Tag: jungian psychology

  • Al-Andalus – a failed Renaissance

    Al-Andalus – a failed Renaissance

    Last fall, I travelled all over Al-Andalus in the footsteps of philosophers, poets, warriors and great mystics Sufi’s like Ibn-Arabi. If you are interested in philosophy, science history and intercultural transmission of knowledge, Al- Andalus is your place and I invite you to read further. Al-Andalus represents a singular, tragic and wonderful moment of cultural history, however, also a warning, despite being obscured by its Western romanticized view.

    Andalusien_2015_09_06_22_25_53

    Being an outpost, al-Andalus did give more freedom to outstanding thinkers, but they were a minority. A transmission of knowledge existed, but that was filtered and soon tolerance stopped by fundamentalists from North Africa invited to help out against the Christians advances.

    It was the very autumn, when CNN sent those images from Munich of a welcomed mass immigration in the world. Influenced and attracted by the history of Al-Andalus, I remember seeing those strange pictures with rather mixed emotions. Indeed this “German Fall” would on New Years Eve turn into a winter like the “Arab Spring” did.

    Anyway, Al-Andalus is one of many icons of Europe’s cultural diversity. It is also a visible warning, despite it’s history has been heavily obscured by a Western romanticized view.

    Please be aware, this is just an essay, written to collect my  memories of al-Andalus. In first two main chapters I want to connect history and culture with an emphasis on Sufism. In the last chapter this essay presents al-Andalus’ beauty in art and architecture and last but not least its great people.

    For those in a hurry, who just want a quick powerpoint intro to the history of al-Andalus:

    al -Andalus an anticipated Renaissance

    Medivial Spain
    Medivial Spain

    “al-Andalus” is the historical and also geographical term for the epoch, when Islam dominated from the eighth to the fifteenth century Southern Spain. It refers to the cities of Almeria, Malaga, Cadiz, Seville, Cordoba, Jaen and Granada. The contact of Islam with all the good and evil of the West created the unique culture of Al Andalus. The culture shock of the invaders anticipated a (failed) Islamic Renaissance, with great thinkers of secular philosophical and mystical Islam.

    It is a fact that al-Andalus developed a unique frontier society. Cordoba, at one time the capital city of Al-Andalus, was the center of a sophisticated and rich civilization. In its heyday, Cordoba is often praised for its intellectually advanced culture, its centers of learning and its great libraries. In those years, there were about one million people, 200,000 houses, 60 palaces, 600 mosques, 700 baths, 17 universities and 70 public libraries in the city.

    Cordoba The Mezquita
    Cordoba The Mezquita

    al-Andalus and Andalusia are different two terms and even opposed. The ambiguity, of course, based on the phonetic similarity. In Arabic, al-Andalus refers to any Muslim Hispania (that is to say up to Duero River, the northern border in the tenth century, or only the kingdom of Granada in the XIV century). The word Andalucia (Andalusia) is used in Spanish that in the course of the thirteenth century.

    The Moorish era is so regarded as the golden age of cultural prosperity and religious tolerance among Muslims, Christians and Jews. The myth of al-Andalus – too good to be true. Every time, every culture, indeed every society creates myths in which they reflect themselves. This is different to living mythology as defined by C.G. Jung. Every discipline – temporal or spiritual –  in the world has among its practitioners, those who engage the faith beyond the common boundaries of doctrine and dogma, seeking an unmediated relationship with reality and self realization. Myths load the cold randomness of existence with meaning,  to organize the  world into good and evil. Myths are like magical mirrors the viewer reflect the picture that he and his peers have of themselves. One of the favorite myths of the educated classes of the West is the one from Splendor and the decline of Moorish Spain considered as the golden age of science and the arts and Christian-Jewish-Muslim harmony – under the protection of a tolerant, mild, of reason through the Islam on European soil.

     

    Granada
    The Alhambra, Granada @fallenangel

    The Muslim Spain as a place superior humanity was invented 250 years ago in the period of Enlightenment and has been renewed in countless versions. Political myths always serve these interests at the appropriate time. At that time French ideology based on radicalized revolutionary ideals wanted to contrast the sclerotic rigid Catholic Church with an idealized, almost deistic purified Islamic alternative. A world without Pope, dogma or inquisition (which indeed has strong Spanish roots). As  Rousseau’s noble savage, also the figure of the noble Muslim or noble Orientals of Pierre Bayle,  and later Karl May and others form a critical “model of virtue and self shame” towards the European culture and civilization. Jean-Jacques appeared the cultural activist and champion of the opressed; but he also provided arguments which served the purposes of the Jacobine terror in contrast to Montesquieu and Voltaire.
    In Herder’s humanity utopia, it finally appears as the Hispano-Arabs act as “Teacher of Europe”, who bring the light of the “oriental Genius”, to end the culture occidental “darkness” of the Medieval Age. The romantic turnings with their longing for the past and an enchanted place in the Moorish traditions and legends are an ideal decor for tales of chivalry, honor and selfless love. Washington Irving (“Tales of the Alhambra”, 1832) started this with his book an Alhambra cult” and as a result the cultural tourism with relevant travel reports  – as mine.
    The famous Rainer Maria Rilke wrote 1912 in a letter from Spain: “By the way, you need to know, since I’m from Córdoba an almost rabid Antichristianity, I read the Quoran, often it creates a voice so I feel all it strengths, as the airflow inside an church organ.

    Ibn al-‘Arabi – al-Andalus seen from Jungian view

    Sufi House Córdoba
    Little private Museum Córdoba dedicated to mystics an philosophers

    There is no better biography (to me), which relates the greatness of  al-Andalus and the offer the Islam rejected, than that of the Sufi master, poet and philosopher Ibn al-‘Arabi . The reason, that I am attracted or at least fond of Sufism, is Ibn al-‘Arabi. His Sufism is more of a secular, almost a pantheist like Taoism and approachable for Westeners even from C.G. Jung.

    Some say Sufism, or Tasawwuf as it is known in the Muslim world, is Islamic mysticism; others say it is the primordial mystical tradition, much older than Islam, using Islam as a structural frame as Gnostics usually did. Perhaps Sufism is best defined as an universal path to union with God through self reflection – individuation. In Jungian psychology there are many concepts that illumine the relationship between soul and Absolute, human and God: the ego as the center of consciousness and the Self as a path to god; the individuation process whereby the ego increasingly realizes its source and dependence upon the Self; the alchemical conjunction of ego and Self.  See here another of my essay about Sufism: Sufism the Gnostic chameleon – muscle and brain of Islam.

    Sufis understand themselves as the only heir of a spiritual heritage, which had been split in many religions and sects.  Like Tao, Sufi is eternal, and uses  words like “drunkenness” or “grape” or “heart” … As Rumi puts it: Before garden, vine or grape were in the world Our soul was drunken with immortal wine. 

    To Ibn al-‘Arabi Sufism is best defined as a universal path to union with God through self reflection – individuation in Jungian terms. In Jungian psychology there are many concepts that illumine the relationship between soul and Absolute, human and God: the ego as the center of consciousness and the Self as a communication path to God or even rather gnostic, a part of god.

    Everything that exists is a part of and a manifestation of the Oneness of God. Humans are part of God. The idea of ones Ego is the result of ignorance.

    IMG_9942

    Ibn al-‘Arabi was born in a Taifa called Murcia, one of the many petty-kingdoms in al-Andalus, in AD 1165. At the age of twenty he was initiated into Sufism.His father Ali Ibn al-Arabi was a man of influence as he considered Cordoba‟s chief judge Ibn Rushd. When Ibn Arabi was 8 years old, Murcia was occupied the family moved to Seville, the great intellectual centre. This is where Ibn Arabi spent the next 30 years of his life. Seville was also an important centre of Sufism, with a record number of Sufis living in the city. He met two women saints here who had a strong influence on him,Yasamin of Marchena, and Fatimah of Cordoba. Due to Ibn Arabi‟s extraordinary scholarship and spiritual insights, his fame spread throughout Andalus.
    Cordoba‟s Qazi Ibn Rushd, also the master interpreter of Aristotle, requested Ibn „Arabi’s father for a meeting with Ibn Arabi.This meeting is important in that of the two illustrious men, one was a follower of the edicts of reason, who became the most influential thinker in the West. The other was almost a Gnostic for whom knowledge meant “vision”, who became a towering personality in Sufism. From the 1190s he engaged in three decades of travels as a wandering scholar, poet and mystic, visiting the Maghreb, Egypt, Arabia, Syria and Asia Minor. In 1223 he finally settled in Damascus.

    Ibn al-‘Arabi applies Sufism  rigorously. To associate anything at all with God would be shirk. Therefore, nothing can exist except God.
    However, Ibn al-‘Arabi believed that God had a transcendental as well as an immanent aspect. God was manifested in, but also extended beyond the material universe. Ibn al-‘Arabi had a hidden, non-religious side. In the Juderia, the Jewish quarter of Cordoba, I visited a peaceful little museum to Sufism with a little bookshop. A poem of Ibn al-‘Arabi on rough, self-made paper caught my eye, so tourism or not, I bought it. This is one of my favorite poem by him:

    My heart has become capable of taking on all forms.
    A pasture for gazelles and a convent for Christian monks,
    and a temple for idols and the pilgrim’s Kaa’ba,
    and the tables of the Torah and the book of the Quran.
    I follow the religion of Love: whatever route Love’s caravans shall take,
    that path shall be the path of my faith.

    The Tarjuman al-Ashwaq by Ibn al-Arabi, translated by Reynold A. Nicholson, 1911

    Tarjuman al-Ashwaq, or the ‘Interpreter of Desires,’ the first edition of which was completed in 1215 A.D.When the poems were later criticized by religious scholars as being to sensous, he had to add an explaining comment. There are other statements from The Bezels of Wisdom and The Treatise on Being, which go in the same direction.

    Identity of self and God.
    Thou art not thou: thou art He. Thou never wast nor wilt be, Thou art neither ceasing to be nor still existing. Thou art He. [TB]

    God is all things.
    The Cosmos is His form. The forms of the Cosmos are the manifest Reality, He being the manifest. He is also their inner essence, being also the unmanifest. He is the first, since He was when they were not, and also the Last, since in their manifestation He is the Essence. [BW X]

    God is essentially all things. He permeates through all beings created and originated. [BW X]

    He is Being itself, the Essence of Being, He is the Preserver of all. In preserving all things, He is preserving His form, lest anything should assume a form other than His Form, which is not possible. [BW X]

    One of the most prolific of the medieval Sufi writers, al-Arabi wrote over 150 books. Unfortunately, very little of this output was translated, up to the early 20th century.

    His texts are of great interest, aside from its literary merits as delightful (but highly encoded) Sufi love poetry. Reynold A. Nicholson supplied extensive commentary for each poem. This is key to disentangling the Sufi narrative from the exterior form of the work. At this level, Sufi love poems may actually be interpreted a philosophical treatise with profound insights.
    The whole of the spiritual life begins, Ibn ‘Arabi would say, in the realization of  transcendence, and Ego ends in it Jung would say. What lies between is the discovery of the intimate heart of each individual being the self. So the discovery of God is equally the self-discovery of the individual. The world is no longer static, but the dynamic theatre of the Divine manifestation, and every movement in it is essentially a movement in love of God. It is simultaneously “He and not He”, as Ibn ‘Arabi says, just like the image of a person in a mirror. The particular quality that he often employs in his writings is that of the constant interplay of paradox, similar to the Zen koan, a Taoist poem, to force the mind to reach its limit so that the truth may be seen without limitation.

    al-Andalus Myths and Reality

    al-Andalus war and peace

    The reality is, that al-Andalus has seen numerous religious and ethic fights and many revolts and revolutions. In short, it was also blunt Islamic imperialism. It is the fact, that 800 years of Islamic rule of Al-Andalus were a permanent war and inner-Islamic struggle between ethnics, sects, Islam fractions, fiefdoms, or dynasties of Islam. There were also constant fights with uprisings of the non-Muslims, slaves, or against Christian intruders and Muslim raids or failed expansions into Christian territory. Furthermore the Renaissance was primarily not defeated by the Christians, but destroyed by “Islamist” fundamentalists (the second wave of Berbers), who viewed Al-Andalus decadent. From al-Andalus from Arab troops and gangs launched regular raids (al-ghazw, Arab. ” the rampage”) deep into the backcountry of the Christian barbarians. They plundered repeatedly  the Rhone Valley, terrorizing southern France, occupied Arles, Avignon, Nîmes, Narbonne, which they set on fire 793, devastated 981 Zamora and deported 4,000 prisoners. Four years later, they burned down Barcelona, ​​killed or enslaved all the inhabitants, 987 they devastated the Portuguese Coimbra, which then seven years remained uninhabited. León along with surroundings was destroyed by the Amiriden ruler al-Mansur, “the Victorious” (981-1002), known for burning all philosophical books, which he got hold of. He led during his reign about fifty vampaigns, one regularly in the spring and one in autumn.

    al-Andalus Islamic tolerance

    The Orientalist Bernard Lewis has pointed out, that the “myth of Spanish-Islamic Tolerance was particularly promoted by Jewish scholars for a very good reason: “One of the main reasons was the prolonged refusal of Christian Europe, in regards of emancipation and recognition of Jews. To offset this, Jewish intellectuals led the historic case of al-Andalus in the battle, “those beautiful and unmatched Civilization “, as the English statesman Disraeli  wrote: “During this blessed centuries it was difficult to distinguish the followers of Moses  the followers of Mohammed. Both they built palaces, gardens and Wells, sided equal the highest offices of state, competed in an ambitious and enlightened in the distance trade and vied together at famous universities.”
    Also in recent years al-Andalus evocative sound soothes confused elites of Europe scared and offended by unending violence and war in the Middle Easte and by the advance of Islamist terror in their own cities. Just opening the borders is and contact is fruitful, isolation and struggle is seen as deadly.True, Christians and the Jews enjoyed under Muslim rule limited religious freedom. Nobody was forced to convert, there, but there were numerous penalties and executions of real or alleged religious violation. Apostasy was like today atoned with the death. Christians as well as Jews were granted a Dhimmi status, an Arabic term that refers to its non-Islamic embracing population living in Islamic conquered lands and subject to special tax. The Dhimmi is a distinctly subjugated second class non-citizen. Granted, this status also brought a certain degree of security and even participation. Influential Christians, as well as Jewish, made a good living as scholars, administrators, even run petty kingdoms called Taifas and were integrated into this rich culture. The attempt of a tiny minority of Islamic scholars to reconcile Islam with Greek philosophy proved ultimately unsuccessful due to persistent religious resistance. Philosophers were banned and their books burned by the orthodox majority. Now, that’s not what I really wanted to focus on. I am interested in the historical and cultural dimension of that period and in particularly Sufism.

    Rise and fall of al-Andalus

    Pre-conquest

    Al-Andalus history is one of invasion and immigration; they came over the Pyrenees or over the sea, warriors or merchants. The blessed Iberian Peninsula at the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic was an attractive place for Carthaginians, Romans, Phoenician and Greeks. Carthage the trade city at the North African coast had its branches in Andalusia. After the Punic wars the Romans valued this piece of country for approximately 700 years. Very important Roman personalities were originally from Andalusia, so the philosopher Seneca to whom a monument is dedicated in Córdoba and Emperor Trajan and Hadrian. After the Fall of the West Roman empire the Visigoths reigned briefly 3 million inhabitants. Visigoths believed to a Christian heresy called Arianism so they were never entirely comfortable with the Church of Rom nor with the Byzantine East Rom. They saw their legitimization from their noble descent.

    Andalusia was soon conquered by the Arabs and mostly Berbers, the Moors. They dominated almost 800 years the south of Spain. Unlike the Visigoths, the Islamic rulers did interact with the Roman, Greek and Hispanic culture, which created the uniqueness of Al-Andalus I want to focus on the cultural aspects of that historical period Al-Andalus. If the Arab were conquerors of the Iberian Peninsula or created by the interaction of cultures the identity of Spain is still a hotly debated topic, which has been controversially discussed by two historians Americo Castro and Claudio Sanchez-Albarnoz.

    According to Claudio Sanchez-Albarnoz the signs of the Roman and Visigoth culture in Andalusia must not to be discarded and the influence of the Iberian Romans culture to the Muslim Invaders not to be overlooked. Also, it is fact that Islam interacted not only close with the two religions of the book, but also Greek philosophy. This has influenced deeply the history of Spain, also Europe, but not the orthodox Islam in its core constituency.

    Rough overview over the Muslim Period

    After a passible betrayal of the Byzantine Exarch (viceroy) Julian, the count of Ceuta, an army under the leadership of Berber commander Tariq Gibraltar (Jabal al-Tarik, the Rock of Tarik) invaded 711 AD and short time later controlled, large parts of Spain.It was the most western part of the Islamic Empire, which itself stretched from Lisbon to the Indus. The Muslim rule in al-Andalus can be divided in five major phases:

    • 711-756: Dependent Emirate of Damascus. Al-Andalus is ruled by the Umayyads.
    • 756-929: Independent Emirate after the Abbasids replaced Umayyad dynasty in Damascus and Abd-al-Rahman I takes refuge in Cordoba.
    • 929-1031: Caliphate of Córdoba with Abd-al-Rahman III  first proclaimed caliph.
    • 1031-1261: Taifa Kingdoms. Political division of al-Andalus inidependent petty kingdoms called Taifa. Later  the Almoravids and then the Almohads took power.
    • 1238-1492: Kingdom of Granada. Last stronghold of the Arab presence in the Iberian Peninsula.

    During the whole epoch also Islamic sailors and pirates crossed the Coasts of southern France, Italy, Sardinia, Sicily, Greece on. Their devastating raids resulted in the depopulation as many contemporary accounts document. Crete, recorded in a chronicle, was looted 827 for twelve days, and the inhabitants of 29 cities were driven into slavery. Another chronicle tells of the case of Syracuse after a nine month siege in 878: “Thousands of people were killed, and it was there booty like never before in another city. Only a few managed to escape. “
    The troops of the emirs and caliphs consisted partly of large contingents of non-Muslims. The raids presented – in addition to the filling of the rulers treasury – the supply of fighting slaves, but also those of working slaves or women in the harem. And it had yet another purpose, according to the historian Ahmed Mohammed al-Maqqari from the North African. Because of the terror, he wrote, which the Arab horsemen and sailors spread, the later conquest was easier: “Allah, on this manner sows fear among the infidels, so that they are not there  dared to stir, and to fight against the invaders; only as a supplicant they approached, begging for peace. “
    To be clear, raw brutality, enslavement, pillage were the practice of all armies of the in the past. But the “excess, the regularity and the systematic nature of devastation », says the British-Egyptian Historian Bat Ye’or, distinguish the Islamo-Arab expansion of military operations of the then Greek, Slavic, Latin armies, and make them to “perhaps the greatest of lootings of history”.
    The Muslim combatants were inspired by the idea of ​​jihad, the holy war, a central concept in Islam until today.  Islam divides the world into the Dar al-Islam (House of Islam), in which the law Allah prevails, and in the Dar al-Harb (House of War), residence of the Infidels, meaning all non-Muslims. The goal of jihad is to bring the people of the world under the law of Allah, to bring under the Sharia. “The jihad is a sacred duty” , wrote 14 in the century the famous Ibn Khaldun, a politician, sociologist and descendant of a noble Arab family from al-Andalus, “because of the Universality of the Islamic mission and the obligation to anyone to convert to Islam , either by persuasion or by force”.

    Arab Invasion

    Routes taken by Tariq and Musa for the conquest of the Peninsula.png

    The invasion seemed to happen like an accident, more like a private enterprise than centrally ordered. After the brief 710 exploratory raid led by a Tarif bin Malluq (remembered in the town of Tarifa, where it happened), Tariq ibn Ziyad, governor of Tangier, sent 711 an expedition of 7,000 Berbers to the Iberian Peninsula through the Strait of Gibraltar. Tariq ibn Ziyad conquests swiftly Algeciras (Portus Vandalusius) and defeats the Visigoth king Rodrigo at the Battle of Guadalete. The location of the battle has been described at various but was probably thirty-five kilometers to the north-west of. The Visigoth troops were decisively defeated and fled northwards, spreading terror and despair, because the invaders triumphed over the Visigoth army and eliminated their king.

    Musa, the Arab governor of Tunisia and Tariq’s superior, follows 712 to incorporate the Berber conquests to the Arab Empire. It is often claimed that religious convulsions and resentments to the Visigoths, may have favored the quick surrender of many cities like Cordoba, Malaga, Seville and Toledo (capital of the Visigoths) In 713 Merida fell, this has been a refuge for many Goths in the region of Murcia. It is true, that the Spanish-Roman population disliked their Visigoth leaders and the Jewish community the treatment of the Christian majority. The existing network of roads laid down by the Romans and the standard pragmatic approach, giving treaty on favourable terms to surrenders have helped. But in any case there is a lack documentation of Arab conquest. The first Arab chronicle that relates the event, that of Ibn’Abd al-Hakam is in effect after a century and a half. Maybe, it is due to the fact, that the first three major actors vanished quickly. In 713 Musa’s son Abd al-Aziz, who was appointed Governor of al-Andalus as Musa had been recalled to Damascus 712 and never heard of. Musa’s deputy Tariq also fades out of history. Musa’s son Abd al-Aziz, married in kingly ambitions Egilona, the widow of Roderic, but got murdered in Seville in 715.

    Myth of Visigoth King Rodrigo

    With the Islamic conquest a myth is connected. The Visigoth Count Julian sent his daughter Florinda Cava to the Visigoth court of Toledo. King Rodrigo (Roderic) raped her and the enraged Count turned to the Islamic conquerors. This development is said to have led to the rapid demise of the Visigoth kingdom and has probably a historical core. In Spain, the figures of the lecherous King Rodrigo, of Count Julian and his beautiful daughter Cava Florinda were themes of folk romance songs. In those romances the king must pay for his lust, through a two-headed snake, which eats both his heart and his private members as a kind of symbolic punishment for the rape and the destruction of the Visigoth kingdom in southern Spain.

    Emirate of Dependent Damascus

    Caliphate of Córdoba
    Caliphate of Córdoba

     

    It took a while, until the spoils of the victory were divided, and the Berber grumbled, since they counted for the majority in the army, but got short changed by the Arabs, who saw them inferior. Córdoba became the capital a few years after the invasion.

    There were numerous uprising of the Berbers. On one occasion the Arabs called in a Syrian relief army in, which, after quelling the Berber unrest turned against the Arabs. The Syrian were given some fertile lands and settled, fractionizing al-Adalus even more. A pattern we will see more often later in the history of al-Andalus. The invasion was brought further, as Arab army crossed the Pyrenees at the eastern end and took Narbonne in 720. In an attack on Toulouse in 721, the Arabs suffered a defeat. A defeat through Charles Martel ended the France adventure, logistically over-extended, and up against an equally powerful force. They continued raiding Christian possessions and got rich by tributes an looting, until fragmented Muslim states weakened under the Taifa period. Muslim petty kingdoms got invaded in return, raided or had to pay tribute.

    In 750 the Umayyad Caliph was overthrown by the Abbasid clan. Only one young man, Abd al-Rahman an Umayyad prince fled from Damascus and established the Iberian branch of the dynasty in 756. Only with this establishment of the Emirate of Cordoba Uma by Abdel Al Rahman I, Southern Spain was brought in a solid and permanent form Islamic rule.

    Umayyad Emirate and Caliphate

    As described above, the Umayyad conquest of Hispania established the dependent Emirate of Cordoba. The situation changed after the Umayyad caliphs in Damascus were defeated by the Abbasids. Al- Andalus and Cordoba became an independent Umayyad outpost of the Abbasids rule in Baghdad. The independent Emirate of Cordoba was established by Abd al-Rahman I, which marks the westernmost expansion of both the Muslim rule in Europe.

    Later Abd al-Rahman III, called al-Nasir (or Victorious), succeeded in 912 his grandfather as emir and ruled until 961 for almost 50 moon years. An astute politician, Abd al-Rahman adopted the supreme title of Caliph in 929, to legitimize his imperial pretensions over the claims of Abbasid and Fatimid rivals. Cordoba became during his reign the greatest metropolis of Western Europe, rivaling Constantinople. He had pacified the realm, dealt aptly with his Fatimid rivals, and stabilized the frontier with Christian Spain.

    Almoravids 1086 until 1147
    Almoravids 1086 until 1147

    His son Al Hakam II brought Cordoba to the height of its power. He expanded the Mosque of Córdoba and a library which included 400,000 books and manuscripts from religion to philosophy and rule book subsidence. His successor was less successful, their period is called in Arabic the time of confusion. Invasion, civil wars and complex ethnic conflicts between newly arrived Berbers from North Africa against Arabs and the already assimilated first wave Berbers brought the caliphate down. On the death of al-Mansur finally internal struggles reappeared and Al-Andalus disintegrated 1031 into numerous kingdoms called Taifa. The caliphate disappeared and the aftermath was a patchwork of petty Taifa kingdoms fighting each other sometimes of religious lines.

     

    The fragmented Taifa Kingdoms of Al-Andalus

    1031-1261 Taifa Kingdoms
    1031-1261 Taifa Kingdoms

    Al-Andalus fragmented 1031 into numerous kingdoms, the most powerful were those of Seville, Toledo, Zaragoza and Badajoz.

    Abdallah ibn Buluggin, a contemporary explained the rise of the Taifas:

    “When the ‘Amirid dynasty [of al-Mansur] came to an end and the people were left without an imam [leader], every military commander rose up in his own town and entrenched himself behind the walls of his own fortress, having first secured his own position, created his own army and amassed his own resources. These persons vied with one another for worldly power, and each sought to subdue the other.”

    Those Taifa kings were not from the Umayyad family, nor did they have any traditional claims to authority, so their ability to exert authority was limited to their ability to militarily conquer lands. With dozens of commanders rising up in the mid-11th century, conflict was bound to happen. Later the Almoravids and then the Almohads halted momentarily the Christian domination, but also incorporated it in their Berber empire.

    Almoravids came to Spain in the eleventh century to stop the inexorable advance of the Reconquista, but their rigid understanding of Islam marked also end of tolerance in al-Andalus. Almoravids were a Berber dynasty controlling an empire stretching from Morocco to al-Andalus, so it lost its independence and became merely a province. Almohades replaced in the twelfth century Almoravids. They were even more literal interpreting the Koran. Almohad (al-Muwahhidun) means ‘monotheistic’.

    Defeat at Las Navas de Tolosa (1212)

    This fragmented situation obviously favored the advance of the Christian kingdoms of the North which was slowed down by Berber armies from North African kingdoms. This Almoravids dominance 1086 until 1147 and the Almohad dominance from 1172 until 1212 proved more a curse than a blessing. During the Reconquista, Muslim states fell one by one to the Christian kingdoms invading from the North. The major cities of Cordoba, Seville, and Toledo fell from the 1000s to the 1200s. Eventually the Almohades suffered a major defeat at Las Navas de Tolosa (1212) until 1261 all but one Taifa Kingdoms had vanished.

    Granada – last stand of Islam in Al-Andalus

    1238-1492 Kingdom of Granada
    1238-1492 Kingdom of Granada

    In the days following the battle of Las Navas de Tolosa (1212) years, the Spaniards conquered the Guadalquivir valley. One Muslim state – Granada – was able to escape conquest by Christians in the 1200s. After the fall of Cordoba in 1236, the rulers of the Emirate of Granada signed a special agreement with the Kingdom of Castile, one of the most powerful Christian kingdoms. It became the only Muslim kingdom of Granada territory, ruled by the Nasrid dynasty. 1238-1492 the Kingdom of Granada represented the last stronghold of the Arab presence.

    Its territory was mountainous, which facilitated the defense. Furthermore, the extent of its coasts facilitated trade. The kingdom of Granada achieved great cultural and artistic splendor, though their kings often were forced to pay tribute to the Christian monarchs of Castile.

    Culture of Al-Andalus

    We hear that the Spanish are the heirs of the Arab-Muslim culture that has been present in Spain for more than seven centuries. Some even say that the Spanish are “half-Arab”, anxious to find exotic origins, distinct from those of all other Spaniards. The existence of a Spanish vocabulary whose root is Arabic is not a strong argument in favour of the thesis of the Arab-Muslim legacy, as the phonetics, prosody, morph syntax of Spanish Arabs are few, while the Latin affiliations Germanic and Christian are absolutely predominant. There were many languages spoken in al-Andalus.

    • High Arabic used by Mozarabics and rulers
    • Latin, the high language used by Christians
    • Hebrew used by Jews
    • Mozarabic language a continuum of Romance dialects was spoken by many groups in the territory of al-Andalus.there are preserved documents written in Mozarabic.
    • Andalusia Arabic, or Hispano-Arabic, was a variety or were varieties of the Arabic dialects spoken by all groups in the territory of al-Andalus
    • Berber dialects spoken by the new Berber of al-Andalus

    Al-Andalus was the birthplace of important philosophers and religious scholars and some of then played a pivotal role in the Jewish history. In Roman times the Stoic philosopher Seneca needs to be mentioned.

    Sufi Mystics

    sufism
    Sufism

    Sufism is a continuity of Near Eastern tradition using any religion as a vessel and structure. It may be at the same time indigenous to Islam. You may read more about Sufism in my other essays. Muslim mystic-philosopher gave the esoteric, mystical dimension of Islamic thought its first full-fledged philosophic expression, but they were called into doubt by many scholars, who were suspicious of the monastic tendencies of their metaphysical teaching and often allegorical interpretation of the Qur’an. Ibn ‘Arabi, the most well known Sufi in the West, faced fierce theological controversy over the great Muslim mystical thinker. Even during his lifetime, Ibn ‘Arabi’s conformity with the Muslim dogma was called into doubt by many scholars. Following Ibn ‘Arabi’s death, these misgivings grew into an outright condemnation of his teachings by a number of influential thirteenth through fifteenth century theologians who portrayed him as a dangerous heretic bent on undermining the foundations of Islamic faith and communal life. Ibn ‘Arabi’s advocates, however, praised him as the greatest saint of Islam who was unjustly slandered by the bigoted and narrow-minded critics. Ibn ‘Arabi was rejected by many in Islam, for example, Ibn Taymiyya (d. 1328), the Wahhabi movement as a pantheist who leads people into heresy with are heretical innovations. But supporters see him until today as a saint who explained reality in the most profound way. His writings are not for the layman, but rather in the spiritual and scholarly elect.

    The Near Eastern Tradition is based on Christian desert ascetics & monks of Syria and Gnostic Tradition, i.e. salvational knowledge to escape the prison of the material world and reunite with God. In the 9th century those Gnostic themes appeared in Sufism: a model of emanation and return. There were l‘Sober’ (later ‘Orthodox) Sufis prominent in Baghdad and Iran like Junayd (d. 910), al-Sarraj (d. 988), al-Qushayri (d. 1072) who attempted to portray Sufism as thoroughly ‘Islamic’. Early Sufis like Ibn Hanbal were portrayed as Sufis and Gnostics and got even mainstream acceptance.

    Ibn al-ʿArabī, in full Muḥyī al-Dīn Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad, also called Al-Sheikh al-Akbar or “Magister Magnusborn July 28, 1165, Murcia, Valencia—died November 16, 1240, Damascus),His major works are the monumental Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyyah (“The Meccan Revelations”) and Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam (1229; “The Bezels of Wisdom”).  Educated at Sufi school of Ibn al-Arif in  Almería (Taifa of Murcia), moved to Sevillia and later Damascus.  Father friend of Philosopher Averroes. Human beings as manifestation of God’s attributes God: “I was a hidden treasure….”
    Abu Hamid al-GhazaliBorn     c. 1058
    Tus Persia, Great Seljuq Empire
    Died     1111
     Muslim theologian, jurist, philosopher, and mystic of Phas been referred to by some historians as the single most influential Muslim

    God is ‘Light of all Lights’ – Gnostic model

     

    Jalal al-Din Rumiborn c., 1207, Balkh [now in Afghanistan]—died  1273), lthe greatest Sufi mystic and poet in the Persian language, famous for his lyrics and for his didactic epic Mas̄navī-yi Maʿnavī (“Spiritual Couplets”) the cry of the reed-flute

    Neo-platonic philosophers

    philo
    philo

    In Islamic times, the attempt to reconcile Islam with Greek philosophy was to last for several centuries, but ultimately proved unsuccessful due to persistent religious resistance.

    Jews were given high positions as something more reliable than Christians who were under latent suspicion to be a treacherous partisan of the enemy Christians States. And towards Muslim dignitaries they had the advantage, that they could never be a threat to the Caliph or Sultan. Without tribal or family connections to the courtyard, infidels never hope itself to gain power, and owed their by sharia in prohibited position only because of the arbitrary decision of their ruler created a strong loyalty.
    After Samuel Ibn Nagrella died 1056 under unclear circumstances was followed by his son Josef, also a gifted scholar in his official post. At 1066, there was an anti-Jewish pogrom. The thousands of members of the Jewish community of Granada were slain, with them also the Jewish Vizier. Pamphlets and poems as that of pious jurist Abu Ishaq had the mood prepared: “These Jews, who earlier in the Middens a scrap of colored cloth sought to bury their dead, […]
    Granada has now divided among themselves […]. Drag a Tribute and dress up elegant […], and the monkey Josef has his house with marble designed […]. Hasten to cut his throat; He is a fat Hammel, take him off his money, because you deserve it more than him! “
    Dishonored intolerably the most famous Jew of Moorish Spain and Cordoba, the great philosopher and doctor Maimonides wrote his works in Cairo in exile. When he fled in 1149 with his family before the persecution of the Jews from Córdoba, already existed hardly any Christian or Jewish communities existed anymore in al-Andalus. He later wrote in a much-quoted letter to the Jews of Yemen, us he had reported the local pogroms: “Remember, my coreligionists that God gives us our great burden of sin because in the midst of this people, the Arabs, has thrown […]. Never us a nation has so complained, humiliated, Humiliated and hated as they […], we were of them in intolerable Way dishonored.”
    Al-Andalus has left a rich legacy of lyrical. In Arabic and Hebrew is celebrated nature, the enjoyment of wine, the love Youths, the transience of life. The sophistication, the beauty, and frivolity of poems testify to the intellectual freedom and libertinism a narrow urban and courtly elite, which is rigid from the
    Whose rules too strict doctrine of God far away. It is striking, however, also the highest percentage of lobby poetry: Almost all poets have written to the mighty many hymns. This refers to another feature of their life. Not only the court Jews, but also poets and Scholar, science and art were generally part of an Oriental clientele system.
    The ruler patron gave the order, and he had the power, the artists in throwing the dungeon, if he did not like the result. Only he could before he protects the snares of a fanatical theology or before vindictiveness another patron. What he chose depended on his mood or his current interests. The artist or scholar was his master dependent to death, and he had every reason to keep these in a good mood.

    Fundamentalist
    Fundamentalist

    Even more precarious the status of the scholar was the unstable political ratios. The era of al-Andalus was marked by riots, semi-anarchy, civil war, progroms, throne struggles, conquests and reconquests. Times of peace were rare. The protective patron could be suddenly gone, murdered by the brother, expelled from another competitor tribal. The biographies of many Moorish scholars reflect this situation. They tell of escape, a new beginning, banishment, of adjustment. List of a deeper meaning. As that of the great scholar Averroes (1126-1198), the modern European philosophy owes so much.
    From his audience with the Almohad Sultan Yusuf I Averroes reported: “After the Commander of the Faithful had asked me my name, just after my origins, he began the conversation by saying: ‘What they think (the philosopher) across the sky and the world? Think of them as forever or created?. It came over me, a mixture of shame and fear. […] I found my composure back, so in the end, I took the floor and he could find out what I thought about. For the goodbye, he order a gift of money, a precious robe of honor and to hand over a horse.”
    Averroës was personal physician to the sultan and commented on whose behalf the works Aristotle. When the Sultan died, issued his successor Sultan Jakub”Al-Mansur» 1195 a decree, in which the philosophy and the “Greek”
    Studies were sentenced. The books of Averroes were the fire thrown, asked the philosopher in front of the Mosque of Cordoba in the pillory and subsequently banned for three years. Shortly after his release he died.

     

    Ibn KhaldunBorn 1126, Córdoba [al-Andalus]—died 1198He developed one of the earliest nonreligious philosophies of history, contained in his work the Muqaddimah (“Introduction”) where he sought to explain the basic factors in the historical development of the Islamic countries. Yet he was limited by his traditional Islamic contempt for non-Muslim cultures.
    Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq aṣ-Ṣabāḥ al-Kindī
    ,
    (ca. AD 801-870), flourished in Iraq under the caliphs al-Maʾmūn (813–833) and al-Muʿtaṣim (833–842).First notable Muslim philosopher, although his reputation in the Middle East was eventually eclipsed by that of al-Farabi (ca. AD 878-950). Al-Kindi flourished in Baghdad in the ninth century where he wrote on many subjects ranging from medicine, optics, mathematics, Indian arithmetic and basic cryptography to the manufacture of swords.
    Averrhoës Ibn Rushd,  medieval Latin Averrhoës, also called Arabic in full Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Rushd    , born 1126, Córdoba [Al-andalus]—died 1198His attempts to integrate Islamic traditions with neoplatonic Greek thought and Aristotelian philosophy were largely ignored in the Islamic world but were ironically thoroughly studied in Latin Christian Europe. He faced trouble for his work, was expelled and books burned. He is today hailed as a beacon of “tolerance,” yet he was also an orthodox jurist of Makati law and served as an Islamic judge in Seville. He approved, without reservation, the killing of heretics in a work that was entirely philosophical in nature.
    Abu al-Qasim Khalaf ibn al-Abbas al-Zahrawi (ca. 936-1013), born in CordobaHe combined Middle Eastern and Greco-Roman Classical teachings with his own innovations and became “Islam’s greatest medieval surgeon.” As a matter of fact he was “virtually the only significant physician in the Islamic world who had practical experience with surgery. Surgery was neglected also by Rhazes and Avicenna.” His surgical treatise had again tremendous influence in Christian Europe.
    Avempace, Ibn Bâjja or Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Yahya, Baddscha, Badjdja, Ibn Badj, Ibn Bagga, Ibn Bajja, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Sa’igh Ibn Baggain(ca. 1085 – 1138)Medieval Andalusian: his writings include works regarding astronomy, physics, and music, as well as philosophy, medicine, botany, and poetry
    Ibn Ḥazm, in full Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd Ibn Ḥazm (born November 7, 994, Córdoba, Caliphate of Córdoba—died August 15, 1064, Manta Līsham, near Sevilla)Muslim writer, historian, jurist, and theologian of Islamic Spain, and leading exponents of the Ẓāhirī (Literalist) school of jurisprudence, he produced some 400 works, covering jurisprudence, logic, history, ethics, comparative religion, and theology, and The Ring of the Dove, on the art of love.
    Other Islamic ScholarsAbd Allah al-Qaysi, an early jurist spreading the Zahirite school

    Mundhir bin Sa’īd al-Ballūṭī, a prominent judge for the Caliph of Cordoba,

    Ibn Maḍāʾ, the first linguist to write about dependency grammar,

    al-Qurtubi, a leading jurist of the Maliki school

    Moses MaimonidesCordobaA rabbi who radically changed Jewish philosophy.

    Andalusian religious groups

    2 Ways to see it
    2 Ways to see it – Los Baños de Doña María de Padilla, Alcazar de Seville

    Like in all Islamized countries, also in al-Andalus, the Dhimma law applied. Although less contractual and more like blackmail arrangement- tribute or death – Dhimma methods exerted a civilizing effect on dominated states. Jihad was the tradition of a predatory economy where the migrant Bedouin formed the main forces of the united Islamic occupations. The idea of a binding agreement with the vanquished not to exercise the usual plundering, massacres and enslavement moderated the cruelty of the Bedouins” (Bat Ye’or). A Dhimma law made the Jihad efficient. The modern lovers of Moorish occupation in Spain, with amazing logic see in the Dhimma a striking proof of al-Andalus’ tolerance. “The new Islamic policy, “writes, for example, the Yale professor María Rosa Menocal in her book “The Ornament of the World,” “not only has permitted the survival of the Christians and Jews but according to the Koranic order protected on them as a whole. “But the protection contract obeyed the secular principle of Utilitas, with pragmatic sly usefulness. The protection agreement is also called Pact of Umar, after Umar (634-644), the second Caliph, who urged his followers to protect the Dhimmi, because it is the will of the prophet and because “it for the livelihoods of your families to care”. And one of the companions of the Prophet was asked, so the
    Tradition, including the tributaries of the Muslims were good. “They help you, “the answer,” to escape poverty.”The system of tribute, takes the form of Cash, or kind of work, too, “was because the first (and most important) Source » (Bat Ye’or) of economic welfare of the Umma, the Islamic Community.
    The sheer demographic reality forced the Muslims to bureaucratization and legalization of raising funds. They stood as foreign conquerors for a long time against huge majority local Christian and Jewish faith. The transfer of resources and makes locking
    Knowledge was ensured by the Caliph, the head of the Dhimmi communities, the rabbis and bishops with high positions in business and administration entrusted. As a command receiver and privileged beneficiaries of the Islamic Power were those prepared to squeeze their own people even if the tribute demands had long exceeded the tolerable measure.
    At the same time provided a theological, political and everyday rules for permanent humiliation and “ritual humiliation” (Bernard Lewis) of non-Muslim population. The highly respected scholar Ibn Abdun wrote, for example, in 1100 in Seville a long legal appraisal as the representative of the Maliki school of law, which had prevailed in al-Andalus. It states: “A Muslim must not massage a Jew, not a Christian. He is allowed to not eliminate their waste and do not clean their latrines; it is reasonable that Jews and Christians to exercise this trade, because it is the work of the most despised “(n. 153).
    “We must not allow a tax collector, policeman, lawyer or a rich Jew a Christian, to dress like a noble. Sincerely, because Satan has taken possession of them and forget the remembrance of Allah. Satan has gained mastery over them and has made them neglect remembering Allah. They are the party of Satan. Behold, the party of Satan will be the losers. (Sura 58:19). You must wear a badge on which one recognizes that you shame enough “(n. 169).
    “One must sell the Jews and the Christians no scientific book sell, unless the author confess to their religion, because they translating scientific books and write their trailers and Bishops, while their authors are bishops “(n. 206).

    The society was divieded in religous groups:

    • Muladíes (<muwalladín ‘non-Arab mother’) were the Christians during the Islamic domination embraced the new faith of Muhammad.
    • Mozárabes (<musta’rabí ‘Arabized): Christians who lived in Muslim Spain until the late eleventh century, preserving their Christian religion and even ecclesiastical and judicial organization
    • Mudejares (<muwalladín ‘non-Arab mother’) were the Moslems under the Christian domination
    • Moriscos were the Moslems embraced christianity in reality or deceiving
    • Jews

    Andalusian ethnic groups

    Bernard Lewis and before him, Ignaz Goldziher showed from many Arab texts of the time that ethnic criteria were commonly used: Arab north against southern Arabs, Berbers against Arabs against Arabs and Slavs against Muslims of Hispanic origin (who were the most numerous) and, obviously vice versa.

    • Visigoths noble ruling until conquest
    • Hispanic-Romans
    • Jews
    • Few families of Arab origin ruling the army (Berber and Slaves)
    • Old Berber, Islamized native inhabitants of North Africa, predominant in invasion army
    • New Berber, Mercenaries of Caliphs or Berber dynasties
    • Moriscos, crypto muslims after 1500

    The religious “apartheid” continued in a sharp social stratification . At the top of the social hierarchy al-Andalus’ was the
    Master race of Arab tribes. Set out from the most inhospitable parts of the world, they had the fertile river valleys of Spain
    possession. In constant rivalry with each other for the most lucrative positions in new kingdom, they were united in their contempt for the North African Berber. This, forcibly Islamized by the Arabs and them as clients assumed had the dry mountain and steppe regions make shift and looked down at the turn Muwallad, converted to Islam Locals. The condescension of all turn hit the unbelievers who in theCities in ghettos lived, whose testimony was inalid in court, where it was forbidden to ride on a noble animal like a horse or to have sexual relations with Muslim women and marry them, and had to live constant fear, denigrated for blasphemy and for death sentenced to be. Social deeper were only slaves.al-Andalus Cities and Taifas.

    The following is an overview of the most important cities.

    Cordoba

    Cordoba was founded by the Romans, with its mighty bridge “El Puente Romano” over the Guadalquivir River. But Cordoba’s hour of greatest glory was when it became the Moorish formal capital of the independent Emirate and later Caliphate. A brief period of one-off and relative religious tolerance witnessed al-Andalus in the second half of the 10th century under Abdurrahman III. (912-961), the Caliph of Córdoba, and his successor al-Hakam a bibliophile, who is said to have created the mentioned library of 400,000 volumes. With ruthlessness Abdurrahman had united the disintegrated rich country again and organized it with prudence.The economic boom – not least caused by the peacefulness Christian principalities, which lowered the cost of the army, and by a exceptional series yielding crops – took some pressure off the dhimmi away, helped unprecedented lavish tour of the farm and attracted large European ambassadors and the heads of the international intelligence and Art by Córdoba. Luxury and cosmopolitanism produced a “sham boom multicultural tolerance “as the Orientalist Hans-Peter Raddatz writes, “Whose existence depended less from the spirit of Islam but of its ability to maintain the flow of tribute.

    The city’s most famous landmark, The Great Mosque, or “Mezquita” became, after several centuries of additions and enlargements one of the largest in all of Islam.  The Romans had built a pagan temple earlier on this site, which was replaced by the Visigoths by a church for St. Vincent which, in turn, was razed by the victorious Moors. The spectacular landmark took more than 200 years to complete and more than 1,000 pillars of granite, onyx, marble and jasper support its arches. When the Christians seized the city in 1236 they built a cathedral in the midst of it, creating today’s extraordinary church-mosque. The juderia is a charming entirely white district, filled with patios and flowers that state the testimony of the Jewish nucleus that already existed at Roman and Wisigoth times. In 1965, in the small Tiberias square, after over 800 years, the Cordobans finally erected a monument in honor of Maimonide, born in 1135 right there in the juderia. Persecuted and expelled from his homeland by the Moors when very young, he traveled the world studying medecine and philosophy becoming the illustrious and wise thinker we known today. Also in its western part, amongst ponds and gardens, a tribute to two others great Cordoban figures: Seneca, Roman writer and philosopher, whose statue is located in a charming square neighbouring the Door of Almodovar, and the statue of Averroes in the street of the Muralla. Another famous monument is the Alcazar, or Fortress, which was constructed by the Christians in 1326.

    Seville

    The Giralda of the Cathedral in Seville, Spain. It was originally built as a minaret during the Moorish period
    The Giralda of the Cathedral in Seville, Spain. It was originally built as a minaret during the Moorish periodb

    During the period of Al-Andalus the Arabs arrived under the command of General Musa ibn Nusayr, and made Sevilla one of the most beautiful cities of Al-Andalus. She was known as the Isbiliyya. From 1013 on the town became one the of the Taifas kingdoms.
    The Almoravids ruled it from 1086 on, and the Almohads from 1144 on. From that time on Sevillia experienced an economic boom through trade with North Africa . The Great Mosque is built, whose towers the Giralda belongs. During the Christian conquest it was taken by Ferdinand III. 1248

    Cádiz

    Founded as Gadir or Agadir by Phoenicians from Tyre, Cádiz may be the most ancient standing city still standing in Western Europe.Under Moorish rule between 711 and 1262, the city was called Qādis.  The Moors were finally ousted by Alphonso X of Castile in 1262.

    Almería

    Andalusien_2015_09_03_12_20_06
    View From Moorish Castle Fortress Of Coastal City Almeria …

    In 955   it became the principal harbour of Abd-ar-Rahman III of Córdoba in his extensive domain to strengthen his Mediterranean defences. In this period, the port city of Almería reached its historical peak. Its Moorish castle, the Alcazaba of Almería, is the second largest among the Muslim fortresses of Andalusia, after the Alhambra.

    After the fragmentation of the Caliphate of Córdoba in 1031, Almería continued to be ruled by powerful local Muslim Taifa emirs like Jairan and Almotacin, the poet emir. Contested by the emirs of Granada and Valencia, Almería experienced many sieges, including that of Alfonso VII and it was occupied in October 1147. Within a decade, however, Almería had passed to the control of the puritanical Muslim Almoravid emirs. The city surrendered to the Catholic Monarchs, Fernando and Isabel, on December 26, 1489.

    Málaga

    The castle of Gibralfaro, Malaga
    The castle of Gibralfaro, Malaga

    After the Moors invaded Spain Málaga became a major Moorish city and port – it was the main port for Granada tooe. Moorish ruler Yusuf I built the Gibralfaro as a defence against the Christian conquerors. Málaga fell to the Christians in 1487. It was one of the last cities to be taken by the Christian conquerors,

    Ronda

    Ronda was part of the Visigoth reign until 713, when it fell to the Arabs, who named it Izn-Rand Onda (“city of the castle”) and made it the capital of the Takurunna province.
    After the disintegration of the caliphate of Córdoba, Ronda became the capital of a small kingdom ruled by the Berber Banu Ifran, the taifa of Ronda. During this period Ronda received most of its Islamic architectural heritage. In 1065 Ronda was conquered by the taifa of Seville led by Abbad II al-Mu’tadid.
    The Islamic domination of Ronda ended in 1485, when it was conquered by the Marquis of Cádiz after a brief siege.  Shortly after 1492, when Granada, was conquered, the Spanish decreed that all Muslims and Jews must either vacate the peninsula or convert to Christianity. Muslims who converted were called Moriscos  (“Little Moors”). The term later became a pejorative applied those who had outwardly converted but secretly continued to practice Islam.  The Spanish Inquisition  investigated suspected secret Muslims.  Systematic suppression forced the Muslims to seek refuge in mountainous regions; Ronda was one such refuge. Both the poet Salih ben Sharif al-Rundi (1204–1285) and the Sufi scholar Ibn Abbad al-Rundi (1333–1390) were born in Ronda.It was the hometown of  Abbas Ibn Firnas (810–887), an inventor, engineer, aviator, physician, Arabic poet, and Andalusian musician.

    Conclusion

    Myth & Reality
    Myth & Reality

    A myth will not be primarily recognized for its upscale, anthemic sound, but especially at the obstinacy with which it resists reality and time. So the transfiguration of of the Islamic rule in Spain and its accompanying complaints of Christian intolerance systematically ignored the Arab military invasion and violent domination in Spain.

    Al-Andalus is not only for a the intellectuals a mythical desired country. In one of the apartments of the Islamist bombers who  killed 191 people on 11th March 2004 in Madrid trains and injured hundreds more, the police found a video claiming responsibility. The terrorist Islamists justified it by referring to al-Andalus, the land which was once belonged to the Dar al-Islam.

    Fact is, there was no permanent confrontation in al-Andalus, but there was also no harmony or tolerance without limits: everything depended on the specific circumstances. The Moriscos, Jewish and Christian communities saw some of their rights (not all, of course) recognized as groups. Jews and Christians practice their religions with restrictions and with the greatest possible discretion. In the middle of the ninth century, there was an anti-Christian persecution in Cordoba, with many martyrs. The largest anti-Jewish pogrom in Granada occurred in 1066. But the situation worsened even further from the twelfth century, after the Almohad took over.

    Serafín Fanjul is one of the most prestigious Spanish Arabists and written books and numerous articles denouncing the myth of al-Andalus “the most advanced civilization of the High Middle Ages,” symbol of the peaceful and tolerant coexistence of the three cultures. He refutes a homogeneous historical process of nearly eight centuries. In the eighth century, the society of al-Andalus was different from the tenth century, a time when Muslims were the majority, and Arabic cultural hegemony was a fact and Christianity in full decline. The kingdom of Granada, which lasted two and a half centuries (1238-1492), was not identical to the al-Andalus in the prior period. It was a monoculture society, with one language, one religion and often a terribly intolerant society.

    The contribution of scientists of al-Andalus was undoubtedly important, especially in transmitting knowledge of Persian, Indian and Greek antiquity that reached Europe through various channels including that of al-Andalus. However the medievalist Sylvain Gougenheim questioned the claim that the Muslim world has played a single and a fundamental role in the transmission of Greek science and philosophy to the West in the Middle Ages. In his book, Aristotle at Mont Saint-Michel: The Greek roots of Christian Europe, he showed the importance of filiations Latin translations was widely underestimated thus incurring the reproach.

    Bibliography

    For those who wish to explore further the world that was al-Andalus, the following are recommended in the first instance:

    Bernard Lewis. The Arabs in History, 1993 edition
    Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong?: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East 2002 edition
    Georg Bossong, Das Maurische Spanien: Geschichte und Kultur (Beck’sche Reihe)– 25. Juni 2011
    Michael B. Barry Homage to al-Andalus: The Rise and Fall of Islamic Spain, ebook . Andalus Press 2014
    Washington Irving Tales of the Alhambra – 2009
    Claudio. SANCHEZ ALBORNOZ ESPAÑA, UN ENIGMA HISTORICO. (English Translation) Madrid – 1975
    Barrucand, M. and Bednorz, A., Maurische Architektur in Andalusien Gebundene Ausgabe – 1991
    Stanley Lane-Poole The Moors in Spain – ebook Published by Didactic Press 2013
    Fletcher, R., ‘Moorish Spain’, University of California Press, Berkley, 1993.
    Guichard, P., ‘From the Arab Conquest to the Reconquest, The Splendour and Fragility of al-Andalus’, Legado Andalusí, Granada, 2006.
    Karoline Gimpel, DuMont Kunst-Reiseführer Andalusien: Kathedralen, maurische Paläste und Gärten im Süden Spaniens – 2012

    For those who wish to explore Sufism and transmission of cultures, the following were helpful for me:
    Idries Shah The Sufis – 1971 An exellent introduction of Sufism interest in philosophical Sufi aspects
    Annemarie Schimmel, Mystische Dimensionen des Islam – 1992
    Sylvain Gouguenheim Aristoteles auf dem Mont Saint-Michel: Die griechischen Wurzeln des christlichen Abendlandes – 2012
    Bat Ye’or, Europe, Globalization, and the Coming of the Universal Caliphate – 2011
    Bat Ye’or, The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians Under Islam by Bat Ye’or – 1985
    Idries Shah Tales of the Dervishes – 1993
    Idries Shah Caravan of Dreams – ebook 2015
    Idries Shah und Doris Lessing Learning How to Learn: Psychology and Spirituality in the Sufi Way – 1996
    Sigrid Hunke, Le Soleil d’Allah brille sur l’Occident : Notre héritage arabe 1. German 1961

    Internet ressources
    http://www.ibnarabisociety.org/articles/treasureofcompassion.html

     

     

  • Following the traces of Esclarmonde de Foix

    Following the traces of Esclarmonde de Foix

    Momorial of the site where over 200 Cathars were burned alive, having refused to renounce their faith.
    Memorial of the site where over 200 Cathars were burned alive, having refused to renounce their faith.

    I  just came back again from the haunted and magic Languedoc-Roussillon, where I followed the footsteps of the Esclarmonde de Foix and the heretic Cathars. This essay will focus on Esclarmonde de Foix. Cathars, Catharism and its connection to the holy grail seen through the eyes of Otto Rahn, a shady self proclaimed archaeologist, who had been driven into suicide by the Nazis:

    • Where did the Cathars come from and what were their beliefs?
    • Was Otto Rahn (“Crusade Against the Grail”), a kind of Indiana Jones, killed for failing to find the Holy Grail in the Cathar land?
    • In her mystic and symbolic importance, was Esclarmonde de Foix (1151 to 1215), not only a “Cathar Bona Femna” (Good Woman), but also a “Ketzerpäpstin” (heretic counter pope)?

    In Languedoc-Roussillon Cathar castles, Templar Abbeys and Châteaus inspire powerful myths, major mysteries, complex religious history, symbols of psychological relevance and – also significant pseudo-history. There are lots of stories about the Crusades and the mysteries of Sacred France connected to it. Or, as in the case the holy Grail, downright fabrications and conspiracy theories. So my journey became a transformational journey visiting places with magic and mysticism in addition to hiking, camping and photographing. I choose as base camp a wonderful Bed&Breakfast in sight of the last Cathar stronghold Montségur and close to Foix. As always, please be aware that this is an essay on my impressions and their reflections on history, culture and psychology, not a scholarly work. Readers of my articles know, that I have an soft spot for intuitive, but holistic interpretation of historical schisms, heretics and cross cultural transmission of myths and knowledge. Catharism holds all those secrets, and more, the egnima of Catharism can be felt still in southern France.

    My encounter with a French writer

    Chalet in France
    Chalet in France

    We stayed in sight of Montségur’s castle, in the hamlet of Mijanes, which is situated 650 m above sea level in a clearing at the end of a small road. The house is an old stone farmhouse, beautifully restored in order to preserve the built’s authenticity. At street-level, the old hay barn completely open to the south, gave the opportunity to develop a large community room with separate entrance and fireplace. Very bright, it opens onto a gallery with large sliding doors. Two hectares of meadows surround the house with lots of room for sheep, chicken and a dog called Hector. After a few tries, he got along with our dog. Around, the forest offers beautiful walks and the lack of light pollution nice astronomical pictures and nice sights of the sunset over Montsegur.

    The house has “only” room for two guests, its wall of the rooms’ corridor is fully dressed with a bark and natural pigment wallpaper from New Caledonia. The other room was occupied by a French couple, a writer and a retired teacher, who we met during breakfast. The writer happened to be Jose Dupre, who wrote about the German anthropologist Rudolf Steiner, Catharism and Déodat Roché, with whom he maintained a close relation and friendly collaboration during nearly 10 years. Not only a writer, but an expert in his field. Jose Dupre saw interestingly Déodat Roché as a bon homme, a modern Cathari Parfaite or perfect.

    JoseDupre

    Roché’s career was an interesting one, from Martinism – esoteric Christianity, concerned with the fall of the first man – and the Gnostic Church he promoted his own understanding of perennial religion while remaining an active and influential Mason leader for a small formal group of disciples. Via the work of Rudolf Steiner, “Christianity as Mystical Fact” in 1921, the then 43 years old Déodat Roché discovered a modern “Manichean spiritual stream, and received the advice to meditate on the main stages of the life of Jesus Christ from the representation of John’s Gospel. This looked for Roché like a living link with the meditative tradition, which had been maintained by the Cathars.

    He became well known through his writings, which were – especially in the 1960s and 1970s – a major source for the renewal of interest in Catharism, marketed into

    otto-rahn-faux-cathare-et-vrai-nazi
    French view of Otto Rahn

    The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (1982) and thence into The Da Vinci Code (2003). He was a Gnostic, who lived like a contemporary Carthar lifestyle according his friend Jose Dupre – “Un cathare au 20e siècle”.

    During a conversation, I naively showed to Jose Dupre a vintage copy of Otto Rahns book which started an interesting if not agitated discussion. Otto Rahn is not forgotten in France, but highly disputed if not despised, and his views are of Chatharism and Esclarmonde considered as pure speculations. Jose Dupre told me some details of Déodat Roché, who died in 1978 at the age of 101 years He was a philosopher and seeker who sought contact with people of very different spiritual orientation like Otto Rahn, Simone Weil, but never to lost sight of Christian-Gnostic Manichaeism. Even his appearance – slim, ascetic and benevolent facial features – reminiscent of a figure of early Christianity, such as Origenes, whose writings are more interesting than many “esoteric” contemporaries.

     

    The heretic papessa Esclarmonde de Foix

    Esclarmonde 001

    Esclarmonde was identified from the German mystics Otto Rahnas a historical precedent of the protector of the Grail “Repanse de Schoye” of Eschenbach’s “Parzival”, which included the Grail in the mountain of Munsalvaesche (Montségur), to protect him from the armies of Lucifer.

    The historical Esclarmonde (” Light of the World ” in Occitan) was born around 1150 as daughter of Roger Bernard I, Count of Foix and who fathered also another Esclarmonde (The Bastard). Esclarmonde and her brother, Raymond-Roger grew up in the Cheateau de Foix at the foothills of the Pyrenees mountain range at the center of the triangle of Carcassonne-Toulouse-Andorra. She married Seigneur de l’Isle-Jourdain. Their six children’s children included Bertrand, Baron de Launac who later inherited the County of Foix. She was widowed in October 1200, and from this time turned openly to the Cathar Church.

    In 1204 she became a Parfaite, a member of the Cathar Elect by the Consolamentum from the hands of the Cathar Bishop Guilhabert de Castres. She would become almost a female pope of the Cathar faith, combining temporal power and transcendental authority. She moved to Pamiers and later decided to fortify the Castle at Montségur against likely assaults by the French Catholic Crusaders. Otto Rahn claims that Montségur was the famous the castle of the Gral’s legend. In 1207 she organized the Colloquy of Pamiers, the last public debate between the Cathars and the Roman Catholic Church, whose representatives were led by Dominic Guzman (later Saint Dominic). It was at this debate that Esclarmonde, an educated Occitan, famously spoke up. The of the Roman Church lost in these intellectual and theological debates as often. At one point, being reminded of the cruelty of the Church by Esclarmonde Dominic admonished her: “go to your spinning madam”. It is not proper for a woman to speak in a debate of this sort”. The following year, 1208, despairing of success through intellectual and spiritual means, Pope Innocent III would launch the Albigensian Crusade.

    05282015 Montsegur008
    Montsegur

    Certainly the Cathar and Esclarmonde challenged the central power structure of the Roman Popes. The popes of that period were very powerful and interfered quite broadly in the affairs of secular monarchies. But it was also a church that was troubled by corruption and lack of clerical celibacy and moral decency.

    Because she refused to submit to the Roman Church, the pope put a price on her head; even so, she managed to evade not only the crusaders and the papal legates but also a series of bounty hunters. There was evidence that she was in the area around Dun until 1212, but the Chateau de Foix, Esclarmonde’s brother’s estate, from was 1214 to 1218 in the hands of the papal legate, who turned it over to the feared and hated Simon de Montfort.

    When Raymond-Roger went to Rome to try to retrieve his lands in 1215 at the Lateran Council, the pope reproached him about his sister’s activities. By then she had become the symbol of the resistance against the crusaders’ occupation and the papal inquisitors, as she encouraging the resistance fighters, providing them useful information, and refortifying castles. She became so cunningly, that in time the Crusaders were to call her La Renarde de Foix (the Fox of Foix); the Occitans called her La Grande Esclarmonde (Esclarmonde the Great), and her frequent appearances all over the land gave the people hope and inspiration. In 1218, Raymond-Roger did eventually win back his castle, not through any justice or intervention of the pope, but rather by force of arms. Rumors tell, that for more than 30 years, Esclarmonde lived as a fugitive on the run, sleeping sometimes in caves and keeping a hair’s breadth ahead of the inquisitors and bounty hunters. There is one mention of her in 1232. But it was only a brief appearance, and then she vanished once more.
    Her death is said to be 1215, but no-one knows the exact time or place of Esclarmonde’s death— she was rumored to have died in one of the caves where she took shelter—but her memory lives on. Jules Massenet wrote his opera Esclarmonde about her life 1889. In 1911 in Foix, a committee tried to erect a statue to her memory, but the bishop of Pamiers, Jean-Marie Vidal, did all in his power to have the project stopped. Esclarmonde, for she remains “one of the strongest symbols of the Occitan woman’s attachment to religious freedom” and an inspiring role model for courage and strength against tyranny and despotism everywhere. Esclarmonde of Foix has become something of a role model, after her name – almost forgotten for seven hundred years – but made known again by Otto Rahn in the twentieth century.

    Otto Rahn the Indiana Jones, who worked for the Nazis

    Rahn Otto. Source http://otto-rahn.com
    Rahn Otto. Source http://otto-rahn.com

    Very little is certain in the short life of Otto Rahn. But one of the few things one can with any confidence say about him is that Rahn, small and weasel-faced, with a hesitant, sly smile and oily hair, was the inspiration for Harrison Ford’s most famous role, Indiana Jones.  Like Jones, Rahn was an archaeologist, like him, he fell foul of the Nazis and like him he was obsessed with finding the Holy Grail – the cup reputedly used to catch Christ’s blood when he was crucified.  Rahn was a dreamer, who entered into a terrible Faustian pact: impressed with his first book “Kreuzug gegen den Gral” (Crusade Against the Grail), Heinrich Himmler committed every resource imaginable to realize his dream and a formidable salary. There has been just one catch: in return, he had to find something that – if it ever existed – had not been seen for almost 2,000 years, which he write must be buried in southern France.  He didn’t, so Rahn’s obsession ended up costing him his life.

    Rahn was born in 1904 in Michelstadt (Germany) and made Abitur (German university entrance qualification) in Giessen 1922. Through one of his religion teacher, he became fascinated by the history of the Cathars. At an early age became fascinated with the Holy Grail and the famous German archaeologist, Heinrich Schliemann.  Schliemann had found what he believed to be the ruins of Troy on the western coast of Turkey. Rahn used later the 13th-century epic Parsifal as his guide to finding the Holy Grail. He started studying 1922 law, but switched and completed his university studies in literature and philology 1928.

    Research trips

    During his stays in Geneva and Paris 1928 he researched medieval scripts. In Paris he met an esoteric circle of literati and scholar like the Toulouse poet Magre, who both believed that the manuscript of the mysterious Bogomil Bishop Nicetas the Château de Monségur was preserved. It was thought to be hidden during the Albigensian Crusade as part of the legendary Cathar treasure in the underground cave of Ornolaca in the south of France, Languedoc. Through Magre,  Rahn met the spiritualist Countess Miryanne Pujol-Murat and became her protege. She claimed to be a descendant of Countess Esclarmonde de Foix and a member of a Gnostic Church.

    Grail quest with Antonin Gadal

    From 1929 Rahn undertook as part of his study,  travels in southern French Languedoc, where he researched among other things caves, and the ruins of Montsegur. In 1930 he undertook a journey to the valley of the Ariege. In France, he investigated the medieval heretic movement, especially the Cathars and Albigensians. On his first explorations he befriended Déodat Roché,  a follower of Rudolf Steiner, and the local historian Antonin Gadal.  Gadal developed an intense friendship Rahn, and become his mentor and patron, and both worked extensively in the following three years together. From late autumn 1931, Rahn settled in the small spa town of Ornolac-Ussat-les-Bains, in which Antonin Gadal lived, with whom he remained friends over the coming turmoil and difficult years until his untimely death.  From 1930-1932 Rahn explored from his home the southern French Pyrenees together with Antonin Gadal.

    The more Rahn, a serious scholar read Eschenbachs Parsifal, the more he became convinced that the Cathars, the medieval Christian sect, held the secret to the Grail’s whereabouts. In 1244, shortly before the Cathars were massacred by a Catholic crusade, three Cathar knights had apparently slipped over the wall of Montsegur Castle in the Languedoc area of France. With them, together with the Bogomil manuscripts, was a cup reputed to be the Holy Grail.

    Rahn arrived at Montsegur in the summer of 1931. He didn’t find the Grail, but he did find a complex of caves nearby that the Cathars had used as a kind of subterranean cathedral. If he’d been of a less optimistic bent, he might have shrugged his narrow shoulders and gone home. Rahn, however, wasn’t the going-home type. Certainly he was on the right track, he wrote a book called Crusade Against the Grail in which he described his quest.

    Otto Rahn and the Nazis

    It was because of this book, that Rahn met his Mephistopheles Heinrich Himmler, the head of Hitler’s SS. Not only had Himmler read Crusade Against the Grail; he loved it.  All Rahn had to do was find the Holy Grail.  Everything but a Nazi he seems to have been blithely unaware with what  what he was letting himself in for.  A few weeks later a close friend (Rahn was gay) ran into him wearing the black uniform of an SS Sturmbannführer and asked him what on earth he was doing. ‘A man has to eat,’ Rahn replied sheepishly. ‘What was I supposed to do? Turn Himmler down?’

    He wrote another book, with the none too catchy title of Lucifer’s Court: A Heretic’s Journey in Search of the Light Bringers, which detailed his further efforts to find the Grail. The book had one open anti-Semitic passage, which was not from him. By now it must have dawned on Rahn that he was dealt with extremely nasty folks.

    Otto Rahn’s mysterious death

    wilder-kaiser
    wilder-kaiser

    What gives Rahn’s dilemma peculiar piquancy, is that there’s evidence to suggest that he was Jewish himself – although it’s not clear if he was aware of it and gay. Bravely, if naively, Rahn began to move in anti-Nazi circles. As naive as it was brave, he applied to Himmler to resign from the SS – an organization you could only resigned from feet-first. And so he did. There are stories that Rahn had links with British Intelligence.  He ended up dead like Faust. One evening in March 1939, he climbed up a snow-covered slope in the Tyrol mountains and lay down to die. He is believed to have swallowed poison, although no cause of death was ever given. The following day Rahn’s body was found, frozen solid. He was 34.

    Nigel Graddon, author of a new biography of Rahn, “Otto Rahn and the Quest for the Holy Grail: the Amazing Life of the Real Indiana Jones”, believes that Himmler’s disenchantment with Rahn was a result of his failure to find the Grail.

    The Cathar heresy

    IMG_9937-Stake

    The Cathar heresy was a major challenge to the Roman Catholic Church. The Cathars rejected the Roman Catholic church structure and considered themselves the only true Christians. The Thirteenth century was at a high point of their power and influence. Unless in other countries, the itinerant preachers in southern France received extensive support of the local nobles.

    The Cathars rejected the old testament of the Bible. They called themselves “veri christiani” (true Christians) and defended of a dualistic world view, which contained Marcionites elements. Catharism promoted values of equality, neighbourliness and charity, and turned its back on the pomp, hierarchy and worldly wealth of the Catholic church. It did not have a founder or leader, nor did it take root in one place. It may have originated in the Middle East i.e. Persia, and spread to Europe via Constantinople, the Balkans and Italy. It inherited elements of Sufism, Gnosticism and Zoroastrianism, fused with the mentioned dualist perspective: a universe of Good versus Evil; Light versus Darkness;  a Good God of the spiritual world and an Evil God of the material world. By the eleventh century, there were Cathar believers all over Europe, including England. But one of the places, in which the Cathar church really flourished, and the place with which the word Cathar is now strongly associated, is southern France.

    Among several books on Albigensians another name for Catharism, that of Jacques Madaule is free of sectarianism, although noticeably not without sympathy for the phenomenon. It claims to adhere to the results of scientific research and the French writer I met, was worried that the speculation by the Otto Rahn damages their credibility.
    The riddle that gives us this first great medieval movement against the Roman Church, has so many aspects.  The central questions are:

    • How was it possible for an early Christian movement from far remote to propagate beliefs and partly hostile moods and practices in the superior Languedoc, home of the Troubadours and an advanced cultural refinement?
    • Why was their doctrine preferably found among the nobility of the country and their followers?
    • Why did Rome react so harshly under Innocent III against this doctrine and practice of nonviolence?
    • Why did the Inquisition decades after the defeat of the Albigensian army still searched for the “good people”?
    • How do we understand the proven fact, that quite many representatives of the Southern French aristocracy and Bishops were Roman Catholics, but were also persecuted and repressed?

    When one considers that there have been in northern Italy and on the Rhine Cathars and that Northern Italy temporarily offered even refuge to the persecuted, the matter is even more mysterious. To equate the Cathars with early Protestants is wrong. Those Heretics were Gnostics. Their dualist teachings, their tolerance, their mild life practice their gentility were the flower of a different culture or time. The denial of the incarnation of Christ meant in the Middle Ages the negation of all spiritual and worldly social fabric created by the councils of the forth century.

    The Chathars and the Templars

    The Templars have never taken part in the fight against the Cathars which raged around during half a century in Europe. They even accepted them into their order. There are hints that the Templars possessed original manuscripts of the apostle Johannes, from Marcion origins (old christian heresy). In the original country of the Cathars, the Southern French province of Languedoc, two-thirds of the population were exterminated in this western “crusade”. Repeated requests, to act, had been strictly rejected by the Templars. They had very good reasons. The Cathars based some of their writings of Marcion, which Templars had found in Jerusalem. In the most popular publications about the Templars, one can read nothing about it. So the Templar’s order in ecclesiastical regard was not homogeneous Christian anymore. Some of the Templar’s secrets living up to the present day. The Cathars most probably handed over sanctums and valuable texts to the Templars.

    What the knights thought at that time and felt, we are not able to imagine. The knighthood kept wisely that knowledge under strict secrecy. Later, Hugo of the Champagne procured some first Cathars writings, contents to which the accounts of the Eschaimin texts fitted. The sign of the Marcionites Gnostics was the red Thorn cross – exactly as later that of the Cathars. After the legend the mother Christ had tinkered from four thorns of the crown of thorns a small cross. This thorn cross became later the origin of all knight’s crosses. Till then the Templars had a simple Roman Cross in use. From now on it became the Red thorn cross on White.

    The Myth of the Holy grail

    IMG_9936

    Myths may be divided into three classes: those that are connected with the quest for certain power symbols, of which the Grail is only one, those that deal with the quest of the hero in a Jungian sense; and third, those that deal with the nature and history of the symbols.
    These wordily stories were interpreted in the light and spirit of medieval Christianity and mysticism, but in essence were contradictive to the Cathar dualistic rejection of the real world.

    The Holy Grail is generally considered to be the cup from which Christ drank at the Last Supper and the one used by Joseph of Arimathea to catch his blood as he hung on the cross.
    Guyot, a Provençal poet who flourished in the middle of the twelfth century, is said to be the originator of the story. Much ink had been spilled around the possible Eastern origin of the Grail legend based on an Arabic book by an astrologer, Flegitanis found in Toledo, Spain, which contained the Grail story. “Flegitanis” sounds certainly not like an Arabian proper name, but more like the Persian felekedânêh (“astrology”). Some believed the legend originated in the mind of Guyot himself, but there is, however, there is some reason to believe that the story might have been brought from the East by the Knights Templar.

    In earlier sources and in some later ones, the grail is something very different. Chrétien, for example, speaks of “un graal,” a grail or platter and thus not a unique item. Wolfram von Eschenbach’s Parzival presents the Grail as a stone which provides sustenance and prevents anyone who beholds it from dying within the week.
    Parzival is a medieval German romance written by the poet Wolfram von Eschenbach in Middle High German. The poem, commonly dated to the first quarter of the 13th century, centers on the Arthurian hero Parzival (Percival in English) and his long quest for the Holy Grail.

    As for the Grail, that too lives on, with claimants and contenders continuing to turn up in the most unlikely places. As one said at the time, ‘The Grail is like Everest: you climb it because it’s there.’ Or not there, of course.

    The Chathars and the Holy Grail through Otto Rahns Eyes

    IMG_9940

    Rahn’s studies and his extensive research in the French archives of Montsegur (Eastern Pyrenees), it eventually led him to believe that he had found the mysterious Grail, that for the first time, was mentioned by the Provencal poets of the 12th century Guyot, the inventor of the Holy Grail. So proclaimed Rahn that in the history of the Cathars so meaningful Montsegur Castle with the Castle of the Grail Montsalvatge (Mont Salva sealed) from Wolfram von Eschenbach epic Parzival is identical. Otto Rahn had put forward the theory, that the Cathars were the guardians of the Grail, which he described as a stone of light. He claimed also that Pope Innocent III. had initiated Albigensian war, actually as a crusade against the Grail. Those theses originate mainly from Antonin Gadal, a teacher, who researched after his retirement after the historical heritage of the Cathars and gained a reputation as a Neukatharer-expert. He was interested in the French history and the Cathar heresy and explored it also climbing into many caves. Gadals paleontological studies of the caves in the valley of the Ariege and his extensive research in the southern French Languedoc finally made both believe, that he had come to the mysterious Cathar treasure. They likened it to the Grail, which the inventor of the Grail legend, a Provencal poet of the 12th century Guyot , mentioned. Gadal infected Otto Rahn in his assumption that the Cathar treasure is hidden in the caves of Sabarthes and encouraged the research of the Middle Ages Montsegur Castle, which he likened to the Grail Montsalvatge (Mont Salva sealed) from Wolfram von Eschenbach epic Parzival held.

    The Albigensian Crusade and Inquisition

    The 11th century was the century of monks and knights, but also of a second wave of religious disputes like in the first two centuries, the century of heretics. While waves of Crusaders were fighting in Palestine, the common people of Europe were experiencing a crisis of faith. They could not find God in the churches, with their corrupt clergy.

    In a bizarre parallel to the fourth century, Rome tried to quell the heresy by a string of councils and sent out priests, but that did not help. Since Catharism represented a clear and present danger to Catholicism, Innocent III sent a call for another holy war March 1208, summoning all Christian nations to launch a Crusade against a country of fellow-Christians. The Pope’s appeal came four years after the sacking of Constantinople by a Crusaders’ army, already the fourth against the Saracens a much harder enemy, than initially thought. The Albigensian Crusade can clearly be described as the first act of genocide in Europe. Starting with the sack of Béziers, historians estimate that the persecution of the Cathars in Languedoc caused half a million deaths. In cultural terms, the suppression of the Cathar heresy and the consolidation of French power in Occitania led to a complete strangling of Catharism in mediaeval Europe.

    The temporal enemy was Raymond VI, Count of Toulouse, a cousin of the King of France, a feudal sovereign whose authority extended over the regions of Agenais, Quercy, Rouergue, Albigeois, Comminges and Carcassès, not to mention the County of Foix. In the owner of all the territories where the langue d’oc was spoken.

    The nobility was weakened on the battlefields of Palestine, during the various local campaigns they had to conduct proving futile. The Crusades itself were gradually appeared to be a dead end.

    What was new type of Crusade? The aristocracy of this period was as cosmopolitan as before the first World War. Italian and Spanish poets composed in the langue d’oc, and German Minnesinger took lessons from the Troubadours. Against a methodical system of oppression was established from West Rome. The circumstances which led Innocent III were of some justification for the Pope’s appeal. Every single district throughout the Count’s countries was a hotbed of heresy; and on 14th January 1208 Brother Peter of Castelnau, the Papal Legate, had been assassinated at Saint-Gilles — which was a capital crime. It did, however, justified a declaration of war, since the Church was not, in theory, a temporal power, but intervening in the life of an Emperor still a valid option.

    But when the Pope pronounced his excommunication against the County of Toulouse, he knew that was not the case. Raymond VI’s mistake was that of ruling a country where the spiritual authority of the Church was in decline. The murder of Peter of Castelnau, has been said ‘was worse than a crime: it was a mistake’, most likely not of the Count himself, who just declined to take part in the league of Southern barons, to hunt down heretics. The Papacy had no armies in its pay and could not force the French King to launch a Crusade, and in the event failed to persuade him, but could attract a ragged and greedy team of Rome’s mercenaries. The propaganda drive was so successful that the King of France found himself forced to change his stand. It was a large army, which made a considerable impression and devastated the country in what would be called today an act of ethnic cleansing or genocide. Except, that not only heretics were killed, but also Catholics and Jews, as evident in the Massacre at Béziers. “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. (“Kill them all, God will know His own)” was a phrase allegedly spoken by Papal legate and Cistercian abbot Arnaud Amalric prior to the first major military action of the Albigensian Crusade.

    The Fall of Montségur and termination of Catharsis

    The last stand of the Cathars took place at Montsegur 1241, literally the safe or ‘secure’ mountain. The siege lasted more than two years and there were battles and skirmishes fought every day.

    According to Magre, many of the great heroes of chivalry fought and died there. “Men such as Lantar, Belissen and Caraman”, and the beautiful Esclarmonde d’Alion, also known as “Esclarmonde the Bastard”, sword mistress of the south. Through two winters the defenders of Montsegur held out against the Pope, against the Spanish inquisition, the Teutonic knights, the kings of France and last but not least Simon de Montfort – effectively against the world.

    The castle fell to treachery just before the spring equinox in the second year of the siege, when shepherds from the neighboring village of Camon showed the Teutonic knights, who were accustomed to the icy Alpine conditions, the secret path up the sheer side of the mountain by which the defenders smuggled in their supplies and on March 16th, the last of the Albigensians, some 225 surviving men, women and children were dragged down the mountain in chains to be burned on the Camp de Cremat.

    The castle’s history as, above all, a symbol of resistance made it impossible for the conquering orthodoxy to Christianize or take in the Holy Roman faith as they did at Montserrat and countless other pagan sites such as Montserrat, Lourdes or Fatima.

    It is surprising that the outside world has thus far avoided the subject matter of a clear Catholic genocide. When the ‘Cathars’ do surface in films, they are usually portrayed in the inquisitions terms as fanatics or devil worshippers. Otto Rahn’s positive account, Crusade Against the Grail, was the first to be published outside France, and translated in the English. Despite the title, surprisingly little reference to the Grail itself is made in Otto’s opus. Besides, as before mentioned, nobody seems to know what a Grail is, theories range from the sacred bloodline or ‘Sangraal’ described in Baigent, Lincoln and Leigh’s fanciful bestseller The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, Bran’s cauldron, the lost Gospel of Saint John, the Book of Nicetas, a graven tablet or a ‘hard, dark stone’, symbolic of Christ’s suffering according to Wolfram von Eschenbach’s Parsifal or the Indian Lapis as Otto Rahn suggested.

    Conclusion

    In what was then the largest French provincial newspaper, the Dépêche de Toulouse printed 1933 a lead editorial that tore a veil in front of the secret history of Occitan South.
    A foreigner, even German, who had until then encountered arrogant silent rejection, suddenly showed that the bloody tragedy of the crusade against the Albigensian Church had not disappeared from the awareness of citizens of Southern France nor from the world.

    What was the reason that the repressed and buried layers suddenly came to light? It was a speculative, scientifically immature book of a completely unknown young German named Otto Rahn, who wrote boldly, almost provocative “The Crusade against the Grail, the tragedy of the Cathars”. He took his life under strange circumstances in 1939, alone in the snowy mountains of the Wilder Kaiser, after he had maneuvered through an unexplained cooperation in entanglement and danger with Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS. How is it possible, that an unknown German usurped the historical past of Muret and Montségur?

    Otto Rahn was from the Marburg area, in which long ago, a judge, Konrad from Marburg had been assigned as an inquisitor to stamp out an heretic offshoot of Catharism, until his assassination.

    Rahn had presented prehistoric evidence of the caves of the Pyrenees area, that ancient Persian religions, Gnosticism and Manichaeism of post-Constantinian period had been entrained earlier than historical sources claimed, the heretic church known as Albigensians spread over later over the entire Languedoc, the county of Toulouse across to Beziers, Montpellier, Narbonne and to Catalonia and Ax. The boldest of Rahn’s thesis was, that the Grail legend was nothing more than mythologizing the Cathar belief of their heretical Sacrament and the famous and infamous Mountain Montségur in the lonely Pyrenees, the historical archetype of Montsalwatsch in the great poems of Chrétien de Troyes and the 13th-century work Parzival by Wolfram von Eschenbach and The Ring opera’s of Richard Wagner.
    It was understandable raising eyebrows in those years, that a German took the French a centerpiece of history and turned it into something like an anti-Roman gnostic anti-Pope myth.
    Now the French historical research Catharism has of course been more repressed than neglected. Jacobinism and Enlightenment as the official doctrine had no room for medieval religious wars and so-called Crusades. Meanwhile the situation has changed thoroughly. In the Tarn valley underground places of worship were discovered which suggested strange astral symbolism. Montségur, especially the burial ground (champs cremats), where the last fighting faithfuls have been burnt in 1244, was investigated and buried ceremonial objects found.
    Of course, we it is known, that there is something like a heretic movement against Rome in French South has formed; science also knows, that originally domestic Bogumiles in Bulgaria represent the link from the Christian centuries to Catharism; we know of the crusade against Albigensian by Pope Innocent III and that the “secular sword” of Anglo-Norman baron Simon yon Montfort and the subsequent Inquisition by the Dominican Order and its founder Dominic de Guzman have eradicated literally Albigensian sect. Nevertheless, there is a certain fuzziness.

    The reasons are diverse. In fact, the prosecution has produced a lot of documents, but in particular those relating to doctrine and worship, destroyed. The heretics had been driven back together with their cult in the Pyrenees caves. However, a number of important documents have found in the recent past. Ironically, scholarly Dominicans are significantly involved in these discoveries and important chronicles were found in the Vatican.
    What we do not know, comes from the fact that the Catharism continues, and in a sense the old heretic church remains to this day. Only in 1950 the Cahiers d’Etudes cathares were founded. The writer I met, called his late professor a typical “perfait”. Actually, there may be men out there, who up to the present day, form an Episcopate of the “Pure”.

    Indeed the original meaning of the word Cathari, came from the Greek katharos, “pure”). The Cathari professed a neo-Manichaean dualism—that there are two principles, one good and the other evil, and that the material world is evil. Embarrassingly often the medieval Catharism is seen as the frontrunner of Anthroposophy, Rosicrucianism, occult directions or New Age movement. Certain analogies must be stated, like the historical the historical and current anti-Roman movement particularly in Germany.

    In any case, this land is full of myths and beauty. You find further information about heretics in Southern France here:

    Sources

    • Otto Rahn  Kreuzzug gegen den Gral. Die Tragödie des Katharismus Gebundene Ausgabe – November 1955
    • The Cathars, France  MSM 2006
    • Christiana Reemts, Origenes: Eine Einführung in Leben und Denken Broschiert – Dezember 2003
    • Hans-Jürgen Lange, Otto Rahn und die Suche nach dem Gral Taschenbuch – 1999
    • The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy (Yale Nota Bene),  Stoyanov, Yuri
    • The Cathars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Heresy by  Sean Martin
    • The Knights Templar: The History and Myths of the Legendary Military Order by Sean Martin
    • Gnosticism and Early Christianity by R. M. Grant
    • Jesus Wars Harper, 2010 by Phillip Jenkins
    • C.G. Jung,  Aion Untersuchungen zur Symbolgeschichte
    • The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries by Rodney Stark
    • The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia–and How It Died by Philip Jenkins
    • Historia Mundi Volume IV, Lehnen Verlag,  Die Kirche zur Zeit der Apostel und Märtyrer
    • The Cults of the Roman Empire, Robert Turcan
    • Les sites templiers, Jea Luc Barbiere
    • Montsegur Le trace du Chateau
    • Bernard Hamilton: The Albigensian Crusade. Historical Association, London, 1974.
    • Milan Loos: Dualist Heresy in the Middle Ages. Academia M.Nijhoff, Prague, 1974.
    • Renè Nelli: Èncritures cathares: La Cêne secretè.etc. Denøel , Paris, 1959.

      Renè Nelli: La philosophie du Catharisme. Payot, Paris, 1978.

      Zoe Oldenbourg: Massacre at Montsegur. New York, 1961 (Kindle)

    Only listed (as my French is not sufficient) the works of José Dupré:

    • José Dupré, Un cathare au 20e siècle : Déodat Roché, 1877-1978 : Sa vie – Son oeuvre – Sa pensée 23. August
    • José Dupré, Catharisme et chretiente (relie) 6. Oktober 2005
    •  José Dupré, Les études cathares sous le ciel : Astrologie – Biographies – Philosophie 27. Juni 2002
    •  José Dupré, Rudolf Steiner : L’anthroposophie et la liberté

      13. Januar 2005

     

    Internet Ressoures

    http://otto-rahn.com/
    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
    http://www.chemins-cathares.eu
    http://www.catharisme.net/les5esclarmonde.htm
    http://opera.stanford.edu/Massenet/
    http://www.terres-cathares.com/spip.php?article24

    Cathar Texts and Rituals

    http://www.cathar.info/cathar_legacy.htm

    http://gnosis.org/library/cathtx.htm

     

    Photos:

     

  • Sufism and female archetypes

    Sufism and female archetypes

    Love and Self
    Love and Self

    Some say Sufism, or Tasawwuf as it is known in the Muslim world, is Islamic mysticism; others say it is the primordial mystical tradition, much older than Islam, using Islam as a structural frame as Gnostics usually did. In this article, we will use Jungian concepts, Sufi poetry, and myths to explore the relationship of female Archetypes and  the Sufi path. Although the leaders of tariqas and participants in public dhikrs are (almost) always men, there have been some well-known Sufi women adepts, e.g. Rābiʿah al-Baṣrī, and many others, less well-known. Women participate considerably in popular Sufism, especially in visits to the tombs of walis, mulids.

    Perhaps Sufism is best defined as an universal path to union with God through self reflection – individuation. In Jungian psychology there are many concepts that illumine the relationship between soul and Absolute, human and God: the ego as the center of consciousness and the Self as a path to god; the individuation process whereby the ego increasingly realizes its source and dependence upon the Self; the alchemical conjunction of ego and Self.

    Sufis understand themselves as the only heir of a spiritual heritage, which had been split in many religions and sects.  Like Tao, Sufi is eternal, and uses  words like “drunkenness” or “grape” or “heart” … As Rumi puts it: Before garden, vine or grape were in the world Our soul was drunken with immortal wine. 

    I also found, to my astonishment, Sufism is addressing the greats belonging to a variety of cultures: Rumi, Shakespeare, Goethe and other influential thinkers and poets.  Goethe’s West-östlicher Divan, or West-East Divan, is a work with deep roots his knowledge of and love for Sufism. I regret to say, that Sufis even caught up with C.G. Jung, and the concept of individuation. C.G. Jung was aware, that any spiritual aware religion – for example Sufism and Catholicism – inherently resembles a psychoanalytic healing.

    Boundaries of Sufism

    Sufism in a hurry

    Well, in any case lets define the boundaries first,  but be aware that my understanding of Sufism is deeply influenced by Idries Shah and the interpretation of it by C.G. Jung. This article is not an attempt to feminize Islam, but to explore Sufism from this particular point of view.

    See above a slide show with some basic concepts of Sufism. You may press buttons to change slides manually or switch to full screen.

    •  Sufism is a dimension of Islam rather than a sect of Islam. Its mysticism and monastic order are hosted by Islam, but originating and reaching beyond Islam. The abstinence from pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most Sufi Masters, and their retiring from others to worship alone has of course a striking similarity to Christian monks. Sufi orders (Tariqas) can be found in Sunni, Shia and non-Islamic (or hardly Islamic) groups. Like the Christian monks Sufis were influential in spreading their belief, particularly to the furthest outpost world in Africa, India and the Far East.
    • Doris Lessing, stated once: “I found Sufism as taught by Idries Shah, which claims to be the reintroduction of an ancient teaching, suitable for this time and this place.” Arthur J. Deikman, a professor of psychiatry, expressed the view that Western psychotherapists could benefit from the perspective provided by Sufism”.
    • Sufis are emphatic, that knowledge should be learned from teachers and not exclusively from books. They view deceiving and fanatic fundamentalists seeing Sufis as haram and deceiving scholars as evil spirits, no wonder that these attempts to destroy Sufi heritage.
    • Tariqas can trace their teachers back through the generation. Modelling themselves on their teachers, students hope that they too will glean something of the Prophetic character. Although Sufis are relatively few in number they have shaped thought and history. Through the centuries Sufis contributed hugely to  literature for example Rumi, Omar Khayyám and Al-Ghazali’s is quoted by Western philosophers, writers and theologians.
    • This new voice of the Abrahamic tradition attempted to reestablish the recognition of the Unity of Being. It tried to address the imbalances that had arisen by the three religions of the books, advising respect and honor for the feminine as well as for the graciousness and harmony of nature.
    • From the early days onward, women have played an important role in the development of Sufism, which is classically claimed to have begun with the Prophet Muhammad, but Sufisms’s roots are most likely older. Within some Sufi circles, women were integrated with men in ceremonies; in other orders, women gathered in their own circles of remembrance and worshiped apart from men. Some women devoted themselves ascetic, apart from society, others chose the role of benefactress and fostered circles of worship and study. Many of the great masters had female teachers, students, and spiritual friends who greatly influenced their thought and being.  The Sufi Master Ibn Arabi (see below), tells of time he spent with one elderly woman mystic, Fatimah of Cordova:  “I served as a disciple one of the lovers of God, a gnostic, a lady of Seville called Fatimah bint Ibn al-Muthanna of Cordova. I served her for several years, she being over ninety-five years of age… “

    Panentheism

    panteistic god
    panteistic god

    Given the diversity of schools and the diversity of religious and philosophical ideas of their masters, it is very difficult to pin down the Sufi thoughts define. By some scholars Sufism is considered a perfect pantheism in the search for knowledge and reunion with the Divine. I prefer, therefore, not necessarily to speak of any religious doctrine in Sufism, as the Sufi belief system exceeds them Sufism is free because of its mindset of every religious limit. Rather, it seems to me an attitude, an enlightened philosophy of the individual search for God.  Ibn al-‘Arabi (Ibn’ Arabi) (se also below)  is the most rigorous Sufi panentheism. Many theologians were scandalized by the apparently blasphemous expressions that occur in his writings, and taxed him with holding heretical doctrines, e.g., the incarnation of God in man (ulúl) and the identification of man with God (ittiád). Centuries passed, but controversies continue. To Ibn al-‘Arab everything, that exists is a part of and a manifestation of the Oneness of God. Humans are part of God. To him the idea of a separate self is the result of ignorance. Ibn al-‘Arabi was born in Spain, in AD 1165. At the age of twenty he was initiated into Sufism. From the 1190s he engaged in three decades of travels as a wandering scholar, poet and mystic, visiting the Maghreb, Egypt, Arabia, Syria and Asia Minor and finally settled in Damascus. Ibn’ Arabi ascribes the source of his inspirations to an angel, which, in Jungian terms, is an archetypal inhabitant of the unconscious. Angels are particularly regarded as the messengers or intermediaries between God and the human world. With respect to the psyche, as intermediaries and messengers, angels are the very permeability of the division between the two zones of the psyche. Unconscious content, which cannot be directly apprehended by the conscious, is translated into terms the conscious can comprehend: language. Intermediaries between conscious and unconscious are necessary because, as Jung points out, [. . .] “psychic contents cannot be observed in their unconscious state, and moreover the psyche cannot know itself. The conscious can know the unconscious only so far as it has become conscious “( C. G. Jung). Insofar as God is beyond the categories of human thought and beyond language and concept, He is unknowable, unutterable. Commensurately, the Sufi experience of God is referred to as knowledge of the heart. The Sufi calls “knowledge” his own experience – in all areas of the senses and in the experience of own transcendence.  Important is the strength and the ability to leave the social frames of that limitation, religion to which we belong; then, suddenly, the consciousness understands the true core of any religion.  Any religion.

    Sufi literature

    We owe a lot Friedrich Rückert (1788-1866) , who was a German poet, translator, and one of the founders of the German Oriental Studies. Like Heine and Goethe was Friedrich Rückert a German Sufi ethics. As a translator of poetry Rückert devoted himself to the transmission of countless Sufi verses in the German language poets. 1818, the same year, as Goethe drew up a WestEastern Divan,  the eloquent young poet came to Vienna and began studying oriental languages. With its dual talent, poetic and philological“, Rückert translated Arabic and Persian poetry, notably the Sufi mysticism, amazingly accurate.

    Ibn ‘Arabî – Sufism and heresy

    templars
    templars

    Ibn `Arabî (1165-1240) has been one of the most influential Sufi authors, who deeply influenced the west. He wrote in Persian and Arabic clearly not only for the purposefully for a global readership of all beliefs, but was quite at odds with scholarly interpretations of religious thoughts.  Through Spain and Sicily, and in part by the Templars Cristian and Sufi  thoughts interrelated. The Sufis in the East, like the Christian mystics in the West were attracted the refreshing, deep old knowledge of the Oriental world. None of them apparently did not fear the danger of heresy, and many of them led a double life, so to speak: on the one hand, they lived as devout Christians or Muslims, on the other hand they thought as Sufi scholars.
    In the 12th century the master Suhrawardi lived in Aleppo. He wrote the work “The knowledge of enlightenmentand was murdered by order of the orthodox Scholars. They publicly burned his writing, but some copies have survived: Suhrawardi
    refers to the Sufi tradition as identical with the esoteric teachings of the old Egyptians, the Greeks and the Persians. Later the English scholar Roger Bacon, who spread this knowledge in Europe. Bacon confirmed in his writings that the Sufi ideas came from the ancient Egyptian era and later inherited Pythagoras, Zoroaster and Socrates thoughts.The Sufis have always called The Lovers”.

    sufism
    sufism

    But behind the concept of Love hides rather the pursuit of truth, for the knowledge. In his book The Sufis” Idries Shah gives a brief history of the great masters Ibn `Arabî  and Sufi. Idries Shah finds many parallels between Francis and the Dervishes: the clothing with hood and wide sleeves, the exchange of secular dresses with a cowl and the Franciscan idea of the “holy prayer” and Francistypical Welcome: Pace a voi “Peace be with you” which is an Arabic greeting

    Idries Shah suggests, based on the Spanish Priest Asin Palacios, that Dante had drawn on Ibn ‘Arabi’s writings for his Divine Comedy. That has to be interpreted differently not as a de-christianizing of Dante, as the central theme of comedy” is the Trinity, that very concept, which distinguishes Christianity from Islam. Not only this poem as such has a Trinitarian form, but also the process, by which the pilgrim Dante (and with it the reader) through purgatory ascends to heaven, “proves” the Trinity. Through the process of self-perfection of the pilgrim Dante, who gradually realizes the divine laws of the universe, he reached the entrance to the world of science, to paradise. The Earthly Paradise turns out at the end of the book about Purgatory as a chimera, and as a polemical contrast, the real paradise unfolds as a process, by which the individual understands the divine laws, as a science. Dante’s poem seems a proof of Jun’s individuation and the Sufi paths though. Both relate to the Christian idea of the imago viva Dei.

    In the 13th century, the Scuola siciliana“, the Sicilian literary movement was established at the court of the Hohenstaufen. Frederick II of Hohenstaufen, a pupil of the Templars, founded this institution. The German Emperor Friederich II (Frederick) spoke and wrote Arabic perfectly, and the soldiers of his bodyguard were all Arabs. Sicily, then in charge of the Knights Templars was the center of the Arab sciences. The German Emperor was a close friend of the Sultan of Egypt, al-Kamil, the very same Sultan, who had also received the St. Francis of Assisi.

    Rumi – Sufism and individuation

    In his book The Sufis” Idries Shah gives a unique history of the great master Rumi. This is a typical example of Sufi central theme – love – therefore I would like to quote it here:

    „Ein Mann kam zur Tür der Geliebten und klopfte. Eine Stimme fragte: – Wer ist da? –
    -Ich bin es -, antwortete er.
    Da sagte die Stimme: -Hier ist nicht genug Platz für mich und dich.- Und die Tür blieb geschlossen.
    Nach einem Jahr der Einsamkeit unt Entbehrung kam der Mann wieder und klopfte.
    Von drinnen fragte die Stimme: – Wer ist da?-
    – Du bist es -, sagte der Mann. Und die Tür wurde geöffnet.“
    (Jalauddin Rumi)

    The  connection between the Troubadour movement and Sufis had been established long ago. The term “Troubadour”, the “Finder” can be originally derived from an Arabic root rbb”, as this certain Sufi community, whose members are the slaves of love”, played viola. And from the Arabic word for “Viola” came the European Troubadour”. The Sufis have always called The Lovers”. But behind the concept of Love hides rather the pursuit of truth and knowledge.

    How is it that a thirteenth-century Sufi master, like  Rumi should become the darling of the West and Amazon Kindle books, in times with interest in neither poetry nor spiritual discipline?  His works include a massive collection of lyric poems (ghazels and rubaiyat) as well as the six-volume Mathnawi, a collection of rhymed couplets that weaves together a rich fabric of stories, humor, and spiritual teaching. In our Western literary tradition and empty churches we have lost this union of the sensual and the spiritual. Our own cultural history has discarded: religion and literature. The Sufis, especially, were neither puritanical nor sensual indulgent. In Rumi we have a model of the potential harmony between the physical and the spiritual, the animus and the anima, the Ego and the Self, the human and the Divine.  Two examples from Essential Rumi by Coleman Barks

    When I am with you, we stay up all night,
    When you’re not here, I can’t get to sleep.
    Praise God for these two insomnias!
    And the difference between them.

    And an excerpt …

    Could this be our real master?

    The lover is forever like a drunkard whose secrets spill out,forever mad, frenzied, and in love.
    To be self-conscious is to worry about everything, but once drunk, what will be will be.
     
    If you desire the self, get out of the self.
    Leave the shallow stream behind and flow into the river deep and wide.
    Don’t be an ox pulling the wheel of the plow, turn with the stars that wheel above you.

    Sufism and psychology

    Source: Khalil Andani’s Concept of Tawhid in the Isma’ili & Sufi Thought
    Source: Khalil Andani’s Concept of Tawhid in the Isma’ili & Sufi Thought

    In Arabic, the words for ‘eye, ‘fountain’, and ‘self or identity (Self or Ego)’ all emerge from the same root.The specialty of having the same consonance for different words has given poets many opportunities for connections and word play, and Ibn ‘Arabi made masterly use of it.Gardens of paradise are beautiful metaphors for the heart; its center being this spring, which waters and vivifies all in the garden. Spreading out from this centre, according to this cosmological diagram (from Miguel Asin Palacios’ 1931 book on Ibn ‘Arabi  – El Islam cristianizado)  he compares the Ibn ‘Arabi’s vision of paradise to that of Dante: Self and Ego arr central concepts.

    Every discipline – temporal or spriritual –  in the world has among its practitioners, those who engage the faith beyond the common boundaries of doctrine and dogma, seeking an unmediated relationship with reality and selfrealization. Sufism, as can be discerned from the writings of Ibn’ Arabi and Jelaluddin Rumi, can be discussed in the terms offered by C.G. Jung in his theories of the structures and functions of the human psyche. In Jung’s terms, Sufism can be seen as an example of how a healthy, integrated psyche might function, and what a living mythology might look like. Sufism as a psychological system has postulated the discoveries of Freud or C.G.Jung centuries before: the Sufi sheikh Ghasali wrote down the sexual knowledge of Freud around 1200 AD and C. G. Jung’s findings on psychological archetypes and the collective unconscious were formulated by the Sufi Master Ibn Arabi. C.G. Jung might have known that  therefore and wrote: „What we hold for a specifically western invention, namely the psychoanalysis and those of her outgoing suggestions, it is a beginner’s attempt in comparison to that what is old-skilled art in the east.“  He meant the Far East, but also the Middle East as he was well aware of the findings of the Nag Hammadi library (famous for the “fifth” Gospel of Thomas favored by the Sufis). C. G. Jung has shown a pronounced and informed interest in Gnosticism an Middle Eastern knowledge.  Sufism emphasises on the knowledge of transcendence arrived at by way of interior, intuitive means as Jung’s individuation. The importance of the Nag Hammadi library, discovered in upper Egypt in 1945, was pointed out by C.G. Jung. His Book “Antwort auf Hiob” (Answer to Job) is a downright  answer to the Bible´, but in accordance of Sufism’s answer to rigid religions.  In the light of such recognitions, one may ask: “Is Sufism a religion or a psychology?” The answer is that it may very-well be both, just like Jung’s thought may be interpreted religiously. One of the aeonial beings who bears the name Sophia (“Wisdom”), referred to by C.G. Jung many times,  is of great importance to the Gnostic world view and resembles closely the story of the human psyche that loses its connection with the collective unconscious and needs to be rescued by the Self. Analogies of this sort exist in great profusion.

    Sufism and syncretic Gnosticism

    Myth of the Baphomet derived from its usage in Provence the centre of the Cathar Church in France,
    Myth of the Baphomet derived from its usage in Provence the centre of the Cathar Church in France,

    We do not know for sure, why has Sufism so much common with Gnosticism. The reason is maybe, that both of these systems implanted their mystical ways, in the prophetic religion (Judaism,Christianity or Islam,) or in a deeper sense how to individually unite with God. We can also admit that the Gnostic Christianity could have influenced the early stage of Islam, particularly Arianism.

    The Sufi and also Gnostic view on the created world is sometimes very negative.“The world is a dunghill, and a gathering place of dogs; and meaner than a dog is that person who does not stay away from it.”  Sufi could not participate in secular affairs and he must know, that world is a merely an illusion. Even Jesus (highly considered by Sufis) said in the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas: “Whoever has cometo understand the world has found (only) a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world.”  We can clearly say that Gnostics and Sufis are not interested in the world or they despise it. Not only, the world is seen in the negative light, but also the work of the heavens and the time. According to the Gnostics, the mundane world is influenced and ruled by the lower heavens – seven spheres with one planetary ruler( archon).
    Gnosticism From ancient Oriental religion? Zoroastrian, Mesopotamian, Indian? From heterodox Judaism? Apocalyptic, mystical? From heterodox Christianity? From late Hellenistic philosophy? Neoplatonism?
    Gnosticism
    From ancient Oriental religion?
    Zoroastrian, Mesopotamian, Indian?
    From heterodox Judaism?
    Apocalyptic, mystical?
    From heterodox Christianity?
    From late Hellenistic philosophy?
    Neoplatonism?

    While Sufi teachings have been influenced by various religions, their practices also bear close similarities to those of Hinduism and other mystical religions of the East. The Sufi orders are led by shaikhs, who play the same role as Hindu gurus.  Most Sufi orders still consider the five pillars of Islam to be essential, and practice them piously, however, they go far beyond this, aiming to spiritual awakening. Central to all of these practices are ritual “invocations of the Divine Name,” also known as dhikr, which can be done either silently or in a chant. Here similarities with Hindu mantras are unmistakable.  The evidence of Sufi borrowings from other Eastern religions such as Hinduism and Zoroastrianism is certain. The similarities in teachings and ritual are overwhelming. It is no surprise then that the goals of Sufism reflect their pantheism and monism.  Of course it is one of the characteristics of living traditions that they are ultimately oral. The spark that kindles the enlightenment is rarely captured on paper: it shifts its emphasis and context with the times and the individual. In matters of the heart and soul, it is the experience of love or of the Self that resonates – not dogmas or theories. This aspect of Sufism is the hardest to convey: In Sufism, great importance is given to the complete human being, the one who is considered activated. It is through the guidance of such a human being that the inner process unfolds. Any particular beliefs in dogmas dissolve as the complete one assists the seeker to fall fully into his or her relationship with God and to recognize the importance of that essential experience.

    The socially approved knowledge of argumentation is not valid  – unless we have found it out ourself. The Sufi calls all things meaningless, if they are old or new, big or small, important or insignificant, because all things are separated in reality forms one and not. All things („the evident“) are merely bridges to the true reality. Rituals, symbols are representatives, are to reflexion of an internal truth they can be exterior dead and stereotyped; but they show that who can see a way to the internal truth. There is no external sign (like the Christians Cross or the Crescent of Islam) from which one could say this symbolises the Sufi being. Sufis use the most different symbols, quite knowingly that these are just represented phenomena.

    Sufism and female archetypes

    Fatimah – the primordial woman

    Fatimah Zehra wife of Ali
    Fatimah Zehra wife of Ali

    Fatimah, beloved daughter of the Prophet Muhammad, is the most prominent female in the Islamic tradition. Islam is aniconic. In other words, images, effigies, or idols her are not allowed, although verbal depiction is elaborate. She is regarded as a  primordial woman, a symbol of divine womanhood giving her many holy names. Shias revere the person of Fatimah, mother of the line of inspired imams who embodied the divine truth for their generation. She was the wife of the fourth Caliph, wife of Ali, mother of Hasan and Hussein and defended Ali’s cause, fiercely opposed the election of Abu Bakr. Fatimah is often associated with Sophia, the divine wisdom, which gives birth to all knowledge of God. She has thus become another symbolic equivalent of the Great Mother. When Fatimah,  enters the throne all 124,000 Prophets stand in respect. Around the world men and women of Islam and Sufism look to Fatimah for comfort and inspiration. Because of her special beingness of personality and beyond, Fatimah is considered by many Muslims as divine in origin and several variations of a major hadith describe how she was conceived on the night of Mi’raj (ascension).

    I heard the Apostle of Allah say, ‘I am a tree, Fatimah is its trunk and Ali is its pollen. Hassan and Hussein are its fruits, and our followers are its leaves. The roots of the tree are in the Garden of Eden, and its trunk, fruits and leaves are in Paradise.’ – Sacred tradition of Islam on the authority of ‘Abdu ‘r-Rahman ibn ‘Awf’

    Fatimah tul Zehra (Fatimah the Radiant, Fatimah the Brightest Star, Fatimah-Star of Venus, Fatimah-The Evening Star), the daughter of the Prophet, is the secret in Sufism. She is the Hujjat of ‘Ali. In other words, she establishes the esoteric sense of his knowledge and guides those who attain to it. Through her perfume, we breathe paradise. Though she was his daughter, the Prophet Muhammad called her Um Abi’ha (mother of her father). While Fatimah Zehra was Muhammad’s daughter, the Rasulallah (Prophet of God – Muhammad) understood that his gnosis was bestowed upon him from the Divine Feminine.

    In his allegorical book Herrman Hesse’s  “The Journey to the East” searches for a mystical woman named Fatima. Given that this is the author of Siddhartha, one might suppose that the league represents a group of individuals in search of eastern mysticism. The book has clear spiritual overtones.

    Sophia – Sufism’s goddess of wisdom

    At the very core of Sufism there is a vision of the gnostic Sophia. The philosopher Muid ad-Din ibn al-Arabi (1165-1240) saw a young girl in Mecca surrounded by light and realised that, for him, she was an incarnation of the divine Sophia. She is part of many mystical and religious currents and mentioned often by the psychoanalyst C.G. Jung.

    • Torah/Old Testament: Sophia is the Greek word for wisdom which is a “she” who personifies integrity, honesty, clear perception, the power by which kings and princes rule, and the creative power present with Yahweh at creation. (see also C. G. Jung’s Answer to Job about the “anamnesis of Sophia” referring to the recollection of God of Wisdom.)
    • Ancient Wisdom Goddesses: Isis as the “Black One.”
    • Iranian Sufism: Sophia is Perfect Nature, the object of ecstatic ideation, which was described in an 11th century text as “the philosopher’s angel.” (Cf. H. Corbin, Man of Light in Iranian Sufism.)
    • Gnosticism: Two Sophias, higher and lower: Ogdoad and Sophia Achamoth, the generative wisdom of the world. (Cf. also “The Thunder Perfect Mind” in Nag Hammadi Library.)
    • Alchemy: Sapientia (Latin for Sophia, Wisdom). Moon, tree, ogdoad, alchemical salt. (Cf. Jung’s writings on alchemy.)
    • Christian Black Madonnas in churches throughout Europe: may represent Sophia (often likened to Mary Magdalene) in exile, blackened by association with either the sun, solar principle, or the earth, as in alchemy, black earth.
    • Western mystical /philosophical/ humanistic tradition: Dante, Boethius, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Rudolph Steiner . . .
    • Nietzsche: “Supposing truth is a woman . . .” (Beyond Good and Evil)
    • Jungian psychology:  anima development in male psychology; individuation concept.
    Sophia__Wisdom
    Sophia__Wisdom

    Sophia (Greek for “wisdom”) comes from Hellenistic philosophy (Platonism) and is important in Gnosticism, Orthodox Christianity and Christian mysticism. Sophia is honored as a goddess of wisdom by Gnostics, as well as by some Neopagan, New Age, and feminist-inspired Goddess spirituality groups. In Orthodox and Roman Catholic Christianity, Hagia Sophia (Holy Wisdom), is an expression of understanding for the second person of the Holy Trinity  as seen in the Book of Proverbs 9:1, but not a goddess.

    The earliest Gnostic forms of Sophia emphasized her power and influence on earth and in the human psyche.  In the ancient text of Hypostasis of the Archons, found at Nag Hammadi, it is written that Sophia preexisted and gave birth to the male godhead. She chastises his arrogance when he says there is no other god before him. She claims her spiritual authority. She says “you are wrong, Samuel” (meaning Lord of the blind) and stretches forth her finger to send light into matter. She then follows the light down into the region of “Chaos.”

    This power of Sophia within the earth realm was seen in early visions:  “I am nature, the universal mother, mistress of all the elements, primordial child of time, sovereign of all things spiritual, queen of the dead, queen of the immortals, My nod governs the shining heights of heaven, the wholesome sea breezes, the lamentable silences of the world below. I know the cycles of growth and decay.”  

    Black_Madonna_of_Einsiedeln
    Black_Madonna_of_Einsiedeln

    Certainly Sophia has been derived by the Great Mother(s) from whom all life arises and is sustained. The Great Mother was worshipped from 25,000 to 5,000 BC. Themes of the intertwining of nature and spirit, and the paradox of life and death are everywhere in images of the Great Feminine.  Muid ad-Din ibn al-Arabi  believed that women were the most potent icons of the sacred, because they inspired a love in men, which must ultimately be directed to God, the only true object of love. Ibn al-Arabi argued that humans have a duty to create theophanies for themselves, by means of the creative imagination that pierces the imperfect exterior of mundane reality and glimpses the divine within.

    The faculty of imagination is commonly associated with the Divine Feminine. The Sufi poetry teaches the feminine qualities of joy, love, tenderness and self sacrifice on a path of true knowledge derived from the spiritual heart. The spiritual rebirth of the individual is not unlike the trial and tribulation of physical childbirth, according to the Sufis. They take the principle of divine love and use it to facilitate the process of alchemical transformation from mundane human to spiritual being. Sophia is the mystical companion, which belongs to no race or religion exclusivly: ‘My place is the placeless, my trace is the traceless. ‘Tis neither body, nor soul, for I belong to the Soul of the Beloved.’40 Certainly, the Divine Feminine is so marginalized in Islam, that one might be forgiven for believing it to be totally absent.Both Mary and Fatimah are reverenced within esoteric Islam, for they are both mothers of the Logos, the Word. Fatimah inherits the role of Spenta Armaiti, within Shi’ism, for she is the mother of a lineage of imams. She is seen as symbolic of the ‘supracelestial earth.’  She is considered to be the source of the imam’s wisdom because she is lawh mahfuz or ‘the hidden tablet; upon which God has written.’  One of her titles in Ismaeli Shi’ism is Fatimah Fatir, or Fatimah the Creator, which recalls the Sophia Ergane of Proverbs.The nature of both the Black Goddess and Sophia are brought out in Islam. The exoteric fulminations about women, so similar to those found in Christianity and Judaism are, of course, negative polarizations of the devouring Goddess, yet this exists side by side with the positive image of the Ka’ba, Islam’s Black Madonna, preserves the veiled tradition of Sufism.

    The Peacock Angel and Sufi’s Iblis

    PeacockAngel
    PeacockAngel

    Considered a mystery by Orientalists, the Cult of the Snake and Peacock in Iraq was founded on the teaching of a Sufi Sheikh, Adi, son of Musafir, in the twelfth century, although they date their origin back 6,000 years or more.The Yezidi faith is syncretic and combines elements of Judaism, Christianity, Sufism, Manichaeism and the Persian Zoroastrianism faith in parallel and selectively.
    In Arabic, ‘Peacock’ also stands for ‘adornment’; while ‘Snake’ has the same letter-form as ‘organism’ and ‘life’. Hence the symbolism of the cryptic Peacock Angel Cult—the Yezidis—is a way of indicating ‘The Interior and the External’, traditional Sufi formula. The Cult has adherents in the West, but was largely unknown,  before CNN put the spotlight on them, because of their recent persecution (together with the Christians).

    In the Gnostic tradition (in which both Yezidi and Sufism have some roots), the Peacock Angel is analogous to the first son of the Goddess Sophia, who in the process of creating and governing the universe divided herself into seven rays or “sons.” Her seven sons were coeval with and governed one of the seven colors, tones, planets, etc. The  peacock was the first form of the Supreme God and one of the Seven Great Angels, named Tawsi Melek or Melek Tawus (the Ildabaoth of the Gnostic’s).

    Aroused snake by the entrance to a Yezidee-temple. It is blackened by soot.
    Aroused snake by the entrance to a Yezidee-temple. It is blackened by soot.

    However the Angel’ other name — Shaytan — means “devil” not only in Arabic, even in German Scheitan means Satan. Therefore Yezidi, have often seen as Devil worshippers, also through the manifestation the Peacock Angel as as a snake. This is analogous with the gnostic understanding of the Serpent on the Tree in the Garden of Eden –  interpreted in Christianity as Satan. Furthermore, because to the connection to the Sufi Iblis tradition, some equate the Peacock Angel with their own unredeemed evil spirit Satan. Iblis is a supernatural being — either a fallen angel or a diabolical fiery creature known as a jinn. In his disobedience against God and his role as tempter of mankind, again resembling the rebellious Satan in the Christian tradition. In fact, they are more remnant of pre Christian religion: the peacock angel being the mysterious Phoenix. The picture above shows an aroused snake by the entrance to a Yezidee-temple. It is blackened by soot. Yezidees (today almost a million believers) think, that in the last judgement the devil will be reconciled with God, and even play an important role in the final judgement of man.

    Mary – Sufism’s divine mother

    Holy Mary
    Mary – Divine Mother                       Maria-Hilf-Kirche. Murnau was the chosen residence of the famous painters – Blaue Reiter

    Mary, mother of Christ, is regarded as the most marvelous of all women, a high adept and living example of the pure and holy life. Later commentaries describe Mary as an intervening force between God and humanity. When Muhammad retook Mecca, he removed many frescoes and images from Kaaba, that he considered inauspicious but he specifically left on the walls a fresco of the Virgin Mary and her child.
    In one of the most powerful Hadiths ( prophetic sayings of Muhammad) it is reported that Muhammad said, “Paradise is at the feet of the Mother”. Muhammad was escorted by the archangel Gabriel (a masculine force) but the vehicle upon which he rode was the Buraq, a white horse with wings and the face of a woman, clearly suggesting a symbol Goddess or Divine Mother.

    A Sufi Ode to the Divine Mother

    On the face of the earth there is no one more beautiful than You
    Wherever I go I wear your image in my heart
    Whenever I fall in a despondent mood I remember your image
    And my spirit rises a thousand fold
    Your advent is the blossom time of the Universe
    O Mother you have showered your choicest blessings upon me
    Also remember me on the Day of Judgement
    I don’t know if I will go to heaven or hell
    But wherever I go, please always abide in me.

    While Sophia has noteworthy archetypal qualities, she lacks in some of the most virtuous aspects. Within the areas they lack in virtue and morality, the Virgin Mary, who is from Christian religions, make up for them. The Virgin Mary is the mother of Jesus, the Son of God. Mary is not the wife of God though. She was chosen by God to give birth to Jesus. “And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name Jesus” (Luke 1:31). Mary represents everything good in the world. She has never been touched and is clean and pure. The Virgin Mary represents the woman that man wants. “She will conceive…a Son”. Mary is the subservient to man. She is not represented with any symbols, excepts for her pureness. She does not have any mystical powers, except for her conception of child without sex. The Virgin Mary is represented as a woman that has been graciously touched by God himself, and gives birth to the Messiah, Jesus Christ. Yet she is still a “handmaid of the lord”(Luke 1:38). The church, the creator of this story, was apparently concerned with the idolization of the Virgin Mary and wrote:

    God came down from heaven, the Word clothed Himself with flesh from a holy Virgin, not, assuredly, that the Virgin should be adored, nor to make her God, nor that we should offer sacrifice to her name, nor that, now after so many generations, women should once again be appointed priests…Let no one adore Mary. (Epiphanius 49)

    Here we can see man coming into the monotheism, where Christian belief is today. The Virgin Mary does represent a mother archetype, although it is not as prevalent as Demeter and Isis. Mary’s character is more housed, in a way that can be controlled and can be put into guidelines. Just as times before, man wants what he can not have. In Mary’s case, the forever virgin.
    Man needs to realize that men and women are different, and each has wonderful traits. Though many of these archetypes are brought on by the unconscious mind, which is the portion of one’s psyche which is outside of awareness, those thoughts should be left at the realization that they are thoughts. These goddess or mother archetypes are brought into our societies to teach man and woman the values in each other. To restore balance in one’s lives. Demeter, she helped to explain strange occurrences in Greece as well as reveal the importance of woman’s traits to give life. Isis, she kept the Egyptian nation strong and united during her reign by being everything at once. Mary, she has had mercy brought into the Christian beliefs against the sometimes stern male God. All three characters are important throughout history, and have managed to keep their legends alive.

    Conclusion

    The West is, as Herrman Hesses wrote 1920 in “The Longing of Our Time for a Worldview”.  We, in the West, “understand” Sufism, like the group of blind men (or men in the dark) who touch an elephant to learn what it is like. Each one feels a different part, but only one part, such as the side or the tusk. They then compare notes and learn that they are in complete disagreement. Some see Sufism as Neo-platonic, some connected with Manicheanism, some see Sufism as heretic Christianity and others as Persian sect (the latter three all may be interpreted as Gnosticism).  To me, Idries Shah’s presentation of Sufism as a form of timeless wisdom, that predated Islam makes sense. Sufis are connected with sacred sex and the movement of troubadours; quite a few important Sufi scholars were women. Sufism has often called the concept and denomination to love. Clearly the role of the Divine Feminine,  its principle has been described and explored at length in the tradition of Sufism. Sufism emphasizes passionate, mystical and individual adoration of God. Many Sufis (and other mystics in other religions) seek a spiritual union between themselves and the divine principle not unlike that between a child (the Sufi) and his mother (God) or a bride (Sufi) and the husband (God).

    Bibliography

    • Idries Shah The Sufis 1964, Translated 1980 „Die Sufis“, Diederich’s Gelbe Reihe
    • West-östlicher Divan. In: Project Gutenberg.
    • Philip Jenkins  Baylor University, History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia — and How It Died
    • “The Other God”.  Yuri Soyanov, Yale University Press, 2000
    • neo-sufism-the-case-of-idries-shah-reprint
    • Women and Sufism, by Camille Adams Helminski
    • Ibn ‘Arabi, SELECTED POEMS
    • KABIR HELMINSKI, THE POCKET RUMI 2011 Shambhala Publication
    • Mystische Dimensionen des Islam, Annemarie Simmel 3rd Edition, Munich 1995
    • CW9(i) = Jung, C.G. The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol.9, Part I, The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious  Zürich 1951, Rascher
    • CW9(ii) = Jung, C.G. The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol.9, Part II, Aion Zürich 1951, Rascher
    • Jacobi, J. The Psychology of C.G. Jung.  Zürich 1961
    • Jung, C.G. Memories, Dreams, Reflections, London: Harper Collins, 1995, PG213.
    • The Yezidis http://www.yeziditruth.org/

    Appendix

    I encountered this fairly good paper and Hesses essay after I finished my article, which also investigated the fact that spiritual Sufi training is very similar to the process of Individuation.

    Spiritual Sufi Training is a Process of Individuation Leading Into the Infinite

    This paper was presented to the VIII International Conference of the International Transpersonal Association at Davos, Switzerland, Sept 1st, 1983, by Irina Tweedie

    (more…)
  • The many faces of Jesus from an Jungian view

    The many faces of Jesus from an Jungian view

    A recurring thought in books about The many faces of Jesus is the thought that every time created its own Jesus. Jesus, like the virgin birth, the crucifix and resurrection, is a major symbol in the Jungian sense of the word, an abstract archetype one can fill with our own multiple meanings recognized in very culture, even non-christian. Now if we look for the many faces of Jesus, we may get access to him as a person, scholarly (theologically), from contemporary views, from other main religions, from sworn enemies of any religion and from the father of symbols – C.G. Jung:

    Mny Faces of Jesus
    Mny Faces of Jesus
    • Jesus – seen archetypal
    • Jesus – seen biographical
    • Jesus – seen as private person
    • Jesus – seen from masculinism
    • Jesus – seen from feminism
    • Jesus – seen from world religions
      • Jesus – seen from Buddhism
      • Jesus – seen from Hinduism
      • Jesus – seen from Islam
      • Jesus – seen as cultural construct
        • Jesus – seen from the Egyptian god Aton
        • Jesus – seen from the Roman Mithras Cult
        • Jesus – seen from the Roman Isis Cult
        • Symbols of Christianity
        • Astronomical interpretation of mystery cults – Astral Religions
        • Historical evidence of Christianity
        • Conclusion

    The historical Jesus almost gets buried under his construction, even the catholic church rarely refers to him as real historic person in recent writings. Sometimes it seems that Jesus in the Gospel was also such a creation realizing the striking similarity of New Testament symbols with the Egyptian pantheon and myths. Those faces is what this article is all about. The best I have read in that regard about Jesus is from C.G. Jung,  so lets start with him. Warning, this is just an essay but a rather lengthy one.

    The Faces of Jesus

    Jesus – seen archetypal

    The Ego, the Self and God
    The Ego, the Self and Jesus – Individuation and Transcendence

    C.G. Jung says that humanizing Jesus is a regress, which ultimately leads to Arianism, rejection of trinity and Ebionitism, the idea that Jesus was a human being and not at all divine. This is a view god which is based more on the Old Testament or on Islam than in Christianity. Arianism does believe that Jesus Christ is less divine and is inferior to God the Father. Obviously if you look in the Jesus Wars, the regress in homoiousie is evident, since the early heryes denied the complex divine and human coexistence of the Caledonian Creed.

    The gospels are clearly non-historical, painting an image of Jesus, to emphasis his being as human and god, with a particular audience  in mind. I dare to say, the Gospels are the earliest and most beautiful faces of Jesus, deliberately created for effect. I think therefore, it is clear that Jesus lived but its historical details are less important  than the archetypal symbols he invokes. The gospels already hide his real being behind metaphysical constructs. The whole fertile ground of the Middle East and its religions are already visible creeping up. However, Jesus became an ultimate archetype of the collective unconsciousness in the West and the East as we shall see. C.G. Jung  actually saw all attributes of the hero myth in him: strange origin, holy parentage, endangered birth, narrow survival,  early  maturing, mastering death and separation, miracles, early death, symbolic way of death, postmortem deeds. To Jung the symbolic of the Gospel is a Marriage Made in Heaven : Trinity Finally Becomes a Quaternity. And Jesus is eventually the symbol of the Self and individuation, as I have written here.

    Jesus – seen biographical

    life of Jesus according to john
    life of Jesus according to john

    I think Jesus became such a strong symbol and archetype, that his biography is less important. Unlike most biographies, the Jesus Christ narrative of the gospels does not begin with his birth, or even with his conception. There are even few hard historical records proofing his very existence, as describe below. Clearly a charismatic movement can’t be started without the leader, so existed. The new archetype of Jesus, created by the gospels and St. John are so strong however, that his life before his preaching does not matter only those last two years. The essence of the powerful Jesus archetype is his death and resurrection. This is the most unique selling prepositions in comparison to other world regions. Another is that there were no heirs, was no real family, it was inconclusive if he had wife and kids, and no priest class based on heritage in Christianity after him. Jesus was an outcast, indifferent to family, money, property or rank.Unusual for the Middle East.  It is not true that his followers were only the pure, often they had high ranks – but the attraction was logos the word.

    Let’s say the narrative of the gospel are a somewhat trustworthy biography, therefore  I like to recollect it very briefly:.

    At an early age, Jesus and his family fled to Egypt because an angel warned Joseph in a dream of impending danger. When they returned from Egypt, they settled in Galilee, in the town of Nazareth.Then there is a big gap, only at one point touched by the gospel of Luke.  At the age of twelve, Jesus traveled to Jerusalem with Mary and Joseph to celebrate the Feast of the Passover and went missing nut the they found him talking with the priests and teachers. Based on the Writings found in Quaram 1947, one may assume that he belonged and was educated by the desert brotherhood of the Essenes, who lived on the north-west of the Dead Sea.

    At approximately 30 years of age, Jesus entered into the public space. John the Baptist had preached of the coming Messiah, preparing the way for Jesus’ ministry. John baptized Jesus. After this, Jesus went into the wilderness for a time of fasting and prayer . Then the devil came to him and tempted him unsuccessfully. Jesus began to preach a message of repentance, and from among his followers hand-picked twelve disciples, or the apostles. The teaching and preaching of Jesus convicted, challenged, or encouraged those who heard it. Jesus performed many miracles of healing and restoration, as well as miracles designed to teach a lesson. Then he provided the way of salvation from sin by way of the ultimate sacrifice, his crucifixion , followed by his resurrection from the dead after three days. The philosopher Karl Jaspers counts Jesus one of the most important men in humanity, together with Buddha, Socrates and Konfuzios. See below, how little we know from the historical Jesus.

    Jesus – seen as private person

    640px-Sandro_Botticelli_Lamentation over dead Christ
    Sandro_Botticelli_-_The_Virgin_and_Child_(The_Madonna_of_the_Book)_-_Google_Art_Project

    Nowhere in the gospel there is a hint that Jesus felt uncomfortable with women or vice versa, but quite the opposite. He was not a puritanical asket but almost a free spirit. His attitude towards women in adultery and prostitutes – if some of them were  prostitutes indeed at all – was understanding and feeling good about their companionship. Women were free to become his disciples and in general Mk 10.7-8 says: That’s why a man leaves his father and mother and gets married. He becomes like one person with his wife. Then they are no longer two people, but one.  If  you refer to gnostic or non-religious writing this goes even further. Yale Divinity School dean Harold Attridge asked the question about an erotic relationship recently in a short piece piece prepared in response to The Da Vinci Code based on his interpretation of the Gospel of Philip, one of the codices discovered in the 1940’s in Upper Egypt near the town of Nag Hammadi.  The Gospel of Philip has caused quite a stir for several reasons. It says Jesus’ companion (also translated as “consort”) was Mary Magdalen, and that he “loved Mary more than the rest of us because he used to kiss her on the ____ [hole in the text].” Philip also speaks of a “stainless physical union” which has great power. Early scholars translated the ‘union’ phrase as “undefiled intercourse,”. One wonders like many with the French scholar Jean-Yves Leloup, that the Gospel of Philip may speak of actual intercourse, and not the ritual kiss that “passes the peace.”

    Jesus – seen from masculinism

    Had Jesus a wife? pressHype-PsychologyToday
    Confusede? Jesus seen from masculinism -PsychologyToday

    No, I didnt’ make up the word. There has to be a balancing between the masculine and feminine energy in Christianity. That is why feminism is  a dead end: because they cannot give up what some have called “feminist dualism”. Having said that clearly the Vatican and  Christianity owes women their impact as a world religion.  “I and my Father are One” – says Jesus…..what does this mean? It explains more than the Trinity and Caledonian Creed: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. They are all One yet they are separate as well. It als means, God is the Father, Jesus is His Son, and both feel good about this. Today most sons (and often fathers) say, “I and my Father are Not One – we are at variance or at odds “. This is a problem of the industrial revolution, but even before, the Catholic Church did well with Mary. I mean here Holy Mary but also Mary Magdalene. Lets face i,t the love of mother is perceived as unconditional, whereas father’s love was always connected with an important fact of socialization – conditional love. Today the father imago  is created almost exclusively by mothers or hostile media. But the Catholic church, depicting Jesus as  innocent blue eyed nice guy did not help either. The Church discarded the Shaman energy discard mal energy, still found in the fraternity of monks with the power to proselytise. Jesus thought highly of John the Baptist, the Wild Man. Only after he had been imprisoned he went North to found his movement.

    I mean really, much of Church teaching is alien to a dualistic (gnostic) understanding like God/Satan, good/evil, sacred/profane, pater/nun. In Jesus one would think, there would also be  ‘masculinism’ to counter balance ‘radical feminism’ but certaily also a male only hierarchy, todays pharisees. A lot of they published opinion on that, however, is not Christian, it’s not very Catholic either, but just profane voices out of the spiritual void to undermine Jesus’ one Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and not only the indeed very female Church. I have my doubts, we will ever get a sermon from Pope Francis denouncing radical feminism.  I suspect the fact that will ever happen is the biggest proof radical masculinism is alive and well in the Roman Catholic Church.

    Jesus – seen from feminism

    WolfFeminism
    Feminism

    Contemporary feminism believe that the “true” history of Jesus – without idolatry – will decide, if an own feminist religion must be constructed or a feminist Christianity may evolve. Obviously the have a problem with Jesus as a man and perceive especially priesthood as patriarchical relict. Pagan myths of the goodness who rests the dead hero in her lap are projected to historical women  from Mary Magdalene. Taking the gospel as history, indeed Many of Jesus’s followers were female. They were not included in the 12 apostles, but the community surrounding him was far larger than that. Women were also among his key supporters. I find myself in an interesting tension. I think overtly feminist views, especially those of the atheist-feminist circles miss the point but I do see may see as a shift from early Christianity towards a patriarchal religion.

    Jesus – seen from world religions

    Jesus – seen from Buddhism

    After individuation, or the suffering and the death of the Ego (the I) on the cross, we reach our self. A Buddhist might  say, welcome, we already here, we don’t even know the concept of Ego. It seems therefore the Cruzification must be disturbing for Buddhists.

    Jesus – seen from Hinduism

    Hinduism sees Jesus as a teacher, as the understand the relation between god and human an individual matter. This personal experience of one’s relationship with God is considered authoritative, for some, even more so than scripture. As an other religion, Hindus see the figure of Jesus Christ through the categories of their own world view. Time is not seen by Hindus in linear terms but in cyclical terms. As a human being one is subject to the round of birth, death and rebirth called samsara. The manner of one’s rebirth is governed by one’s karma.Two further issues must be considered. It is believed that from time to time God incarnates, particularly when evil seems to be gaining the upper hand within the world. So  Jesus is seen as:

    • Moral Teacher: Jesus is a great man and true guide to God
    • Incarnation: Jesus is as one with God and humankind’, stressing ‘divine humanity and absorption into God.
    • The Unbound Christ: Jesus is not bound by Christian dogma, or Western Church’s tradition, not bound by formulations which restrict, nor bound to that institutions.

     Jesus – seen from Islam

    Islam sees Jesus, as said before as a mere messenger and lesser prophet. They doubt that he died on the cross (Jusuf Ali’s translation):

     “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.”

    St. John Damascene’s critique of Islam was contesting Muhammad’s Arianist contention that only the appearance of Jesus was crucified, not the actual body of Jesus. “In Dante’s Inferno, Canto XXVIII puts Muhammad and Ali in the Circle of the Schismatics, not that of Heretics. The angel slashes at the damned schismatics to symbolize their tearing of the Body of Christ. Meanwhile, quite a few levels higher up, the heretics are interred alive in flaming coffins. Islam is seen from Christians as a heresy, and a recrudescence of Arianism as well as a weird forerunner of Jesus in feminism (which also denies the incarnation), but is reckoned a schism in the Inferno.

    This issue somewhat different with Shiites and quite different with Sufism, who refer to Jesus as wise ascetic man with secret knowledge.

    Jesus – seen as cultural construct

    Jesus as cultural Construct
    Jesus as cultural Construct

    There is a Peter Joseph’s Internet film series, Zeitgeist, which asserts that Jesus never existed and is in fact a mythical character, in a Jungian sense a symbol (derived of  collective archetypes), based on the Egypt sun god Aton. Some of what the Internet film asserts , essentially a New Age product, is true. Unfortunately, this is mixed with material that is only partially true and much that is plainly and simply bogus. He sees all the motifs and characters of the New Testament as coded astrological or solar references. The argument that Jesus was a mythical construct has been made and nowadays often commercially motivated —  there are a number of people claiming that the accounts of Jesus as recorded in the New Testament are simply myths borrowed from pagan folklore, such as the stories of Osiris and Mithras. The claim is that these myths are essentially the same story as the New Testament’s narrative of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. As Dan Brown claims in The Da Vinci Code, “Nothing in Christianity is original.” To discover the truth about the claim that the Gospel writers borrowed from mythology, it is important to (1) unearth the history behind the assertions, (2) examine the actual portrayals of other gods being compared to Christ, and (3) expose any logical fallacies being made. The claim that Jesus was a myth or an exaggeration originated in the writings of liberal German theologians in the nineteenth century.

    jesus_gnostic

    They essentially said that Jesus was nothing more than a copy of popular dying-and-rising gods in various places— Mesopotamia,  Syria, Asia Minor, and he trinity of Isis, Osiris and Horus in Egypt and asserted that there is no evidence for a historical Jesus. I am Christian, but I think this misses the point. The thesis ignores the messianic/apocalyptic aspects of the New Testament writings, that indeed a charismatic person is needed to kindle a spiritual movement. Religions are ritualized spiritual systems, but also cultural constructs which influence each other.  Successful religions utilize archetypes and symbols, often consciously or unconsciously borrowing of each other like great artists.  In the book – The lost history of Christianity – Philip Jenkings provided many insights of the Eastern Christians, particularly since he makes clear, that also religion history is written by the victor or winner. Religions deteriorate, vanish or die. Religions get killed and when that happens they leave ghosts or vanish without traces.That is very evident in the short-lived cultural revolution, which led to the worship of Sun God Aton and it failing after twenty years. This first attempt to a monotheistic religion also did not come out of thin air, but as  I have written most likely from Syria  in “Jungian archetypes of Nefertiti and the Heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten”. I suggest strongly, the gospel writers knew and learned from this failure. The gospels always had a target audience in mind.

    Jesus – seen from the Egyptian god Aton

    Aton
    Aton

    Akhenaten, the pharaoh who carried out a religious revolution which, for a period of about twenty years,  replaced the age-old beliefs and practices of the Egyptian religion of about 2000 god and goddesses in human, composite or animal form for one single abstract concept  – the sun (Aton).  He did away with an elaborate and powerful system of priests, temples, and iconic images in particular with Amun the god of all gods. Its priests were at that time almost as powerful (and rich) as the Pharaoh.  Akhenaten alone was the mediator to god and asked to be worshiped, actually with his wife as holy family. He was the son of Aton. Akhenaten, the new capital with temples was built from scratch, like Brasilia, but Akhenaten  lasted only 20 years and almost destroyed the Egypt empire.

    “O Sole God beside whom there is none”.

    Akhenaten has often been brought in connection with Jesus and more often Moses. The worship of idols (symbols of transcendence) eases and ends with with pure monotheism. Strict monotheism prohibits images , rejects any magical acting ceremony and puts the emphasis on the writing and worldly ethical requirement as gods law without constraints of idolatry.  The murder of God , also known as parricide , is the main subject in Freud’s Moses and Monotheism religion – the historical truth of religion.  Moses is, according to Freud , ” the creator of the Jewish people ” (IX , p 553 ), and he explains this as follows: Moses himself was an Egyptian living in Egypt who imposed to a Jewish ethnic group the already banned again monotheism of Akhenaten as their own religion. Then, he led this people  (shortly after Akhenaten’s death ) out of Egypt.

    Jesus – seen from the Roman Mithras Cult

    mithraic-communion
    mithraic-communion

    I recently attended a lecture of an Mithras expert. He explained, that mainstream scholarship speaks of at least three Mithras: Mitra, the Vedic god; Mithra, the Persian deity; and Mithras, the Greco-Roman mysteries cult. There was, however, always a problem with Cumont’s assumption that the Mithraic mysteries derived from ancient Iranian religion, the iconography in ancient Iran was different from the primary fact of the Roman Mithraic cult.lSince the 1970s, scholars have generally argued against Cumont’s master narrative of east-west transfer. whereas recently now render a revised Cumontian scenario of east-west transfer including Armenian religion.

    The important icon in the Roman cult was the tauroctony. This scene shows Mithras in the act of killing a bull, accompanied by a dog, a snake, a raven, and a scorpion; the scene is depicted as taking place inside a cave like the mithraeum itself. If the god Mithras of the Roman cult was actually the Iranian god Mithra, we should expect to find in Iranian mythology a story in which Mithra kills a bull. However, the fact is that no such Iranian myth exists: in no known Iranian text does Mithra have anything to do with killing a bull. Franz Cumont, the major expert in the twentieth century had responded by pointing to on an ancient Iranian text in which a bull is indeed killed. However, in 1971 in the course of a Congress Cumont’s scholars at the Congress hypothesized  that the Roman cult of Mithras was actually a new religion, and had simply borrowed the name of an Iranian god in order to give itself an exotic oriental flavor.  A dam was broken in regards the study of the Mithraic mysteries, its pictorial may not be based on the Iranian myth, but rather something utterly different: namely, an astronomical star map and the cult an new astral religion, for soldiers of the declining Rome as Rober Tucan pointed out.

    As one of the competing cults in the second century, Mithraism has been compared to Christianity, pointing to numerous similarities. It should be kept in mind that if elements from Roman, Armenian and Persian Mithraism were utilized, not as a whole ideology but as separate items, that is a very usual behavior of religions, which utilize and occupy archetypes in Jungian sense to prevail.  Thus, the following list represents possible independence of Christianity and Mitra/Mithra/Mithras cult.

    The Roman Mithra cult has the following in common with the Jesus character:


    • Mithras was born on December 25th of the virgin Anahita.


    • He had 12 companions or “disciples.”


    • He performed miracles.


    • He ascended to heaven.

    The Roman Mithra cult has the following similarities with Christianity:

    • Mithras represents the “Way, the Truth and the Light,” the Redeemer, the Savior, the Messiah.

    • He is described as “hears all, sees all, knows all: none can deceive him.”


    • His sacred day was Sunday.


    • The Roman Mithra cult had a rite similar to the eucharist meal.

    • Mithraism had a sort of baptism although with ritual blood.

    The Roman Mithras cult has many other attributes not common with Christianity, particularly its central mythical secret, Mithra slaying the bull.

    Jesus – seen from the Roman Isis Cult

    The cult of Isis was the opposite of the “men religion”  of Mithras. As we see later, Jesus bears similarity with Horus, whereas Isis clearly had influence on the archetype of the Holy Mary in Christianity.  The cult of Isis entered around the Egyptian deities Isis and Osiris is very likely brought to Rome under Marcus Antonius. It had a popular following up until the fourth century AD, but as Christianity took a firmer hold was completely eliminated by the sixth century. The central image of the cult concerned the myth of the death and rebirth of Osiris. While the rituals of the cult remain a mystery even today, we do know that in the initiation ritual the initiate experienced symbolic “death” and “rebirth,” purified by the Goddess Isis.  The cult mainly concerned itself with concepts of material sacrifice (such as fasting and donations of wealth), and rituals involving symbolic death and the revelations of cult secrets. Unlike other mystery religions, there were both yearly rituals and daily services.  Rodney Stark suggests that the cult of Isis was the largest competitor for Christianity in the Empire, especially concerning the inclusion of women as priests and worshipers equally. I will go in the next chapter in the details of iconography of the Virgin Mary which often bears similarity to Isis, and Isis’ titles such as the “Queen of Heaven”  a reference to the Virgin still used. Finally, Osiris’s promise of eternal life (through his sacrifice) for his followers has clear parallels to early Christian understandings of Christ.

    Symbols of Christianity

    Christ and Trinity
    Christ and Trinity

    Certainly Christianity combined a bit of religious syncretism with quite unique selling propositions (see “Isis, Mithras and Jesus: Clash of male and female Archetypes in classical Rome“.  All religions did that and some are only cut and past or heretical offshoots.  Certainly the Egyptian culture has influenced much of the world over a period of centuries and millennia.  The Egyptian religion was, like that of many cultures, polytheistic and pantheistic at the same time and for a brief period even henotheistic,  often referred as first attempt to a monotheistic belief system. Religions are based on myths and beliefs, hence must be based on archetypes.

    A scholarly fashion claims that only by coincidence Christ and not the Egyptian Isis or the Persian Mithras gained the upper hand as a world religion. There is some truth in it, but also an utter disregard of the attractiveness of Christianity at that time and uniqueness of its offering. A globalized  Roman Imperia created a market of religions. Furthermore the exclusive – or shall I say smart – Christian religious offerings took in account the Romans’religious preferences and the  weaknesses of the many competing religions and cults. Its explosive growth was supported by a successful sociological approach and a savvy management style – strategic global, acting locally but centralizing its control over teachings. But most of all on powerful symbols and archetypes. So let us in this article analyze Jesus’ many faces, using Jungian methodology of symbols and archetypes.

    The cross

    The first assertion which can be made is, that the cross – was a known  symbol of Quaternity, explained here, and not only  a representation of the instrument of Jesus’ execution.  The Christian cross probably represents a melding of the real crucifix shape with the solar cross as a bit of religious syncretism. The cross has been always a symbol of the four cardinal directions and the four winds. Hence, the solar associations of the cross, calls on another archetype as symbol of the Crucifixion. That’s true enough but falsifies nothing.

    The resurrection

    When it comes to Egyptian sources of the Christ myth,  the Isis/Osiris/Horus myth,  by Plutarch, goes as follows: Set, the evil brother of the good Osiris, murders that god and cuts his body into 14 pieces. Isis, the wife of Osiris collects and reassembles the pieces, minus one, the phallus (such thirteen the unlucky number). She copulates – without phallus – with the dead god in the form of a bird, conceives Horus and gives birth to him and let him raise in secret. Osiris becomes resurrected from the dead, although only as God of the underworld. When Horus comes of age he does battle with his uncle Set. The physical resurrection of Osiris, even though it is in the underworld, is a significant precursor to Jesus as a dying and rising god, found in many other Indian, Asian and classical myths. Surprisingly, Joseph fails to mention this bit of classical mythology. Horus being born and nursed in the rushes of an island in the Nile is an important parallel to the infant Moses being found among the rushes. The underworld and hell is an old construct.

    The virgin madonna

    isis-and-nursing-horus the child (black maddonna)
    isis-and-nursing-horus the child (black maddonna)

    However, besides the resurrection of Osiris, there are other parallels between the Egyptian myth and the New Testament like the – sort of – virgin birth. Isis with the dead body of Osiris prefigures the imagery of the Pieta. More importantly, Christians definitely took over the imagery of Isis and the infant Horus in the form of the Madonna and child. Certainly, the virgin birth and the elevation of the Virgin Mary in the Gospel of Luke reflects pagan influences on the Christ myth, which can be seen in the Lucan Nativity and which sharply contrast to the messianic/Davidic kingship motifs of Matthew. As previously noted. Luke’s Nativity seems to be based on Egyptian panels from Luxor dating to the 18th dynasty and the reign of Queen Hatshepsut.

    The panels from Luxor depict the mother of Hatshepsut being told she will bear the divine child. Next, the god Amon-Ra consorts with Hatshepsut’s mother. Then the divine child (Hatshepsut) is adored by gods and mortals. This is probably the source of Luke’s Nativity. Mary is told by the angel Gabriel she will bear the divine child. The Holy Spirit overshadows her. Then angels and mortals (shepherds) adore Jesus. Copulating with Amon Ra was part of the standard Egyptian royal myth of each Pharaoh. Amon Ra, taking his father’s mortal form to have sexual relations with the Pharaoh’s mother here even more important because Hatshepsut, a rare female Pharaoh had to prove rank and heavily decent, because as a female, she was assumed to have ordinary mortal origins.

    Christ birthday

    The December 25 — is significant, but Mithra in his solar aspect as Sol Invictus (Latin for “Unconquered Sun”). The reason Mithra/Sol Invictus was born on December 25 was that in the Roman calendar of that day, that was the Winter Solstice, the 24-hour period having the fewest number of daylight hours.  True,  Christianity had a nasty habit to hijack pagan holiday, so the birthday of Mithra as a way of occupying a rival’s holiday.

    The three magi

    Furthermore there is one astronomical event the Christ myth. This is obvious with the magi following the star in the Nativity story of Matthew. In the original Greek of the New Testament, what is translated as “wise men” is magi, that is, Zoroastrian holy men. The Greek word magos is the source of our words mage, magic and magician. Second, Matthew nowhere says how many magi came to Jerusalem. So where did we ever get the idea there were three of them? Also, if they were actually following a star, it would have led them directly to Bethlehem. The star doesn’t actually lead the magi until they have been told by Herod’s scribes to go to Bethlehem. Only then does the following happen (Mt. 2:9–11). It is in these three gifts, along with the eastern origin of the magi, that we see the key to the actual myth in Matthew’s Nativity, which is political. Throughout Mathews Nativity account, the gospel’s author takes great pains to find fulfilled prophecies showing Jesus to be the messiah of the Davidic line of kings. He is born in Bethlehem because that was David’s home town, and Jesus must be born there to fulfill the prophecy in Micah 5:2, which the chief priests and scribes quote to Herod when the magi ask where the baby is that is born to be king of the Jews (Mt. 2:5, 6). So Bethlehem’s mythic associations have to do with Davidic kingship, not astrology. The three gifts also reflect Davidic kingship, since the Queen of Sheba gave King Solomon rich and kingly gifts (1 Kings 10:10). These included a great quantity of gold and, by implication, since Sheba, or Saba was located in modern Yemen, at the southern end of the Red Sea, frankincense and myrrh. Sheba, or Saba, in Yemen is at the southern end, the point of origin of an ancient caravan route that stretched from Yemen to Damascus called the “Incense Route,” since what was traded from the southern end of the Red Sea were two forms of incense, frankincense and myrrh. Thus, the infant Jesus received from the magi the same gifts given to Solomon by the Queen of Sheba.

    The passion myth

    Easter in the Passover season was probably originally a festival of first fruits, that is, a seasonal, agricultural festival relating to rebirth. However, Jewish seasonal festivals relating to a cyclic view of time were recast in messianic, apocalyptic terms as historical and related to a linear concept of time. In the case of Jewish belief, I believe it’s safe to say that the linear, historical view effectively eclipsed the original seasonal festival. Since the Christian Passion and Resurrection narratives reintroduce a dying and rising god meme into the holiday, the layering of Easter becomes far more complex. Easter blends apocalyptic messianism, emphasizing Christ’s death and resurrection as the critical turning point in God’s war with Satan, and portraying Jesus as the culmination of Israel’s hopes and dreams, with the dying and rising god motif, and the promise to Christians that they, too, would transcend death. It must also be remembered that the cult of Isis and Osiris, which spread through the Roman Empire about a century before the time of Jesus, was not entirely the same as the millennia old Egyptian fertility cult it had originally been. Rather, it was, in all probability, Hellenized and showed some of the refinements of Greek philosophy.  As to the sighting of Easter near the time of the Vernal Equinox, we must remember that the Passion is staged during Passover. There is a complex layering here that is lost if we simply relegate Easter to a celebration of the Vernal Equinox.

    The Number 12

    Jesus having 12 disciples relates more to Jewish Messianism. The 12 disciples relate to the 12 tribes of Israel, which, though they no longer existed as political entities, were important  to the extent that Paul could confidently claim to be of the tribe of Benjamin (Romans 11:1). Actually, there were 13 tribes, 12 plus the priestly tribe of Levites. Each tribe originally supported the Levitical priesthood and maintained the central shrine for one month a year. The division of the tribes worshipping Yahweh into 12 divisions may well reflect influences of the lunar calendar.

    Jesus’ crown of thorns

    Jesus’ crown of thorns, along with most of the specific details of the Passion — his being clothed in a purple robe and given a reed as a scepter, the mocking and scourging by the Roman troops, even his being put to death — were probably elements of the Zagmuku Festival, coming from Babylon after their captivity there (587–538 BC). Elements of this festival are to be found in the entirely fictional Book of Esther and the celebration of the Jewish holiday of Purim.

    Astronomical interpretation of mystery cults – Astral Religions

     Age of Taurus, Aries, Fish and Aquarius

    Aeons of Zodiac
    Aeons of Zodiac

    The dawn of Christianity coincided with the Symbol of the fish and its trouble with dawn of Aquarius. When Jung was dying in 1961, age-old and terminally ill from heart problems, his thoughts circled round the Far Eastern practice of the rebirth. Now, so he entrusted friends, he will probably learn shortly what the Self is all about. In 1958 Jung, in a writing with the title “a modern myth”, he had forecast the coming world order in the sign of the Aquarius: “Now we approach”, he announced, “the big change, with the entry of the spring equinox we expect the coming world order in Aquarius”  with “secular changes of the collective psyche”. Jung’ assistant , Aniela Jaffé tied it with transition with the (decline) of the Christianity whose symbol is the fish. She claims, that possibly thousand years ago – as the second part of the Pisces sign was touched, the age of the Antichrist begun whose climax we experience right now.

    The precession of the Earth and the Great or Platonic Year

    The zodiac is a spherical celestial coordinate system. It designates the ecliptic as its fundamental plane and the position of the Sun at Vernal equinox as its prime meridian in 12 equal parts. In astronomy, the zodiacal constellations are a convenient way of marking the ecliptic (the Sun’s path across the sky) and the path of the moon and planets along the ecliptic.  The gradual shift in the orientation of Earth’s axis of rotation changes the apparent position of the vernal equinox through all twelve traditional constellations of the zodiac, at the rate of about 2150 years for one of them (called a Great Month) in a full cycle of ca. 26,000 years (called a Great or Platonic Year). We have entered or will enter the Aquarian Age and looks like the beauty of it lies in the beholder.

    newWorldOrder

    The edge established between Pisces and Aquarius locates the beginning of the Aquarian Age around the year 2150. C.G. Jung followed interpretation that the Age of Aquarius will begin in AD 1997 but in the Mayan Calendar / Egyptian Cycle of the Phoenix begins AD 21 December 2012. We live indeed in emotional and intellectual disturbed times. .

    The reason of the Great Year is an axial precession of the earth similar to the precession of a spinning top due to gravity. The precession of the Earth’s axis has a number of observable effects. First, the positions of the celestial poles appear to move in circles against the space-fixed backdrop of stars, completing one circuit in 25,772 Julian years (2000 rate). Thus, while today the star Polaris lies approximately at the north celestial pole, this will change over time, and other stars will become the “alignment star” for star gazers. Secondly, the position of the Earth in its orbit changes relative to the backdrop of the stars and therefore also the vernal equinox slowly regresses a full 360 degree through all twelve traditional constellations of the zodiac, at the rate of about 50.3 seconds of arc per year.

    Modern astronomy aside, all religions and cultures have recognized the vernal equinox for thousands of years. The date is significant in Christianity because Easter always falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the vernal equinox. It is also probably no coincidence that early Egyptians built the Great Sphinx so that it points directly toward the rising Sun on the day of the vernal equinox. The first day of spring also marks the beginning of the Persian New Year in the 3,000-year-old tradition of Zorastrianism. Other important advanced civilisations of the humanity – Maya, Sumerian, Chaldaean, Egypt’s, Chinese etc. – held a similar idea of the change of Aeon’s and interpreted it in religious and mythical traditions . ‘Aeon’ comes from the Greek and means “long time” originally a name of the old Persian eternity God czar’s van akaran (=time without end). In the numerous mystic schools of the later Gnosis, which heavily influence C.G. Jung, “Aeon”, loses this original meaning and  defines those long zodiac periods 0f 2150 years.

    The areas of the Platonic Year

    So every 2150 years, we enter a new Area. As has been shown, the defection the transition into the Aquarius depends on arbitrarily agreed zodiac borders of the constellations, the change the age cannot be defined rationally or exactly. Thus very different times were calculated up to now for the Age of Aquarius.  2012 aligned with the Mayan calendar) and 2146 were given. The latter number arises if one defines the (Western notation) year 1 A.D. or Jesus as a beginning of this Pisces age. C.G.Jung has dated such a change of “Aeons” in his work, hence, on 1997.  Lets have a short look to the ages:

     Aeons

     YEARS

     FOCUS

     ARCHETYPES

     NOTES

     1 Age of Aquarius

     (AD 2150 to 4300)

    Aquarian age will foster in a period of mass consciousness. Furthermore we saw the appearance of dictators, extreme self-expression. Traits of Aquarius such as being ‘humanitarian’ but at the same time ‘unemotional’ may indicate to the emergence of active trans-governmental organisations and global “solidarity” movements. Alternatively, it may indicate individual New Age spiritual awakening.

     Aquarius Symbol of Chaos

    12 Age of Pisces

    (AD 1 to 2150)

    Christianity (Monotheism, Spirituality) The Age of Pisces is characterized by the rise of Christianity (founded 1st Century) and Buddhism (founded 6th to 4th Century BC) due to the “spiritual” nature of Pisces to go beyond the boundaries of the physical world.

    Fish Symbol of Christianity

     11 Age of Aries

     (2150 BC to 1 AD)

    Old Testament (War and Fire) When Moses descended from the mountain with the ten commandments (c. 17th – 13th century BC, the end of the Age of Taurus), he instructed the worshippers of the golden calve to be killed. Represents Moses “killing” the bull and ending the Age of Taurus, starting his Age of Aries.

    Ram Symbol of Jews

     10 Age of Taurus

    (4300 to 2150 BC)

    Earth, Agriculture: This age is notable for theEgyptian and Iranian Empire. Mithra was the Iranian god of the sun, justice, contract, and war in pre-Zoroastrian Iran. Mithras in the Roman Empire during the 2nd and 3rd centuries ad,  was honoured as the patron of loyalty to the emperor wit the “slying bull Icon. They personify structure, solidity, stability and attempts at eternity,  ‘strength’ but at the same time ‘sensuality’ may be attributed to civilizations such as Ancient Egypt’s and Persians.

    Bull Symbol of fertility cults

     9 Age of Gemini

    (6450 to 4300 BC)

    Trading: During this age writing developed, and trade started to accelerate. Both writing and trade (including messaging) are traditional archetypes belonging to the ruling planet Mercury or Gemini. The wheel, is an archetypes associated with it.

    Gemini

     8 Age of Cancer

    (8600 to 6450 BC)

    The Age of the Great Mother: Settlements and Farming: The Neolithic Revolution, including the beginning of civilization, with domestication and farming nomadic people settled down to living in permanent dwellings. Cancer is always associated with ‘protection’ by utilizing an external barrier

    Cancer

     7 Age of Leo

    (10,500- 8000 BC)

    The Golden Age: De-glaciation of what now constitutes much of the  habitable world. Leo is a Fire sign and is traditionally ruled by the Sun.

     Leo

     6 Age of Virgo

     12650 – 10500 BC End of last Ice Age. Clay Pottery. First intensive hunter-gatherer culture. First agriculture in near East.

     5 Age of Libra

     13800- 12650 BCLascaux cave paintings. Arrival of humans in America across Bering land bridge.

     4 Age of Scorpio

     14800- 12650 BC

     3 Age of Sagittarius

     16950- 14800 BC

      2 Age of Capricorn

     19000- 16950 BC


    Christianity as astral religion

    According to this scheme the Age of Taurus (the Bull) was ending or had ended when Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt and was being superseded by the Age of Aries (the Ram). This age was, in turn, superseded by the Age of Pisces, in which we live, but which is now winding down. It will soon be followed by the Age of Aquarius, hence the song by the same name from the musical Hair. The blowing of the shofar, specifically a ram’s horn, and other symbols indicate that Judaism came, initially, out of the Age of Aries. Since Christianity came into being at the beginning of the Age of Pisces, fish symbolism is particularly common in the New Testament. Thus Jesus tells the fishermen he recruits (Mark 1:17), “Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.” Thus he feeds the multitude with loaves and fishes, and thus the fish is a Christian symbol. So, was the fish imagery in the New Testament a reference to the Age of Pisces? When Jesus spoke of the “end of the age,” was he referring to the transition from the Piscean to Aquarian age some 2,000 plus years into the future? More maybe than yes. First we must assume that the story of the golden calf in Exodus refers, as it would seem, to general idolatry. Fish certainly are major  images in the New Testament. Yet so are olive trees, fig trees, sheaves of grain, and, particularly, sheep and lambs.

    Mithras cult as astral religion

    Mithräum Nida (Frankfurt a. M. - Heddernheim)Ärchaologisches Museum Frankfurt am Main
    Mithräum Nida (Frankfurt a. M. – Heddernheim)Ärchaologisches Museum Frankfurt am Main

    The astromical explanation of the tauroctony is based on two facts. First, every figure found in the standard tauroctony has a parallel among a group of constellations located along a continuous band in the sky: the bull is paralleled by Taurus, the dog by Canis Minor, the snake by Hydra, the raven by Corvus, and the scorpion by Scorpio. Second, Mithraic iconography in general is pervaded by explicit astronomical imagery: the zodiac, planets, sun, moon, and stars are often portrayed in Mithraic art (note for example the stars around the head of Mithras in the carving of the tauroctony illustrated above); in addition, numerous ancient authors speak about astronomical subjects in connection with Mithraism. In the writings of the Neoplatonic philosopher Porphyry, for example, we find recorded a tradition that the cave which is depicted in the tauroctony and which the underground Mithraic temples were designed to imitate was intended to be “an image of the cosmos.” Given the general presence of astronomical motifs in Mithraic art and ideology, the parallel noted above between the tauroctony-figures and constellations is unlikely to be coincidence but of course a coincidence is never a proof in history.

    Historical evidence of Christianity

    “The Age of Freedom”  and political implications

    As I said before, the historical Jesus became meaningless but certainly is attractive. The cynical view  history – the story of the past, told at present for present purpose has never been so true,  The mentioned movie Zeitgeist asserts that Christianity was, in fact, developed by the Romans as a means of social control. He cites the Council of Nicaea in 325 as the beginning of it.  I would say the Romans tolerated Christianity as they considered it politically harmless, that is true and it had followers in high ranks. However who wants to understand, why academic Europeans turned to Indian gurus in the sixties and a sacral religion of supra-nationalism today, should rather read Jung than Freud; Jung is a precursor of that capitalism and civilisation criticism which becomes more than valid  in view of the menacing economic and spiritual disasters of literally dying societies.

    Though there are no parallel verses to this in the New Testament, it also proclaims the imminent end of the world (John. 5: 28, 29):

    Do not marvel at this, for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his [Jesus’] voice and come forth, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.

    Secularism in the West and  not bring enlightenment but a soft totalitarian Socialism in partnership with the New World Order of the “Masters of the Universe”.  Presumably before the start of the current global mess and violence, the age of the Aquarius promises an era of nonconformity and individualism defined by qualities like tolerance, openness and a non-egalitarian but elitarian world bourgeoisie. I don’t think elitarian is a word, but more feudalism and hidden goals. Hence, the Aquarius Age by worldwide interlinking and globalisation it creates the base to centralize the problems of the humanity worldwide essentially in a post democratic way but there is also a decentralized counter movement.  The New World Order or the emergence of a totalitarian trans-national government seem more likely than the anticipated new human millennium the musical anticipated.

    A not so secretive power elite with a globalist agenda will eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government— replacing sovereign nation-states—and an all-encompassing propaganda that ideologizes its establishment as the culmination of history’s progress. Numerous historical and current events can be seen as steps to achieve world domination through financial powers and manipulated decision-making processes.  Pope Francis urged the world on 2014 to shed its apathy in the face of what he characterizes as a third world war, intoning “war is madness”, The pope said “even today, after the second failure of another world war, perhaps one can speak of a third war, one fought piecemeal, with crimes, massacres, destruction.” Pope Francis said also these wars are driven by “interests, geopolitical strategies, lust for money and power, and there is the manufacture and sale of arms.”

    Both the church and academia have gotten along successfully without the historical Jesus for centuries. The historical Jesus, the human being who walked the roads of ancient Israel, gathered disciples, and was executed by the Romans, is often contrasted with the “Christ of faith,” a supra-historical figure whose presence in the world has enlivened and nourished Christian communities. The latter has always been far more important for most Christians.

    Was there a real jesus?

    marc-chagall-agape
    marc-chagall-agape

    Many have assaulted on the historicity of Jesus, claiming that, outside the New Testament, there is no indication that Jesus ever existed.

    Was there a real Jesus? While the historical evidence is meager, it does exist. In his Antiquities of the Jews, book 20, chapter 9, item 1, referring to the execution of James, Josephus refers to him as the brother of “Jesus, who was called the Christ.” It is quite plain that Josephus didn’t see Jesus as the Christ (Christos, the Greek word meaning “anointed”), he merely recorded that James’ brother was the Jesus who had been called or was alleged to be the Christ .The Roman historian Tacitus said about Jesus early in the second century. Concerning rumors that had spread that Nero had deliberately set fire to the city of Rome, Tacitus says (The Annals of Imperial Rome, Book 1, Chapter 15):

    To suppress this rumor, Nero fabricated scapegoats — and punished with every refinement the notoriously depraved Christians (as they were called). Their originator, Christ, had been executed in Tiberius’ reign by the governor of Judea, Pontius Pilatus. But in spite of this temporary setback the deadly superstition had broken out afresh, not only in Judea (where the mischief had started) but even in Rome. All degraded and shameful practices collect and flourish in the capitol.

    That Tacitus is obviously a hostile witness makes it much more likely that he accepted Jesus as a real person. Had he reason to suspect he was nothing more than a fabrication, Tacitus would certainly have said so. That author’s claim that Jesus had been executed by Pontius Pilate could only have come from one of two possible sources: Either Tacitus knew this to be true from extant imperial records or he was repeating what Christians themselves had said of Jesus. Were Jesus a mythical character they had invented, they certainly wouldn’t have gone out of their way to invent his being a criminal who had been executed.

    Why is there so much attention now to the person of Jesus? Is it part of our interest in people’s private stories, an impulse that multiplies talk shows and sells People magazine? Is it our need to humanize our heroes to make them more accessible? Is it part of the search for roots, and our desire to reclaim our pasts in a way that contributes meaning to our present? Is it simply part of humankind’s enduring interest in religion, which takes many forms, but never really fades? The answer is probably a bit of each.

    Truth is the story of the past told at present for present purpose.
    Truth is the story of the past told at present for present purpose.

    In fact, the current wave of books constitutes a third quest for the historical Jesus. The first largely Protestant quest — from the late eighteenth to the late nineteenth century — breathed the air of the Enlightenment, presenting Jesus in utterly rational terms, explaining his miracles as natural phenomena, and depicting him as a teacher of timeless wisdom. It came to a close with Albert Schweitzer’s book, The Quest for the Historical Jesus, published in 1906. He concluded that the historical Jesus must be a “stranger and an enigma.” The Jesus designed by nineteenth-century rationalists never had any existence. Furthermore, what little we could know about this Jesus was irrelevant to theology. Jesus means something to our world because a mighty spiritual force streams forth from Him and flows through our time also,” wrote Schweitzer, “This fact can neither be shaken nor confirmed by any historical discovery.” The current generation of Jesus researchers have similarly bracketed questions of theology.

    The second quest was centered in Germany in the 1950s and 60s, led by Ernst Kasemann and others who were influenced by and in reaction to the towering New Testament scholar Rudolf Bultmann, who argued that most the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ life grew out of the mythos of the early church. These scholars argued that Christian theology could not be cut off from history and developed a set of criteria for deciding what is historical in the gospels. Although their existentialist theology now seems dated, many of their rules for assessing historicity continue to be utilized, for example by the current “Jesus Seminar,” a group of scholars re-examining the synoptic traditions and particularly the sayings of Jesus. They have produced The Five Gospels, a work that evaluates the four canonical gospels and the non-canonical Gospel of Thomas for authentic sayings of Jesus.

    Despite how often the question of recovering the Jesus of history has been declared hopeless, it has nevertheless generated a vast literature. What distinguishes the latest crop of Jesus scholars from their predecessors is that they understand Jesus within the context of Jews and Judaism in the first century.  This generation also has access to more materials. The Dead Sea Scrolls, only recently available to a wide range of scholars, do not mention Jesus, but they do illuminate a brand of apocalyptic thought and expectation alive in the first century. The urgency of the impending apocalypse that John the Baptist and Jesus preached has been muted by 2,000 years of church history, but the Dead Sea Scrolls remind us that many expected the end of the world would be violent and imminent.

    In addition to the information from the Qumran materials, recent archaeological finds correspond to details of the Gospel stories of Jesus. The skeleton of a crucified man was discovered in Israel on Giv’at ha Mivtar. His ankle bones were pierced and his legs broken, giving evidence of the nature of Roman crucifixion. In 1990, archaeologists discovered an ossuary containing the bones of Joseph Caiaphas, the high priest who interrogated Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew and is mentioned in the Gospels of Luke and John.

    A number of different portraits of Jesus have emerged. Marcus Borg portrays Jesus as a religious ecstatic, a teacher of wisdom and a social prophet, focused on the present. “Jesus’ relation to the Spirit was the source of everything that he was”, Borg claims. Burton Mack describes Jesus as a Jewish Cynic, a popular sage who shocked people into understanding with his sharp and disturbing sayings. Like Borg, he sees Jesus as focused on the present state of the world, a dispenser of timeless truths. Crossan pictures him as a preacher of radical egalitarianism, addressing a peasant society suffering in political and economic straits, offering a message of healing: “You are healed healers, so take the kingdom to others, for I am not its patron and you are not its brokers. It is, was, and always will be available to any who want it.”

    As these scholars further hone their theories, certain issues dominate the emerging picture of the historical Jesus:

    Jesus preached the kingdom of God, not himself. This kingdom is about God, not Jesus himself, and is on earth. It addresses two main concerns of peasants: bread and death. I am not surprised, that the he historical Jesus and the Jesus of the early church bear little resemblance to one another. Even more tenuous is the connection between the historical Jesus and later Christianity. Contemporary Jesus scholars seem to agree one can be a good Christian without knowing a bit about this Jesus of history. The flesh-and-blood Jesus in the late ’20s of the first century gave way to the reconstructed and interpreted Jesus of the gospels in the 70s and ’80s and was superseded by the “Christ of faith” of the later church. When believers speak of their faith in Jesus, it is this last figure to which they refer.
    Jesus’ view of himself also differed widely from the early church’s. Whether he saw himself as the Messiah is debatable, but he almost certainly did not see himself as divine. His followers, and even a non-believer like the Jewish historian Josephus, recall Jesus as a healer, exorcist, and miracle worker. Interestingly, his detractors neither call him a fraud, nor say the miracles were faked, but attribute his powers to Satan or demons.
    Except for a few of the women, the bulk of Jesus’ followers abandoned him at the time of his death. Nor did his family seem to support him during his ministry. At one point (Mark 3:20-2 1), they think he is possessed.
    Remarkably, Jesus’ death did not mark the end of his movement. His followers continued to believe in his message of God’s Kingdom. Other apocalyptic leaders have arisen throughout the course of Jewish history. When Jesus’ followers, probably in hiding somewhere, heard he was dead, it did not spell the end of his group. Somehow, hope persisted and was transmuted into a force that changed history. Anyone who looks at maps of established churches in the late first, second, and third centuries cannot help but marvel at the rapid spread of Christianity. There are treasons for that: History of Christianity: Success factors and USP’s. The persistence and extraordinary growth of Jesus’ following after his death no miracle. Indeed, the transformation of some disappointed followers of Messianism into a dynamic movement is one of the fascinating stories of history as Rodney Stark has written about in “The Rise of Christianity”

    Jesus & Mary Magdalene were ‘married with children,’

    Yet another story
    Yet another story

    I love the stories of Mary Magdalene, no only from a Jungian point of view. That Jesus was a devoted family man with two kids and Mary Magdalene for his wife, new history book always based on an ancient manuscripts claim every other year also 2014.

    Claims that Jesus was married have been published before. One of the latest cases was the 2012 discovery of an Egyptian papyrus fragment, which some scholars believed to be the first explicit reference to Jesus being married.  There most plausible and enigmatic story is connected with the Cathars. In “A Jungian journey through a land of heretics and Mary Magdalene” I have written a bit of it.  The anti-CatharErmegaud deBeziers and Durand de la Huesca wrote that the Cathars secretly taught that Mary Magdalene was the wife or concubine of Christ;and also that she was the woman ‘taken in adultery’ who Christ had saved from the Jews who wanted to stone her. According to his story, after Jesus’ death (or  ascend into heaven) she flew and moved to France. Petit Provence is the region in southern France adjacent to Aude andHerault where Mary Magdalene and the others came ashore at St.Maries de la Mer. A painting of Mary Magdalene is at the Church in LesSaintesMaries de la Mer, which is west of Marseille showing the boat carrying Lazarus, Martha, Mary Magdalene and a young girl named Sarah. Also the sister of the Virgin Mary and several others are shown on the boat. Often the jar in Mary Magdalene’s hand signifies the blood of Jesus. Left is the painting of the Crucifixion from the Basilica Sainte-Marie-Madeleine et le Couvent Royal, in St.Maximin. This is where Mary Magdalene was buried. She is shown at the foot of the cross in a very beautiful almost intimate pose.

    Sandro_Botticelli_Lamentation over dead Christ
    Sandro_Botticelli_Lamentation over dead Christ
    800px-Sandro_Botticelli_excerptMaryMagdalene
    Sandro_Botticelli_Lamentation over dead Christ _ecerpt Mary Magdalene

    From this allegations has arisen something of a conspiracy theory: It has it that knowledge of Christ’s alleged relationship with Mary (and perhaps proof thereof) passed from the Cathars to the Knights Templar. It was to remove the threat of this great secret, potentially damaging as it supposedly was to the Church, that the Catholic establishment suppressed the Templars, a century after the Albigensian Crusade. Although the theory probably has a particular appeal to those with a latent penchant for goddess worship in both cases, eliminating of the Cathars and the Templars was pure politics and greed. Many esoterics have additionally speculated that Mary Magdalene was herself of royal blood, or a priestess of some Isis/Ishtar cult, and that the Cathars and Templars regarded her almost as the embodiment of the feminine aspect of the divine and the personification of holy wisdom (Sophia to the Gnostics). Another theory has Mary and Jesus founding a dynasty, which fused with the Merovingian line.

    I saw Mary Magdalene statues or paintings in almost ever church. extensively in Rennes-le-Chateau. It must be remembered that she was a legitimate Catholic Saint. Her supposed relics had been claimed by the Benedictine Monks of Vezelay in Burgundy, Central France. The cult was in evidence there from the mid eleventh century. The abbey claimed that the relics had been brought there centuries before by a monk who had retrieved them from their original shrine near Aix in Provence, where Mary had supposedly been lain to rest after spending 30 years living as a hermit in a remote cave called la Sainte Baume .Mary Magdalene is usually thought of as the second-most important woman in the New Testament after Mary. Mary Magdalene traveled with Jesus as one of his followers. She was present at Jesus’ two most important moments: the crucifixion and the resurrection. Within the four Gospels, the oldest historical record mentioning her name, she is named at least 12 times more than most of the apostles.  In the New Testament, Jesus cleansed her of “seven demons”,[Lk. 8:2] [Mk. 16:9].

    Conclusion

    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Mary Magdalen
    RENNES-LE-CHATEAU Mary Magdalene

    The images of Jesus throughout history are as varied as the people who have embraced him, the Son of God, the Divine Word by whom the world was created, the Passover sacrifice on behalf of the people, the Suffering Servant who takes on the sins of the world, the lesser Prophet, or more recently, Jesus the liberator of the oppressed, the New Age Sun God of the heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten, or a simple tabloid Jesus in love with a woman. The careful reader reader might have noticed, not only in this essay, that I am even fond of the myth around Mary Magdalene. However, each Zeitgeist and generation sees in Jesus a reflection of itself, but the Jesus archetype as cultural pattern C.G. Jung likened to the Self has been alive for 2000 years and is here to stay. That is the essence of C.G. Jung’s archetype, to be in the collective memory, constantly be reborn as symbol. And that is the power Christianity utilized to win and still has. I touched on the lecture about the Roman Mithras cult recently; interestingly almost the complete audience were rather, rather mature women and men. They listened approvingly like they would have done hundred years ago to a sermon, nodding happily on every suggestion that Christianity might have borrowed from Mithras Cult, like this would somewhat invalidate Christianity.  However, archetypes are not owned by any religion,  every religion uses archetypes in its narrative. They quote each other like another cultural achievement – great art. An exception of the rule is the archetype of Jesus – a god became human, died and became alive again and went to heaven.  This archetype is destined to stay, even if after Christianity eases in the mental fog  and violent turmoil of radical globalization and neo-feudalism. Religions get created, prosper and die, archetypes transcend history and reality but are stunningly real.

    Bibliography

    • The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy (Yale Nota Bene),  Stoyanov, Yuri
    • The Cathars: The Rise and Fall of the Great Heresy by  Sean Martin
    • Gnosticism and Early Christianity by R. M. Grant
    • Jesus Wars Harper, 2010 by Phillip Jenkins
    • C.G. Jung,  Aion Untersuchungen zur Symbolgeschichte
    • A History of Egypt from the Earliest Times to the Persian Conquest, James Henry Breasted Kindle-Edition
    • The Religions of Ancient Egypt and Babylonia A. H. (Archibald Henry) Sayce Kindle-Edition
    • Malcolm Barber & Keith Bate (translators & editors), The Templars: Selected Sources (Manchester Medieval Sources Series, Manchester University Press, 2002)
    • The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries by Rodney Stark
    • The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia–and How It Died by Philip Jenkins
    • Historia Mundi Volume IV, Lehnen Verlag,  Die Kirche zur Zeit der Apostel und Märtyrer
    • The Cults of the Roman Empire, Robert Turcan
    • Haskins, S.  Mary Magdalene: Myth and meaning,  (1993) New York, NY: Riverhead Books
    • Mithra: The Pagan Christ


    Earlier Gnostic Writings and Cathar Texts

    • The Cathar religion represents a major medieval resurgence of Gnosticism, and we offer an important collection of Cathar Texts, including the complete manuscript of the Lyon Ritual, Interrogatio Iohannis, and The Book of the Two Principles.
    • While the Nag Hammadi Library represents the richest  source of classical Gnostic texts, many other primary Gnostic documents were discovered in the century prior to the Nag Hammadi find.  These are cataloged in the Classical Gnostic Scriptures and Fragments section.
    • Of associated interest is the Christian Apocrypha and Early Christian Literature, a section containing other important Christian texts surviving outside canonical tradition, some of which manifest Gnostic influence.
    • The G.R.S Mead Collection contains over a dozen volumes written by G. R. S. Mead (1863-1933), one the greatest early scholars of Gnosticism.  These works provide an invaluable evaluation of texts relating to Gnostic tradition available before discovery of the Nag Hammadi collection.
    • Opinion about the tradition was primarily based on Works Against the Gnostics by the Church Fathers.  I included is a full text site search function.
    • A large sample of these  is presented in the Manichaean Writings collection, along with an introductory lecture.
    • Also included in the library is a section devoted to Mandaean Texts and this still living Gnostic tradition.

    Contemporary Gnostic Writings and Jungian Texts

    Alchemy was recognized by C. G. Jung as another strand of Gnosticism;

    The Nag Hammadi Library

    • Excerpt from Elaine Pagels’ excellent popular introduction to the Nag Hammadi texts.
    • The Nag Hammadi Library, a collection of thirteen ancient codices containing over fifty texts, was discovered in upper Egypt in 1945. This immensely important discovery includes a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures — texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define “orthodoxy” — scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library has provided impetus to a major re-evaluation of early Christian history and the nature of Gnosticism.
    • We have add extensive resources on two centrally important texts from Nag Hammadi: The Gospel of Thomas and The Secret Book of John. Multiple authoritative translations of several Nag Hammadi scriptures are included in the collection.
    • Valentinus and Valentinian Gnosis. Valentinus was one of the most influential Gnostic Christian teachers of the second century A.D., and was the only Gnostic considered for election as Bishop of Rome (Pope). He founded a movement which spread throughout Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Despite persecution by developing orthodoxies, the Valentinian school endured for over 600 years. A large number of texts in the Nag Hammadi collection are influence by Valentinian tradition. Due to its importance, we have a large section of the library dedicated specifically to Valentinus and the Valentinian Tradition.

    The Dead Sea Scrolls Collection

    • The Dead Sea Scrolls Collection in the Gnostic Society Library is one of the largest and most referenced Dead Sea Scroll resources on the internet. During the middle years of the twentieth century two important but very different collections of ancient religious texts were unearthed in Palestine and Egypt: the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library.
  • Rethinking the Banality of the Good

    Rethinking the Banality of the Good

    The Banality of the Good or for many the most evil man in the world right now, seems to be a  retired lieutenant colonel of the Russian KGB, who is determined to reestablish the Soviet empire, to invade world and was likened to Hitler by a leading politician of a superpower. To others, President Vladimir Putin is a judo-chopping, IMF-taming, U.S.-defying global hero. But according to  the controversial biography of  Stanislav Belkovsky, a star columnist at a Moscow tabloid,  former speechwriter and insider, Putin represents the “Banality of the Good” (quote).  The striking similarity with Hannah Arendt’s remark, one of the 20th century’s great political thinkers did catch my eye and let me finish his book, which has its weaknesses. Now if “being good” is all, after a string of rumours and dirty laundry, which may or may not be true, what Stanislav Belkovsky, sworn enemy of Putin, came up against him, there must be something unworthy with all of us, not belonging to the élite.  I long fancied to write a psychological study of Putin, motivated by the C.G. Jung interview of H.R. Knickerbocker 1938 in the Cosmopolitan , reprinted in C.G. Jung Speaks (page 115-135). To qualify the banality of the good (or the evil) I will follow C.G. Jung’s method, the money flow and the little I really know about the person Putin – that is some minor direct account, my own remote observation, his own account and what his enemies say.

    The Banality of the Good and Evil

    This is how one understands the banality of the good: In order to gain a sense of selfworthiness of a normal citizen, it is not needed to be an hero or to be sacrified on the cross. It is completely sufficient (and required) to take good care of and raising kids, pay taxes, go to work, obey rules and laws. And not because one would be punished hard for not obeying them, but because one sees them as mandatory and essential in a sense of the Kant’s imperative.

    The Banality of the Good is often likened to the secondary virtues or vices. Secondary virtue was an important term of the German positivism dispute in the 1970s / 1980s.  Secondary virtues or civic virtue characteristics were classified as those virtues, which contribute to the practical accomplishment of everyday tasks and a trouble-free” operation of a society without having intrinsic ethical significance, provided they are not used to implement the primary moral virtues but held up as means in itself: Diligence, loyalty, obedience, discipline, sense of duty, punctuality, reliability, tidiness, courtesy, cleanliness.  That one can with “secondary virtues” easily run a concentration camp, was thrown at a fomer German chancellor Helmut Schmidt once. And this very assessment, secondary virtues and having a tendency to choose “non-Machiavelli none-elite” friends,  was the most serious allegation Stanislav Belkovsky brought up, besides Putin’s alleged accumulated wealth. Interesting circle, bringing us back to Hannah Arendt’s banality of evil of which I have written here, isn’t it? 

    Putin through the eyes of C.G. Jung

    Putin’s Ego

    Starting point of the consideration is Putin’s reportedly rather unhappy childhood. It does not matter if the gossip version of the birth and childhood of Putin states is true, that the future Russian President was born two years before the date that is otherwise formally specified as a birthday of PutinLater, the mother gave her son to childless relatives who are officially recognized as the birth parents, in what was then Leningrad. This version is buzzing around again in MoscowStanislav Belkovsky  concludes from that Putin was looking for a father figure, which he had initially in Anatoly Sobchak, the former mayor of St. Petersburg, and later found in Boris Yeltsin. Second argument was Putin’s encounter with the – at that time – very effective hard working Germans gave him according to Stanislav Belkovsky a culture shock with lasing implications. 

    Putin’s Persona

    PutinPersona
    PutinPersona

    The Persona is  the “mask” helps us get by in the world, the ideal image we have of ourselves. We latch onto these social identities to define us, but as a part of the “collective psyche” they do not distinguish us in any significant way. For the persona of a public person you just look at the best spin and pictures in the media. The media nowadays are just hooker,s printing what they are told. It’s no secret that Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin carefully presents his reputation of masculinity with various publicity stunts and photo ops. First of all, let’s look at physique. Putin does have a certain eagerness to flaunt his bare chest, and there’s definitely a Rambo quality to the man when he starts going after wildlife.

    Vladimir Putin is a Culture Warrior. Every Jungian must admit his effort and success who he carefully constructs an archetypal warrior identity. Is seems,  most media and most of his fellow world leaders , that he receives more hate for presenting the archetype of a warrior than anything else. The imago’ range from tagging dangerous animals, to stopping wildfires, to playing with guns on vacation. Putin may not want  be the most popular guy in the world but he sure manages to be one of the most interesting. Even action-star Arnold Schwarzenegger can’t outdo this is original WWP . He does judo, which lacks the pure bestial blood lust of American football; but when not using others’ own strength against them, he likes to take to the outdoors. On a horse. With a gun. He hunts wild animals. Tigers. Bears. Moose. He prowls around the Siberian woods, with no shirt, as a variety of fearsome beasts. The Western media used to say – not anymore – iIt’s lucky he’s got affairs of state to distract him, or extinction rates of rate animals would double overnight. And when he’s not hunting, he’s hang-gliding: 2012 he led a flock of endangered cranes on their migration route.

    Putin’s Shadow

    04_Putin_shadow_g_w

    The Shadow lives within us another side of our personality that is filled with all those aspects of ourselves we hide away, both from ourselves or others, as unacceptable. The shadow has a “dark side,” what we find morally reprehensible – and often project into others, but it also has a “bright side” containing our potentialities .For the shadow of a public person again you just look at the worst public rumors and gossip printed by the mainstream media. Stanislav Belkovsky is good too, he must have compiled all dirt one can openly find and was given to him. Biographies are often books about the authors themselves and sometimes amalgam between most banal kitchen psychology, insider knowledge, personal experiences and spreading rumors.  If informal decision-making processes prevail, the hour of psychology is rife. Belkovsky  insinuates that Putin, who is divorced with two daughters, might be gay. Belkovsky offers little proof for any of this also for his allegation of wealth. He also acknowledges that people who crossed about Putin (except in one case) never meet unfortunate ends – he even gives plausible versions of the case of an  journalist and a KGB traitor, who both  died under mysterious circumstances. Stanislav Belkovsky shows Putin as weak, soft KGB bureaucrat responsible for interior work rather than the foreign Cold War agent. Stanislav Belkovsky says Putin is shy, and would much rather spend his time with four-legged friends. “Therein lies the real Putin. He flees from people and his obligations to nature. Here we have Vladimir’s best friends; the Labrador Conny and the Bulgarian shepherd dog Buffy, his only roommates in the presidential residence.” A Russian political scientist summed up Belkovsky this way: “he can be considered to be either a little crazy or a business-minded manipulator whose utterances are always well paid for by someone in advance.”

    Putin like the German Schroeder and Berlusconi all pariahs are all self made out of their own strength. That is true. Surely Putin is driven by business interests and under him the flourishing corruption is not as visible anymore but still seems to be there. Putin might be indeed, feel an end time ruler who either might slow the decay, or maybe stop it 

    From narcissism and paranoia 

    In another attack of kitchen psychology Stanislav Belkovsky differentiates two type of politicians the schizophrenic and the paranoid, the former creative enforces, do creating empires the latter manager and beholders soonly administering decay. I do agree with his thesis, only the mentally unstable go into politics (se my article Archetype of the vampire in todays culture of Narcissism). I think, however he meant narcissism and paranoia, and here, having had my own encounter with politics, he defintly  got some point. Putin  to him, is of course the weak paranoid.   Narcissism and paranoia sounds like a pathology and it often is. However, those are dynamic opposites of the psyche even in healthy subjects but can actually reach down to the severest forms of psychopathology. Healthy narcissism is the desire to be loved and to provide adequately for their own well-being, and a healthy paranoia setting corresponds to what is called healthy skepticism. In a balanced way both guarantors for mental health.  Stalin was a sever case of paranoia, and according to Jung not a creator just a devourer.  Narcissism and paranoia in a slightly or severe pathological form is found in almost any politician. Slight pathological paranoia includes distrust and to be a little suspicious with the tendency of principle: You never know Such a person is cautious, somewhat aloof but of course also vigilant. The basic feeling is that you should always be on guard.Well in regards to Putin, if so it served him well. There is a deliberate elusiveness of the Russian system, in which all sorts of conspiracy theories flourish. But according to a Russian saying, just because you’re paranoid,  it does not mean that you will not be prosecuted.

    Projection of the Westen Shadow

    Pojection ot the Western Shadow on Putin.
    Pojection ot the Western Shadow on Putin.

    Is Putin like Stalin? To quote C.G. Jung again: Stalin [..]  is, however, not a creator. Lenin, created; Stalin is devouring the brood. He is a conquistador; he simply took what Lenin made and put his teeth into it and devoured it. He is not even creatively destructive. Lenin was that. He tore down the whole structure of feudal and bourgeois society in Russia and replaced – it with is own creation. Stalin is destroying that. Mentally, Stalin is not so interesting as Mussolini, who resembles him in the fundamental pattern of his personality, and he is not anything like so interesting as the medicine man, the myth—Hitler. Anybody who takes command of one hundred and seventy million people as Stalin has done, is bound to be interesting, whether you like him or not. No, Stalin is just a brute—a shrewd peasant, an instinctive powerful, beast—no doubt in that way far the most powerful of all the dictators. He reminds one of a) Siberian saber-toothed tiger with that powerful neck, those sweeping mustaches, and that smile like a cat which has been eating cream. I should imagine that Genghis Khan might have been an early Stalin. I shouldn’t wonder if he makes himself Czar.

    Maybe not.

    The West has a bad habit of personalizing foreign affairs and demonizing uncooperative leaders. Remember when Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser was denounced as “Hitler on the Nile?”, “Khadaffi, Mad Dog of the Mideast?”, Assad  a butcher slaughter of the innocents, Hussein and many others. Vladimir Putin is the foreign bogeyman. He is being hysterically demonized by the  Western Media, an as we know we usually project out shadow in others.

     

    The Terror of the Good – Origins of Totalitarianism

    Journalists are awfully liberal, Arendt they
    Journalists are awfully liberal, Arendt they?

    I’ve read Hannah Arendt “Eichmann in Jerusalem” and “The Origins of Totalitarianism”, several times – it always amazes me. I find Arendt very hard to disagree with – she just seems so shrewd, so alert, annoyingly good at noticing everything that needs noticing; She must have it right. Writing 50 years ago, this great theorists of totalitarianism, noted that totality and irreversibility are related. It used to be thought that totalitarianism had repealed the law of history by which power sows the seeds of its own destruction. If sheer ruthless vigilance could destroy any center of opposition, even any island of independent thought, then — aside from external conquest, with humanitarian  pretext — totalitarian rule could never be reversed. Conversely, if total control fails due to today’s interconnected multipolar world, what happens to single-minded direction? If totalitarianism can decay, can it not be transformed? We don’t yet know. We know only that it can be modified. It can give way to a society with some space. How much? Well,  somewhat between 1984 with drones,  full coverage realtime surveillance and a brave new world of constructed realities – the terror of the Good.

    On 5 February 1794 Robespierre stated, “Terror is nothing else than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible.” The government in a war against terror is despotism of liberty against tyranny. Sounds like today’s war on terror. Stalin said “Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?” Well, we might have run out of ideas and ideals, but sure not of weapons. How much different is President Obama, when he declared gently that “we tortured some folks.  The West shrugged their shoulders, well than we tortured some folks.  Nobody is perfect, but we are exceptional.  This is the terror of the good, the soft terror for the good, but rather the banality of the evil than the banality of the good. My famous quote of Arendt is: The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.

    The ordinary average guy

    Certainly the terror of the Good is not the same as the Banality of the Good: do or not doing something without fear of being caught by temporal or heavenly police as Alan Watts once said. When I lived in California I could not avoid to stumble over this song.

    I’m just an ordinary average guy
    We all live ordinary average lives
    With average kids
    And average wives …
    And every Saturday we work in the yard
    Pick up the dog do
    Hope that it’s hard (whaf whaf)
    Take out the garbage and clean out the garage…
    Ordinary average average guys.

    We are getting in archetypes if not stereotypes, but the banality of the Good is not so banal after all, just like the banality of the Evil. In an essay for Foreign Affairs, Joshua Yaffa notes a fascinating way Putin has responded to what Stanislav Belkovsky, described as grumbling Haute-Volée in Moskow during his last election (he called them “Bildungsbürger” which I cannot really translate, something like educated class, bourgeoise, maybe the chattering classes is good here, a term often used in the media and by political commentators). Putin instead reached out to the average guy, channeling populist politicians in the rhetoric of class-warfare: This dynamic perhaps explains why by the end of the campaign season in February and March, Putin sought to stir up a kind of Russian class-based politics. As he saw it, he was the leader of rural and industrial Russia, defending the country from those unnamed forces that want, as he said in a campaign speech, “to interfere in our affairs, to force their will on us.” In this speech and others, Putin has tried to link in the public consciousness the country’s middle-class protestors to enemies abroad that would wish Russia ill. On the night of his victory, he told the employees of a tank factory, “You put in their places those people who went one step too far and insulted the working man.” The real “Russian people,” he went on to say, are the “worker and the engineer.”

    The banality of the good or the evil?
    The banality of the good or the evil?

    Putin through the eyes of the cultural war

    I said half-jokingly the other day that it’s sometimes hard to tell the reporting of Western mainstream media  between Soviet-era Russia and Putin-era Russia.  If you ignore the personal insults, it’s impossible to tell the difference between now and the Cold War after JFK. In many cases, Putin is closer to the US and Europa’s ideals and interests than its own élite and global financial oligarchy. Plain stereotypes of the cold war are applied from them every day, but this is not my topic here. Lets go back to C.G.  Jung.

    H.R. Knickerbocker asked the famous question: What would happen if you were to lock Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin in a room together and give them one loaf of bread and one pitcher of water to last them a week? Who would get all the food and water, or would they divide it? Jung’s answer included a cryptic remark:The true leader is always led. We can see it work in him. He himself has referred to his Voice.”  … “The demands of the unconscious act at first like a paralyzing poison on a man’s energy and resourcefulness, so that it may well be compared to the bite of a poisonous snake.

    Journalists are awfully liberal, Arendt they?
    Hillary Clinton, hardly a reasonable facsimile of gender icons going along.

    Let’s rephrase it, What would happen, if we were to lock Hillary, Merkel, Putin and Obama today  in a room together and give them one loaf of bread and one pitcher of water to last them a week? Putin seems to be a gentlemen but not a push over. The Russian president asked whether it would be worse to meet with Clinton than President Obama: “It’s better not to argue with women. But Ms Clinton has never been too graceful in her statements.”  From there, Putin added: “When people push boundaries too far, it’s not because they are strong but because they are weak. But maybe weakness is not the worst quality for a woman.”  So that is interesting, also with Mr. Merkel, there is divide of gender archetypes of a supposedly feminized west, calling this modern and a supposedly more traditional Russia with a positive image of the male archetype. I am not sure if this cultural war is the Russian response to a cultural revolution, or just one more warfare technique before an information, financial and hot/cold war.

    Putin and his friends and enemies

    Who is Putin? The question is as pressing today as it was 14 years ago when he became Russia’s president for the first timePutin’s supporters consider him the savior of Russia, opponents see him as a tyrannical ruler. Despite the rhetorical attacks on the chaotic conditions in Russia in the nineties Putin , Putin a heir of Yeltsin’ apparently made a deal with Yeltsin’s oligarchy (The Family”) between 2000 and 2004, but on his terms. From there on he seem to have accepted a mission which Mr. Putin’s role model, Czar Peter the Great, might have tolerated. The major oligarchs who survived under Putin are Roman Abramovich, Alexander Abramov, Oleg Deripaska, Mikhail Fridman, Mikhail Prokhorov, Alisher Usmanov, German Khan, Viktor Vekselberg, Leonid Michelson, Vagit Alekperov, Pyotr Aven, and still Vladimir Potanin and Vitaly Malkin.

    • Alisher Usmanov: The richest man in Russia and the 40th richest person in the world;
    • Oleg Deripaska: Aluminum magnate Deripaska embroiled in ‘yachtgate’;
    • Mikhail Prokorov: Ran as an independent candidate against Putin;
    • Roman Abramovich: The oil tycoon one of Putin’s closest allies.  He had a major dispute with Putin king-maker Boris Berezovsky, who committed suicide after loosing an $5 billion lawsuit against him.
    • Leonid Mikhelson: CEO of Novatek, one of Russia’slargest natural gas producers and art sponsor
    • Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Once the most wealthy Russian with Yukos oil, he’s now only worth $170 million anymore.

    A few more  business people have become oligarchs during his time, such as  Vladimir Litvinenko and  Arkady R. Rotenberg (Russian). Some had to go, who did not hold the bargain and subsequently coming under fire for various illegal activities, particularly tax evasion. Vladimir Gusinsky (MediaMost) and Boris Berezovsky both avoided legal proceedings by leaving Russia, and the mentioned, Mikhail Khodorkovsky , was arrested in October 2003 and only recently as released on December 2013. Like so many other oligarchs, he made his fortune when the Soviet Union privatized its resources in an ill-fated Western strategy, tying himself in to the country’s desasterous move to a typical IMF inflicted economy.  Khodorkovsky challenged Putin openly 2003 on behalf of the old Yeltsin oligarchy and Putin pardoned him only after a decade in prison, according to Stanislav Belkovsky the only really serious counter move, Putin has inflicted on  his enemies. Even after that Khodorkovsky was allowed recently  to address a crowd of protesters in Kiev, railing against the Russian government.

    Looking at the numbers, GDP (a hockey stick success curve, granted 50% from energy business)  and dept (none), I hate to say he  did “slightly” better than President Obama’s, TARP, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, including the banking bailouts and fiscal stimulus in years of quantitive easing (QE). We generally overlook that his value to the system, like that of the czars who preceded him, is based on maintaining the balance among competing vested interests. Just as it was centuries ago, the main battles inside the Kremlin among these groups are about power, money and access to special privileges, not ideology.

    Conclusion

    I found something C.G. Jung could, maybe even would have said about the Putin Complex:The world is as it ever has been, but our consciousness undergoes peculiar changes. First, in remote times (which can still be observed among primitives living today), the main body of psychic life was apparently in human and in nonhuman objects: it was projected, as we should say now. Consciousness can hardly exist in a state of complete projection. At most it would be a heap of emotions. Through the withdrawal of projections, conscious knowledge slowly developed. Science, curiously enough, began with the  discovery of astronomical laws, and hence with the withdrawal, so to speak, of the most distant projections. This was the first stage in the despiritualization of the world. One step followed another: already in antiquity the gods were withdrawn from mountains and rivers, from trees and animals. Modern science has subtilized its projections to an almost unrecognizable degree, but our ordinary life still swarms with them. You can find them spread out in the newspapers, in books, rumors, and ordinary social gossip. All gaps in our actual knowledge are still filled out with projections. We are still so sure we know what other people think or what their true character is C. G. Jung -“Psychology and Religion” (1938) In CW II: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P. 140
    To be continued /expanded – published as a case of oops…

    Appendix:

    Hypothesis

    • Putin is the not a real macho nor a tyrant
    • Putin is the typical “little guy” a self-made man with business sense
    • Putin is not an imperialist but an anti-Soviet
    • Putin is an outsider  of the cultural chattering class (globally and in Russia)
    • Putin is an idealist who does not care for power
    • Putin was never the tough KGB agent but a disliked outsider; as his career was nearly destroyed by the KGB he dislikes it
    • Putin did not create a central Putin system, but rather a system of many power clusters not unlike the Czar’s
    • Putin was pro-West, first puzzled, later annoyed and now confronting Western geopolitics and wars
    • Putin is the real successor of Yeltsin but with a better sense for Russian interest
    • Putin is pro-German or pro-Europe in the sense of Czar Peter the Great, Peter
    • There is a big shiism between the Moskowitsch ( god-derived) and Peterism (rule based) autocratic system

    Expanded Definition of the Banality of the Good:

    • In order to gain a sense of selfworthiness of a normal citizen, it is not needed to be an hero or to be sacrified on the cross. It is completely sufficient (and required) to take good care of raising kids, pay taxes, go to work, obey rules and laws. And not because one would be punished hard for not obeying them, but because one sees them as absolutely required in a sense of the Kant’s imperative.
    • A real direct democracy is possible.
    • Citizen an stated must mutually respect each other.

    Bibliography

    • Wladimir: Die ganze Wahrheit über Putin von Stanislaw Belkowski von Redline Verlag,München  (Dezember 2013, Translation)
    • Aus erster Hand von Wladimir Putin Heyne (2000)
    • Chodorkowskij: Legenden, Mythen und andere Wahrheiten Gebundene Ausgabe – 9. März 2012 von Viktor Timtschenko
    • Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963). (Rev. ed. New York: Viking)
    • The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). second enlarged edition;  A MERIDIAN BOOK First Meridian printing
    • C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters (Bollingen Series)
    • C.G. Jung Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle
    • C.G. Jung Four Archetypes (Routledge Classics)