Tag: Spiritual

  • A Jungian journey through a land of heretics and Mary Magdalene

    A Jungian journey through a land of heretics and Mary Magdalene

    Lastours - our campground facing Château de Cabaret, Tour Régine, Château de Surdespine und Château de Querthineux
    Lastours – our campground facing Château de Cabaret, Tour Régine, Château de Surdespine und Château de Querthineux

    I  just came back from Languedoc-Roussillon, where I followed the footsteps of May Magdalene the Templars and the heretic Cathars. This essay will focus on their similarity with early Christian and Jewish Gnostic thoughts, in which C.G. Jung was very interested. Where did the Cathars came from and what were there beliefs? What was the mystic and symbolic importance of Mary Magdalene, who is still worshiped prominently there in Catholic Churches?

    In Languedoc-Roussillon Cathar castles and Templar remains,  Abbeys and Châteaus are inspired by powerful myths , major mysteries, complex religious history, symbols of psychological relevance  and – also significant pseudo-history. There a lots of stories about the Crusades and the mysteries of Sacred France in regards to Jesus, Mary Magdalene connected to it. Or, as in the cases of Rennes-le-Château, downright fabrications and conspiracy theories. So my journey became a transformational journey visiting places with magic and mysticism in addition to hiking, camping and photographing.

    The Déjà-vu

    My American wife,  recently very pro-French again (wine and food) proposed the very south-west of France to improve my son’s French, she said. It is a long but doable drive, meaning that our  Labrador – a good hiker – could accompany us. I tought there could be something in for me too: visiting the remains of  Gnosticism and Templars.  At some point the journey almost brought back 1971, when I travelled with two friends extensively in the Middle East, in particular Lebanon and Syria.

      The Château de Montségur is probably the best known of all Cathar Castles. It is famous as the last Cathar stronghold, which fell after a 10 month siege in 1244. A field below the hilltop castle is reputed to be the site where over 200 Cathars were burned alive, having refused to renounce their fait

    The Château de Queribus is probably the best known of all Cathar Castles. Some say it is the last Cathar stronghold, after Montesegur fell after a 10 month siege in 1244. A field below the hilltop castle Montesgur is reputed to be the site where over 200 Cathars were burned alive, having refused to renounce their fait

    One drives through a harsh, sometimes nearly unpopulated rural area , ruled by medieval castles which you can visit in smoldering heat, often by yourself. Languedoc-Roussillon and especially the department Aude has been like Syria always cultural fertile and diverse with all its violent consequences. Like Levante and Egypt, Languedoc-Roussillonon harbors historical significance for Christianity and Gnosticism and their fight with each other, in what Phillip Jenkins called Jesus Wars“. I have written about that here. Through Templars and the crusades this geographic and cultural regions are even themselves interconnected.  The 11th century was the century of monks and knights, but also of a second wave of religious disputes like in the first two centuries, the century of heretics. While waves of Crusaders were fighting in Palestine, the common people of Europe were experiencing a crisis of faith. The Cathars, who lead an austere lifestyle, flourished in Aude and Herault at the foothills of the Pyrenees. My thoughts about them in the context of the Templars here.

    This second wave of Gnosticism in Europe started a decade years after Jerusalem fell. Graham Simms and others have written about Jesus after the Cruzification. The book Holy Blood, Holy Grail  put forward a hypothesis, that the historical Jesus married Mary Magdalene, and their children emigrated to what is now southern France and that would eventually initiated the Merovingian dynasty. This was later trivialized in the Da Vinci Code and correctly rebuked by serious historians. The Templar-Grail myth and the Rennes-le-Château version have been scolded as two of most notorious  pseudo-histories and classic examples of conspiracy theories in history.

    It seems sometimes, we experience today a third wave of Gnosticism, although only a trickle in the void of nihilism. Basic Gnostic theology was already known from the Nag Hammadi  texts and earlier finds. Christianity has always had many variants, just as it does today, and Gnosticism is still alive and well. At some point, serious believers must decide where to place their faith not to be detracted from the basic Christian message, unless they want it. In any case from, this essay takes an interest in the transmission of thoughts from Jerusalem and Alexandria to southern France.

    History of the Region

    The region is named Languedoc, after the language formerly spoken there – the Language of Oc or Occitan and famous by its historic walled city of Carcassone in the north, once overrun by the Moores, today by visitors. The Pyrenees-Oriantales form  in the West the border between France and Spain with both sides actual Catalan (still a spoken language). The area was trading extensively with Greece and was later called Septimania, because Augustus settled his veterans of the 7th legion there. After the break-up of the Roman Empire, this part of Gaul was dominated by the Visigoths, who migrated into France from central Europe. They sacked Rome in 491 and are known to have carried off the sacred treasure that the Romans had taken from the Temple of Jerusalem. The Visigoths dominated the Languedoc from the 5th until the 8th centuries with strongholds in Carcassone and Narbonne. There are also many remains of  fortifications found around Rennes-le-Château, as mentioned a village with a recent “mystery story” and myriads of explanations on its own with a little help of the BBC.

    After the Visigoths, the Arabs dominated the area for much of the 8th century. The sacred treasure is last recorded in the Visigoth treasury at Carcassone, but disappears from history after the Moorish invasions  in the 8th century from Spain.  Languedoc had also a substantial Jewish population in the region from Roman times – and 768 due to their help pushing back of the Arabs, a semi-autonomous Jewish principality was established there. Until the 13th century Languedoc was defacto independent of the rest of France ruled by the Counts of Toulouse. The Languedoc had its own distinct culture, which at that time – probably because of influence of Greek and Jewish – was the most cultured and advanced in Europe. It was here that the troubadour movement flourished and Gnostic thought resurfaced 1000 years after it was stamped out in the cradle of Christianity in the Middle East. In the 12th and 13th centuries the region was the heartland of the Cathar heresy, supported by the Counts of Toulouse. This gnostic form of Christianity is a strong dualism, essentially very similar to the Manichean thoughts and totally opposed to materialism and authority of the Church of Rome.The bloody and traumatic genocide of the Albigensian Crusade, so named after the major Cathar town of Albi, marked a watershed in the history of the Languedoc, ending the south of France’s independence, becoming subordinate to the north. The crusade against the Cathars infamously ended after the siege of Montségur.

    The other major power in the medieval  France were the Knights Templar, that mysterious order of warrior-monks formed during the Crusades. They were conspicuously neutral – some suspected even secretly helping the Cathars.  After having outlived their usefulness after the fall of  Outremer in the Holy land, the Templars were accused for secret heresy and for similar reasons (greed and power struggle although her of temporal forces) stamped out a century after the Cathars genocide. Although the Templars were found throughout Europe, the greatest concentration of their property was in the Languedoc and the neighbouring Roussillon region. After the crusade against the Cathars, the Languedoc retained its heretical character. The first witch trials in Europe were held at Toulouse in the 14th century. In later centuries, Languedoc was famed as a centre for alchemists – the town of Alet-les-Bains, 5 miles north of Rennes-le-Château, being a particular centre for the so-called ‘black art’.

    Dualism

    Ugo Bianchi, an  Italian historian of religions identified three distinct features of Dualism:

    1. Absolute Dualism regards the two principles of good and evil as coeternal and equal, whilst moderate Dualism regards the evil principle as a secondary, lesser power to the good principle.
    2. Absolute Dualism sees the two principles as locked in combat for all eternity. Many absolute dualists’, regards time as cyclical and therefore lean to in reincarnation, whereas moderate Dualism sees historical time as being finite and linear; at the end of time, the evil principle will be defeated by the good.
    3. Absolute Dualism sees the material world completely evil, but moderate Dualism regards creation as essentially good.

    Clearly the Cathars were absolute dualists, however this definition may be used to classify Christianity as moderate dualists, without  the great (religious) philosopher Augustine of Hippo, who added our free will and  Omne bonum a Deo, omne malum ab homine – “All good from God, all evil from man.”  The psychoanalytic C.G .Jung said under the impression of the second world war: We need more understanding of human nature, because the only real danger that exists is man himself. ” Simpler said, We’ve all got both light and dark inside us. The Shadow, as C.G. Jung defined it, is in us.  

    Christian dualist heresy has always derived from a tradition that was ‘hidden’ or ‘concealed’ or suppressed from late antiquity onwards. Frome the Catholic/Orthodox point this tradition was mostly recognized as Manichaeism, occasionally in combination with other ancient dualist heretics. From the other side, of course it have been the early Christian apostles who became corrupted by the Church. Hence, this revealing of a kind of ‘secret history’ and attempt to reconstruct suppressed or concealed religious development follows the pattern of pseudo-history.

    Manicheanism

    Gnostic-Manichaean doctrines offered an investigation of the important dualist religious currents. Dualism defines distinctive source of evil in the divine and supernatural sphere the interrelationships between the divine, human and natural world.

    The syncretism and distorted borrowings between the orthodox and heretical religions in antiquity and the Middle Ages present a complex picture. Arguably the development of such religious ideas are best evaluated over a great period of time.

    With the establishment, expansion and consolidation of the Christianity, Judaism and Islam, other religious traditions dualism routinely attacked by its monistic critics, began to decline and even disappear from their traditional spheres of influence in Mediterranean Europe and the Near East. However, during the High Middle Ages dualist religiosity in Europe was resurrected, mainly through the missionary efforts of the Bogomil and Cathar heresies.  The ecclesiastical and secular elites of medieval Christendom had to pursue what they saw as a re-fight of the battle against its revived ancient Manichaeism, the only universal religion to emerge from the great spiritual turmoil in third-century Mesopotamia. In Manichaeism, the traditional dualist religious vision which divided divine reality and the world into two opposed realms of good and evil was further magnified. Mani, the founder of Manichaeism, proclaimed that his intricate dualist system formed  a meta-religion and underlay the teachings of Zoroaster, Buddha and Christ after it reached this universalist phase, having passed through a centuries-old evolution in Iran and the eastern Mediterranean world.

    ‘Dualism’ has a different usage in philosophical-historical and religio-historical contexts. In religious systems such as Manichaeism  it means God and the devil as two coeternal principles.  In more general terms, the term dualism is applied also to philosophical systems fort pairs of oppositions like that of Plato, with its dualities between the mortal body and the immortal soul, or the world perceived by the senses and the world of eternal ideas, comprehended by the mind; or the Kantian distinction between the phenomenal and the noumenal world.

    Kabbalistic Gnosticism

    Jung has been often (rightfully) seen of being a contemporary Gnostic. [1] However, the interpretations which Jung places on Gnosticism and the texts which Jung refers to on alchemy, were often Kabbalistic, so much so that one would be more justified in calling the Jung of the Mysterium Coniunctionis  or Kabbalistic in contemporary disguise. One of the most serious and arguably criticisms against Kabbalah and the early Gnosticism was of course, that they may lead away from monotheism, and instead promote dualism, the belief that there is a counterpart to God: The good power versus an evil power. Gnostic-dualistic cosmology having roots in Zoroastrianism, believes since creation good and evil forces are divided; Neo-Platonism (which found its way in Christianity), argues that the universe knew a primordial harmony,  disrupted by an evil force. Some argue that both models influenced Catharism.

    Catharism

    Queribus
    Queribus

    Catharism was the most successful heresy of the Middle Ages, essentially a Neo-Dualism  which followed the classical religious doctrine of the two principles. Most scholar agree Catharism had its roots in the Paulician movement in Armenia and the Bogomils of Bulgaria, as they inherited much (beliefs and organisation) from the Bogomils. However, explanations that it derived from local Jewish Gnostics, like the Essenes or even early Christians migrated to there are quite plausible. Often labeled as Neo-Manichaeism, one has to be aware, that Manichaeism was used then as a blanket term for Gnostics.
    Flourishing principally in the Languedoc (Southern France and Northern Spain) and Italy, the Cathars taught that the world is evil and must be transcended through a simple life of prayer, work, fasting and non-violence. As all heretics, the Cathars believed themselves to be the heirs of the true heritage of Christianity going back to apostolic times, and completely rejected the Catholic Church. Most of the bible was rejected (except St. John) and Cathar services and ceremonies, were held in fields and in people’s premises. The main focus, however, has always been on the Cathars (from the Greek word meaning ‘pure’), a name that is normally reserved for the dissident Christians who lived in .

    Cathars found widespread popularity among peasants, aristocrats and merchants, which alarmed  the Church which founded the Inquisition and launched the Albigensian Crusade to exterminate the heresy. While previous Crusades had been directed against Muslims in the Middle East, the Albigensian Crusade was the first Crusade to be directed against fellow Christians, and was also the first European genocide. With the fall of the Cathar fortress of Montségur in 1244, Catharism was largely obliterated. Today, the mystique surrounding the Cathars is as strong as ever, as plenty can be written and projected about. Most of what we think we know comes from the Italian branch and inquisition protocols, because Catharism was mostly oral. What really happened, and what did the Cathars actually believe?

    The Cathar Perfect was believed to have reached state of spiritual purity had been achieved through which the Holy Spirit, thus releasing them from the burden of reincarnation and the suffering  “equal unto the angels” and thus already semi-Divine. After a rigorous training a ceremony took place in which various Scriptural extracts were like the opening verses of the Gospel of John. The Perfect were believed to have become “trans-material” or semi-angelic as expressed in the Gospel of Luke.

    The first Cathar Synod was held between 1167 and 1176 at St. Felix-de-Caraman, near Toulouse marked the start of the real struggle between the Catholic Church and Catharism, as the Church now had an organised body to fight. In 1208, Pope Innocent III repeatedly tried to use diplomacy to stop the spread of Catharism, but in that year his papal legate and hated inquisitor Pierre de Castelnau was murdered (allegedly by an agent serving the Count of Toulouse). The event pushed him from diplomacy into military action. Some even consider the death of de Castelnau a false flag operation, engineered so that the crusade would be declared. An estimated 200,000 to one million people died during the twenty year campaign, which began in earnest in Béziers in July 1209.  Papal Legate Arnaud-Amaury, saw no need to distinguish between the heretics and the thousands of faithful Catholics that lived in the city. “Kill them all,” was the abbot’s alleged reply. “God will recognise his own!” The number of dead that day was  between 7,000 and 20,000, the latter figure reported back from Arnaud-Amaury to the Pope.

    With such carnage, the other towns (e.g. Narbonne and Carcassonne) offered no resistance and soon the Southern counts had lost their territories and powers to the King of France and his allies. For these Northern lords, attaining the lands of the Languedoc had always been paramount; their mission had been accomplished.

    An Inquisition was established in Toulouse in 1229 and from 1233 onwards, hunting down Catharism was no longer done on an individual basis. Many Cathar elders realised the lethal dangers they faced and began to take refuge in the fortresses at Fenouillèdes and Montségur, while others were able to incite uprisings, which forced the Inquisition out of Albi, Narbonne and Toulouse. Count Raymond-Roger de Trencavel was defeated at Carcassonne and only those Cathars hiding in the castles remained to be eradicated. A ten month siege began of the castle of Montségur but in March 1244, the last castle  surrendered. Though their life would be spared if they recanted, the Cathars preferred to be burnt, rather than reject their faith. The last Cathar Parfait to be burnt at the stake was Guillaume Bélibaste, in 1321 in the between Rennes-le-Château  – known for the mysterious 19th century priest Bérenger Saunière, mentioned later in this essay who with somehow could afford a lavish lifestyle an triggered a massive treasure hunt in the sixties.

    Cathar Writings

    Very few Cathar tracts have come down to us. Most of the surviving works come from Italy, due to literacy levels were generally higher than in the Languedoc. The Secret Supper elucidates the Cathar creation myth, in which Satan is cast out of heaven for wishing to be greater than God. Satan pretended to repent, at which God forgave him and let him do what he wanted. With his new-found freedom, Satan created the world of matter, and formed human beings from the primordial clay. Each soul was a trapped angel from heaven. Satan then convinced humanity that he was the one true god. The most important surviving Cathar tract is The Book of the Two Principles, which was written in the 1240s, probably by John of Lugio, a Cathar from the Albanensian. The Book of the Two Principles makes a case for there being two coeternal principles of good and evil, each of which created their own spheres – heaven and the material world. by Sean Martin states in his book The Cathars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Heresy:  “The true god cannot be the author of evil. The verse in the Gospel of John which states ‘All things were made by it [the Word of God], and without it, was made nothing’ was interpreted as meaning that ‘nothing’ – i.e., the material world – was made by Satan.”

    The Cathars studied and taught solely from the New Testament, notably the Gospel of St. John and the Book of Revelations, both of which were written by Mary Magdalene’s brother, Lazarus, who was devoted to Jesus. Cathar beliefs might thus  come from Christianity in the time of Jesu. Some conclude from the Gnostic Gospels, that Mary Magdalene and Jesus were Gnostic. Gnostics believed the follower of Christ experienced Gnosis, knowledge, and thus became close to God. Some say, the Cathar were originally taught this by Mary Magdalene. As the Gnostic leaning psychoanalyst C.G. Jung described it: by knowing your Self, you can connect to God.  The Cathars only appeared out of nowhere  around the 11th century, but that they might have lived here in Languedoc hundreds of years before that, from the time of early Christianity is more plausible than the Bulgaria connection.

    Catharism and women

    Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209.
    Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209. Derived from open source.

    Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209. In this group, women appear not as numerous as men. As the early Christianity, also the Cathar movement proved to be extremely successful in gaining female follower.  Unlike often stated. the  record of Cathar and women is mixed,  but the Cathars did respect women, and women played a  role in the movement. Women could become Perfects known as Parfaites or Perfectaes. The Cathars were wary of the temptations of the flesh, but allowed females to receive the consolamentum and to preach. While women Perfects rarely traveled to preach the faith, they still played a vital role in the spreading of the Catharism by establishing group homes for women. Cathar beliefs include that one’s last incarnation had to be experienced as a man to break the cycle. Toward the end of the Cathar movement, French Catharism  started the practice of excluding women Perfects.

    Perfecti (they called themselves “bonhommes”) were expected to follow a lifestyle of extreme austerity and renunciation of the world which included abstaining from eating meat and avoiding any sexuality.  They also seem to have had their own ideas concerning Mary Magdalene. [2]

    Saint Mary Magdalene is still popular in southern France. She had been one of Christ’s followers. According to the Canonical Gospels, she was present at the Crucifixion, and the tomb of Christ, and took the news the missing body to the disciples. John’s Gospel additionally has her as the first to encounter the risen Christ, after she lingered in the garden weeping. Because of her role as messenger Mary Magdalene was afforded the title of apostola apostolorum. The early Gnostics has also revered the saint, and their writings portrayed her as a member of Christ’s inner circle. They believed Christ’s spirit appeared to her, after the Crucifixion, to reveal to her deeper spiritual truths. Gnostics also believed that Mary comprehended Christ’s teaching better than any other, being one of the closest people to him. According to one of the Gnostic apocrypha, the Gospel of Philip, she was called the companion of the Saviour.

    …But Christ loved her more than all the other disciples and used to kiss her often on the mouth. The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said to him ‘Why do you love her more than all of us?’ The saviour answered and told them ‘Why do I not love you like her?

    The Catholic Church, however, downplayed her as a penitent whore. After the crucifixion, according to the medieval myth, she came and to southern France, living out her days as a hermit. Mary’s redemption by divine grace made her a symbol of God’s forgiveness of sinners. In so far as this she may have appealed to the Templars, many of whom, in their own way, had turned their backs on sinful lives to follow Christ.  Many, including gypsies and poor people around the Languedoc, revered this saint, and believed the legend (fostered by Vezelay from the 1030s onwards) that she came there. She fled Palestine, and landed at Marseilles with Martha and Lazarus, and preached to the pagan inhabitants. Like the Gnostics before them, the Cathars elevated her above the other apostles. They may even have regarded her as the widow of Jesus. The anti-Cathar Ermegaud de Beziers and Durand de la Huesca wrote that the Cathars secretly taught that Mary Magdalene was the wife or concubine of Christ; and also that she was the woman ‘taken in adultery’ who Christ had saved from the Jews who wanted to stone her.

    Mary Magdalene

    mary magdalen st-maxim-cross - petit provence
    mary magdalen st-maxim-cross – petit provence

    From this allegation has arisen something of a conspiracy theory: It has it that knowledge of Christ’s alleged relationship with Mary (and perhaps proof thereof) passed from the Cathars to the Knights Templar. It was to remove the threat of this great secret, potentially damaging as it supposedly was to the Church, that the Catholic establishment suppressed the Templars, a century after the Albigensian Crusade. Although the theory probably has a particular appeal to those with a latent penchant for goddess worship in both cases, eliminating of the Cathars and the Templars was pure politics and greed. Many esoterics have additionally speculated that Mary Magdalene was herself of royal blood, or a priestess of some Isis/Ishtar cult, and that the Cathars and Templars regarded her almost as the embodiment of the feminine aspect of the divine and the personification of holy wisdom (Sophia to the Gnostics). Another theory has Mary and Jesus founding a dynasty, which fused with the Merovingian line.

    I saw Mary Magdalene statues or paintings in almost ever church. extensively in Rennes-le-Chateau. It must be remembered that she was a legitimate Catholic Saint. Her supposed relics had been claimed by the Benedictine Monks of Vezelay in Burgundy, Central France. The cult was in evidence there from the mid eleventh century. The abbey claimed that the relics had been brought there centuries before by a monk who had retrieved them from their original shrine near Aix in Provence, where Mary had supposedly been lain to rest after spending 30 years living as a hermit in a remote cave called la Sainte Baume.Mary Magdalene is usually thought of as the second-most important woman in the New Testament after Mary. Mary Magdalene traveled with Jesus as one of his followers. She was present at Jesus’ two most important moments: the crucifixion and the resurrection. Within the four Gospels, the oldest historical record mentioning her name, she is named at least 12 times more than most of the apostles.  In the New Testament, Jesus cleansed her of “seven demons”,[Lk. 8:2] [Mk. 16:9].

    Petit Provence is the region in southern France adjacent to Aude and Herault where Mary Magdalene and the others came ashore at St. Maries de la Mer. A painting of Mary Magdalene is at the Church in Les Saintes Maries de la Mer, which is west of Marseille showing the boat carrying Lazarus, Martha, Mary Magdalene and a young girl named Sarah. Also the sister of the Virgin Mary and several others are shown on the boat.  Often the jar in Mary Magdalene’s hand signifies the blood of Jesus. Left is the painting of the Crucifixion from the Basilica Sainte-Marie-Madeleine et le Couvent Royal, in St. Maximin. This is where Mary Magdalene was buried. She is shown at the foot of the cross in a very beautiful almost intimate pose.

    Rennes-le-Chateau

    Rennes-le-Chateau, is located near Couiza between Carcassonne and Quillan, has become world-famous ever allegedly since its infamous priest Bérenger Saunière discovered – or was given – a small fortune. About 300 books were written where the money came from, arguable and convincingly rebuked by Bill Puttnam as distorted pseudo-history:

    • Lack of solid evidence
    • Citing evidence without giving a sources
    • Presentation of evidence in a misleading way
    • Coincidence taken as evidence
    • Failure to explore consequences of derived conclusions
    • Disregard of conflicting evidence
    • Conflict with accepted chronology

    Theories put forward, what kind of Treasure the priest Saunière might have found:

    • the treasure of the Visigoths, including the treasure of the temple of Jerusalem,that roman emperor Titus took  ad 70. and Alaric I, took from Rome during the sack of 394
    • the treasure of the Cathars. When the last Cathar bastion of Montségur fell, the besieging royal troops found nothing of the famous Cathar treasure taken before its surrender
    • the treasure of the Knights Templar. The Templars had a presence in the region. There was a commandery at Campagne-sur-Aude and an observation post on Mount Bézu.
    • the treasure of Blanch of Castille. The mother of Saint Louis, regent of France, came to Rédé (Rennes-le-Château) in 1249
    • evidence that the Merovingian bloodline is unbroken.
    • evidence that Jesus didn’t die on the cross
    • evidence that Jesus was in fact married to Mary Magdalene.
    • evidence that after the crucifixion  Marie Magdalene came to France carrying her offspring that later became the Merovingians or intermarried with them.
    • he tombs of Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea in the vicinity of Opoul Perillos
    • the tomb of Mary Magdalene and perhaps even one or more of her children in the vicinity of Rennes-le-Château, perhaps in the Grotto locally known as
    • the mummified body of Christ, Mary Magdalene or both is buried in the region somewhere
    • the Crypt of the Lords of Rennes beneath his church
    • the Arma Christi (the instruments used during the Passion of Christ) were kept in Notre Dame de Marceille and Rennes-le-Château by a group of Fransciscan Ebionites.

    Mary Magdalene and Isis

    But that is not the point, the area of Rennes-le-Château is full of interesting real history especially of Mary Magdalene. Although it did not exist in Roman times, founded by the Visigoths in the fifth century, there was most likely an Isis Temple there. Reports of ancient authors relate to the area of Rennes-le-Chateau ( Celtic Rhedae,Rezae,Reddis or Reda).  The Greek geographer Strabo describes the tribe of Celtic Tectosages as “Simple and modest in their way of lifebut they fear the gods. Another report comes from the Roman authors Pomponius from southern Spain who has written about 43 AD, his famous book De Situ Orbis Geography. In it, he describes a hidden treasure in the mines of the Pyrenees south of Carcassonne. Furthermore, there is a report that on an old parchment (which was discovered in Jerusalem in a Bible), a temple dedicated to Isis in Rhedae  under Emperor Nero. then under Titus in 70 AD baptized with the name Magdalene.

    Many think today Mary Magdalene was a Priestesses of Isis. Ironically Pope Gregory, in 591 AD  cast doubt on the “purity” of Mary Magdalene’s love for Christ when he suggested  that one of the seven demons that Christ cast out from Mary Magdalene must have been the sin of adultery. He also conflated Mary Magdalene with Mary of Bethany, the “sinner” who washed Christ’s feet with her tears and dried them with her hair, causing Peter, not exactly concerned of Anima, to wonder how Christ could allow such an appalling display of erotic attention. The idea that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute caught the collective imagination and spread like wildfire in legend and art. From Jungian view on has to take this contagious fantasy into account as meaningful projection of her sin which gets  a life of its own for psychological reasons. The Catholic Church has admitted its error in the smearing of Mary Magdalen as a prostitute, however, although Mary  Magdalene is almost always mentioned first ahead of the Virgin Mary, only a handful of scholars have attempted to reconstruct why she could have been so important. She carried a royal title that translates as “The Wise Women.” According to the Gnostics, Jesus referred to her as “The One who knew all.  The Wise Women was in Mesopotamia called Cybele, Astarte, and Ishtar, the Egyptians called her Isis, the Greeks called her Athena, and the ancient Hebrews called her Asherah, The Woman of the Tree and the very consort to the Lord God YHWH. Gnostics called her Sophia, but in the hands of the Catholic Church, she became The Black Madonna. Legend connects this Black Madonna with both Isis and Mary Magdalene.

    Bérenger Saunière  built a house and called it Villa Bethania. That he named the house like this is the nearest thing to any mysterious religious knowledge he might have had, for then the Church believed that Mary at Bethany and Mary Magdalene were different people.  But Bérenger Saunière didn’t.  He built a “folly” and called it the Tour Magdala.   There he would study and read.

    The church is dedicated to Mary Magdalene, and some people think that the priest’s great treasure was spiritual – the knowledge that Mary Magdalene and Jesus were married and had founded a bloodline, great knowledge which would destroy the Church’s concepts of virginity being related to godliness. There is no doubt that the priest loved Mary Magdalene.  He restored his church lovingly and spent a large sum on it between 1886 and 1897 of unknown origin.

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Mary Magdalen
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Mary Magdalen

    Inside the church is a statue of Mary Magdalene and she appears much more often than usual in a catholic church. It is standard iconography that Mary holds a crucifix (the crucifix was not used as an emblem until the 9th century) and her jar of ointment.  At her feet is a skull resting on a book; this signifies her meditations on mortality. Although it is nowhere mentioned in the Bible, there are well known hints that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute. If we take this story seriously what does this mean? First we know that Jesus did mix with prostitutes, tax-collector and the general outcasts of society. Second, in ancient Sumer and in Egypt, priestesses participated annually in the Sacred Marriage, representing their goddess and thus ensuring fertility and the continuance of life. It is most likely that the latter idea of “temple prostitution” arose from the participation of high priestesses in the sacred rituals.

    It is clear in the Old Testament that the priests of the god Jehovah hated the Priestesses of Goddess temples and referred to them as Temple prostitutes because it was known that in many Temples of the day used sexual rituals. One of the Gnostic Gospels was called “The Gospel of Mary” and this gospel it seems contains the teachings of Mary Magdalene. Another Gnostic Gospel (see Early christian writings here) called Pistis Sophia (Sophia was the Goddess of wisdom) is about a dialogue between Jesus and Mary Magdalene whom he calls, “dearly beloved. In one dialogue Peter complained to Jesus that Mary Magdalene dominated the conversation with Jesus but Jesus rebukes him. In another Gnostics text called “Dialogue of the Saviour” she is portrayed as a very wise Woman who understood Jesus completely unlike the rest of Jesus’s disciples. So it seems that Mary Magdalene was a very important member of early Christianity. Pistis Sophia was dated about 250 AD.  Sophia means wisdom.  In Pistis Sophia  Jesus returns to the disciples eleven years after his ascension into Heaven to exchange views on his teachings.  Pistis Sophia, written in 250 AD, apparently show the Gnostic teachings of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Arguably the Pistis Sophia is blend of primitive Christianity and Hellenic Paganism, with other elements such as reincarnation, Astrology, Mystery religion and Hermetic magic. The Goddess makes an appearance in the guise of Sophia, a Fallen Angel. In Old French legend, the exiled “Magdal-eder,” the refugee Mary who seeks asylum on the southern coast of France, is Mary of Bethany, the Magdalen. The early French legend records that Mary “Magdalene,” traveling with Martha and Lazarus of Bethany, landed in a boat on the coast of Provence in France.

    Mary Magdalen as Eros and feminine archetype

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Porta 1
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Porta 1

    Back to the Church of Mary Magdalene in Rennes-le-Chateau.  The inscription at the portal is most startling  (at the left with permission from www.marymagdalenebooks.com). The decor may seem somewhat superficial in any Catholic church at  any time and place, but a closer look reveals strangely disturbing – and perhaps even pagan – dark imager and symbols that should unsettle Christians , including a hideous grimacing plaster demon crouched just inside the door, and had the words ‘This Is A Terrible Place’ inscribed over the porch, clearly a gnostic view.

    In the church Mary is shown in conventual manner, weeping as Jesus is laid in his tomb by Joseph of Arimathea.  The person in red comforting the Virgin Mary in the background is Mary Magdalene’s brother, Lazarus. Like Isis and  Ishtar, Mary Magdalene mourns the death of the god and her partner she loves, and when he resurrects, she celebrates his renewal. Through her intense spiritual love, she represents the feminine side of the death and resurrection phenomenon that plays a facilitating role in the humanization of the god-image the reverse process of C.G Jung’s individuation. I can’t help to think which kind of love she represents.  There are four shades of love – derived from the different Greek words for love. (I have written here about it).  The Greek language distinguishes four distinct words for love: agápe, éros, philía, and storgē.

    • Storge (στοργή) means “affection” in ancient and modern Greek. It is natural love, like that is felt by parents for offspring, or between brother and sister or by children for their parents. It is a descriptor of relationships within the family. It is also known to express mere acceptance or putting up with situations, as in “loving” the tyrant. The key attribute is natural.
    • Philia (φιλία) is “conscious” love, we know from words like philosophy – love for wisdom (Sophie). It mean a feeling of friendship and enjoyment of an activity, again used in both ancient and modern Greek. It is a dispassionate virtuous love, a concept developed by Aristotle. It includes loyalty to friends, family, and community, and requires virtue, equality and familiarity. The key attribute is rational.
    • Agape (ἀγάπη) means love in a “spiritual” sense. In Ancient Greek, it often refers to a general affection or deeper sense of ” unconditional love” or altruistic love , coming from the heart. In latin the equivalent word is “caritas”, it gives and expects nothing in return. Agape is used by Christians to express the unconditional love of God for us and loving each other like we love ourselves. The key attribute is spiritual.
    • Eros (érōs) is “physical” passionate love, with sensual desire and longing without the balance of consciousness. The Modern Greek word “erotas” means “intimate love”. Plato expanded this definition: as appreciation of the beauty within an object, or even of beauty itself. Indeed the word platonic love today describes, “without physical attraction.” Plato argues that eros helps the soul find knowledge in beauty which contributes to an understanding of spiritual truth, leading to transcendence. The Greek believed that beauty can never be evil. The key attribute here is sensual.
    Mary Magdalen  Jesus
    Mary Magdalen Jesusbb

    I have written here about  feminine archetypes here. I am quite sure  Mary Magdalene represents the latter three, quite obvious since the Holy Mary represents Storge and from a Jungian view the archetype of the mother and completes the trinity to quaternity (See my article Marriages Made in Heaven : Trinity Finally Becomes a Quaternity).

    Although the Judeo-Christian fathers excluded any sign in their orthodoxy that Yahweh and Christ may have had love partners, archeological evidence and Gnostic texts point to the possibility that they did. In our era, with the psychological perspective that C. G. Jung heralded, we can  understand the role of the Eros principle [3] that was split off from our god-image, along with the “evil” of the flesh. The emergence of Mary Magdalene in popular culture as the “Holy Grail” or vessel of Christ’s child reflects the intense yearning in the psyche for the feminine principle to participate in the continuing incarnation of the god-image, and for the divine feminine–masculine partnership to realize itself in personal, human experience. Mary is also the first to experience, personally and empirically, the spiritual image of God, a paradoxical union of opposites: life and death, man and god, spirit and matter.

    Magdalen in this church painting on the front of the altar, is shown with a book and a skull and usual but with a crucifix of living wood, implying to some that Jesus did not die on the cross, as early heretics, Gnostics and Cathars believed.

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Churc Mary Magdalen with empty Cross of living wood
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Churc Mary Magdalen with empty Cross of living wood

    Many argue, that Jesus was a Gnostic teacher but did not die on the cross. We know from the Bible that Jesus spent most likely his childhood in Egypt. A very important Egyptian religion of the time was the religion Isis and Osiris. Like Jesus Osiris was a god who was murdered and then returned from the dead. Many scholars have commented on the similarities between Jesus and Osiris and Isis and the Black Madonna. I have described here, obvious similarities of the teaching of the trinity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit, with triads in ancient  religions. So it all does indicate to some that perhaps Jesus and Mary Magdalene was a trained priest and priestess in Egypt with relations to Isis and Gnosticism. In the porch of the church is yet another secret message that implies that Bérenger Saunière believed that Mary Magdalene loved Jesus, indeed, adored him.  Just recently, after some 60 years of treasure-hunters, the village is becoming greatly loved by spiritual people interested in Mary Magdalene.

    The Black Madonna

    I lived for 5 years nearby the Benedictine Abbey of Einsiedeln, close to Zurich in Switzerland.
    The breathtaking Baroque basilica in the Einsiedeln’s monastery alone is stunning, in which the  black statue  resides. The Madonna holds the Christ child, who is, himself, holding a black bird. The Way of St. James which extends from all corners of Europe, touches Einsiedeln and the 11th-century abbey of Saint-Martin-du-Canigou situated in a spectacular location in the Pyrenees mountains on the way to Santiago de Compostela and Finisterre. Black Madonnas have been a  source of mysticism within the Catholic Church.

    Black_Madonna_of_Einsiedeln
    Black_Madonna_of_Einsiedeln

    Whatever the true significance may be, approximately four hundred Black Virgins are now located throughout Europe, the majority in France. The Black Madonna can be frequently traced back to pre-Christian mother goddess figures. Black Madonnas may in fact have been originally pagan goddesses who were renamed to transfer worship of the Earth Mother to the Virgin Mary or as some believe Mary Magdalene as incarnation of Isis. The cult of Isis was one of the dominant religions of the Mediterranean during late Roman times  had spread all over Roman-occupied lands. Please refer here, to read mor how at that time the Mithras Cult, Christianity and Roman State Religion competed: Isis, Mithras and Jesus: Clash of male and female Archetypes in classical Rome.  Churches were routinely built over Isis temples after Christianity became in the fourth century state religion, like it is said happened in Rennes-le-Château. Cybele and Artemis/Diana of Ephesus, both dark-skinned fertility goddesses were still worshipped in France and the Mediterranean coast from Antibes to Barcelona during the later centuries of the Roman Empire. Cybele was during the 3rd century the supreme deity of the town of Lyon. Marseilles was devoted to Greek Artemis. When the Crusaders returned from the Middle East Knights Templar, and refuges of overun Outremer surely brought heretic and christian art and gnostic thoughts. Many of whom who were wiped out as heretics, were involved in promoting the cult of the Black Madonna and her association with Mary Magdalene. The Black Madonna Limoux, south of Carcassone very close to Rennes-le-Château. The church at Limoux is called the Notre Dame de Marceille.

    Conclusion

    What precisely the Cathars believed, remains somewhat of an enigma. Many have used it as a blank canvas, to paint their own thoughts or convictions on. Hence, a lot of myths and falsehoods now exist about Catharism. Suggestions that Jesus survived the crucifixion, went to Egypt, then settled in France are highly speculative,  lacking historical evidence (heretic gospels grew like fungus in the formative period of Christianity) and of course are alien to my belief. However, some relations between Christianity and Egypt are clearly not. So is the thought, that gnosticism was already there long before it resurfaced. There is historical and archaeological research that proves a connection between Jerusalem, Egypt, the Land of heretics and Mary Magdalene. Nor would I argue against the view, that there is much more in the story of Mary Magdalene than the gospel tells. Except maybe rhe gospel of luke Luke – my favorite – who resonates so subtile the Anima [4] of the Church in his description of Holy Mary, Mary Magdalene and Mary of Bethany. Is seems almost they represent the classic female archetypes of love and their shadows – from a Jungian view.  Notable, the Cathars recited from the gospel of Luke during the ceremony of receiving  the consolamentum and become “bonhomme”.

    I might return to the subject and the location.

    Bishop Fulk, asking a knight why he did not expel heretics, received the classic answer: ‘We cannot. We have been reared in their midst. We have relatives among them and we see them living lives of perfection.’

    Malcolm Lambert,

    The Cathars

    Notes:

    1. Some of biggest creative thinker of the humanity, like C.G. Jung were de facto semi-gnostic and spiritualist. Might has always utilized symbols and collective archetypes. This is valid from  Greek philosopher Plato,  Dante Alighieri’s “La Divina Commedia”, up to Richard Wagner’s Parsifal, to name just a few.
    2. In the 20th century Freud made the mistake, equating drive energy strictly with sexual energy. Jung’s break from Freud came in part because Jung saw drive energy as transpersonal and deriving from the unconscious, the feminine counterpart to consciousness.
    3. Pope Gregory the Great’s homily on Luke’s Gospel, dated 14 September 591, first suggested that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute: “She whom Luke calls the sinful woman, whom John calls Mary, we believe to be the Mary from whom seven devils were ejected according to Mark. And what did these seven devils signify, if not all the vices? … It is clear, brothers, that the woman previously used the unguent to perfume her flesh in forbidden acts” (1844–1864, Homily XXXIII, col. 1238–1246).
    4. Though critical, the role of the animus must be left for another time. I recommend Animus and Anima, Emma Jung.Gnosticism Term used to designate many different sects who flourished in the first few centuries AD. many elements of Christian Gnosticism are pre-Christian Gnostics, such as the belief in Dualism. The name derives from the Greek word for knowledge, gnosis.
    5. Gnosticism: Term used to designate many different sects . Many elements of Christian Gnosticism are pre-Christian Gnostics, such as the belief in Dualism. The name derives from the Greek word for knowledge, gnosis. Gnosticism can be found  around all revealing religions as it is essentially syncretistic .
    6. Dualism: The belief that good and evil are two independent, opposing principles.
    7. Bogomilism: Dualist heresy founded by the priest Bogomil in the early tenth century in Bulgaria. The earliest tangible evidence is datable to 1167. The movement survived up to the nineteenth century. It appears to have influenced Catharism strongly, although some see other, local roots.
    8. Paulicianism: Dualist heresy that emerged in seventh-century Armenia. In 717, a council of the Armenian Church denounced them as ‘sons of Satan’ and ‘fuel for the fire eternal’. They are thought to have survived until the seventeenth century.
    9. Docetism: The belief that Christ did not have a physical body, common amongst Gnostics. Docetics believed that Jesus’s body was an illusion, as was his crucifixion. Docetism was declared heretical by the Church. Both the Bogomils and the Cathars were Docetist.
    10. Essenes: Radical Jewish sect that existed from the second century BC to the first century AD.  Some argue that  that both Jesus and John the Baptist had links with the sect. The community at Qumran, which produced the Dead Sea Scrolls, is thought to have been Essene.
    11. Elchasaites: Jewish Christian sect who were, interestingly, also known as katharoi. Their most famous member was the Persian prophet Mani.
    12. Manichaeism: Dualist religion founded by the Persian prophet Mani in the third century. As it had an Universalist claim it was majorcompetition, Wiped out in Europe during the sixth century, and emigrated as the Nestorians to Asia. ‘Manichaean’ became a blanket term for heretic during the Middle Ages
    13. Adoptionism: Belief that Christ was not born divine, but only became so after his baptism.
    14. Nestorianism The belief, first proposed by Nestorius, then patriarch of Constantinople in the fourth century, that Christ’s person contained two separate beings, one human, the other divine. Nestorianism was declared heretical at the Council of Ephesus in 431, but it survived in Asia and came back ironically with the Mongols in the thirteenth century. See Phillip Jenkins “Jesus Wars”.
    15. Arianism Named after Arius (256–336), from Alexandria, denied that Christ and God were one person, seeing them instead as two different Divine entities. Declared heretical at the Council the Council of Nicaea.
    16. Marcionism Gnostic dualist sect that taught the principle of the two gods, with Christ being the son of the true god, and the Jehovah of the Old Testament being seen as the evil god.
    17. Some Cathar terms:
      1. Listeners In the Cathar context, a Listener was a person interested in Catharism, but was not ready or willing to become an actual member of the church, which required the taking of the convenanza.
      2. Believers The majority of Cathars were Believers. That is to say, they had taken the convenanza, but were not yet consoled. They were not subject to any dietary restrictions.
      3. Perfects In the Cathar context their priests. Perfect The were ascetics who were the heart and soul of the Cathar movement. Bogomilism also had similar classes
      4. Consolamentum Cathar rite of baptism that elevated the Believer to the state of a Perfect.
      5. Convenanza Formal rite that made a Cathar Listener a Believer.

    Bibliography

    • The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy (Yale Nota Bene),  Stoyanov, Yuri
    • The Cathars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Heresy by  Sean Martin
    • The Knights Templar: The History and Myths of the Legendary Military Order by Sean Martin
    • Malcolm Barber, The Trial of the Templars (Cambridge University Press, 1978); The New Knighthood: A History of the Order of the Temple (Cambridge University Press, 1994)
    • Gnosticism and Early Christianity by R. M. Grant
    • Jesus Wars Harper, 2010 by Phillip Jenkins
    • The Treasure of Rennes-le-Chateau: A Mystery Solved, by Bill Putnam
    • C.G. Jung,  Aion Untersuchungen zur Symbolgeschichte
    • A History of Egypt from the Earliest Times to the Persian Conquest, James Henry Breasted Kindle-Edition
    • The Religions of Ancient Egypt and Babylonia A. H. (Archibald Henry) Sayce Kindle-Edition
    • Malcolm Barber & Keith Bate (translators & editors), The Templars: Selected Sources (Manchester Medieval Sources Series, Manchester University Press, 2002)
    • The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries by Rodney Stark
    • The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia–and How It Died by Philip Jenkins
    • Historia Mundi Volume IV, Lehnen Verlag,  Die Kirche zur Zeit der Apostel und Märtyrer
    • The Cults of the Roman Empire, Robert Turcan
    • Les sites templiers, Jea Luc Barbiere
    • Haskins, S.  Mary Magdalene: Myth and meaning,  (1993) New York, NY: Riverhead Books
    • Animus and Anima, Emma Jung
    • STRUKTURFORMEN DER WEIBLICHEN PSYCHE wolff  Structural forms of the Feminine psyche (http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00001582/00001)
    • Early christian writings
    • Interesting reading http://www.marymagdalenebooks.com

    Speculative

    • Jesus after the Crucifixion: From Jerusalem to Rennes-le-Château, by Graham Simmans
    • Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (Jonathan Cape, 1982)
    • Rennes le Château Rennes le Château Temple of Mysteries
    • Pistis Sophia


    Earlier Gnostic Writings and Cathar Texts

    • The Cathar religion represents a major medieval resurgence of Gnosticism, and we offer an important collection of Cathar Texts, including the complete manuscript of the Lyon Ritual, Interrogatio Iohannis, and The Book of the Two Principles.
    • While the Nag Hammadi Library represents the richest  source of classical Gnostic texts, many other primary Gnostic documents were discovered in the century prior to the Nag Hammadi find.  These are cataloged in the Classical Gnostic Scriptures and Fragments section.
    • Of associated interest is the Christian Apocrypha and Early Christian Literature, a section containing other important Christian texts surviving outside canonical tradition, some of which manifest Gnostic influence.
    • The G.R.S Mead Collection contains over a dozen volumes written by G. R. S. Mead (1863-1933), one the greatest early scholars of Gnosticism.  These works provide an invaluable evaluation of texts relating to Gnostic tradition available before discovery of the Nag Hammadi collection.
    • Opinion about the tradition was primarily based on Works Against the Gnostics by the Church Fathers.  I included is a full text site search function.
    • A large sample of these  is presented in the Manichaean Writings collection, along with an introductory lecture.
    • Also included in the library is a section devoted to Mandaean Texts and this still living Gnostic tradition.

    Contemporary Gnostic Writings and Jungian Texts

    Alchemy was recognized by C. G. Jung as another strand of Gnosticism;

    The Nag Hammadi Library

    • Excerpt from Elaine Pagels’ excellent popular introduction to the Nag Hammadi texts.
    • The Nag Hammadi Library, a collection of thirteen ancient codices containing over fifty texts, was discovered in upper Egypt in 1945. This immensely important discovery includes a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures — texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define “orthodoxy” — scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library has provided impetus to a major re-evaluation of early Christian history and the nature of Gnosticism.
    • We have add extensive resources on two centrally important texts from Nag Hammadi: The Gospel of Thomas and The Secret Book of John. Multiple authoritative translations of several Nag Hammadi scriptures are included in the collection.
    • Valentinus and Valentinian Gnosis. Valentinus was one of the most influential Gnostic Christian teachers of the second century A.D., and was the only Gnostic considered for election as Bishop of Rome (Pope). He founded a movement which spread throughout Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Despite persecution by developing orthodoxies, the Valentinian school endured for over 600 years. A large number of texts in the Nag Hammadi collection are influence by Valentinian tradition. Due to its importance, we have a large section of the library dedicated specifically to Valentinus and the Valentinian Tradition.


    Hermetism and the Hermetic Gnosis — including the Corpus Hermeticum

    • Beyond the bounds of classical Christian Gnosticism — represented by the above materials — the Hermetic tradition is another very important and influential Western tradition of Gnostic character.  The Hermetic writings represents a non-Christian lineage of Gnosticism. Our Corpus Hermeticum and Hermetic Writings section offers the most extensive collection of Hermetic texts available on the internet. Included here you will find introductory material, the complete texts of the Corpus Hermeticum, and essentially all other extant Hermetic writings. Included is an introductory lecture.

    The Dead Sea Scrolls Collection

    • The Dead Sea Scrolls Collection in the Gnostic Society Library is one of the largest and most referenced Dead Sea Scroll resources on the internet. During the middle years of the twentieth century two important but very different collections of ancient religious texts were unearthed in Palestine and Egypt: the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library.

    Illustrations are my own (except stated otherwise) and may be used with quoting the proper sources.

  • The four archetypes of love and their shadows – an Jungian view

    The four archetypes of love and their shadows – an Jungian view

    This Sunday sermon in St. Ottilien (http://mp3.erzabtei.de/2014-05-25-0915-konventamt.mp3) addressed (from minute 23) an interesting line of thought: the four shades of love – derived from the different Greek words for love. I must confess, that those thoughts about the four archetypes of love and their shadows have both inspired and somewhat unsettled me. The priest happened to be a catholic monk and Jungian psychoanalyst and so by listening to the sermon, quite a few thoughts or association crossed my mind.

    The Greek language distinguishes four distinct words for love: agápe, éros, philía, and storgē.

    Four Archetypes of Love

    • Storge (στοργή) means “affection” in ancient and modern Greek. It is natural love, like that is felt by parents for offspring, or between brother and sister or by children for their parents. It is a descriptor of relationships within the family. It is also known to express mere acceptance or putting up with situations, as in “loving” the tyrant. The key attribute is natural.
    • Philia (φιλία) is “conscious” love, we know from words like philosophy – love for wisdom (Sophie). It mean a feeling of friendship and enjoyment of an activity, again used in both ancient and modern Greek. It is a dispassionate virtuous love, a concept developed by Aristotle. It includes loyalty to friends, family, and community, and requires virtue, equality and familiarity. The key attribute is rational. 
    • Agape (ἀγάπη) means love in a “spiritual” sense. In Ancient Greek, it often refers to a general affection or deeper sense of ” unconditional love”  or altruistic love , coming from the heart. In latin the eqivalent word is “caritas”,  it gives and expects nothing in return. Agape is used by Christians to express the unconditional love of God for us and loving each other like we love ourselves. The key attribute is spiritual.
    • Eros (érōs) is “physical” passionate love, with sensual desire and longing without the balance of consciousness. The Modern Greek word “erotas” means “intimate love”. Plato expanded this definition: as appreciation of the beauty within an object, or even of beauty itself.  Indeed the word platonic love today describes, “without physical attraction.” Plato argues that eros helps the soul  find knowledge in beauty which contributes to an understanding of spiritual truth, leading to transcendence. The Greek believed that beauty can never be evil. The key attribute here  is sensual. 

    The sermon continued with a few examples describing the opposite of love. Obviously indifference and hate are opposite of love, so is antipathy. A few other examples were given, like egoism and narcissism, which seem to be so common today. Now what would be the four opposites for love: agápe, éros, philía, and storgē. in some languages

    Four Archetypes of Love
    storge

    The opposite of storgē, would be indifference. In German I associated immediately “herzlos” (heartless) as in “herzlose Mutter” or “Rabenvater”. Also there is rarely hate in families, but quite often you find indifference in this relations.

    The opposite of philía would be antisocial and disloyall behaviour in regards to community and society.  Here I associated immediately “antipathy” may be mutual and unilateral disloyalty in friendship (Falscher Freund).

    The opposite of Agape would be of course narcissism and egoism. Here I associate immediately, “lieblos”, “hartherzig” und “Eigenliebe” instead of “Nächstenliebe”.  Narcissus feels no empathy.Narcissus is a character from Greek myth… a young man of incredible beauty that one day caught his own reflection in the surface of a pond – and became so enamored of his own face that he stayed there, gazing at himself, until he died. Modern psychology has taken this mythology and describes narcissism is a disorder wherein an individual is so wrapped up in themselves that they have trouble maintaining healthy relationships with other persons. There is reason to believe that many “successful” (and unsuccessful) leaders nowadays suffer from narcissism and narcistic wounds. I have written here about it: Archetype of the vampire in todays culture of Narcissism.

    The remedy against egoism is according to the pater the holy spirit. Pope Franciscus tweeted a few days ago: “Come, Holy Spirit! Help us to overcome our selfishness”. According to C.G. Jung the Ego must be overcome to find the Self (which is our window to god). The remedy against narcissism is according to his sermon humor (or jokingly 2 years of psychotherapy). Like a needle it punches and deflates the inflated ego, allows “heart talk” and empathy. Now I do not know if he knows the book, “Heart Talk”, a study of the emotional range of the Thai language through the word ‘jai’ or heart in English. It provides a comprehensive list of 900 jai phrases, neatly organized for different situations. I will later give a few examples of this linguistic heartscape where ideas take shape and  feelings are formed.

    The opposite of Eros is hate. Hate is passionate and strong like love is. It is a deep feeling, often triggered by rejection. Any student of the psychotherapies would have heard of the terms: Eros and Thanatos – Life instinct and the death instinct. Sabina Spielrein wrote originally on this concept and it  was sized by Freud in his revised theory of human nature. In his book “The ego and the id” he discusses this theory of opposites:  Eros is a “…self-preservative instinct,…”. On the other hand there is the death instinct whose task it is to, “…lead organic life back into the inanimate state;…” We are entering into the field of the philosophy of opposites.  Where has philia as in philosophy and metaphysic its place? The word philosophy comes from the two Greek words: philia and sophia. Philia is the Greek word for ‘love’ (a bond of friendship), while Sophia is Greek for ‘wisdom’. Philosophy is literally the “love of wisdom”. But love may  pursue, but not possess.  Wisdom comes form the mind,  love from the heart. Clearly love is another, a different form of wisdom.

    philo
    philo

    The sermon mentioned of course that love comes from the heart. By marriage and business experience I am also familiar with the many words of heart in Thai language – Jai.  Jai is one of the most important concepts for consultants to understand when they commence business in Thailand. The Western capitalism is often very pragmatic and business-like, but this culture can be misinterpreted (and sometimes rightfully interpreted) as “jai dum” – black heart.

    • One may consider Jai dum as opposite of Eros, very similar to a person full of hate. Jai dum is a cruel lack of humanity (dum =dark or black). In Thailand, as in many other cultures, the color black has negative associations as black is quite literally the “full lack of light”.
    • Kao jai (understanding) may relate to Philia.
    • I think Nam jai relates to Storge. Nam jai directly translates as “Water from the heart” (Nam = water). It refers to a kind, generous person, who thinks about the other person. Nam jai is one of the strong values by which Thai people judge each other. If you are perceived as mai mee nam jai (lack of nam jai),  people will perceive you in western term as heartless and not cooperate.
    • I think Jai boon relates to Agape. Jai boon means “generous” and “full of merit”. Someone who is jai boon gives away or donates what they have to others (Boon = “merit”, reflecting the Thai Buddhist custom of “merit making” in this life for the afterlife by doing “good works” and providing alms to monks).

    A lot of expressions I learned from the mentioned Canadian novelist Christopher G. Moore – his fiction is quite useful for cross cultural training: chua jai – believe, dee jai – happy, dtaam jai – please yourself, up to you, dtang jai – purposefully, dtat sin jai – decide, dtok jai – shocked, frightened, goom jai – worried, greng jai – be afraid of offending, jai baap – sinful, jai dum – cruel, malicious, jai dee – kind, generous, jai deeoh – faithful, jai keng – stubborn,jai lai – mean, nasty, jai orn – soft-hearted, jai rorn – hot tempered, impatient, jai yen – calm, jai yen yen – calm down, mai por jai – dissatisfied,man jai – confident, nam jai – generous, por jai – satisfied. There is a motto that say “Sabai jai krue Thai tae (Sabai jai is the true Thai). Sabai means “comfortable”. For example, “Sabai jai loan” is a highly advertised.

    E. munch-eros
    E. munch-eros

    There was some relationship advice in that sermon too. You may relate agápe, éros, philía, and storgē also to relationship and marriage. When we first meet, woo and eventually commit to one another we experience Eros, a passionate love in a strange long distance relationship. However, a successful marriage must hold on Eros, but also understand that a more cooperative, sustaining connection must be formed. Philia is a love based on friendship between two people, it is patient and kind. In a marriage it is important that you not only love, but also like your mate. When we get older, sexual lure wains or shared experience decreases, a sense of connectedness must  remain. Get to know your partner now as a friend, not only as lover. Next, Agape love is beyond Philia and Eros love. Selfless and non-judgemental, it is considered the spiritual dimension of love. Agape is given without self benefit, expectation or condition. Last but not least, storgē means take care for each other in a very literal sense, during sickness or old age. “For better and worse” means love despite disappointment and shortcomings, at difficult times.

    marc-chagall-agape
    marc-chagall-agape

    Now, finally, what is the love of God? What the Biblical concept of ‘Love’. We’ve travelled so far away from the love God today. It was agape that the early Church used to denote the Love of God demonstrated in His sending of the Son to effect reconciliation (I John 4:10, Rom 5:8, Eph 2:4-5). It’s these twin concepts of ‘undeserved merit’ and ‘the giving of oneself’ that lie behind the concept of the love of God in the NT.

    So sad whats going on in Bangkok and everywhere now. Evil is the opposite of love – in all four dimensions of it. As C.G. Jung said,  your vision will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes. This is what the dynamic model of love and anti-love proposes. Up to date psychotherapies have learned from the church on the (moral) static dichotomy of good and bad and the god and the devil. 

    Isis, Mithras and Jesus: Clash of male and female Archetypes in classical Rome

  • Charismatic Roman-Catholic’s?

    Charismatic Roman-Catholic’s?

    Charismatic Christian (Whitsun) movements have been a huge challenge for the Roman-Catholic church in Africa, South America and India largely ignored by Europe’s clerical mainstream. I was first made aware of this by Philip Jenkins “The Next Christendom”.  He gives not an entirely optimistic analysis but a profoundly helpful up-to-date eye opener. To me the election of Pope Francis addressed these phenomena for the first time with the needed attention.  This article offers some thoughts based on empiric analyses of the charismatic movement within the Catholic church in the USA South America,  the Philippines and Africa. “Experiences” with those movement of Catholic priests of the Philippines, from Nigeria, Congo, India, Poland and Brazil show various differences and influencing factors in local education and  liturgy, the dogmatic base and mission of a Church and its effect on personal spirituality and sociological impact on the individual.  As usual, this is neither a scholarly article nor a brief essay, merely working out a few questions I had to sociological aspects presented by Philip Jenkins and to the positioning of Pope Francis and the Pope Benedict XVI emeritus on the Charismatic Christianity.

    Pentecostalism is based on a key event in the life of the early Christians: the baptism of the twelve disciples by the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost.   Thus, Pentecostal refers to the New Testament experiences of the early Christian believers on the Day of Pentecost:

    Pentecost, a was originally a Jewish feast, was celebrated 50 days after Passover, and pilgrims had come to Jerusalem from all over the world to celebrate the event.  The 12 apostles –  Judas Iscariot replaced by Mathias – were gathered together in a house when a terrific wind came from heaven and filled the place. They saw tongues that looked like fire, that separated and came down on each of them.. Immediately the apostles were filled with the Holy Spirit, who granted them the ability to address these foreign visitors in their own languages and to do many other miracles and wondrous signs.  Before his ascension into heaven, Jesus had promised his disciples that he would send the Holy Spirit to give them strength and wisdom to spread the gospel throughout the world. (Acts 1:8). The crowd was so moved when Peter told them about Jesus’ crucifixion and God’s plan of salvation that they asked the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” (Acts 2:37, NIV).The right response, Peter told them, was to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins. He promised that they would receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

    Philip Jenkins , a respected professor of history and religious studies made me first aware of Pentecostalism  within Christianity (German: Pfingstler, Pfingstkirche, Pfingstbewegung),  which is steadily winning millions of follower in Latin America, South America, Africa, India, Malaysia, China, and Eastern Europe, including Russia. There is also a Catholic Charismatic Renewal, which Benedict XVI emeritus praised highlighting its positive contribution. According to the U.S. urban specialist Mike Davis “Pentecostalism is the largest self-organized movement of urban poor in the world”.

    Those “Pentecostal” or Charismatic Christians are, however, are mainly Protestant movements who believe, that today the “manifestations of the Holy Spirit” can be experienced by modern Christians.  Charismatic Christians are very an emotionally and close knit community often with modern style of religious service. They appeal worldwide above all to simple folk and give them the chance to experience their faith especially under difficult living circumstances and persecution. They gained so a significant momentum because they appeal extremely well to the emotions of the people, and lift “followers” on a center stage.  Those, however, who do not talk in tongues or cure sick people or drive out demons – or have at least one of these three qualities – are not looked upon  as Christians, because if the holy spirit did not come to them, God has not “accepted” them . There are some former members of such Whitsun municipalities who have felt a huge psychic pressure because they feared not to make “it well enough” .

    Geopolitical aspects

    Recent history

    The rapid growth of Christianity around the world (both within and alongside existing traditions) will literally reshape the world, with possible religious and geopolitical conflicts not mentioning its decisive cultural cross road. At the beginning of the 20th century the Pentecostal movement, formed in Los Angeles a “third wave” of the Evangelical revival known as the Azusa Street revival. Their services were increasingly imbued with emotion and the action of the Holy Spirit. Their name derives from the biblical narrative of Pentecost the Holy Spirit in the form of tongues of fire on Jesus disciples descended and empowered them with special gifts. According to the Pentecostal faith, this is done with the today’s believers, which prophecy, healing, exorcising ghosts, or speaking in tongues to be given as gifts. The latter applies in the classical Charismatic Christians a clear sign of “baptism by the Holy Spirit”, which sealed the Evangelical “rebirth”.

    The Pentecostal-charismatic movement emphasizes enthusiastic worship and the ability of individuals to discern God’s will through a personal connection with the Holy Spirit. The connection can manifest itself in New Testament practices such as healing prayer. The movement began humbly with the teachings of Charles Fox Parham in Topeka, Kansas, in the beginning of the 20th century, followed in a few years by the Azusa Street Revival in Los Angeles. But in the past century, Pentecostal-charismatic movements grew at nearly four times the rate of both Christianity and the global population, expanding from 1.2 million in 1910 to 584 million in 2010, according to the World Christian Database. The movements are multifaceted, ranging from traditional Pentecostal denominations such as the Assemblies of God and the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel to independent churches to charismatic movements within older denominations, including the Catholic Church. There were an estimated 177 million Catholic charismatics in 2010, according to the World Christian Database.  To be sure, the Catholic Church, despite losses in much of Europe, is still experiencing dramatic global growth, particularly in Latin America and Africa. From 1990 to 2000, the Catholic Church added an average of nearly 13 million members a year, and by some estimates it is expected to grow to more than 1.5 billion members by the middle of the century, according to the Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. But this is a slower rate than the growth of renewalist movements, which are expected by some to go from a quarter to a third of the world’s Christian population as the Catholic Church holds on to about half of Christianity. From 1990 to 2000, for example, the Catholic Church lost an estimated 355,000 adherents a year after adding up converts to and from the church. In contrast, Pentecostal-charismatic churches gained 2.8 million adherents a year through conversions, according to the World Christian Database. .

    An uncertain future

    In contrast to the Catholic Church, the Pentecostal churches – despite some very large churches with Central bureaucracies – know no all-encompassing central instance. Rather, the Pentecostal movement consists of a fragmented, countless amount of individual churches, church associations and umbrella organizations. This fragmentation lends a high degree of flexibility, the Pentecostal the there them by early on allowed, be adapted and customized to regional realities and to grow together to a certain extent with the local culture. The Pentecostal Churches used this an unique advantage of for their missionary work. Although their spread was accompanied by missionary from the United States and Europe, an independent movement spread in Latin America quickly. So already there own Pentecostal “Awakenings” among evangelicals in Chile and Argentina in the first decade of the 20th century. But proselytizing efforts showed real success only from the 1950s, when a downright explosive spread of Pentecostalism in African and Latin American countries happened. Since then, the number of adherents on the subcontinent is growing rapidly and the phenomenon gaining presence in the public sphere and to a certain extent with the respective local culture to grow together. In Africa, this happens in an utterly hostile environment. Between 1900 and 2000, however, the number of Christians in Africa grew from 10 million to 360 million, and by 2025 is expected to reach 633 million. In a post-modern world, religion returned to center stage in the 90s, and Jenkins revisits Huntington from a Christian perspective and new data. Jenkins contests Samuel Huntington’s thesis in The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, that “the relative Christian share of global population will fall steeply in the [21st] century, and that this religion will be supplanted by Islam.” Huntington predicted that “in the long run . . . Muhammad wins out,” mainly because Islam is advanced by “conversion and reproduction,” whereas “Christianity spreads primarily by conversion.” Huntington and Jenkins share many valid points, and it seems we all have had difficulties to predict the future. Both do agree on the danger of potential conflicts caused by religious and cultural differences. Sociological and religious future trends interact – as always – and these perils are unfortunately today’s reality.

    Phenomenology

    To me Pentecostal movements are the opposite of Gnosticism, but they share one common point – to bring structure in its many deviations and flavors are a lost cause and fruitless tedious work.

    When did it start? For a Pentecostal, the day would be “33 A.D. — the Day of Pentecost. And yes, not as much than with Gnostics, but still also roots of Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians can be found in early heretics (Montanism in the 2nd century).  There have been further brief movements throughout Christian history that resembled some spiritual aspects of Pentecostalism, What we know as the Pentecostal/Charismatic movement didn’t really get started until the beginning of the 20th Century. Evangelical Christianity stresses a religion lived about rituals and religious affiliation. There is Babel in the Evangelical field. Therefore, the establishment of any classification even for expert is a difficult task. However, there are three characteristics that are commonly used for their description: firstly, a conception of salvation, which is reflected in a radical life change (conversion), which is often described as a rebirth. For this reason, Evangelicals ar often called as “born again Christians”. Furthermore, the Bible is seen as an infallible and final authority in all walks of life for evangelicals. Thirdly evangelicals are characterized by a missionary zeal, which is considered a personal commitment to the spreading of the Gospel. I tried to summarize some info (see also sources in the appendix).

    Perhaps no movement has made more of an impact on the church world than Pentecostalism. Certainly no movement has done so in the last ten to twenty years. In addition to the Pentecostal Churches, there is a related movement which has come to be called ‘Neo-Pentecostalism.’ ‘

    Tongue speaking (and other miracles and signs) did, of course, occur in the New Testament church. We find references to this in Mark 16, the book of Acts, and I Corinthians 12-24. It is noteworthy, however, that from A.D. 100 to 1900 tongue speaking virtually disappeared and is not to be found in the mainstream of the church. It is found among the Montanists in the second century and in the various other minority groups and sects. I would urge the reader to consult Brunner’s book for an excellent and detailed history of Pentecostalism.

    Pentecostals themselves explain the virtual disappearance of tongue speaking and other miracles and gifts from the mainstream of the church as due to a lack of faith in or rejection of the Holy Spirit by the organized churches.  Without the experience the believer, and consequently the church, will remain impotent, virtually dead.

    It is out of this conviction that Neo-Pentecostals especially direct a very serious charge at the catholic churches and believers. They claim to hold fast to the ‘faith of the fathers’, the confessions of the church. Only, they claim to have something more, something in addition to the traditional teachings and practices of the church. And, that something more is the Baptism in the Holy Spirit with its resultant power and gifts which make the Christian and the church effective in service and life. This, they say, the non-Pentecostals lack; and therefore, the churches today are guilty of dead orthodoxy. They are lifeless, powerless, and ineffective and busy themselves sweeping around dusty dogmas.

    (Neo)-Pentecostal (neo) understand that his view of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit radically affects the understanding of the truth of the Scriptures; his view of God, first of all (The Holy Spirit is God!); of God’s Christ. Jesus promised this return in the Spirit in the night of His betrayal (cf. John 14, 15, and 16). This promise Jesus further defines as the ‘baptism with the Holy Ghost and with fire’. Noteworthy in this connection is the fact that Jesus commanded them to wait in Jerusalem for the Spirit, but Jesus did not lay down a list of conditions which they had to fulfill in order to be baptized with the Holy Spirit. He simply told them to wait.  Most of the heresies of the Pentecostals (if one wants to call of them so) come from the book of Acts.  Acts 2 certainly points to the uniqueness, the once-for-all-time character, of the event of Pentecost. Prophecy has been fulfilled, the Day of the Lord has come, God begins calling His saints out of all nations through Jesus Christ crucified, raised, exalted.  In the Spirit Christ has come into the Church, filling the hearts of the saints, in order to call such as should be saved. The final instance of tongue speaking in Acts is found in chapter 19:1-7 where Paul meets a band of twelve disciples.  The point of this passage is plain. These twelve disciples were still living in the age of the shadows, at the door of the New Dispensation, but still in the shadows. They were unaware of the fact that the day of the Lord had come and had not even heard that there was a Holy Spirit. This event too is an extension of the unique wonder of Pentecost and the tongues and prophecy serves as a sure sign to believers that the Spirit of the crucified, risen Christ had indeed been poured out.

    The catholic view

    Evangelical Christianity stresses a religion lived about rituals and religious affiliation. There is Babel also in the whole Evangelical field. Therefore, the establishment of any classification even for expert is a difficult task.  The Catholic Church differentiates and recognizes a multi dimension “localized” danger:

    Latin America: The sociologist Brenda Carranza from Brazil sees  of a “Pentecostalization” of the Catholic Church for instance in Brazil by the neo-charismatic movement and new Catholic communities which would led by non- professionals and is successful and industrious of the modern media used.  The lack of catholic priest clearly adds to this danger urgency. I am convinced that will be addressed by both Pope Francis.

    Africa: The Scholar Paul Gifford sees a direct link between the traditional ghosts and witches on the African continent and the local success of the Pentecostal movement. This brings back an enchanted worldview in Christianity. He criticized the fact that African theologians gave little attention to this aspect of enculturation.

    Philippines: The sociologist and political scientist Kessler noted in its empirical investigation in the Philippines that the charismatic movement rather appeals to people with higher education. Hope for a way out of the misery, even on social change by ills such as corruption and violence do connect to the personal relationship with Jesus and the own spiritual transformation. I am convinced that will be addressed by both Pope Francis.

    India: The Jesuit father Jerry Rosario from the region of Tamil Nadu in South India described the local Pentecostal as a phenomenon of the middle class. The movement is dominated by young people, to overcome the caste system, emphasize the lay Christianity and grant women more rights in the municipality.

    Europe: The Dominican and journalist Tomasz Dante from Poland showed a correlation between the charismatic movement in the Polish Catholic Church and the political beginnings in the 1980s. That means the church must take a stand for the powerless. I am convinced that will be addressed by both Pope Francis.

    Global: The theologian Eckholt handles the designation on the Pentecostal churches as “a new, fifth basic structure of Christian churches”. She asks why the Catholic Church could not meet the need of becoming a religious subject through an understanding of the Church as the people of God and sacrament of the peoples in pointing back to the Second Vatican Council.  Clearly that has been addressed by both Pope Francis and Pope Benedict XVI emeritus.

    John XXIII said, “It is not that the Gospel has changed: it is that we have begun to understand it better. Those who have lived as long as I have were faced with new tasks in the social order at the start of the century; those who, like me, were twenty years in the East and eight in France, were enabled to compare different cultures and traditions, and know that the moment has come to discern the signs of the times, to seize the opportunity and to look far ahead.” Pope Benedict has declared that a Year of Faith will begin this year on the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council and yet rather than embrace this movement of the Holy Spirit. However, Pope Benedict warned also 2011 the Lutherans of what he called a ‘new form of Christianity’ that was challenging mainstream Christian churches. While not saying so, it was obvious by his comments that he was referring to Evangelicals and Pentecostals:

    • “Faced with a new form of Christianity, which is spreading with overpowering missionary dynamism, sometimes in frightening ways, the mainstream Christian denominations often seem at a loss.”
    • “This is a form of Christianity with little institutional depth, little rationality and even less dogmatic content, and with little stability. This worldwide phenomenon poses a question to us all: what is this new form of Christianity saying to us, for better and for worse?”

    So it is with a sense of anticipation that many Catholics, who experienced the megastar papacy of John Paul II, are hopeful that the new Pope and successor to Benedict XVI can find an evangelist-in-chief to compete in the global marketplace.  Having chosen someone from Latin America  does ignite international interest in the billion-member institution , where more than half of the world’s Catholics now reside and not only be a significant affirmation of the global nature of the church, but will  help stem defections to Pentecostal congregations in those southern regions. But what may matter more than the nationality of the next pope,  is his commitment to allowing the growth of lay leadership (in the face of a shortage of priests) and culturally sensitive worship that is at the heart of the success of the Pentecostal movement.

    “A new pope would do well to officially sanction some of this, rather than resist it,” said Donald Miller, the series editor of “Global Pentecostalism and Charismatic Christianity” and the executive director of the Center for Religion and Civic Culture at the University of Southern California.  Catholics have considerable strengths – from a strong tradition and presence in many nations to well-organized networks of schools, hospitals and seminaries. And the church in Latin America and Africa has been in many ways supportive of charismatic practices within worship. But a hierarchical church with a priest shortage also faces significant challenges competing with Pentecostal and charismatic movements led by local leaders who provide an environment that is sometimes compared to a large extended family, observers say.  Pope Francis may want to consider the importance of increasingly legitimizing the role of all people in the congregation, promoting practices such as healing prayer and integrating culturally meaningful music and forms of worship within congregations, scholars say. Todd Johnson, director of the Center for the Study of Global Christianity, said the training of local Catholics is critical both to evangelization and to address concerns that worship not veer from church teaching into areas such as advocating a prosperity gospel equating faith with health and wealth. The religious community needs to be more rooted in the actual experiences of the people, “which is of course the major insight of Pentecostalism,  Many Latin American Catholicsstill  consider themselves “the soul of Catholicism,” and electing a pope from the region may be  seen as “a very powerful symbolic statement that they’re accepted and they’re recognized,” said Arlene Sanchez-Walsh, an associate professor of Latino church studies at Azusa Pacific University.

    After nearly eight years of what many observers have characterized as a “Europe centered” papacy, the choice the cardinals enabled far-reaching consequences for Christianity’s most dynamic landscape – the Global South. It seems the New Pope Francis has a handful – not only in the pagan West, with a self centered decayed curie  – but also in the South.

    Case Study South America

    Pentecostal churches are becoming stronger in Latin America. Their followers are steadily growing and its ability to mobilize them far exceeds the Catholic Church in some countries. Often, they occupy spaces, where state structures have failed. But they have also great influence on education and urban elite.

    The priest throws a challenging look at the camera. Then he proclaimed his triumph: “today our TV channel  in Mexico City has received collection. Give him a strong round of applause; it was a heroic deed of Jesus Christ! “. “Some people believe a TV show would have nothing to do with anointing, but Show as well as anointing!” Otherwise mostly dressed in a fine suit, on this day the charismatic pastor of Guatemalan Neo-Pentecostal Casa de Dios (“House of God”) wears a military uniform. He shows his finger at the camera and calls: “now you, who you sit at home, which only stands up to criticize the station listen to: this is the channel, which is now taken in honor of the Lord in the greatest city in the world.” The first broadcast in Mexico City is at the same time the opening of the Youth Congress “Hechos 29” in the Mexican Neo-Pentecostal Church Casa sobre la roca (“the House on the rock”). The representatives of the Neo-Pentecostal Church from Guatemala is here to attract new adherents and to spread his community’s influence beyond Guatemala’s borders- by stepping up to mass media.

    In Latin America, are the largest religious group after the Roman Catholics already evangelicals and thus increasingly compete with the historically influential Catholic Church. Although still some over 80 percent of the Latin American population belong to the Catholic Church their number decreases steadily for 20 years. An estimated 15 to 20 percent of the Latin American population is Evangelical. Especially where poverty and exclusion are felt, Evangelical churches have large crowds. So Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, or seventh-day Adventists have become widespread. The overwhelming majority of Evangelicals in Latin America are members of Pentecostal churches – about 70 percent.

    Media savvy

    A new branch contributed to their rapid spread: the so-called Neo-Pentecostal, which later spread to Latin America, particularly from the 1970s onwards. These differ from the classical movement mainly through its strong media presence and the enterprises mentioned churches.  Also female preachers dominate today the field of media savvy religion and are based on a diverse culture.  Their repertoire includes concerts, international camps, conferences, plays, Telenovelas and healing spectacle that resemble rock concerts. Thus, Neo-Pentecostal is a pioneer a business-like, commercialized and transnationalized religion.

    It is particularly noteworthy that the Neo-Pentecostal Churches in Latin America have developed their  own regional “style” and thus now become now  “Exporters of medicinal goods”.  I think generally that is a concept looked by us European Catholics too. I am not advocating Healing spectacle like “Noches de Gloria” (glory nights)which are an export hit in all Latin America or Bill Graham.  However to listen to Latin America’s or Africa’s or Asian’s preacher and understanding spirituality is probably what both popes have in mind.  In the US those are  often  guests at thematic conferences in North America. That a country where the American evangelism by evangelicals played a very strong role – proselytize in the United States, testifies especially for  Pentecostal churches – a reversal or at least change the traditional North-South order in the spread of Christianity of late modernity.

    Prosperity theology

    In addition to the targeted use of modern mass media, the Neo-Pentecostals are characterized above all by their “prosperity theology”.  Their view of the world is less hereafter, but the here and now. This is a common to protestant and modernization activist and in my opinion a dead end.  However, one has to acknowledge how Pentecostal pastors show the faithful strategies in dealing with their difficulties and desires in everyday life. Not only the material level, but also areas such as health, social relations or the peace of mind are part of the preached self help. As a Jungian I can related to this.  However,  it is not entirely helpful if Neo-Pentecostal address social problems only on individual success and God loyalty. While some Pentecostal churches maintain social programs as part of the good tone, they seem not interested in structural conditions of poverty and inequality nor would they live like pope Francis did in a Favellas. For this reason, I agree with sociologists, who see close parallels between the neo-liberal economic paradigm and Neo-Pentecostals. The rise of capitalism in the 19th century was to a good deal connected with protestant “work ethic” or money orientation In some Pentecostal churches, the trail to God’s blessings leads directly on the budgets of municipalities and their pastors. The faithful blessing is a “cause to donate”, where the wealth of the pastors should serve as a role model to the members of the community. The followers are taught that the more they are willing to sacrifice, the more God will show ready, to meet the needs of the faithful.  On may arguably criticize this as a form of “exploitation of their believers”.

    A large business Empire derives com from those Churches, for example of Latin America’s largest neo-Pentecostal Church: the Igreja universal do Reino de Deus (“UniversalChurch of the Kingdom of God”, IURD) from Brazil which  is present in 170 countries. Highly controversial even within the Pentecostal churches, the IURD recorded impressive achievements not only in Latin America but also in Asia and Africa. The sale of religious talismans and financial offerings earn the IURD millions of dollars, as it called their mostly poor clients to dispose of a large part of their income to the Church. How influential the religious global player are, highlights the fact that the IURD has globally now 16 TV stations, 36 radio stations, two newspapers, two printers and a variety of other kinds of businesses.

    Spiritual warfare

    Popular is  “spiritual warfare”,  where demons will be forced out with neo-Pentecostal believers worldwide. Unemployment, family disputes, infidelity, illness or addiction are listed at the spiritual problems, caused by obsession or curses of demons. The persons concerned should be freed from the demons exorcism, laying on hands, and other techniques of blessing. The following scenario is happening similar every day in one of the numerous neo-Pentecostal churches of Latin America:

    In the Church of Dios Amor (“God is love”) in Buenos Aires on a Thursday morning a suffering from insomnia woman of healing at the pulpit asked. With his hand on her forehead, the pastor prays aloud, prompting the woman to tremble and to yell begins. Her face warping to a grimace, her voice is dark. “Demon, in other words who you are?” screams the pastor and roars, as no answer of the woman: “responses, demon!” The supposedly possessed screams also, trembling all over his body and eventually falls to the ground. The pastor tells “Disappear from this body, Daemon!”, the woman winces and cries again. The following is an antiphonal between preacher and Congregation: “Fire of God!”, “Burn demon!” After about fifteen minutes, the battle is over and the pastor announced their healing.

    Quieter it is, however,  in a small and classical Pentecostal Church just in Mexico City, where daily a modest number of creditors come  together. The modest Temple of the small Congregation is surrounded by the worldly hustle and bustle of the street market. While out there loud music accompanied the colorful range of street stalls, there is indoor devotional silence.  This is a place to escape the reality of his life, which lurks out there not only loud, but often mercilessly. On their clothing to recognize the members of the community who enter the small temple: women with covered heads in long skirts, men who wear suits despite the heat – all in discrete colors, nothing reminds of the current Flash mode. In this temple, they praise the Lord, sing and pray in the catharsis, to requested the gifts of the spirit: healing, prophecy and speaking in tongues. The great spectacle from as in Dios but is Cupid.

    From the above examples, it is evident that both communities belong to the Pentecostal faith, but are very different. While the classical Pentecostals rather represented traditional and conservative values, the Neo-Pentecostal tend to be spectacular mass rituals.  Is should clear be understood, how difficult it is to define the Pentecostal movement as a whole. There is a diverse range of different styles. This increasingly blurs the boundaries between Neo-Pentecostal and traditional Pentecostal. Today, a large part of the Latin American Pentecostal churches is mixed. In addition, that Pentecostal is very dynamic, constantly changing and constantly adapts to new conditions. It characterizes the religiosity of other Evangelical churches, historic Protestant, as well as sectors of Catholicism so “Pentecostalization” of Christianity is indeed happening (although what does it mean really is in the eye of the beholder). The various versions of the Pentecostal offer a religious strategy in dealing with extreme marginalization and social shortcomings in large sections of the population. People seem to find a plausible alternatives, solidarity and community far from the consumption and capitalist meritocracy: spiritual worldview may seem at first glance as an escape from reality, but solidarity and networks generates also very concrete and substantive results.

    In many Latin American countries the evangelicals are an increasingly important factor and influence  in social processes and issues. Today, the very different Pentecostal churches assess and position increasingly their common interests publicly. In many Latin American countries, associations representing a Evangelical lobby, which brings together churches with remarkably social and faith substantive differences. On issues such as abortion or gay marriage, they even form a common front with the Catholic Church. This was recently highlighted in Mexico and Argentina: when the Governments acknowledged the right to adoption to homosexual couples, the evangelicals together with the Catholic Church, however, made the front.  Pope Francis was an outspoken critic in Argentina and clashed with the Kirchner government with ties to lots of former “turncoat terrorists” and very hostile to any religion. However, the Evangelicals succeeded in many Latin American countries to take influence on the economic and political elites notable in the Brazil Parliament.  In Guatemala, a country with long Evangelical tradition and about 30 percent of Evangelical population, the neo-Pentecostal movement is so strong rather questionable elites like nowhere else.  Also in Chile, the influence of the Pentecostal on the policy is great. The national church Iglesia Metodista Pentecostal de Chile (“Methodist Pentecostal Church of Chile”, IMP) had always been close ties to the leaders. Although a vast majority of its adherents supported the Government of Salvador Allende, the leadership of the IMP predictably switched sides after the Pinochet coup.

    The example of Chile makes it clear that it is difficult to measure whether the Pentecostal churches really influence the political elites, as is often claimed. Furthermore, the basis of the churches must not necessarily share the political tendencies of the church leadership and can resist attempts of influence or stay silent at the ballot box. One principle applies throughout Latin America: not just Evangelical churches have more and more supply, but also the group of those without religion is growing. And many opponents of the historic hegemony of the Roman Catholic Church are also skeptical to the rise of Evangelicals.

    Revolutions are never prettier…

    Religious revolutions were not, as Western intellectuals too often propose against the history, only  mere spiritual, private matters. They bring with them profoundly this-worldly repercussions like genocides, wars, and what Samuel Huntington has famously termed ‘the clash of civilizations’. They can also renew and uproot societies. Arguable a ‘Christian revolution’ is already underway in the developing world, one that our political leaders ignore to the peril of all of us: “We are currently living through one of the transforming moments in the history of religion worldwide. ” The Christian center of gravity has shifted to Africa, Asia, and Latin America “By 2050, only about 1/5 of the world’s 3 billion Christians will be non-Hispanic Whites.” “The era of Western Christianity has passed within our lifetimes….” “The emerging Christian world will be anchored in the Southern continents.” Growing from a handful to several hundred million, the Pentecostal movement is the most successful social movement of the past century that places special emphasis on a direct personal experience of God through the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

    There are parallels between the developments in the ‘South’ and those that characterized a similar time of awakening, urbanization, and religious effervescence in the industrializing North. Jenkins states, that “Up until the end of the eighteenth century, large-scale missionary efforts were strictly the preserve of the Catholic powers….” To connect the spread of Christianity only with imperial expansion is not entirely correct, since fate of the religion would be affected by the breakup of the old European empires. The countries with the largest number of Catholics are Brazil (137 million), Mexico (89 million), Philippines (61 million), the United States (58 million), and Italy (55 million). Catholic growth has been particularly dramatic in Africa, usually in former French and Belgian territories. In 1995, there were 16 million Catholics in all of Africa. Today, there are 120 million. Jenkins states, “For the foreseeable future, the characteristic religious forms of Southern Christianity, enthusiastic and spontaneous, fundamentalist and supernatural-oriented, look massively different from those of the older centers in Europe and North America.” and “In the coming decades, the religious life characteristic of those regions may well become the Christian norm.”

    … Than evolutions

    The history of Christian expansion shows us that it developed globally from the beginning.  Particularly the modernization requests to and attempts the whole idea of ‘Western Christianity’ distorts the true scope of the religion’s development. In the Middle East, African and Asian regions subjugated by Islam, Christian loyalties survived for centuries in some cases until today: , “Arab Christians remained politically powerful until the rise of a new Muslim fundamentalism in the 1980s.” Westerners apologize for the Crusades but do not suggest that Muslims apologize for the aggressive acts that gave them power over these various lands in the first place. Westerners have forgotten the once-great Christian communities of the Eastern world. Undeniably, the Christian missions of this historical phase were intimately connected with political and imperial adventures, and Protestant and Catholic fortunes followed the success of the different empires. All the hypocrisy and the flagrantly self-serving rhetoric of the imperial age, the dedication of the missionaries was beyond question.” Jenkins states, “amazing as it may appear to a blasé West, Christianity exercises an overwhelming global appeal, which shows not the slightest sign of waning.” and “Many Westerners…see missionary Christianity as a kind of cultural leprosy.” But why did Africans and Asians adopt Christianity? “One all-too-obvious explanation is that individuals came to believe the message offered, and found this the best means of explaining the world around them.” Their convictions are illustrated by the many stories of zeal in the face of persecution.

     New Christianity

    Population growth and contraction look poised to reduce European populations radically while a boom in many southern states continues apace. When turning to religious indicators, all of them suggest that the surge in southern Christianity has barely begun. The picture becomes even more interestingly when population mobility is factored into the equation. Immigration to Europe may well establish a renewed Christian presence on that continent. America looks set to become even more of a Christian nation than it is today, again due to immigration. Southern nations are growing rapidly but Northern states are relatively static. – “The stagnation of Northern and particularly European populations will be one of the most significant facts of the twenty-first century.” “By 2050, there will be an ever-growing contrast between the age profiles of the global South and North, between the world of the young and very mobile and the world of the old and static.” “In another epochal change, these urban centers will be overwhelmingly Southern.” “A largely secularized First World confronts a rapidly growing ‘South’ in which religion thrives and expands.” But many in the South are moving north. “ “Looking at the spread of mosques across urban Europe, it would be easy to believe that Islam might indeed be Europe’s future religion. Yet a great many other European immigrants are Christian, and they raise the prospect of a revitalized Christian presence on European soil.” The number of Muslims in the U.S., is probably about 4 million or so, much less than the up to 8 million claimed. Many Arab-Americans are in fact Christian. “Any likely Muslim growth through immigration will be far exceeded by the continuing Christian influx from Africa, Asia, and above all, Latin America.” – “Christian predominance is likely to be still more marked in decades to come.”

    Re-Designing secularity coexistence

    There are varying models of “church and state§ that can be expected as important southern countries become demographically. The predictions are not all reassuring to heirs of a strong tradition of separation between the two. Americans keep church and state separate, but such a distinction is incomprehensible in much of the world. ‘Not only is Christianity flourishing in the Third World, but so are distinctively Christian politics. “Northerners are going to find themselves ever more out of touch with the religious dimensions that shape the new world, and literally unable to communicate with the new people of faith.” – “In one possible scenario of the world to come, an incredibly wealthy although numerically shrinking Northern population espouses the values of humanism, ornamented with the vestiges of liberal Christianity and Judaism.” “Meanwhile, this future North confronts the poorer and vastly more numerous global masses who waves the flags…of ascendant Christianity and Islam. …the have-nots will be inspired by the scriptures and the language of apocalyptic, rather than by the texts of Marx and Mao. In this world, we, the West, will be the final Babylon.” – “The North would be secular, rational, and tolerant, the South primitive and fundamentalist. The North would define itself against Christianity.”

    Re-Designing interfaith coexistence

    A world in which powerful adversaries take religion far more seriously than does today’s sophisticated North should keep strategic analysts alert. Simple parents like myself imagining the world in which my son will come of age already plans immigration for him out of Europe. Religious loyalties are at the root of many of the world’s ongoing civil wars and political violence, and in most cases, the critical division is the age-old battle between Christianity and Islam. The parochialism of Western (and World) public opinion is striking. When thousands are massacred on the grounds of their faith in Nigeria, Indonesia, or the Sudan, the story rarely registers. Come lives are worth more than others. This is bad news, as no less than 10 of the world’s 25 largest states in 2050 could be profoundly divided between Islam and Christianity, and judging by present trends, any or all of them could be the scene of serious interfaith conflict.  Jenkins reminds, that “A number of European nations face huge disparities between very fertile immigrant groups and relatively static old-stock populations, and religious instability could easily result.” – “The fundamental question here is whether Islam and Christianity can coexist.” “Bitter lesson may be in progress in…Egypt, the home of the ancient community of Coptic Christians.” Some of the likely winners in the religious economy of the new century are precisely those groups who have a strongly apocalyptic mindset, in which the triumph of righteousness is associated with the vision of a world devastated by fire and plague.  Jenkins warns, “the situation could become so sensitive that a global catastrophe could be provoked by the slightest misjudgment –just like 1914.” There is a pressing need to re-designing interfaith coexistence, which was recognized started by the Pope emeritus already.

    Re-Thinking spirituality

    The Pentecostal movement is very diverse but in addition to the key beliefs common to all Christians, there are common elements:

    • The experience of adult baptism is the central rite and key concept.
    • Holy Spirit comes personally into our hearts and lives, bringing to us the “charismata” – gift of grace.
    • Presence of the Holy Spirit will become manifest and evident by speaking in tongues, but other supernatural phenomena are also possible.
    • Individuals need to make a personal commitment to faith and to obtain presence of the Holy Spirit. If not. it indicates failure or worthlessness.
    • The style of worship is emotional, marked by clapping, chorusing, contemporary music and dynamic preaching.
    • Many Pentecostals believe that God rewards materially, as well as spiritually.
    • Scripture is interpreted literally.

    The key concept in Pentecostal belief is: ‘The Baptism in, or with, the Holy Spirit.’ We find this in all four Gospel accounts; Matthew 3:11, Mark 1:18, Luke 3:16, and John 1:33. In these passages we learn that John the Baptist baptized with water unto repentance but prophesied that ‘One mightier than I,’ Christ, was coming after him and would baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire. In Acts 1:5 Jesus speaks of the fulfillment of this prophecy: ‘For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.’

    When in addition to being baptized into Christ by the Spirit we are baptized by Christ with the Spirit, the Holy Spirit comes personally into our hearts and lives, bringing to us the charismata (literally, ‘grace things’), the gifts and power that we need for personal growth and service to God in the Church and in the world. This baptism in or with the Spirit is evidenced initially by speaking in other tongues. When a believer is filled with or baptized in the Holy Spirit, the Spirit so overpowers him that he is in a state of ecstasy with no control over his faculties. The Spirit then enables him to speak in other languages the praises of Jesus. This is the sign that one has been filled or baptized with the Spirit. This experience of Spirit baptism and its initial evidence must be earnestly sought by believers. It doesn’t just happen; conditions must be met. Consciously, fervently, actively the seeker has to do these things. Often, too, he needs the assistance of others already filled with the Spirit. These must pray for him, lay hands on him before the Spirit will come. Conditions vary, but generally they are: worship, joyous faith, earnest expectation, praise and thanksgiving, obedience, separation from sin, intense desire, baptism, asking of God,.

    Jenkins notes how churches in the Two-Thirds world `inculturate’ the gospel in their cultural contexts. Though the results are sometimes alarming to Western Christians, Jenkins’ view is rather more sanguine, claiming that most of these adaptations are well within the parameters of recognizably Christian faith. As demographic changes favor the Southern churches, their patterns of life and worship-often visceral supernatural in their orientation-are bound to become the dominant ones in a new Christendom. “The rising churches usually preach a strong and even pristine Christian message.” “Another new ‘missionary century’ may dawn, although next time, the missionaries would be traveling northward.” Events since the late 90s have given the author some hard facts to work with. The southern churches are almost all theologically and culturally more conservative than their northern partners. But are they so distinct so as to be incapable of re-evangelizing secularized Europe and the USA? A fundamental issue: How will the global North change in response to the rise of a new global Christianity? Will its religious character remain Christian, perhaps with a powerful Southern cast? Or will it entirely lose its Christian character?”While traditional Christianity is weakening in large sections of the North, it is indeed being reinforced and reinvigorated by Southern churches, by means of immigration and evangelization.

    Conclusion

    Theological answer

    The Apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, do not forbid the proper use of tongues, neither do will he command it. Obviously even in the New Testament Church where tongues had a place they were not emphasized as by Pentecostals today. Now, some conclusions. First in the Acts passages (chapters 1,2,8,10,11,19), in none of the four occurrences, assuming the Samaritans spoke in tongues, were the believers fulfilling any conditions, praying for the baptism with the Spirit to be evidenced by speaking in tongues.  In each of the four instances all the believers present received the sign of tongues along with other signs. It was not just some who received the baptism in the Spirit as Pentecostals teach.  Second point is this. Tongues and the other miraculous gifts, healings, etc., suddenly are no more in the church. They were of short duration. Why? Because they are designed by God to serve as a sign, a sign not only to authenticate the gospel, but a sign to serve also as a means of making the content of prophecy and knowledge known. But when they have served their confirming purpose as a sign they cease without the least affecting the church’s possession of the mysteries of the faith.

    Political Answer

    From the view 2050 A.D., the persecution and poverty of which so much are made in the New Testament literatures very well in the context of the majority of today’s Christians.  The cut back of Western investment in missions, which has been cut back dramatically at just the point it is most desperately needed, at the peak of the current surge in Christian numbers might be revised by the new pope.  For the average Western audience, the New Testament passages about standing firm in the face of persecution have today little immediate relevance – they are mostly pagans. Millions of Christians around the world, however, do in fact live in constant danger of persecution or forced conversion, from either governments or local militia

    Sociological answer

    There is in our day a terrible despising of the pulpit. It is because the Church generally fails to expound the Word and comes with excellence of speech and worldly wisdom rather than preaching Christ crucified that a movement like Pentecostalism can make such an impact. The sheep of God are hungry and thirsty and are not being fed with the Bread and Water. These weak and sickly sheep are swept along by the bizarre, spectacular ‘successes’ and enthusiasm of Pentecostalism.  What one could say then to a Pentecostal neighbor? Having shown him from the Scriptures the truth he will invariably say to you, ‘But how can you dismiss this? I’ve had the experience. It’s real.’ The answer you must give is, ‘The Bible teaches that tongues have ceased. I cannot and you may not base your faith on your experience. That is pure subjectivism.

    Historical answer

    But here we go.  Looking at Christianity as a global phenomenon, not merely a Western one, makes it impossible to read the New Testament as before. “The Book of Revelation” shows that Christianity is flourishing wonderfully among the poor and persecuted, while it declines among those who consider themselves rich and secure.” The Western modernization response to empty churches is wrong and globally irrelevant. Pope Francis may prove a point again: “Christianity is never as weak as it appears, nor as strong as it appears. And whether we look backward or forward in history, we can see tat time and again, Christianity demonstrates a breathtaking ability to transform weakness into strength.”

    Sources

    A Theology of the Holy Spirit [Paperback]  Frederick D. Bruner (Author), Frederick Dale Bruner

    The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity (Future of Christianity Trilogy) [Paperback]  Philip Jenkins

     

  • The Templars – Gods militia or Gnostic warlords?

    The Templars – Gods militia or Gnostic warlords?

    Were the Templars – Gods militia or Gnostic warlords? Well, whings are never as they appear but also not otherwise. The Templars were the first  trans-national  financial and military organisation,  comparable to a blend of Goldman & Sachs,  Benedictine Monks and a Blackwater mercenaries elite force. Their secrecy, might and  military achievements created awe, envy and myths. Hazy beginnings and their vanishing twenty years later allowed numerous conspiration theories. As soldiers they were the first to enter the battlefield and last to leave. The enemy respected and feared them for their incredible bravery and highly disciplined fighting.  Friends, however, observed that they were hedging their bets based on a unique understanding of cultural complexity and on cunning strategic enemy relations. From the (failed) siege of Damascus on, this had raised doubts on which side they stood. Originally strictly catholic and ascetic , over the time leading Templars were seen as tainted by  Gnostics thoughts. Rapid expansion and internal organisation created a need for a large backend and fighting force adding the inherent risks of a moral decline, by attracting not only  talent and devotion but also some who saw them mainly as promising career path. As the Templars went “native”  their rituals and symbols became increasingly dualistic, if not Gnostic. Financial motives were certainly behind their persecution, but the charges of  heresy might not have been completely unfounded. As a Tibetan monk once stated: ” Things are never as they appear but also not otherwise“. This article wants to investigate briefly, how and why that organization was broken.

    History is the story of the past told for present purpose

    The politically correct version of this story attributes the Crusades to an outbreak of religious fanaticism and aggression on the part of Europe.  However it is important to consider the 1000 years of history in the Holy Land before, its political situation and cultural context. And the spiritual  and economic  relevance of warrior monks from the Crusades — secret societies vowed to the purification  and defense of their religions. Equally interesting than the topic itself, are the shifting reasons given by historians for their undoing, so the religious and secular leanings of the Templars will be touched. The Templars fought against Islam to reclaim the Holy Land  for nearly two centuries. During that time the order grew into a international power,  became a state within states and elite army, backed by an extensive network of preceptories in the Outremer  and the West. In October 1307, all members of the  Order were arrested on the orders of Philip IV, King of France, and charged with serious heresies, including the denial of Christ,homosexuality and idol worship. The ensuing proceedings lasted for almost five years and culminated in the suppression of the Order.

    The beginning of the end

    One unexpected consequence of the failed Crusades was the beginning of the end of the Roman Catholic Church’s control over Europe.  In addition to the military defeat of Christian armies, there were spiritual causes for the fall of the Church’s political and religious hegemony.  In the 11th century a second wave of Gnostic thoughts swapped to Europe, which was fought by pope Innocent III. That the Templar’s order did not take part taunted them for the first time with a suspicion of heresy.  An assertive interpretation of  a monarch’s role and his financial repression toward the orders was the visible and the primary motive of Phillip IV.  All this resulted in a drive for centralized absolutist monarchies, by the Phillip IV who saw himself – not the weak Pope Clement V –  in charge for the defense of Christianity  in his realm. The theocratic conception of kingship and the refusal to recognise any temporal superior provided a firm base for developing a theory of the Kings sovereignty, which crystallised during the disputes with the pope. To the contrary for the Church (and the Templars) a kingdom was  a government of a perfect community ordained from God and so different from oligarchy, tyranny and democracy, where, especially in the case of tyranny, the ruler is interested only in his own good.

    Where the Templars came from

    Lets go one step back to  the hazy beginnings. The Templars were founded in 1119 twenty years after the Capture of Jerusalem by the First Crusade as a military elite force and monastic order, for the  security of “Outremer”,  i.e. the new crusader states in Palestine and Syria . During the twelfth and thirteenth centuries they acquired extensive property and were granted far-reaching ecclesiastical and jurisdictional privileges both by the popes to whom they directly reported, and by secular powers. They became untouchable, functioning as  first global bankers, a position facilitated by their wealth, secure fortresses and international nature of their organisation. When in May 1291 after the loss of Acre, the Christian crusaders were driven out of Palestine by the Mamluks of Egypt, the Templars lost their main purpose power base both in the East and Europe. By coincidence, at that time a weak pope, Clemens V, shifted the  balance toward secular forces . The Templar’s  screwed and dubious warlord politicking, their legendary arrogance and greed had made them many enemies. The military backbone of the Christianity in the Holy Land became now both useless and vulnerable. In 1307, the leading brothers (Grand Master and Visitor) of this Order residing in France were arrested by the officials of King Philip IV in the name of the papal inquisitors.

    The Trial

    The battle-hardened Templar knights who were already returning to France, posed a military threat. A proposal to merge all the military orders and attempts for new Crusade failed. King Phillip IV of France wanted to destroy the Templar Order globally and confiscate all their treasuries and properties in France. King Phillip’s  plan was to arrest the Templar in France, charge them with heresy, and extract confessions from them by torture. Pope Clement V was initially annoyed, but being the charges religious in nature, he could only comply and take the lead himself. Phillip IV managed to carry off a shockingly effective piece of work,  instantly chopping off the head of the Order. 625 members of the Order were arrested in the first wave  including the Grand Master; the Visitor-General; the Preceptors of Normandy, Cyprus, and Aquitaine; and the Templars’ Royal Treasurer. Due to torture, the overwhelming majority of the knights confessed to every charge that was put to them. The pope reacted just as Phillip had planned. Phillip leaned on Clement to issue papal arrest warrants all across Europe, but those were largely ignored or skirted by other monarchs outside of France. After the first shock, some Templars organized a credible defense. What they did not understand, however, was that the Templar order had become just a pawn in the power struggle of Phillip the Fair and Pope Clement, who was willing to sacrifice it. Its seems that the imprisioned Templars were just a shadow of their powerful and cunning ancestors who fought in the East.  To break the defense Phillip ordered 54 of the knights to be burned at the stake in 1310, for the sin of recanting their confessions. That was it.

    In 1312, Clement finally decided to end the situation at a council in Vienna to dissolved the Order. All Templar possessions apart from the cash were handed over to the Knights Hospitaller, and many lower rank Templars were assigned to other Orders. Those who did not confess were sent to the stake. Phillip charged a yearly fee from the Hospitallers. One plausible details of the Templar’s history cites the Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, who promised from the pyre 1313, both the pope and the king,  that they will appear before the heavenly judge’s within one year. Fact is  all leading persecutors died an early and unpleasant death:  Pope Clemens V only one month later of an unsettled illness (perhaps, cancer) and King Philipp IV in December of the same year. Had the „curse of Jacques de Molay” come from earthly followers, possibly members of the secret Templar’s section which still continued to exist for years or by alchemy?  Who knows?

    Where the Templars went

    However, some Templars were tipped off and the main treasure was smuggled out of Paris to the naval base. The whole Templar fleet escaped and was never found. The Templar trials went nowhere outside France, so it might pe possible that they went to Scotland. Rumors tell that some were involved in the founding of  Switzerland with military and banking expertise. It has been established, that the Scottish freemasons borrowed later liberally Templar symbols. As organisation the Templars vanished into the haze of history. What, however, did become from the legendary wealth the Templar? Nobody knows.  Most of it remained untraceable. Historians assume nowadays that their most important  treasures have been of immaterial value. That skills and the  treasures initiated religious and cultural creativity would result in the rise of esoteric (and economic)  movements like Freemasonry.  and later utilized by New Age and a New World Order.

    Secular impact of the Templars

    The Knights Templars are reputed to be the founders of some of the first banks. With the arrival of the Second and Third Crusades, the Templars were perceived in some quarters to have hedged their bets, as they were bankers not only to the local Christian population, but to many of the Saracen merchants as well. The banking system operated with the Templars taking an agreed charge on all monies held, thus ensuring that the Order never ran out of funds. Any monies subject to international transactions were sent under Templar guard to the nearest preceptory in the appropriate region and could be withdrawn somewhere else.  Funds were thus able to move freely throughout Outremer and Europe with very little risk. Under Louis IX, the royal treasure was kept at the Temple. Until 1306 the Templars where deeply involved in the Royal financial administration since they had helped with cash in the Holy Land  Luis VII during the second crusade 1148. They financed the whole crusade locally when he run out of money.  Later they would lend the French Kings significant amount of monies. The acted as royal treasures but the state treasure was relocated from the Templars to the Louvre when around 1292  and 1295  the Templars lost their leading financial influence.

    Between 1295 and 1306 Phillip IV debased his money system with FIAT Money effectively using inflation to reduce his debts. 1306 he returned to the silver-based currency on its  original 1295 value –  basically a partial semi-default. The money depreciated about 70% and riots took place.

    The commercial view

    Big property in the eyes of the Templars was no aim of original Christianity. They thought procuring money in such a way, that it lost his value after half a year. Who had money, needed to bring it in this period in circulation again, otherwise it would become be worthless. Creating money should not be at the disposal of states and other institutions in private hands. This resembles strongly non FIAT money. For long-term plans there should be special value money, which just worked  in the service of the community similar to a monetary device like the MEFO Bills, with which Germany was able to break the chains of her reparation payments and  Hjalmar Schacht overcame the Great depression induced by the US banking and stock crash. When Adolf Hitler became 1933 Chancellor of the German Reich he was supported by one paramount economic adviser, Hjalmar Schacht.  Hjalmar Schacht (Horace Greely) was a Freemason of the Scottish Rite. He was connected to the English Scottish Rite Freemason Montagu Norman, and negotiated very successfully on behalf  of Germany in the financial world of the City of London. As Eustace Mullins wrote in “Secrets of the Federal Reserve”, the Bank of England is under the control of the Rothschild family.

    The early Christian Church declared that any usury was against Divine law. As Canon law had no authority over Jews, Christian monarchs looked to the Jews to supply capital to them. The Jewish usurers therefore had no competition in medieval Christian lands and could charge very high interest. As the Jews were ostracised from most professions they were pushed into marginal occupations considered socially inferior, such as tax and rent collecting and money lending. Naturally tensions between creditors and debtors were going to rise and added to social, political, religious, and economic strains. Judaism allowed interest under certain: „From strangers (Goiim) you may take (people Israel) interest”  Jahweh (5. Mose 23.21). The Christian rulers have accepted this, because they often needed somebody, who borrowed them  money. In the early Middle Ages the influence of these banks was not as big as in our present time only indirect. However, already in the Middle Ages speculation exists, in a certain manner also foreign exchange a monetary syndicates which lent money against interest and compound interest. This appeared to the Templars of evil. To remove this evil, they thought up a new monetary system. Money should serve exclusively the movement of goods, but not traded. It should also not be possible to be hoarded and accumulated.

    The political view

    This was of just the starting point of the idea of a centrally controlled economy, but it reached also  in other areas.  The position of the people should not be determined by birth, but exclusively by personal achievement. This would have been one frontal attack on the prerogatives of the nobility at that time.  Templars also claimed monarchist ar under „God’s mercies” and this was valid of course also for the pope. Very briefly: the worldly ideas of the Templars were revolutionary and it is out of question that if the Templars had come to political power, an authoritarian world state would have been established. Every kind of vice would have been absolutely punished by draconian measures, like the Sharia.  Anybody who thinks the Templar were  tolerant Sufis are extremely wrong. This is also reflected in their order colours: „The white is for the good, the black for the evil, and the Red stand for the blood of Christ”. The faith of the Templars was a dualistic one and divided the world and the people in allegorically white and black in  good and bad people, wise and ignorant.

    Military Tactics

    The Templars’ reputation in the field was unsurpassed. Saladin ordered that all the captive Templars and Hospitallers be executed, such was his conviction that the military orders were the Franks’ main weapon against Islam.  The knights were the mediaeval equivalent of a tank, with their great war horses often standing up to 17 hands high. The horses – known as destriers – were taught to kick, butt and bite. Tactics were simple, but, when timed properly, were devastatingly effective. Initially, the infantry would provide cover, before the cavalry charge, which would form the main attack. A properly timed charge would wipe out everything in its path. In the early years of the Latin East, the Templars quickly developed a fearsome reputation as the best-trained soldiers , showing almost suicidal bravery. However, as the twelfth century gave way to the thirteenth, the Templars began to soften and became  more cautious in battle.

    Organization and Goals

    One reason that the Templars posed a threat, because the also had big plans for a New World Order. In cooperation with a renewed Roman-German empire,  including France they wanted to control the whole world – for the  blessing and the well-being of all. The Templars felt and did not think nationwide. Their brothers came from members of many European countries. In a commercially radical  different understanding of  “Globalisation”  as nowadays,  the Templars can be seen as the first secret transnational organisation. Their goal was essentially a Gods state in an Augustine (or Islam) fashion. The Templars wanted to remove everything what the„western world” today cherishes Their vision resounds in twenty-first century as daringly and revolutionary as it did in their time.  That is why the Templar were pictured as deadly threat to the secular forces and the otherwise relatively liberal republic Venice and the German Hanse issued against Templars draconian punishments.

    The Templars and the East

    templars
    templars

    According to Historical records the Order of the Knights of the Temple of Jerusalem was originally founded by Hugo de Payens and Godfrey de St. Omar. The Temple of Jerusalem, where the title Templar originated, was the Al’Aqsa Mosque, rumoured to be the former site of the Temple of Solomon . In 1129 permitted king Balduin II of Jerusalem-Outremer young ones of a knight’s community which was then called „poor knights of Christ” (Paupere Militie of Christ), to use some parts of it as accommodation. Since then  the order was called now: Poor knights of Christ and the Temple Solomon’s to Jerusalem (Pauperes commilitones Christ templique Salomonici Hierosalemitanis). Hence they were named “Templars” and with it the came the first documents and enlarged knowledge which should determine the fate and history of the order. With the removal of the partly ailing rooms of the “temple” which  Balduin II had permitted, the knights found several documents which were obviously very old, small pieces, described in Aramaic or Hebrew writing. Nobody of the knights knew these languages.  Later on all leading Templars in Outremer would employ Saracen secretary and some learned Arabic and Aramaic.  For the devout knighthood to go through the old accounts was  like a thunder-clap:  Christ not Gods son, but they incarnation of the true, otherwise unknown God! Or maybe only a good, courageous person?  And Allah of the Muslims could be no one than Satan, nevertheless, since the Koran was based on the same Pentateuch like the old testament of the Christian Bible. This could explain, why Christ called Satan „prince of this world”. What the knights thought at that time and felt, we are not able to imagine. With all confusion the knighthood kept  wisely that knowledge under strict secrecy. Later Hugo of the Champagne procured some first Cathars writings, contents to which the accounts of the Eschaimin texts  fitted. The sign of the Marcionites Gnostics was the red Thorn cross – exactly as later that of the Cathars. After the legend the mother Christ had tinkered from four thorns of the crown of thorns a small cross. This thorn cross became later the origin of all knight’s crosses. Till then the Templars had a simple Roman Cross in use.  From now on it became the Red thorn cross on White.

    Excursion to the first centuries

    Now at this point we must undertake an excursion to the first centuries, in a time, in which different Christian and gnostic currents fought against each other violently. In the second century it was unclear, which direction Christianity would assert itself. Although one of the groups arguing with each other had the advantage of big of financial possibilities and a good organizational structure, nothing was yet decided. Whether the strongest formation held and also spread the truth and owned the highest wisdom, is more than in question.   One very fractured group were gnostic who considered (Christian gnosis, not pagan gnosis) Christ as independent incarnation of the true light, the  former unknown God. The Jewish Jahweh was looked by the Gnostics  either as a demiurge, so as a negative world creator, or, as  Satan (opponent of God).

    The huge number of gnostic remains and prevailing religions originated in the Holy Land must have influenced the Templars – above gnosis also Judeo-Christianity,  Sufi Islam and radical Shiitsm. The latter two  contained significant gnostics thoughts. Those gnostic groupings, originally syncretism from oriental pagan god’s plagued in the first centuries Christianity.  One best known of these groups became that of a man from Samaria who was called Simon Magus. Other names to be mentioned are particularly Valentinus and Markos.  Many accounts regard the Gnostic weakened by a lack of self-assertion and unity. However, the (his)story would be told differently, if we lived now not a Christian, but a gnostic Europe. The chances for it stood good; particularly among the educated people gnostic groupings had numerous followers. If the Gnostics had united, they could absolutely have arisen as a winner  in this fight of religions. However, a weakness also lay in the Gnosis itself. For a state religion like the Roman Church or a religious warrior ideology like the Islam, Gnosis was to complicated, too “elitarian”  and actually a step back to polytheism. The demigods (and goddess) from the antiquity were extremely alien to the Middle Age.  However, in some circles of the Templars, particularly with the associates, a female divinity had possessed a high value , presumably only in the South of France. In other seats of the Templar’s order, like in the headquarters to Paris, no tracks of this was found.

    Templars and Baphomet

    Myth of the Baphomet  derived from its usage in Provence the centre of the Cathar Church in France,
    Myth of the Baphomet derived from its usage in Provence the centre of the Cathar Church in France,

    The confessions of the Templars make a boring read. Little is in there of  the accusations brought against the Knights Templar that they worshipped an idol, said to have taken the form of a head or sometimes a black cat. Baphomet representations, like one found in Paris, were in possession of the Templars. Modern scholars held the opinion that the name of Baphomet was an Old French corruption of the name Muhammad, with the interpretation being that some of the Templars, through their long military occupation of the Outremer, had begun incorporating Islamic ideas into their belief system. That heads were something which has no connection with the Bible and church faith.  Baphomet lay long before the foundation of the  Templar’s order; and, nevertheless, it is important for the understanding of his history, since they Templars themselves saw her mystic roots in the epoch of Christ,  in the first and second century. The time after that was meaningless for them, because they went back  to the origin of the Christianity and to its connection with gnostic communities and secret societies. Without all this the way of the Templar’s order would not presumably become such thrilling. However, the history wanted it that it should come differently  for the Templars. The confirmation of Eschaimin notes from Jerusalem, were in many respects  of vital importance for the internal circles of the Templars. As a result, the order developed a confidential apprenticeship which determined their second hidden personality.

    The Templars who lived in the Holy Land, along with the masons they employed, had to deal with the local population on a regular basis. They often became fluent in Arabic, and many crusaders –Templars included — “went native”.  That triggered other theories that “Baphomet” was derived from an Arabic term, _abufihamet_, meaning “Father of Understanding”, in Idries Shah’s “The Sufis”.  The Sufi origins make sense: as an iconoclastic religion, Islam strictly forbids images, either painted or sculpted, of either God or Muhammad, quite different from Sufis who have Saints. Partner  proved that  Baphomet was a known entity before the demise of the Templars, and most likely a person with spiritual power. If Shah is correct in his assertions about Sufi influences on the Templars, there is a link between Sufism and Baphomet. As for the Templars and the Sufis, not only were there many documented contacts between Templars and Sufis (as well as other radical Muslims such as the Ismailis mentioned later) during their time in the Middle East, but there were also opportunities for contacts in Europe. One such individual was the tenth century Sufi martyr Husayn ibn Mansur al-Hallaj, who died in 922 AD.  A pantheist, an alleged miracle worker, and a most definitely unorthodox Muslim, Hallaj was imprisoned and tried for blasphemy.  Shah cited reasons connecting Hallaj to Hiram Abiff and the sect of Sufis known as “the Builders” , who built the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock on the site of Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, which was the Holy Land headquarters for the Templars. Having already encountered books who hypothesized a connection between the Templars and Freemasonry and Templars  participants in documented Sufi practices, Templars who “worshipped a head called Baphomet” may have had some factual basis, namely the commemoration of this decapitated Sufi martyr. However the above thesis,  hopefully interesting to the reader, remains purely speculative.

    Templars and the Assassins

    Alamut - Eagel Nest
    Alamut – Eagles Nest

    The Templars showed a great deal of tolerance towards Islam. As has been noted, Grand Masters always had Saracen secretaries, and it was not uncommon for Templars to learn Arabic. One group with whom the Templars had a less convivial relationship was the Assassins. They were a fanatical sect of Shi’ite Muslims, who had broken away in the late eleventh century from the Fatimids, the main Shi’ite regime, and set themselves up in the Elburz mountains in northern Persia and later in the mountains of the Lebanon; their leader became known to the Franks as ‘the Old Man of the Mountains’.  In 1173, the King of Jerusalem, Amalric I (1162–74), attempted to negotiate an alliance with the Assassins, as Amalric was given to believe that the Old Man of the Mountains was about to convert to Christianity,, as the Old Man had, just a few years earlier, abrogated the law of the Prophet and proclaimed the Millennium, thus making himself and the rest of the sect heretical. Traditional Islam was declared heresy. The Qiyama heresy was promulgated in Syria by the charismatic Assassin leader Sinan. He was a contemporary and sometime ally of both Saladin and Richard Lion-heart. The Syrian Assassins were the channel by which the Ismaili Gnostic current entered the Knights Templar Order which had uneasy and shifting relations with the Assassins. A group of Templar knights ambushed Abdullah, the Old Man’s envoy, near Tripoli and killed him.  If the ambush of the Assassins – which were often seen as Muslim equivalent of the Templar organization – was in agreement with the Grand Master is unknown.

    Tho Old Men meditating upon a fortress Alamut which he and his flock could maintain their independence, pursue their religion, and spread the doctrines of pure Islam. For Hasan-i-Sabah, founder of the Assassins, understood the secret of the true line of succession from the Prophet Muhammad, and the proper direction for the faith.

    When Muhammad died in 632, most Muslims (today known as Sunnis) believed he had endorsed his father-in-law Abu Bakr as his successor.  An alternate contemporary faction (known as Shiites) claimed that Muhammad had actually appointed his son-in-law and cousin Ali as his heir. They asserted that leadership should be reserved for descendents of the Prophet through the marriage of Fatima and Ali. The 1400-year-old conflict over succession between Sunnis and Shiites has produced rivers of blood until today unfolding everyday on CNN. Shiism henceforth became a reformist movement seeking for a rebirth of spiritual purity. From the eighth century Shiism has hosted (seen form the outside) heretical strains  contributed by new converts including Persians, Greeks, Gnostics, Sufis, Christians, Manichaean dualists, and Jewish kabbalistic. Doctrines of the purity of the bloodline of David, and of the Messiah, metempsychosis, reincarnation, magic, astrology, and numerology were absorbed.  In 749, the Abbasids came to power in Baghdad where they would reign for five hundred years. Their political ascent had been heavily supported by Shiites. But the Abbasids abandoned their Shiite base the moment they seized the throne — declaring themselves to be a Sunni dynasty. Yet in 765, another dispute arose concerning the identity of the seventh Imam. Which of two brothers (both lineal descendants of the Prophet) had been given the spiritual mantle to lead Shiites? The supporters of one became known as Ismailis. While they were a minority, they went on to establish the first successful Shiite government in 909. The Fatimid Caliphate ruled Egypt and beyond for over two hundred years. In 1095, during the decline of the Fatimid Caliphate, another schism occurred that is central to our story. The Fatimid Imam (or caliph) concerning  his son Nizar to succeed him. Hasan-i-Sabah e a leader of the Fatimid Ismaili mission in Persia supported the succession of Nizar. When he learned that Nizar had been killed, he declared Nizar’s son the true Imam, and founded the Nizari Ismailis. The sect remains flourishing to this day under the cosmopolitan leadership of the Aga Khan. Hasan built a community of believers in the northernmost regions of Iran near the Caspian Sea. His headquarters was named Alamut, the Eagle’s Nest. It was a secluded mountain fortress where he reigned for 35 years. Hasan’s strategic use of selective political murder to eliminate military threats to his community led to the Nizari Ismailis becoming known as Assassins. Hasan’s most illustrious successor was the fourth leader at Alamut named Hasan II. ordered the overturning of all outward observances of Islam in favor of a Gnostic enlightenment, a heaven on earth. He declared that Nizari Ismailis had entered a state of perfection in which the experience of God within was an ascertained reality.

    Templars and Simon Magus

    Most important has been from Templar’s view Simon Magnus. Within the history of the Templars  the religious world and mindset of the Templars it must have been a shock for the devout knights to be exposed to that knowledge with roots in the first two centuries. Certainly a world broke down – their whole religious world.  Following Simon Magus, the Bible appeared neither as a historical document nor heavenly revealed Truth. The Bible became a devils script which fancies in genesis 1.17 to Abraham with the words: „Ani ha El Schaddai” – I am El Schaddai. On the other hand – what is called the new testament – became a forgery pursued systematically in the earliest time.

    The Templars and Abraxas

    abraxas
    abraxas

    The gnostic sign of the Abraxas is to be found also with the Templars, but it is uncertain in which meaning Abraxas was used by the Templars. There is an unequivocal explanation from Templar’s source themselves with regard to the use of the word “Abraxas” in magic connection; namely in „Small book”. There, however, one must consider that this passage of the „small book” is based of Venetian  reconstructed scripts from the 16th century. Nearly everything speaks for the fact, that the postscript indeed are an original presentations of Templars from the Middle Age and Abraxas images used by the Templars. The key for the gate to all temporalities is called: ABRAXAS; and the key to the gates of all rooms is called: MaKaARa. There are four completely  different times; and it is from high importance to make a distinction.  The Saracen spoke Abracadabra, however it comes from the old Persians, also called Mogani  from which also the word Magic is descended from and before this at first from the far away country of Arya-Varta which is called since later time also India. The gnostic relation with the Templars, most probably is a  fragmentary tradition of Basilides influences (an Egypt born Gnostic of Greek descent) who he lived on approx. 85-145. Basilides defined Abraxas as a symbol of the highest divine being the driver oft the Archetypes of the Great Father and the Great Mother. In Abraxas five old forces united for Basilides: Mind, Power,Providence, Wisdom and Logos.  The standing pentagram  symbolises those  five old forces and can be found with the Templars at several places.

    The Templars and the West

    Without question the Templar’s order was initially strictly Catholic. The word of the pope it was valid for the knights as pure and true, none of them doubted the contents of the Bible. They believed what had been taught them, but already a few decades later  an invisible front line between the Templars and the official theology appeared.  Was Jesus Christ the son of the Hebrew’s God Jahweh, how the Bible states? There discovered quite different perceptions .  Only with the council of Nicäa in the year 325 four became the „new Testament” canonised. Now much older sources had been shown to the Templars.  From the original one, true Gospel almost nothing was preserved, just as little from the real apostle’s letters? No one knew. The search for the truth of Christ became the most important internal job of the Templar’s order. All ideas  arose directly or indirectly from this effort. Some Templar’s formations aimed for a new empire. Spiritual reasons became instruments of power to  realise of higher forces.

    The Templars and Gnostics

    Many leading Templars leaned to the so-called apocalyptic  testament form, believing that the Gospel of Christ had been falsified already in early time. Paulus also points to it in his letter to Titus(Tit.2.10-11), which has been preserved in the new testament. With a certain background the Templars interpreted Paulus words: The Gospel of Christ had been falsified massively. Christ was not a son of the Jahweh, but on the contrary appeared against another Jahweh son, which no one else is as the devil (see in the NT still tracks with Jo. 8.44). This also becomes clear in Templar’s symbolism: The representation of a fallen angel with devil’s head; and the reverse pentagrams means the turning away from the Pentateuch (five books of Mose). Thus one can conclude that some of the Templars were heretics, however, not in the form they were later  accused. Unforgotten were Cathars or Waldenses and Church was on the alert. The history of this second fight against the Gnostics is well-kept in the Vatican confidential archives.

    Templars and the Cathars

    cathars-mass-buring
    cathars-mass-buring

    The 11th century was the century of monks and knights, but also of a second wave of religious disputes like in the first two centuries, the century of heretics. While waves of Crusaders were fighting in Palestine, the common people of Europe were experiencing a crisis of faith. They could not find God in the churches, with their corrupt clergy. Since Catharism represented a danger to Catholicism,  Innocent III sen a call for another holy war. The Templars did never  take part in the fight against  the Cathars  which  raged around during half a century in Europe. They even accepted them to their order. In the original country of the Cathars, the Southern French province of Languedoc, two-thirds of the population were exterminated  in this western “crusade”. Repeated requests, to act, were strictly rejected by the Templars. This had very good reasons. The Cathars  based on writings of Marcion  which were confirmed  fragmentary notes from first century, which  Templars had found in Jerusalem. In the most popular publications about the Templars one can read nothing about it. So the Templar’s order in ecclesiastical regard was not homogeneous Christian anymore. The Chatars  rejected the so-called old testament of the Bible. They called themselves  “veri christiani” (true Christians) and defended of a dualistic world view, which contained  Marcionites elements.   The name Cathars (derived by the Greek: katharós, “purely”)  was changed in a  linguistic detour from “Katharer” in Germany to the word “Ketzer (Heretic)”. Cathars were the biggest Christian lay-movement of the Middle Ages, in various regards comparable to the Marcionites of the first centuries .  There are hints that the Templars Original possess manuscripts of the apostle Johannes, from Marcion  origins (old christian heresy).  Some of the Templar’s secrets living up to the present day. The Cathars most probably handed over  sanctums and  valuable texts to the Templars.

    Templars and Christian Mystic

    Esotericism – from in Ancient Greek  terikós: “internally” – a knowledge, mean is accessible not publicly, but lives only  in the internal circle of a community. The Templars were esoteric in the original sense. They wanted to experience that beyond the visible, beyond the Bible. In particular the alchemists among them related to Master Eckart who lived 260-1328.  Doubts about the  church as institution and new ideas lay apparently in the air. Indeed, like centuries later by C.G. Jung, the Templars claimed spiritual property as personal experience. The spiritual movement of the Middle Ages gave – to Cathars and to the Templars – the longing for the grasp of the supernatural. To what extent Eckart with might have stood in connection with Templars is unknown today. Fact is, however, at least one correspondence has existed. Eckart’s views would not have harmonized with those of Templars in Vienna. However, to him  more moderate religious visions of the Templars in Paris would have partially fitted.

    The Templars and C.G. Jung

    Compare the thought above with C.G. Jung’s “Answer to Job”. Where the subject „The Templars” is touched,  esoteric thinking and conspiracy theories are  not far away. What demonstrate the Templars appeal so outstanding, is a synergy of semi-scientific, financial and gnostic components.  Some of biggest creative thinker of the humanity, like C.G. Jung were de facto semi-gnostic and spiritualist. Might has always utilized symbols and collective archetypes. This is valid from  Greek philosopher Plato,  Dante Alighieri’s “La Divina Commedia”, up to Richard Wagner’s Parsifal, to name just a few. The biggest works of the humanity would not exist without turning to spiritual symbols and collective archetypes. To deal with them is not  unscientific, because science is what creates knowledge – not only, what  is available cited and adapted, as it is nowadays much too often the case. Science requires the boldness to venture in unknown of not secured terrain as C.G. Jung did. And of course: In the empire of the spiritual, in the unconscious, in those mysterious  a lot lies under veils now and then.

    Do you believe in the Conspiracy Theory?

    Templar and Aquarian Age

    An essential part of all efforts of the Templar’s order was to find truth of Christ and to renew to faith. Besides, the Templars also achieved other  results. Soon some saw themselves as Guardian of a special, higher knowledge, which to them by divine chance had been given the key and spiritual knowledge. However, they believed, the time was not ripe yet,  to carry this outside. Only if the new time had come which they expected, the knowledge could be made accessible to all.   After early Christian tradition, Jesus Christ was born on the 19th of December of the year 749 of Roman calendar born, what corresponds to the Year 5 B.C. in our today’s calendar. For determining the „time of the new empire”  that seems to correlate with the nowadays much-discussed „new age” of  self-appointed “esoterics” – the so-called “Aquarius age”.  To the most radicals the new testament contained only tracks of the truth, but not everything could be falsified. Christ  became the incarnation of an unknown God, the true God. In this still lifeless duality he gave the divine  spark life being the everlasting triad soul life. The spark everybody conceived, cannot be lost – there is no death. We  all are in a certain manner, Fallen Angels and “Schaddain” (El Schaddai/Jahweh) (linguistically suitably to the psychoanalytic  Shadow) the unwanted.  It is our job, to recover the divine light of the Self, similar to the integration of consciousness, anima/animus and the shadow. But as Jung believed we enter the age of the Ani-Christ

    The Fiat-Money of King Phillip.

    The first central bank of Europe was created by the Knight Templars.  After their fall, it is assumed, the Templars went underground and formed the secret society of the Freemasons to preserve their secret tradition. There is evidence that the Templars were the carriers of old mystical knowledge related to the Gnostics. The Knight Templar ran an early prototype of a central banking system, as their promises to pay were widely regarded, and many regard their activities as having laid the basis for the modern banking system. They were in effect bankers to the kings and became so powerful that they had to be destroyed. Capitalism has its origin in this secret society – one which the Masonic fraternity claims to be descended involved in the rise of Capitalism and the modern banking system.  Because of their pivotal contributions, numerous modern financial terms, monetary concepts, and banking practices can be traced back to the Templar. Maybe there is an link between todays concentrated’s wealth  and King Solomon’s treasure (believed by some to have been discovered by the Knights Templar), and the fabled “lost treasure of the Knights Templar.”  The Gnostic thoughts were not a vast horde of gold, but a formula for creating wealth. This formula, the author says, was probably discovered by the Templars and passed on to certain Freemasons, who used it to construct the architecture of the US banking system. As has been shown, Phillip used FIAT money and maybe they were against the usage of Fiat-Money.  With Fiat money the currency is not backed by anything but the promise of a country to enforce payment of taxes. Governments are able to create infinite amounts of value without any guarantee. The only guarantee is the trust  in the economic system of the Country itself and the monetary repression of the Government to force their citizens to pay the necessary taxes. Look at the EU today. The Fiat-System has created an enormous amount of hyper inflated countries. The only way to pay back Fiat Money is to generate a high level of inflation and/or a tremendous debt. At this moment the, US, EU and UK and Japan print money  on a large-scale. We might experience the same situation that existed in Germany in the Weimar Republic and in many other countries were the value of money became hyper inflated globally.

    The Fiat-Money of the US.

    Thomas Jefferson the third President of the US knew what would happen when the Fiat-System would be introduced in the US. This was his warning:

    ”I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks]… will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. …The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs“.

    Before government could only cheat with coins by alter tine quality or the quantity of the precious metals by reducing the weight, mixing precious metals with other metals and/or covering cheap metals with precious metals. That did routinely happen – look at Faust and Wallenstein’s time. When paper money was introduced it became much easier to cheat. Paper Notes were copied and King Philip started to play with silver coins to back the paper notes.   Most of the Central Banks are controlled by Government. An exception is the US FED, but also partially the EZB now run by an G&S allimini.  The Elite created and sustained the Great Depression, the financial crises 2008, the EU crises any crisis.  I don’t think the Knight Templar and the Free Masons are part of this conspiracy. I do believe the conspiracy (if it exists) has something to do with  their Ancestors.  The theory behind Financial Manipulation and Financial Warfare is an old theory. It was practiced by all the old Kings. They knew that the control of the foundation of the Money System was crucial to stay in Power. They also knew that they could win a war by destroying the financial center of their enemies. So everybody knows that when a small Elite in a huge Country has the power to issue money they are able to control the World. In a democratic country this power is controlled by Government and Parliament. Not anymore. The consequence is that the coming years, the prices of energy, food and metals will go through the roof. The new Depression will almost certainly lead to a New World Order. It is the only way to go they already claim to solve the EU crisis. All the structures to enforce World Government are already in place and most of them are already in control of the Financial Elite. Does this prove the Conspiracy Theories?   They, the elite, wants to create global financial giants  with Paulson’s own Goldman Sachs. What could be the aim? The aim could be to destroy their European and other worldwide Competitors.

    Revenges

    One of the interesting stories behind the Conspiracy Theories is the fact that the Presidents (Kennedy, Lincoln) who wanted to change the center of the Financial System, The FED, were assassinated. Likewise the career of a brilliant banker, Hjalmar Schacht ( mentioned above), who outsmarted the FED was destroyed. Hitler had him thrown into a concentration camp, as he was marginally involved in a the plot against Hitler. After the victory of WWII, he was liberated and became directly an  US prisoner of war (!).  Hjalmar Schacht must have been the only concentration camp inmate, who was tried in Nuremberg as war criminal and despite  his acquittance became person non grata.

    It seems the Templars werealso  in the way to the absolute power of the French  Kings.  Another interesting detail:  On the morning of 21 January 1793, the French king, Louis XVI, was led out into the Place de la Concord in Paris to face execution. He stepped up onto the platform where the guillotine had been erected, and turned to address the huge crowd who had come to watch him die. He announced that he forgave the revolutionary council who had voted for his death, and then gave himself over to the executioner. The blade fell at 10:15. The executioner held Louis’ decapitated head up by the hair to show that the king was dead. What happened next, according to some sources,1 took the crowd by surprise: a man jumped up onto the platform and dipped his fingers in the dead king’s blood. He held his hand aloft and shouted ‘Jacques de Molay, thus you are avenged!’ The crowd cheered, understanding the reference to the last Templar Grand Master, who was burned as a relapsed heretic in 1314; the long-held popular rumour that one day the Templars would have their revenge on the French monarchy – which had brought the Order down on dubious charges of heresy, blasphemy and sodomy – seemed to have come true. Indeed, speculation was rife that the Templars were among the instigators of the revolution that had swept through France in 1789, ultimately claiming the lives of Louis and his queen, Marie Antoinette.

    Conclusion

    The trial of the Templars can be explained in terms external to the Order, rather than through any of its internal failings: the financial needs of King Philip, the weakness of the papacy, the loss of Acre and the opportunity  the sick Clement and  James of Molay’s presence in France during one of the recurrent financial crises of Philip IV’s government offered. However,  the secret context of the trial should not be ignored. The devil is constantly seeking to spread corruption throughout Christian society, and, by attacking the weak points of the structure, aims to break down its functional unity. Neither the mystic nor the secular ideas of the Templar’s order were realistic, not at their time – but their financial skills maybe. Think of Global banking and Sharia states today. It could be, that a nasty New World Order ( or two,  one secular and one religious) could succeed. There is more than one similarity between the events today and then. Whether in the future this radical thinking will prevail, only heaven knows this. However, remarkably remains that Templars and Middle Age were so close to todays thinking (or our current state is so close to the Medieval Age). The chief executive of Goldman Sachs – which partners and alumni give advice to Europe’s governments and the EU how to solve problems their organization created, run European Governments (until Monday) like Italy and European Central Bank – believes banks serve a social purpose and are doing “God’s work.

    “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

    ― David Rockefeller

    Do I believe in conspiration theories and the dark secrets of the Templars myself?  Secret rituals, symbolism, and myths surround the   Knights Templar  as they do the Free Masons. That they are related is believed in many areas and indeed there is evidence to support this view. Does anyone truly understand the origins and evolution of either group? I think that like all things, there is some truth, some myth and a lot of “we just don’t know”. I do not know either, but have found it entertaining to connect the dots – there are patterns visible. So much in history and contemporary politics today started to sound questionable, not speaking about the recognizable lies of todays published truth.  We live again in interesting times.

    Barber-The-Trial-of-the-Templars-2nd-ed.-2006

    The Lost History of Christianity

    Fiat-Money –  the weapon of mass destruction

    The Knight Templar (Pocket Essentials)

    Hjalmar Schacht and the financial crisis

    Bibliography

    Orthodox

    Malcolm Barber, The Trial of the Templars (Cambridge University Press, 1978); The New Knighthood: A History of the Order of the Temple (Cambridge University Press, 1994)

    Malcolm Barber & Keith Bate (translators & editors), The Templars: Selected Sources (Manchester Medieval Sources Series, Manchester University Press, 2002)

    Edward Burman, Supremely Abominable Crimes:The Trial of The Knights Templar (Allison & Busby, 1994); The Templars: Knights of God (Inner Traditions, 1990)

    Helen Nicholson, Templars, Hospitallers and Teutonic Knights: Images of the Military Orders (Leicester University Press, 1993); Love, War and the Grail:Templars, Hospitallers and Teutonic Knights in Medieval Epic and Romance, 1150–1500 (Brill, 2000); The Knights Templar: A New History (Sutton, 2001)

    Peter Partner, The Murdered Magicians (Oxford University Press, 1981)

    Piers Paul Read, The Templars (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1999)

    Desmond Seward, The Monks of War: The Military Religious Orders (Penguin Books, 1992)

    Judi Upton-Ward (trans.), The Rule of the Templars:The French Text of the Rule of the Order of Knights Templar (Boydell Press, 1992)

    Speculative

    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (Jonathan Cape, 1982)

    Michael Baigent & Richard Leigh, The Temple and the Lodge (Jonathan Cape, 1989)

    Françine Bernier, The Templars’ Legacy in Montreal, the New Jerusalem (Frontier Sciences Foundation, 2002)

    Alan Butler & Stephen Dafoe, The Warriors and the Bankers (Templar Books, 1998); The Templar Continuum (Templar Books, 1999)

    Erling Haagensen & Henry Lincoln, The Templars’ Secret Island (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2002)

    Christopher Knight & Robert Lomas, The Second Messiah (Random House, 1997)

    Keith Laidler, The Head of God: The Lost Treasure of the Templars (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1998); The Divine Deception (Headline, 2000)

    Jean Markale, The Templar Treasure at Gisors (Inner Traditions, 2003)

    Lynne Picknett and Clive Prince, The Templar Revelation (Bantam, 1997)

    Karen Ralls, The Templars and the Grail (Quest Books, 2003)

    Andrew Sinclair, The Sword and the Grail (Century, 1993); The Secret Scroll (Sinclair Stevenson, 2001)

    Related Interest

    76 Jahre meines Lebens, Hjalmar Schacht, 1967

    Das Ende der Reparationen. Hjalmar Schacht 1931

    John Weitz, Hitler’s Banker (Great Britain: Warner Books, 1999).

    Ellen Hodgson Brown, Web of Debt Fifth edition Third Millennium Press

    Economy of Nazi Germany from the Wikipedia at its best

    Stephen Zarlenga, The Lost Science of Money (Valatie, New York: American Monetary Institute, 2002)

    Nazism and the German Economic Miracle Asia Times  by Henry C K Liu

    The Lost Science of Money By Stephen Zarlenga, 2002

    Hjalmar Schacht, Stabilization of the Mark, (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1927)

    Hjalmar Schacht, The Magic of Money, (London: Oldboume, Trans. P. Erskine, 1967)

    Norbert Muhlen, Schacht – Hitler’s Magician, (New York: Alliance, Longmans Green, trans. Dickes

    http://www.freeread.com/archives/tag/fiat-money

    C. C. Veith, Citadels of Chaos (Meador, 1949)

    W.B. Bartlett, The Assassins: The Story of Islam’s Medieval Secret Sect (Sutton, 2001)

    Nigel Bryant (trans.), The High Book of the Grail: A Translation of the Thirteenth-Century Romance of ‘Perlesvaus’ (D.S. Brewer, 1978)

    Edward Burman, The Assassins (Crucible, 1987)

    E. Christiansen, The Northern Crusades: The Baltic and the Catholic Frontier 1100–1525 (Macmillan, 1980)

    Umberto Eco, Foucault’s Pendulum (Secker & Warburg, 1989)

    Wolfram von Eschenbach, Parzival (Trans.AT Hatto Penguin Books, 1980)

    Malcolm Godwin, The Holy Grail (Bloomsbury, 1994)

    Joinville & Villehardouin, Chronicles of the Crusades (Penguin Books, 1963)

    Helen Nicholson, The Knights Hospitaller (Boydell, 2001)

    Mike Paine, The Crusades (Pocket Essentials, 2001)

    Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Knights of St John in Jerusalem and Cyprus 1050–1310 (Macmillan, 1967) The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    Sir Steven Runciman, A History of the Crusades (3 Vols) (Penguin Books 1990–91)

    Yuri Stoyanov, The Other God: Dualist Religion from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy (Yale University Press, 2000)

    Idries Shah, The Sufis (Octagon, 1964)

    William Urban, The Teutonic Knights: A Military History (Greenhill Books, 2003)

    William Watson, The Last of the Templars (Harvill, 1978)

  • Protected: Barber-The-Trial-of-the-Templars- Please refer to the article “The Templars – Gods militia or Gnostic warlords?”

    This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.