2000)
    • Chodorkowskij: Legenden, Mythen und andere Wahrheiten Gebundene Ausgabe – 9. März 2012 von Viktor Timtschenko
    • Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963). (Rev. ed. New York: Viking)
    • The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). second enlarged edition;  A MERIDIAN BOOK First Meridian printing
    • C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters (Bollingen Series)
    • C.G. Jung Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle
    • C.G. Jung Four Archetypes (Routledge Classics)
  • Habermas is wrong. Max Weber is right.

    Habermas is wrong. Max Weber is right.

    Couples
    My title: Singels – One kid families – Singles – Couples … Credit: yonaphoto.com: Post –  China in Transition.

    Reblogged via China in Transition #2: Weber believed that a move towards rational-legal authority was inevitable.

    Habermas meets Weber (erring) when he pipe-dreamed in his last book of a supranational democracy, without demos – the people  –  which at the end according to Max Weber derives its legitimacy only from institutional procedure… In no way a move towards rational-legal authority  is inevitable, irreversible on necessarily democratic.

    The picture even contradicts the thesis – there is no enlightenment nor positive rationalization.

    We entered a new feudal age in the West –  in the world. The sixties are over, 99% hold most of the assets and all of the power. Drones proved effective against asymmetric wars, NSA proved effective against freedom.  The reflective discourse has been Habermas’  fad. The MSM (MainStream Media) manufactures the common consent and controls the allowed dissent. Those in power have grown autistic. For the many it is panem et circenses. We live in our little internet sandbox –  watched. Never ever, so many knew so much, but could or would do so little. Max Weber is right. There are tree types of  legitimacy:

    1. Traditional legitimacy derives from societal custom and habit that emphasize the history of the authority of tradition.
    2. Charismatic legitimacy derives from the ideas and personal charisma of the leader.
    3. Rational-legal legitimacy derives from a system of institutional procedure.

    We have neither but raw financial power. Habermas’ thesis of public discourse is laughable. There is serious financial repression for the lucky. For the unlucky the global refugee figure passes 50m for first time since second world war not mentioning the global migration…

    Disagree? Drop a line.

  • A Jungian journey through a land of heretics and Mary Magdalene

    A Jungian journey through a land of heretics and Mary Magdalene

    Lastours - our campground facing Château de Cabaret, Tour Régine, Château de Surdespine und Château de Querthineux
    Lastours – our campground facing Château de Cabaret, Tour Régine, Château de Surdespine und Château de Querthineux

    I  just came back from Languedoc-Roussillon, where I followed the footsteps of May Magdalene the Templars and the heretic Cathars. This essay will focus on their similarity with early Christian and Jewish Gnostic thoughts, in which C.G. Jung was very interested. Where did the Cathars came from and what were there beliefs? What was the mystic and symbolic importance of Mary Magdalene, who is still worshiped prominently there in Catholic Churches?

    In Languedoc-Roussillon Cathar castles and Templar remains,  Abbeys and Châteaus are inspired by powerful myths , major mysteries, complex religious history, symbols of psychological relevance  and – also significant pseudo-history. There a lots of stories about the Crusades and the mysteries of Sacred France in regards to Jesus, Mary Magdalene connected to it. Or, as in the cases of Rennes-le-Château, downright fabrications and conspiracy theories. So my journey became a transformational journey visiting places with magic and mysticism in addition to hiking, camping and photographing.

    The Déjà-vu

    My American wife,  recently very pro-French again (wine and food) proposed the very south-west of France to improve my son’s French, she said. It is a long but doable drive, meaning that our  Labrador – a good hiker – could accompany us. I tought there could be something in for me too: visiting the remains of  Gnosticism and Templars.  At some point the journey almost brought back 1971, when I travelled with two friends extensively in the Middle East, in particular Lebanon and Syria.

      The Château de Montségur is probably the best known of all Cathar Castles. It is famous as the last Cathar stronghold, which fell after a 10 month siege in 1244. A field below the hilltop castle is reputed to be the site where over 200 Cathars were burned alive, having refused to renounce their fait

    The Château de Queribus is probably the best known of all Cathar Castles. Some say it is the last Cathar stronghold, after Montesegur fell after a 10 month siege in 1244. A field below the hilltop castle Montesgur is reputed to be the site where over 200 Cathars were burned alive, having refused to renounce their fait

    One drives through a harsh, sometimes nearly unpopulated rural area , ruled by medieval castles which you can visit in smoldering heat, often by yourself. Languedoc-Roussillon and especially the department Aude has been like Syria always cultural fertile and diverse with all its violent consequences. Like Levante and Egypt, Languedoc-Roussillonon harbors historical significance for Christianity and Gnosticism and their fight with each other, in what Phillip Jenkins called Jesus Wars“. I have written about that here. Through Templars and the crusades this geographic and cultural regions are even themselves interconnected.  The 11th century was the century of monks and knights, but also of a second wave of religious disputes like in the first two centuries, the century of heretics. While waves of Crusaders were fighting in Palestine, the common people of Europe were experiencing a crisis of faith. The Cathars, who lead an austere lifestyle, flourished in Aude and Herault at the foothills of the Pyrenees. My thoughts about them in the context of the Templars here.

    This second wave of Gnosticism in Europe started a decade years after Jerusalem fell. Graham Simms and others have written about Jesus after the Cruzification. The book Holy Blood, Holy Grail  put forward a hypothesis, that the historical Jesus married Mary Magdalene, and their children emigrated to what is now southern France and that would eventually initiated the Merovingian dynasty. This was later trivialized in the Da Vinci Code and correctly rebuked by serious historians. The Templar-Grail myth and the Rennes-le-Château version have been scolded as two of most notorious  pseudo-histories and classic examples of conspiracy theories in history.

    It seems sometimes, we experience today a third wave of Gnosticism, although only a trickle in the void of nihilism. Basic Gnostic theology was already known from the Nag Hammadi  texts and earlier finds. Christianity has always had many variants, just as it does today, and Gnosticism is still alive and well. At some point, serious believers must decide where to place their faith not to be detracted from the basic Christian message, unless they want it. In any case from, this essay takes an interest in the transmission of thoughts from Jerusalem and Alexandria to southern France.

    History of the Region

    The region is named Languedoc, after the language formerly spoken there – the Language of Oc or Occitan and famous by its historic walled city of Carcassone in the north, once overrun by the Moores, today by visitors. The Pyrenees-Oriantales form  in the West the border between France and Spain with both sides actual Catalan (still a spoken language). The area was trading extensively with Greece and was later called Septimania, because Augustus settled his veterans of the 7th legion there. After the break-up of the Roman Empire, this part of Gaul was dominated by the Visigoths, who migrated into France from central Europe. They sacked Rome in 491 and are known to have carried off the sacred treasure that the Romans had taken from the Temple of Jerusalem. The Visigoths dominated the Languedoc from the 5th until the 8th centuries with strongholds in Carcassone and Narbonne. There are also many remains of  fortifications found around Rennes-le-Château, as mentioned a village with a recent “mystery story” and myriads of explanations on its own with a little help of the BBC.

    After the Visigoths, the Arabs dominated the area for much of the 8th century. The sacred treasure is last recorded in the Visigoth treasury at Carcassone, but disappears from history after the Moorish invasions  in the 8th century from Spain.  Languedoc had also a substantial Jewish population in the region from Roman times – and 768 due to their help pushing back of the Arabs, a semi-autonomous Jewish principality was established there. Until the 13th century Languedoc was defacto independent of the rest of France ruled by the Counts of Toulouse. The Languedoc had its own distinct culture, which at that time – probably because of influence of Greek and Jewish – was the most cultured and advanced in Europe. It was here that the troubadour movement flourished and Gnostic thought resurfaced 1000 years after it was stamped out in the cradle of Christianity in the Middle East. In the 12th and 13th centuries the region was the heartland of the Cathar heresy, supported by the Counts of Toulouse. This gnostic form of Christianity is a strong dualism, essentially very similar to the Manichean thoughts and totally opposed to materialism and authority of the Church of Rome.The bloody and traumatic genocide of the Albigensian Crusade, so named after the major Cathar town of Albi, marked a watershed in the history of the Languedoc, ending the south of France’s independence, becoming subordinate to the north. The crusade against the Cathars infamously ended after the siege of Montségur.

    The other major power in the medieval  France were the Knights Templar, that mysterious order of warrior-monks formed during the Crusades. They were conspicuously neutral – some suspected even secretly helping the Cathars.  After having outlived their usefulness after the fall of  Outremer in the Holy land, the Templars were accused for secret heresy and for similar reasons (greed and power struggle although her of temporal forces) stamped out a century after the Cathars genocide. Although the Templars were found throughout Europe, the greatest concentration of their property was in the Languedoc and the neighbouring Roussillon region. After the crusade against the Cathars, the Languedoc retained its heretical character. The first witch trials in Europe were held at Toulouse in the 14th century. In later centuries, Languedoc was famed as a centre for alchemists – the town of Alet-les-Bains, 5 miles north of Rennes-le-Château, being a particular centre for the so-called ‘black art’.

    Dualism

    Ugo Bianchi, an  Italian historian of religions identified three distinct features of Dualism:

    1. Absolute Dualism regards the two principles of good and evil as coeternal and equal, whilst moderate Dualism regards the evil principle as a secondary, lesser power to the good principle.
    2. Absolute Dualism sees the two principles as locked in combat for all eternity. Many absolute dualists’, regards time as cyclical and therefore lean to in reincarnation, whereas moderate Dualism sees historical time as being finite and linear; at the end of time, the evil principle will be defeated by the good.
    3. Absolute Dualism sees the material world completely evil, but moderate Dualism regards creation as essentially good.

    Clearly the Cathars were absolute dualists, however this definition may be used to classify Christianity as moderate dualists, without  the great (religious) philosopher Augustine of Hippo, who added our free will and  Omne bonum a Deo, omne malum ab homine – “All good from God, all evil from man.”  The psychoanalytic C.G .Jung said under the impression of the second world war: We need more understanding of human nature, because the only real danger that exists is man himself. ” Simpler said, We’ve all got both light and dark inside us. The Shadow, as C.G. Jung defined it, is in us.  

    Christian dualist heresy has always derived from a tradition that was ‘hidden’ or ‘concealed’ or suppressed from late antiquity onwards. Frome the Catholic/Orthodox point this tradition was mostly recognized as Manichaeism, occasionally in combination with other ancient dualist heretics. From the other side, of course it have been the early Christian apostles who became corrupted by the Church. Hence, this revealing of a kind of ‘secret history’ and attempt to reconstruct suppressed or concealed religious development follows the pattern of pseudo-history.

    Manicheanism

    Gnostic-Manichaean doctrines offered an investigation of the important dualist religious currents. Dualism defines distinctive source of evil in the divine and supernatural sphere the interrelationships between the divine, human and natural world.

    The syncretism and distorted borrowings between the orthodox and heretical religions in antiquity and the Middle Ages present a complex picture. Arguably the development of such religious ideas are best evaluated over a great period of time.

    With the establishment, expansion and consolidation of the Christianity, Judaism and Islam, other religious traditions dualism routinely attacked by its monistic critics, began to decline and even disappear from their traditional spheres of influence in Mediterranean Europe and the Near East. However, during the High Middle Ages dualist religiosity in Europe was resurrected, mainly through the missionary efforts of the Bogomil and Cathar heresies.  The ecclesiastical and secular elites of medieval Christendom had to pursue what they saw as a re-fight of the battle against its revived ancient Manichaeism, the only universal religion to emerge from the great spiritual turmoil in third-century Mesopotamia. In Manichaeism, the traditional dualist religious vision which divided divine reality and the world into two opposed realms of good and evil was further magnified. Mani, the founder of Manichaeism, proclaimed that his intricate dualist system formed  a meta-religion and underlay the teachings of Zoroaster, Buddha and Christ after it reached this universalist phase, having passed through a centuries-old evolution in Iran and the eastern Mediterranean world.

    ‘Dualism’ has a different usage in philosophical-historical and religio-historical contexts. In religious systems such as Manichaeism  it means God and the devil as two coeternal principles.  In more general terms, the term dualism is applied also to philosophical systems fort pairs of oppositions like that of Plato, with its dualities between the mortal body and the immortal soul, or the world perceived by the senses and the world of eternal ideas, comprehended by the mind; or the Kantian distinction between the phenomenal and the noumenal world.

    Kabbalistic Gnosticism

    Jung has been often (rightfully) seen of being a contemporary Gnostic. [1] However, the interpretations which Jung places on Gnosticism and the texts which Jung refers to on alchemy, were often Kabbalistic, so much so that one would be more justified in calling the Jung of the Mysterium Coniunctionis  or Kabbalistic in contemporary disguise. One of the most serious and arguably criticisms against Kabbalah and the early Gnosticism was of course, that they may lead away from monotheism, and instead promote dualism, the belief that there is a counterpart to God: The good power versus an evil power. Gnostic-dualistic cosmology having roots in Zoroastrianism, believes since creation good and evil forces are divided; Neo-Platonism (which found its way in Christianity), argues that the universe knew a primordial harmony,  disrupted by an evil force. Some argue that both models influenced Catharism.

    Catharism

    Queribus
    Queribus

    Catharism was the most successful heresy of the Middle Ages, essentially a Neo-Dualism  which followed the classical religious doctrine of the two principles. Most scholar agree Catharism had its roots in the Paulician movement in Armenia and the Bogomils of Bulgaria, as they inherited much (beliefs and organisation) from the Bogomils. However, explanations that it derived from local Jewish Gnostics, like the Essenes or even early Christians migrated to there are quite plausible. Often labeled as Neo-Manichaeism, one has to be aware, that Manichaeism was used then as a blanket term for Gnostics.
    Flourishing principally in the Languedoc (Southern France and Northern Spain) and Italy, the Cathars taught that the world is evil and must be transcended through a simple life of prayer, work, fasting and non-violence. As all heretics, the Cathars believed themselves to be the heirs of the true heritage of Christianity going back to apostolic times, and completely rejected the Catholic Church. Most of the bible was rejected (except St. John) and Cathar services and ceremonies, were held in fields and in people’s premises. The main focus, however, has always been on the Cathars (from the Greek word meaning ‘pure’), a name that is normally reserved for the dissident Christians who lived in .

    Cathars found widespread popularity among peasants, aristocrats and merchants, which alarmed  the Church which founded the Inquisition and launched the Albigensian Crusade to exterminate the heresy. While previous Crusades had been directed against Muslims in the Middle East, the Albigensian Crusade was the first Crusade to be directed against fellow Christians, and was also the first European genocide. With the fall of the Cathar fortress of Montségur in 1244, Catharism was largely obliterated. Today, the mystique surrounding the Cathars is as strong as ever, as plenty can be written and projected about. Most of what we think we know comes from the Italian branch and inquisition protocols, because Catharism was mostly oral. What really happened, and what did the Cathars actually believe?

    The Cathar Perfect was believed to have reached state of spiritual purity had been achieved through which the Holy Spirit, thus releasing them from the burden of reincarnation and the suffering  “equal unto the angels” and thus already semi-Divine. After a rigorous training a ceremony took place in which various Scriptural extracts were like the opening verses of the Gospel of John. The Perfect were believed to have become “trans-material” or semi-angelic as expressed in the Gospel of Luke.

    The first Cathar Synod was held between 1167 and 1176 at St. Felix-de-Caraman, near Toulouse marked the start of the real struggle between the Catholic Church and Catharism, as the Church now had an organised body to fight. In 1208, Pope Innocent III repeatedly tried to use diplomacy to stop the spread of Catharism, but in that year his papal legate and hated inquisitor Pierre de Castelnau was murdered (allegedly by an agent serving the Count of Toulouse). The event pushed him from diplomacy into military action. Some even consider the death of de Castelnau a false flag operation, engineered so that the crusade would be declared. An estimated 200,000 to one million people died during the twenty year campaign, which began in earnest in Béziers in July 1209.  Papal Legate Arnaud-Amaury, saw no need to distinguish between the heretics and the thousands of faithful Catholics that lived in the city. “Kill them all,” was the abbot’s alleged reply. “God will recognise his own!” The number of dead that day was  between 7,000 and 20,000, the latter figure reported back from Arnaud-Amaury to the Pope.

    With such carnage, the other towns (e.g. Narbonne and Carcassonne) offered no resistance and soon the Southern counts had lost their territories and powers to the King of France and his allies. For these Northern lords, attaining the lands of the Languedoc had always been paramount; their mission had been accomplished.

    An Inquisition was established in Toulouse in 1229 and from 1233 onwards, hunting down Catharism was no longer done on an individual basis. Many Cathar elders realised the lethal dangers they faced and began to take refuge in the fortresses at Fenouillèdes and Montségur, while others were able to incite uprisings, which forced the Inquisition out of Albi, Narbonne and Toulouse. Count Raymond-Roger de Trencavel was defeated at Carcassonne and only those Cathars hiding in the castles remained to be eradicated. A ten month siege began of the castle of Montségur but in March 1244, the last castle  surrendered. Though their life would be spared if they recanted, the Cathars preferred to be burnt, rather than reject their faith. The last Cathar Parfait to be burnt at the stake was Guillaume Bélibaste, in 1321 in the between Rennes-le-Château  – known for the mysterious 19th century priest Bérenger Saunière, mentioned later in this essay who with somehow could afford a lavish lifestyle an triggered a massive treasure hunt in the sixties.

    Cathar Writings

    Very few Cathar tracts have come down to us. Most of the surviving works come from Italy, due to literacy levels were generally higher than in the Languedoc. The Secret Supper elucidates the Cathar creation myth, in which Satan is cast out of heaven for wishing to be greater than God. Satan pretended to repent, at which God forgave him and let him do what he wanted. With his new-found freedom, Satan created the world of matter, and formed human beings from the primordial clay. Each soul was a trapped angel from heaven. Satan then convinced humanity that he was the one true god. The most important surviving Cathar tract is The Book of the Two Principles, which was written in the 1240s, probably by John of Lugio, a Cathar from the Albanensian. The Book of the Two Principles makes a case for there being two coeternal principles of good and evil, each of which created their own spheres – heaven and the material world. by Sean Martin states in his book The Cathars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Heresy:  “The true god cannot be the author of evil. The verse in the Gospel of John which states ‘All things were made by it [the Word of God], and without it, was made nothing’ was interpreted as meaning that ‘nothing’ – i.e., the material world – was made by Satan.”

    The Cathars studied and taught solely from the New Testament, notably the Gospel of St. John and the Book of Revelations, both of which were written by Mary Magdalene’s brother, Lazarus, who was devoted to Jesus. Cathar beliefs might thus  come from Christianity in the time of Jesu. Some conclude from the Gnostic Gospels, that Mary Magdalene and Jesus were Gnostic. Gnostics believed the follower of Christ experienced Gnosis, knowledge, and thus became close to God. Some say, the Cathar were originally taught this by Mary Magdalene. As the Gnostic leaning psychoanalyst C.G. Jung described it: by knowing your Self, you can connect to God.  The Cathars only appeared out of nowhere  around the 11th century, but that they might have lived here in Languedoc hundreds of years before that, from the time of early Christianity is more plausible than the Bulgaria connection.

    Catharism and women

    Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209.
    Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209. Derived from open source.

    Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209. In this group, women appear not as numerous as men. As the early Christianity, also the Cathar movement proved to be extremely successful in gaining female follower.  Unlike often stated. the  record of Cathar and women is mixed,  but the Cathars did respect women, and women played a  role in the movement. Women could become Perfects known as Parfaites or Perfectaes. The Cathars were wary of the temptations of the flesh, but allowed females to receive the consolamentum and to preach. While women Perfects rarely traveled to preach the faith, they still played a vital role in the spreading of the Catharism by establishing group homes for women. Cathar beliefs include that one’s last incarnation had to be experienced as a man to break the cycle. Toward the end of the Cathar movement, French Catharism  started the practice of excluding women Perfects.

    Perfecti (they called themselves “bonhommes”) were expected to follow a lifestyle of extreme austerity and renunciation of the world which included abstaining from eating meat and avoiding any sexuality.  They also seem to have had their own ideas concerning Mary Magdalene. [2]

    Saint Mary Magdalene is still popular in southern France. She had been one of Christ’s followers. According to the Canonical Gospels, she was present at the Crucifixion, and the tomb of Christ, and took the news the missing body to the disciples. John’s Gospel additionally has her as the first to encounter the risen Christ, after she lingered in the garden weeping. Because of her role as messenger Mary Magdalene was afforded the title of apostola apostolorum. The early Gnostics has also revered the saint, and their writings portrayed her as a member of Christ’s inner circle. They believed Christ’s spirit appeared to her, after the Crucifixion, to reveal to her deeper spiritual truths. Gnostics also believed that Mary comprehended Christ’s teaching better than any other, being one of the closest people to him. According to one of the Gnostic apocrypha, the Gospel of Philip, she was called the companion of the Saviour.

    …But Christ loved her more than all the other disciples and used to kiss her often on the mouth. The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said to him ‘Why do you love her more than all of us?’ The saviour answered and told them ‘Why do I not love you like her?

    The Catholic Church, however, downplayed her as a penitent whore. After the crucifixion, according to the medieval myth, she came and to southern France, living out her days as a hermit. Mary’s redemption by divine grace made her a symbol of God’s forgiveness of sinners. In so far as this she may have appealed to the Templars, many of whom, in their own way, had turned their backs on sinful lives to follow Christ.  Many, including gypsies and poor people around the Languedoc, revered this saint, and believed the legend (fostered by Vezelay from the 1030s onwards) that she came there. She fled Palestine, and landed at Marseilles with Martha and Lazarus, and preached to the pagan inhabitants. Like the Gnostics before them, the Cathars elevated her above the other apostles. They may even have regarded her as the widow of Jesus. The anti-Cathar Ermegaud de Beziers and Durand de la Huesca wrote that the Cathars secretly taught that Mary Magdalene was the wife or concubine of Christ; and also that she was the woman ‘taken in adultery’ who Christ had saved from the Jews who wanted to stone her.

    Mary Magdalene

    mary magdalen st-maxim-cross - petit provence
    mary magdalen st-maxim-cross – petit provence

    From this allegation has arisen something of a conspiracy theory: It has it that knowledge of Christ’s alleged relationship with Mary (and perhaps proof thereof) passed from the Cathars to the Knights Templar. It was to remove the threat of this great secret, potentially damaging as it supposedly was to the Church, that the Catholic establishment suppressed the Templars, a century after the Albigensian Crusade. Although the theory probably has a particular appeal to those with a latent penchant for goddess worship in both cases, eliminating of the Cathars and the Templars was pure politics and greed. Many esoterics have additionally speculated that Mary Magdalene was herself of royal blood, or a priestess of some Isis/Ishtar cult, and that the Cathars and Templars regarded her almost as the embodiment of the feminine aspect of the divine and the personification of holy wisdom (Sophia to the Gnostics). Another theory has Mary and Jesus founding a dynasty, which fused with the Merovingian line.

    I saw Mary Magdalene statues or paintings in almost ever church. extensively in Rennes-le-Chateau. It must be remembered that she was a legitimate Catholic Saint. Her supposed relics had been claimed by the Benedictine Monks of Vezelay in Burgundy, Central France. The cult was in evidence there from the mid eleventh century. The abbey claimed that the relics had been brought there centuries before by a monk who had retrieved them from their original shrine near Aix in Provence, where Mary had supposedly been lain to rest after spending 30 years living as a hermit in a remote cave called la Sainte Baume.Mary Magdalene is usually thought of as the second-most important woman in the New Testament after Mary. Mary Magdalene traveled with Jesus as one of his followers. She was present at Jesus’ two most important moments: the crucifixion and the resurrection. Within the four Gospels, the oldest historical record mentioning her name, she is named at least 12 times more than most of the apostles.  In the New Testament, Jesus cleansed her of “seven demons”,[Lk. 8:2] [Mk. 16:9].

    Petit Provence is the region in southern France adjacent to Aude and Herault where Mary Magdalene and the others came ashore at St. Maries de la Mer. A painting of Mary Magdalene is at the Church in Les Saintes Maries de la Mer, which is west of Marseille showing the boat carrying Lazarus, Martha, Mary Magdalene and a young girl named Sarah. Also the sister of the Virgin Mary and several others are shown on the boat.  Often the jar in Mary Magdalene’s hand signifies the blood of Jesus. Left is the painting of the Crucifixion from the Basilica Sainte-Marie-Madeleine et le Couvent Royal, in St. Maximin. This is where Mary Magdalene was buried. She is shown at the foot of the cross in a very beautiful almost intimate pose.

    Rennes-le-Chateau

    Rennes-le-Chateau, is located near Couiza between Carcassonne and Quillan, has become world-famous ever allegedly since its infamous priest Bérenger Saunière discovered – or was given – a small fortune. About 300 books were written where the money came from, arguable and convincingly rebuked by Bill Puttnam as distorted pseudo-history:

    • Lack of solid evidence
    • Citing evidence without giving a sources
    • Presentation of evidence in a misleading way
    • Coincidence taken as evidence
    • Failure to explore consequences of derived conclusions
    • Disregard of conflicting evidence
    • Conflict with accepted chronology

    Theories put forward, what kind of Treasure the priest Saunière might have found:

    • the treasure of the Visigoths, including the treasure of the temple of Jerusalem,that roman emperor Titus took  ad 70. and Alaric I, took from Rome during the sack of 394
    • the treasure of the Cathars. When the last Cathar bastion of Montségur fell, the besieging royal troops found nothing of the famous Cathar treasure taken before its surrender
    • the treasure of the Knights Templar. The Templars had a presence in the region. There was a commandery at Campagne-sur-Aude and an observation post on Mount Bézu.
    • the treasure of Blanch of Castille. The mother of Saint Louis, regent of France, came to Rédé (Rennes-le-Château) in 1249
    • evidence that the Merovingian bloodline is unbroken.
    • evidence that Jesus didn’t die on the cross
    • evidence that Jesus was in fact married to Mary Magdalene.
    • evidence that after the crucifixion  Marie Magdalene came to France carrying her offspring that later became the Merovingians or intermarried with them.
    • he tombs of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea in the vicinity of Opoul Perillos
    • the tomb of Mary Magdalene and perhaps even one or more of her children in the vicinity of Rennes-le-Château, perhaps in the Grotto locally known as
    • the mummified body of Christ, Mary Magdalene or both is buried in the region somewhere
    • the Crypt of the Lords of Rennes beneath his church
    • the Arma Christi (the instruments used during the Passion of Christ) were kept in Notre Dame de Marceille and Rennes-le-Château by a group of Fransciscan Ebionites.

    Mary Magdalene and Isis

    But that is not the point, the area of Rennes-le-Château is full of interesting real history especially of Mary Magdalene. Although it did not exist in Roman times, founded by the Visigoths in the fifth century, there was most likely an Isis Temple there. Reports of ancient authors relate to the area of Rennes-le-Chateau ( Celtic Rhedae,Rezae,Reddis or Reda).  The Greek geographer Strabo describes the tribe of Celtic Tectosages as “Simple and modest in their way of lifebut they fear the gods. Another report comes from the Roman authors Pomponius from southern Spain who has written about 43 AD, his famous book De Situ Orbis Geography. In it, he describes a hidden treasure in the mines of the Pyrenees south of Carcassonne. Furthermore, there is a report that on an old parchment (which was discovered in Jerusalem in a Bible), a temple dedicated to Isis in Rhedae  under Emperor Nero. then under Titus in 70 AD baptized with the name Magdalene.

    Many think today Mary Magdalene was a Priestesses of Isis. Ironically Pope Gregory, in 591 AD  cast doubt on the “purity” of Mary Magdalene’s love for Christ when he suggested  that one of the seven demons that Christ cast out from Mary Magdalene must have been the sin of adultery. He also conflated Mary Magdalene with Mary of Bethany, the “sinner” who washed Christ’s feet with her tears and dried them with her hair, causing Peter, not exactly concerned of Anima, to wonder how Christ could allow such an appalling display of erotic attention. The idea that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute caught the collective imagination and spread like wildfire in legend and art. From Jungian view on has to take this contagious fantasy into account as meaningful projection of her sin which gets  a life of its own for psychological reasons. The Catholic Church has admitted its error in the smearing of Mary Magdalen as a prostitute, however, although Mary  Magdalene is almost always mentioned first ahead of the Virgin Mary, only a handful of scholars have attempted to reconstruct why she could have been so important. She carried a royal title that translates as “The Wise Women.” According to the Gnostics, Jesus referred to her as “The One who knew all.  The Wise Women was in Mesopotamia called Cybele, Astarte, and Ishtar, the Egyptians called her Isis, the Greeks called her Athena, and the ancient Hebrews called her Asherah, The Woman of the Tree and the very consort to the Lord God YHWH. Gnostics called her Sophia, but in the hands of the Catholic Church, she became The Black Madonna. Legend connects this Black Madonna with both Isis and Mary Magdalene.

    Bérenger Saunière  built a house and called it Villa Bethania. That he named the house like this is the nearest thing to any mysterious religious knowledge he might have had, for then the Church believed that Mary at Bethany and Mary Magdalene were different people.  But Bérenger Saunière didn’t.  He built a “folly” and called it the Tour Magdala.   There he would study and read.

    The church is dedicated to Mary Magdalene, and some people think that the priest’s great treasure was spiritual – the knowledge that Mary Magdalene and Jesus were married and had founded a bloodline, great knowledge which would destroy the Church’s concepts of virginity being related to godliness. There is no doubt that the priest loved Mary Magdalene.  He restored his church lovingly and spent a large sum on it between 1886 and 1897 of unknown origin.

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Mary Magdalen
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Mary Magdalen

    Inside the church is a statue of Mary Magdalene and she appears much more often than usual in a catholic church. It is standard iconography that Mary holds a crucifix (the crucifix was not used as an emblem until the 9th century) and her jar of ointment.  At her feet is a skull resting on a book; this signifies her meditations on mortality. Although it is nowhere mentioned in the Bible, there are well known hints that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute. If we take this story seriously what does this mean? First we know that Jesus did mix with prostitutes, tax-collector and the general outcasts of society. Second, in ancient Sumer and in Egypt, priestesses participated annually in the Sacred Marriage, representing their goddess and thus ensuring fertility and the continuance of life. It is most likely that the latter idea of “temple prostitution” arose from the participation of high priestesses in the sacred rituals.

    It is clear in the Old Testament that the priests of the god Jehovah hated the Priestesses of Goddess temples and referred to them as Temple prostitutes because it was known that in many Temples of the day used sexual rituals. One of the Gnostic Gospels was called “The Gospel of Mary” and this gospel it seems contains the teachings of Mary Magdalene. Another Gnostic Gospel (see Early christian writings here) called Pistis Sophia (Sophia was the Goddess of wisdom) is about a dialogue between Jesus and Mary Magdalene whom he calls, “dearly beloved. In one dialogue Peter complained to Jesus that Mary Magdalene dominated the conversation with Jesus but Jesus rebukes him. In another Gnostics text called “Dialogue of the Saviour” she is portrayed as a very wise Woman who understood Jesus completely unlike the rest of Jesus’s disciples. So it seems that Mary Magdalene was a very important member of early Christianity. Pistis Sophia was dated about 250 AD.  Sophia means wisdom.  In Pistis Sophia  Jesus returns to the disciples eleven years after his ascension into Heaven to exchange views on his teachings.  Pistis Sophia, written in 250 AD, apparently show the Gnostic teachings of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Arguably the Pistis Sophia is blend of primitive Christianity and Hellenic Paganism, with other elements such as reincarnation, Astrology, Mystery religion and Hermetic magic. The Goddess makes an appearance in the guise of Sophia, a Fallen Angel. In Old French legend, the exiled “Magdal-eder,” the refugee Mary who seeks asylum on the southern coast of France, is Mary of Bethany, the Magdalen. The early French legend records that Mary “Magdalene,” traveling with Martha and Lazarus of Bethany, landed in a boat on the coast of Provence in France.

    Mary Magdalen as Eros and feminine archetype

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Porta 1
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Porta 1

    Back to the Church of Mary Magdalene in Rennes-le-Chateau.  The inscription at the portal is most startling  (at the left with permission from www.marymagdalenebooks.com). The decor may seem somewhat superficial in any Catholic church at  any time and place, but a closer look reveals strangely disturbing – and perhaps even pagan – dark imager and symbols that should unsettle Christians , including a hideous grimacing plaster demon crouched just inside the door, and had the words ‘This Is A Terrible Place’ inscribed over the porch, clearly a gnostic view.

    In the church Mary is shown in conventual manner, weeping as Jesus is laid in his tomb by Joseph of Arimathea.  The person in red comforting the Virgin Mary in the background is Mary Magdalene’s brother, Lazarus. Like Isis and  Ishtar, Mary Magdalene mourns the death of the god and her partner she loves, and when he resurrects, she celebrates his renewal. Through her intense spiritual love, she represents the feminine side of the death and resurrection phenomenon that plays a facilitating role in the humanization of the god-image the reverse process of C.G Jung’s individuation. I can’t help to think which kind of love she represents.  There are four shades of love – derived from the different Greek words for love. (I have written here about it).  The Greek language distinguishes four distinct words for love: agápe, éros, philía, and storgē.

    • Storge (στοργή) means “affection” in ancient and modern Greek. It is natural love, like that is felt by parents for offspring, or between brother and sister or by children for their parents. It is a descriptor of relationships within the family. It is also known to express mere acceptance or putting up with situations, as in “loving” the tyrant. The key attribute is natural.
    • Philia (φιλία) is “conscious” love, we know from words like philosophy – love for wisdom (Sophie). It mean a feeling of friendship and enjoyment of an activity, again used in both ancient and modern Greek. It is a dispassionate virtuous love, a concept developed by Aristotle. It includes loyalty to friends, family, and community, and requires virtue, equality and familiarity. The key attribute is rational.
    • Agape (ἀγάπη) means love in a “spiritual” sense. In Ancient Greek, it often refers to a general affection or deeper sense of ” unconditional love” or altruistic love , coming from the heart. In latin the equivalent word is “caritas”, it gives and expects nothing in return. Agape is used by Christians to express the unconditional love of God for us and loving each other like we love ourselves. The key attribute is spiritual.
    • Eros (érōs) is “physical” passionate love, with sensual desire and longing without the balance of consciousness. The Modern Greek word “erotas” means “intimate love”. Plato expanded this definition: as appreciation of the beauty within an object, or even of beauty itself. Indeed the word platonic love today describes, “without physical attraction.” Plato argues that eros helps the soul find knowledge in beauty which contributes to an understanding of spiritual truth, leading to transcendence. The Greek believed that beauty can never be evil. The key attribute here is sensual.
    Mary Magdalen  Jesus
    Mary Magdalen Jesusbb

    I have written here about  feminine archetypes here. I am quite sure  Mary Magdalene represents the latter three, quite obvious since the Holy Mary represents Storge and from a Jungian view the archetype of the mother and completes the trinity to quaternity (See my article Marriages Made in Heaven : Trinity Finally Becomes a Quaternity).

    Although the Judeo-Christian fathers excluded any sign in their orthodoxy that Yahweh and Christ may have had love partners, archeological evidence and Gnostic texts point to the possibility that they did. In our era, with the psychological perspective that C. G. Jung heralded, we can  understand the role of the Eros principle [3] that was split off from our god-image, along with the “evil” of the flesh. The emergence of Mary Magdalene in popular culture as the “Holy Grail” or vessel of Christ’s child reflects the intense yearning in the psyche for the feminine principle to participate in the continuing incarnation of the god-image, and for the divine feminine–masculine partnership to realize itself in personal, human experience. Mary is also the first to experience, personally and empirically, the spiritual image of God, a paradoxical union of opposites: life and death, man and god, spirit and matter.

    Magdalen in this church painting on the front of the altar, is shown with a book and a skull and usual but with a crucifix of living wood, implying to some that Jesus did not die on the cross, as early heretics, Gnostics and Cathars believed.

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Churc Mary Magdalen with empty Cross of living wood
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Churc Mary Magdalen with empty Cross of living wood

    Many argue, that Jesus was a Gnostic teacher but did not die on the cross. We know from the Bible that Jesus spent most likely his childhood in Egypt. A very important Egyptian religion of the time was the religion Isis and Osiris. Like Jesus Osiris was a god who was murdered and then returned from the dead. Many scholars have commented on the similarities between Jesus and Osiris and Isis and the Black Madonna. I have described here, obvious similarities of the teaching of the trinity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit, with triads in ancient  religions. So it all does indicate to some that perhaps Jesus and Mary Magdalene was a trained priest and priestess in Egypt with relations to Isis and Gnosticism. In the porch of the church is yet another secret message that implies that Bérenger Saunière believed that Mary Magdalene loved Jesus, indeed, adored him.  Just recently, after some 60 years of treasure-hunters, the village is becoming greatly loved by spiritual people interested in Mary Magdalene.

    The Black Madonna

    I lived for 5 years nearby the Benedictine Abbey of Einsiedeln, close to Zurich in Switzerland.
    The breathtaking Baroque basilica in the Einsiedeln’s monastery alone is stunning, in which the  black statue  resides. The Madonna holds the Christ child, who is, himself, holding a black bird. The Way of St. James which extends from all corners of Europe, touches Einsiedeln and the 11th-century abbey of Saint-Martin-du-Canigou situated in a spectacular location in the Pyrenees mountains on the way to Santiago de Compostela and Finisterre. Black Madonnas have been a  source of mysticism within the Catholic Church.

    Black_Madonna_of_Einsiedeln
    Black_Madonna_of_Einsiedeln

    Whatever the true significance may be, approximately four hundred Black Virgins are now located throughout Europe, the majority in France. The Black Madonna can be frequently traced back to pre-Christian mother goddess figures. Black Madonnas may in fact have been originally pagan goddesses who were renamed to transfer worship of the Earth Mother to the Virgin Mary or as some believe Mary Magdalene as incarnation of Isis. The cult of Isis was one of the dominant religions of the Mediterranean during late Roman times  had spread all over Roman-occupied lands. Please refer here, to read mor how at that time the Mithras Cult, Christianity and Roman State Religion competed: Isis, Mithras and Jesus: Clash of male and female Archetypes in classical Rome.  Churches were routinely built over Isis temples after Christianity became in the fourth century state religion, like it is said happened in Rennes-le-Château. Cybele and Artemis/Diana of Ephesus, both dark-skinned fertility goddesses were still worshipped in France and the Mediterranean coast from Antibes to Barcelona during the later centuries of the Roman Empire. Cybele was during the 3rd century the supreme deity of the town of Lyon. Marseilles was devoted to Greek Artemis. When the Crusaders returned from the Middle East Knights Templar, and refuges of overun Outremer surely brought heretic and christian art and gnostic thoughts. Many of whom who were wiped out as heretics, were involved in promoting the cult of the Black Madonna and her association with Mary Magdalene. The Black Madonna Limoux, south of Carcassone very close to Rennes-le-Château. The church at Limoux is called the Notre Dame de Marceille.

    Conclusion

    What precisely the Cathars believed, remains somewhat of an enigma. Many have used it as a blank canvas, to paint their own thoughts or convictions on. Hence, a lot of myths and falsehoods now exist about Catharism. Suggestions that Jesus survived the crucifixion, went to Egypt, then settled in France are highly speculative,  lacking historical evidence (heretic gospels grew like fungus in the formative period of Christianity) and of course are alien to my belief. However, some relations between Christianity and Egypt are clearly not. So is the thought, that gnosticism was already there long before it resurfaced. There is historical and archaeological research that proves a connection between Jerusalem, Egypt, the Land of heretics and Mary Magdalene. Nor would I argue against the view, that there is much more in the story of Mary Magdalene than the gospel tells. Except maybe rhe gospel of luke Luke – my favorite – who resonates so subtile the Anima [4] of the Church in his description of Holy Mary, Mary Magdalene and Mary of Bethany. Is seems almost they represent the classic female archetypes of love and their shadows – from a Jungian view.  Notable, the Cathars recited from the gospel of Luke during the ceremony of receiving  the consolamentum and become “bonhomme”.

    I might return to the subject and the location.

    Bishop Fulk, asking a knight why he did not expel heretics, received the classic answer: ‘We cannot. We have been reared in their midst. We have relatives among them and we see them living lives of perfection.’

    Malcolm Lambert,

    The Cathars

    Notes:

    1. Some of biggest creative thinker of the humanity, like C.G. Jung were de facto semi-gnostic and spiritualist. Might has always utilized symbols and collective archetypes. This is valid from  Greek philosopher Plato,  Dante Alighieri’s “La Divina Commedia”, up to Richard Wagner’s Parsifal, to name just a few.
    2. In the 20th century Freud made the mistake, equating drive energy strictly with sexual energy. Jung’s break from Freud came in part because Jung saw drive energy as transpersonal and deriving from the unconscious, the feminine counterpart to consciousness.
    3. Pope Gregory the Great’s homily on Luke’s Gospel, dated 14 September 591, first suggested that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute: “She whom Luke calls the sinful woman, whom John calls Mary, we believe to be the Mary from whom seven devils were ejected according to Mark. And what did these seven devils signify, if not all the vices? … It is clear, brothers, that the woman previously used the unguent to perfume her flesh in forbidden acts” (1844–1864, Homily XXXIII, col. 1238–1246).
    4. Though critical, the role of the animus must be left for another time. I recommend Animus and Anima, Emma Jung.Gnosticism Term used to designate many different sects who flourished in the first few centuries AD. many elements of Christian Gnosticism are pre-Christian Gnostics, such as the belief in Dualism. The name derives from the Greek word for knowledge, gnosis.
    5. Gnosticism: Term used to designate many different sects . Many elements of Christian Gnosticism are pre-Christian Gnostics, such as the belief in Dualism. The name derives from the Greek word for knowledge, gnosis. Gnosticism can be found  around all revealing religions as it is essentially syncretistic .
    6. Dualism: The belief that good and evil are two independent, opposing principles.
    7. Bogomilism: Dualist heresy founded by the priest Bogomil in the early tenth century in Bulgaria. The earliest tangible evidence is datable to 1167. The movement survived up to the nineteenth century. It appears to have influenced Catharism strongly, although some see other, local roots.
    8. Paulicianism: Dualist heresy that emerged in seventh-century Armenia. In 717, a council of the Armenian Church denounced them as ‘sons of Satan’ and ‘fuel for the fire eternal’. They are thought to have survived until the seventeenth century.
    9. Docetism: The belief that Christ did not have a physical body, common amongst Gnostics. Docetics believed that Jesus’s body was an illusion, as was his crucifixion. Docetism was declared heretical by the Church. Both the Bogomils and the Cathars were Docetist.
    10. Essenes: Radical Jewish sect that existed from the second century BC to the first century AD.  Some argue that  that both Jesus and John the Baptist had links with the sect. The community at Qumran, which produced the Dead Sea Scrolls, is thought to have been Essene.
    11. Elchasaites: Jewish Christian sect who were, interestingly, also known as katharoi. Their most famous member was the Persian prophet Mani.
    12. Manichaeism: Dualist religion founded by the Persian prophet Mani in the third century. As it had an Universalist claim it was majorcompetition, Wiped out in Europe during the sixth century, and emigrated as the Nestorians to Asia. ‘Manichaean’ became a blanket term for heretic during the Middle Ages
    13. Adoptionism: Belief that Christ was not born divine, but only became so after his baptism.
    14. Nestorianism The belief, first proposed by Nestorius, then patriarch of Constantinople in the fourth century, that Christ’s person contained two separate beings, one human, the other divine. Nestorianism was declared heretical at the Council of Ephesus in 431, but it survived in Asia and came back ironically with the Mongols in the thirteenth century. See Phillip Jenkins “Jesus Wars”.
    15. Arianism Named after Arius (256–336), from Alexandria, denied that Christ and God were one person, seeing them instead as two different Divine entities. Declared heretical at the Council the Council of Nicaea.
    16. Marcionism Gnostic dualist sect that taught the principle of the two gods, with Christ being the son of the true god, and the Jehovah of the Old Testament being seen as the evil god.
    17. Some Cathar terms:
      1. Listeners In the Cathar context, a Listener was a person interested in Catharism, but was not ready or willing to become an actual member of the church, which required the taking of the convenanza.
      2. Believers The majority of Cathars were Believers. That is to say, they had taken the convenanza, but were not yet consoled. They were not subject to any dietary restrictions.
      3. Perfects In the Cathar context their priests. Perfect The were ascetics who were the heart and soul of the Cathar movement. Bogomilism also had similar classes
      4. Consolamentum Cathar rite of baptism that elevated the Believer to the state of a Perfect.
      5. Convenanza Formal rite that made a Cathar Listener a Believer.

    Bibliography

    • The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy (Yale Nota Bene),  Stoyanov, Yuri
    • The Cathars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Heresy by  Sean Martin
    • The Knights Templar: The History and Myths of the Legendary Military Order by Sean Martin
    • Malcolm Barber, The Trial of the Templars (Cambridge University Press, 1978); The New Knighthood: A History of the Order of the Temple (Cambridge University Press, 1994)
    • Gnosticism and Early Christianity by R. M. Grant
    • Jesus Wars Harper, 2010 by Phillip Jenkins
    • The Treasure of Rennes-le-Chateau: A Mystery Solved, by Bill Putnam
    • C.G. Jung,  Aion Untersuchungen zur Symbolgeschichte
    • A History of Egypt from the Earliest Times to the Persian Conquest, James Henry Breasted Kindle-Edition
    • The Religions of Ancient Egypt and Babylonia A. H. (Archibald Henry) Sayce Kindle-Edition
    • Malcolm Barber & Keith Bate (translators & editors), The Templars: Selected Sources (Manchester Medieval Sources Series, Manchester University Press, 2002)
    • The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries by Rodney Stark
    • The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia–and How It Died by Philip Jenkins
    • Historia Mundi Volume IV, Lehnen Verlag,  Die Kirche zur Zeit der Apostel und Märtyrer
    • The Cults of the Roman Empire, Robert Turcan
    • Les sites templiers, Jea Luc Barbiere
    • Haskins, S.  Mary Magdalene: Myth and meaning,  (1993) New York, NY: Riverhead Books
    • Animus and Anima, Emma Jung
    • STRUKTURFORMEN DER WEIBLICHEN PSYCHE wolff  Structural forms of the Feminine psyche (http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00001582/00001)
    • Early christian writings
    • Interesting reading http://www.marymagdalenebooks.com

    Speculative

    • Jesus after the Crucifixion: From Jerusalem to Rennes-le-Château, by Graham Simmans
    • Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (Jonathan Cape, 1982)
    • Rennes le Château Rennes le Château Temple of Mysteries
    • Pistis Sophia


    Earlier Gnostic Writings and Cathar Texts

    • The Cathar religion represents a major medieval resurgence of Gnosticism, and we offer an important collection of Cathar Texts, including the complete manuscript of the Lyon Ritual, Interrogatio Iohannis, and The Book of the Two Principles.
    • While the Nag Hammadi Library represents the richest  source of classical Gnostic texts, many other primary Gnostic documents were discovered in the century prior to the Nag Hammadi find.  These are cataloged in the Classical Gnostic Scriptures and Fragments section.
    • Of associated interest is the Christian Apocrypha and Early Christian Literature, a section containing other important Christian texts surviving outside canonical tradition, some of which manifest Gnostic influence.
    • The G.R.S Mead Collection contains over a dozen volumes written by G. R. S. Mead (1863-1933), one the greatest early scholars of Gnosticism.  These works provide an invaluable evaluation of texts relating to Gnostic tradition available before discovery of the Nag Hammadi collection.
    • Opinion about the tradition was primarily based on Works Against the Gnostics by the Church Fathers.  I included is a full text site search function.
    • A large sample of these  is presented in the Manichaean Writings collection, along with an introductory lecture.
    • Also included in the library is a section devoted to Mandaean Texts and this still living Gnostic tradition.

    Contemporary Gnostic Writings and Jungian Texts

    Alchemy was recognized by C. G. Jung as another strand of Gnosticism;

    The Nag Hammadi Library

    • Excerpt from Elaine Pagels’ excellent popular introduction to the Nag Hammadi texts.
    • The Nag Hammadi Library, a collection of thirteen ancient codices containing over fifty texts, was discovered in upper Egypt in 1945. This immensely important discovery includes a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures — texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define “orthodoxy” — scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library has provided impetus to a major re-evaluation of early Christian history and the nature of Gnosticism.
    • We have add extensive resources on two centrally important texts from Nag Hammadi: The Gospel of Thomas and The Secret Book of John. Multiple authoritative translations of several Nag Hammadi scriptures are included in the collection.
    • Valentinus and Valentinian Gnosis. Valentinus was one of the most influential Gnostic Christian teachers of the second century A.D., and was the only Gnostic considered for election as Bishop of Rome (Pope). He founded a movement which spread throughout Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Despite persecution by developing orthodoxies, the Valentinian school endured for over 600 years. A large number of texts in the Nag Hammadi collection are influence by Valentinian tradition. Due to its importance, we have a large section of the library dedicated specifically to Valentinus and the Valentinian Tradition.


    Hermetism and the Hermetic Gnosis — including the Corpus Hermeticum

    • Beyond the bounds of classical Christian Gnosticism — represented by the above materials — the Hermetic tradition is another very important and influential Western tradition of Gnostic character.  The Hermetic writings represents a non-Christian lineage of Gnosticism. Our Corpus Hermeticum and Hermetic Writings section offers the most extensive collection of Hermetic texts available on the internet. Included here you will find introductory material, the complete texts of the Corpus Hermeticum, and essentially all other extant Hermetic writings. Included is an introductory lecture.

    The Dead Sea Scrolls Collection

    • The Dead Sea Scrolls Collection in the Gnostic Society Library is one of the largest and most referenced Dead Sea Scroll resources on the internet. During the middle years of the twentieth century two important but very different collections of ancient religious texts were unearthed in Palestine and Egypt: the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library.

    Illustrations are my own (except stated otherwise) and may be used with quoting the proper sources.

  • The banality of evil from a Jungian view

    The banality of evil from a Jungian view

    We’ve all heard the phrase “the banality of evil”, coined by the political theorist Hannah Arendt. Her 1951 masterwork, “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” about the parallels between Hitler’s Third Reich and Stalinist Russia, made her an intellectual celebrity. In her book, she argued that totalitarian regimes seek to dominate every aspect of everyone’s life as a prelude to world domination. Reflecting recent events, on more than one occasion the phrase “the banality of evil” crossed my mind. Touched by her psychological and philosophical view to totalitarian systems, I often wondered, how this radical political theorist would have commented to evil political events of the new millennium. Based on her quotes this essay suggests, that we live in the advent of new totalitarian regimes. I was very hesitant to publish this essay. Why? The psychological and philosophical analysis cannot be strictly separated from its political perspective. Be assured, that I am just interested in todays Evil from a Jungian view without political prejudices.

    Totalitarianism and supranationalism

    TheOrginsArendt emphasized repeatedly  that totalitarianism differs essentially from other forms of political oppression known to us such as despotism, tyranny and dictatorship. Wherever it rose to power, it developed entirely new political institutions and destroyed all social, legal and political traditions of the country. The term totalitarian, first used in the late ’20s, was not fully developed until the late ’40s and early ’50s, when a classical literature arose describing a new kind of tyranny created in this century.  Arendt discusses the use of supranational organizations, fake (non) governmental agencies, and doctrines as a means of concealing totalitarian aims. She claimed for instance that the Nazis were not simple nationalists. Their propaganda was directed toward their fellow-travelers and not their convinced members; the latter, on the contrary, were never allowed to lose sight of a consistently supranational approach to politics.

    Their aim was a dominating superstructure which would destroy all home-grown national structures alike. They could indulge in hypernationalistic talk even as they prepared to destroy the body politic of their own nation, because tribal nationalism, with its immoderate lust for conquest, was one of the principal powers by which to force open the narrow and modest limits of the nation-state and its sovereignty.

    Isolation and loneliness of the individual

    What made totalitarianism unique was its militant, messianic ideology; its mobilization of the masses; its total control of social life (all independent “intermediate” structures — such as churches, parties, unions — standing between the individual and the state were to be eradicated); and its systematic use of terror to enforce that control. Totalitarian regimes were thought to be (under Hitler and Stalin they certainly were) energetic, enthusiastic in an almost religious sense, on the march. Orwell’s 1984 seen from today was not a parody. It was just a mild extrapolation of past totalitarian reality and a abstract picture of today’s totalitarian possibilities. Totalitarian domination as a form of government is not content with isolation in public political life  but aims to destroy private life as well. It bases itself on loneliness, on the experience of not belonging oneself, which is among the most radical and desperate experiences of man. Superfluousness which have been the curse since the beginning of the industrial  revolution, have become individual isolation and loneliness – one looses even contact with the Self – both outcome and precondition of totalitarian domination.

     

    The Banality of Evil

    Hannah Arendt most memorably employed it in both the subtitle and closing words of Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, her book on the trial of Nazi lieutenant-colonel Adolf Eichmann. To Arendt’s mind, Eichmann willingly did his part to organize the Holocaust — and an instrumental part it was — out of neither anti-semitism nor pure malice, but out of a non-ideological, entirely more opportunistic combination of careerism and obedience.

    The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.

    This kind of evil is very tricky to explain, but one Jungian definition could be this one: Banal evil is a kind of evil
    which is unconscious, a kind of evil that the “evil person” hasn’t reflected over. The complex or the shadow took over.  It’s also a kind of evil that is not considered evil by the person who acts, in the moment of the evil act. The reason why the person doesn’tconsider the act as an evil act is mainly ignorance or inconsiderateness of the Ego.

    In 1961, The New Yorker sent her on her request to cover the trial of Adolf Eichmann, one of the chief instrument of the Third Reich’s Final Solution, who had been kidnapped by Mossad operatives and brought to Jerusalem to stand trial for his crimes. The five-part article which emerged, “Eichmann in Jerusalem,” set off what is considered to be one of the most passionate and best public debates concerning Evil ever to take place

    Arendt, who was born into a secular family of German Jews present-day Hanover and grew up in Königsberg (now Kaliningrad). and Berlin. She studied philosophy with Martin Heidegger (later tainted by his support of the Nazis) and wrote her dissertation in Heidelberg under the existentialist philosopher-psychologist Karl Jaspers on the concept of love in the thought of Saint Augustine, published 1929.  In 1933, she was arrested by the Gestapo for collecting evidence of anti-Semitic propaganda. After fleeing to Paris, she worked for a Jewish relief group before being sent to a French internment camp, from which she escaped. She and her second husband, Heinrich Bluecher a  German Communist, emigrated to America..

    Arendt’s original series of “Eichmann in Jerusalem” articles can be found in the New Yorker‘s online archives:: part one, part two, part three, part four, and part five. Although the poet Robert Lowell called “Eichmann in Jerusalem” a “masterpiece,” Arendt’s portrait of Eichmann as a bureaucrat motivated not by extreme ideology but rather by ambition disturbed many people. Throughout the piece, Arendt wrestles with her perception of Eichmann, calling him “monstrous” yet “terrifyingly normal.” Many readers objected to Arendt’s use of the term “banality of evil” to describe Eichmann. In a Reflections piece published posthumously, Arendt expanded on her use of the controversial phrase:

    I was struck by a manifest shallowness in the doer which made it impossible to trace the incontestable evil of his deeds to any deeper level of roots or motives. The deeds were monstrous, but the doer—at least, the very effective one now on trial—was quite ordinary, commonplace, and neither monstrous nor demonic.

    Go back 60 years to the controversy that surrounded Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, a study of the Adolf Eichmann trial, in which she coined this famous phrase “the banality of evil.” Arendt wrote in a letter to a friend: “It is indeed my opinion now that evil is never ‘radical,’ that it is only extreme, and that it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension. It can overgrow and lay waste the whole world precisely because it spreads like a fungus on the surface.” This was what Hannah Arendt meant: Evil is unspectacular and always human. The normality of evil is evident.

    In any event, the fearful imagination has the great advantage to dissolve the sophistic-dialectical interpretations of politics which are all based on the superstition that something good might result from evil. Such dialectical acrobatics had at least a semblance of justification so long as the worst that man could inflict upon man was murder.

    The truth about evil that needs attention now is its shallow, deadly, fungus quality. Today evil destroys not only  life, but it destroys the fact of existence itself. In a tiny, multicultural world in which different civilizations inhabit different centuries–are often moved by evil deeds, like blowing up the Other. Don’t bother demonizing  terrorists as being inherently evil (as Satan is evil). That’s not how it works.

    Opportunistic evil passes like unconscious complexes (in a Jungian sense – negative energy) through the world, clustered in supranational institutions and financial concentrations, that take up residence in individuals or cultures from time to time. For example, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), an organization of 186 countries has been the centerpiece of the world monetary order since its creation in 1944, and its supervisory role has been considerably strengthened after the advent of floating rates of 1973. The role of the IMF in the current EU-crises and  global events has been largely overlooked. But this is not the story I like to tell here.

    The Global Evil

    Distance once helped dampen the effects of human wickedness, and weapons once had limited range. But evil has burst into a new dimension. The globalization, democratization and efficiency  of the instruments of destruction and control  mean a quantum leap in the delivery systems of evil. Drones for full physical control or their diabolical stepbrother of electronic and financial means  for full virtual control, un-leveled the local playing field globally again – and the level field has fungus on it.  For a short while ragged Islamist group with weapons, which sells girls in slavery can terrorize citizens by asymmetric strategies, but even then, the Local Evil serves a purpose for the Global Evil.

    Only crime and the criminal, it is true, confront us with the perplexity of radical evil; but only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core.

    The Global Evil potential became a world-historical force, but with more discretionary destructive power at hand than the great old monsters, from Caligula to Stalin, ever had. In the new dimension, micro-evil (the dark impulse to rape or murder, say) and macro-evil (economic genocide) achieve an ominous reunion in any bid for the apocalyptic gesture. That’s the real evil that is going around. Most revolutions, as historical analyst  Hannah Arendt points out in her 1963 published book “the fools of history”, have not established and maintained a state of liberty in which a common citizen can usually make politically heard. Even the American Revolution ultimately failed because Americans lost interest in their political condition in order to pursue their private gain.

    Omnipotent Evil

    ResetTheNetAccording to Arendt that totalitarian totalitarian elites have usually a firm and sincere belief their unilateral omnipotence. Totalitarianism and the belief to be chosen to lead the world instead of other less worthy powers go together. This moral cynicism, their belief that everything is permitted, rests on the solid conviction that everything is allowed to them. Moral decisions become dependent on the context. Aggression on the grounds of “ exceptionalism”, is backed by the dubious idea that some are special and cannot be held to the same standards as others. Unilateralism, preemption, and exceptionalism, the toxic combo that has spurred hundreds of of wars, territory occupation, regime change, global surveillance, extra-judicial assassinations, drone attacks, and hyperbolic state terror most of which has been directed at civilian populations whose only fault is that they occupy regions which have some geostrategic or economic importance.

    The totalitarian attempt at global conquest and total domination has been the destructive way out of all impasses. Its victory may coincide with the destruction of humanity; wherever it has ruled, it has begun to destroy the essence of man.


    And if it is true that in the final stages of totalitarianism an absolute evil appears (absolute because it can no longer be deduced from humanly comprehensible motives), it is also true that without it we might never have known the truly radical nature of Evil.

    Narcissism of totalitarian belief systems

    It’s a cliché to say that most politicians become arrogant if they are in office for more than about six or seven years,  and become quite disconnected from reality. We perhaps didn’t realise when the exceptionalism doctrine was presented first – that exceptionalism is a extreme form of narcissism, a messiah complex, that had been always an thriving impulse in  totalitarian systems.

    narcissus-large“If you had to summarise narcissism, it’s a feeling of specialness,” says Dr Adam Perkins, a researcher at King’s College London’s Institute of Psychiatry. “Narcissists view themselves as special, as deserving of better treatment than the rest of the world.”

    I have experienced and written how narcissism and excessive self-confidence can actually “help” in the political realm often supporting a negative selection. When action is needed, Narcissism – even of the mildly delusional variety – may be a useful thing in publicity.

    And a healthy dose of narcissism is probably protective in certain situations. “If you’re dumped as a leader, it might help you to feel special – to think, well, their loss.

    Narcissus fell in love with his own reflection not because he was narcissistic, necessarily, but because his reflection was so beautiful. Extreme narcissism, however, like psychopathy, usually manifests itself evil. Narcissus’s story ended badly, of course. According to the The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder can be made if a patient (or system sic!) displays five of the following nine symptoms:

    • An exaggerated sense of one’s own abilities and achievements.
    • A constant need for attention, affirmation and praise.
    • A belief that he or she is unique or “special”.
    • Persistent fantasies about attaining success and power.
    • Exploiting others for personal gain.
    • A sense of entitlement and expectation of special treatment.
    • A preoccupation with power or success.
    • Feeling envious of others, or believing that others are envious.
    • A lack of empathy for others.

    I mean here extreme exceptionalism, evident in political correctness and certain supranational elites (inner circle) and organisations, and recently very openly in super powers again. Extreme unreflected exceptionalism  has been a trademark of feudal systems with a thin ruling class and a large peasant class.

    Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda.

    Lying and deceiving

    snowden4Totalitarian policy is as a case of the government beginning to believe their own propaganda about their narcissist exceptionalism. The distorted reality will be believed by those who use them, just as C.G. Jung said – the unconscious in us is real. It is this form of perceived omnipotence that leads to bullying and manipulating the citizens and the failed Hero acting of the elite: the weak king, the cruel warrior, the wicked magicians, the narcissistic lover. Sure, there are also clear political struggles and psychological motives behind the supranational and unipolar debate: the establishment join in the hope for the blessings of a centralist post-democratic state, because they share belief in the stability of the state as sole power (and on its non accountable priests). Anything significant beyond the state (such as the individual, the family, the truth, the religion), would challenge the semi-religious ego of the transnational institutions – not only their political clout.

    The trouble with lying and deceiving is that their efficiency depends entirely upon a clear notion of the truth that the liar and deceiver wishes to hide.In this sense, truth, even if it does not prevail in public, possesses an ineradicable primacy over all falsehoods.

    Dissent thoughts let the inner circle fear for the long-awaited stability of a nation less and culture less state. That was the reason why the Europe’s leaders and the EU bureaucracy has been trying to reassure the public with obviously wrong assurances and after an earthquakes election continue with business as usual. Assurances, which are obviously wrong arouse always a debate and laid the foundation of today’s distrust in opponents. This triggered even neutral public figures, to believe that conspiracy theories might be plausible. Welcome to virtual reality. In George Orwell’s dark vision, the year 1984 would see the triumph of totalitarianism in Europe—an era of Newspeak and Doublethink, of dictatorial cruelty and dehumanizing coercion. That fateful year is now three decades away, and it seems less and less visible that Orwell’s grim prophecy  proved correct.

    Conclusion

    I’ve read Hannah Arendt “Eichmann in Jerusalem” and “The Origins of Totalitarianism”, several times – it always amazes me. I find Arendt very hard to disagree with – she just seems so shrewd, so alert, annoyingly good at noticing everything that needs noticing; She must have it right. Writing 50 years ago, this great theorists of totalitarianism, noted that totality and irreversibility are related. It used to be thought that totalitarianism had repealed the law of history by which power sows the seeds of its own destruction. If sheer ruthless vigilance could destroy any center of opposition, even any island of independent thought, then — aside from external conquest, with humanitarian  pretext — totalitarian rule could never be reversed. Conversely, if total control fails due to today’s interconnected multipolar world, what happens to single-minded direction? If totalitarianism can decay, can it not be transformed? We don’t yet know. We know only that it can be modified. It can give way to a society with some space. How much? Well,  somewhat between 1984 with drones,  full coverage realtime surveillance and a brave new world of constructed realities.

    Obviously you can read the banality of evil as a description of the ordinariness of the people involved, or as a statement about the optimisation of work in international institutions like the IMF or others. The point about the ‘radical’ evil – the cruel, savage, sadistic kind – is that it is much easier to spot. Is is visual, it is on CNN.  That is what makes it all the more important to be aware of ‘evil’s’ other face – the unconscious  evil. It hides in the balance sheets.

    Economic growth may one day turn out to be a curse rather than a good, and under no conditions can it either lead into freedom or constitute a proof for its existence.

    The banality of evil is not so banal after all.

    Bibliography

    • Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963). (Rev. ed. New York: Viking)
    • The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). second enlarged edition;  A MERIDIAN BOOK First Meridian printing September 1958 Seventh printing September 1962
    • The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).
    • On Revolution (New York: Viking, 1963).

    Note: the first two books are available as free of charge ebooks.